Thread: General Info
+
Add Report
Results 2,971 to 2,985 of 4287
-
10-23-10 16:19 #1317
Posts: 421Originally Posted by Bimbo Boy
USA is worth only for shopping.
-
10-23-10 15:18 #1316
Posts: 608Air Marshalls abusing their powers
Originally Posted by Sky Ryder
I go the USA as little as I can. I do not feel secure there, not because of criminals, but because of the excessive powers and frequent abuse of security officials.
Passing the immigration controls or passing any airport security check in the USA is a very unpleasant experience.
-
10-23-10 14:34 #1315
Posts: 688Alternate travel docs
Originally Posted by Bubba Boy
-
10-23-10 13:02 #1314
Posts: 1364Alternate travel docs
Alternate travel docs can be a temporary passport issued by the US embassy. The temp passport is basically a cardboard version on the real thing but of course temporary. Anyone that loses their passport can be issued with "alternative travel documents", this can be issued quickly by the embassy to anyone, usually within 48 hours if ID can be proved quickly. In the case of the airmarshals, it was probably have done in minutes.
The real interesting thing would be to see the exact way they got out of Rio, through customs quickly. Possibly accompanied by an embassy member with a diplomatic passort? Possibly an embassy staff member called the airline and they were escorted through customs quickly without the federal police asking too many questions.
-
10-23-10 08:02 #1313
Posts: 1067Originally Posted by Sangue Bon
Given that I have been in the industry for a while, I can tell you that while many people think they know who the Marshals are, the only way you will know is if they want you to know.
As far as them doing "the right thing" in this instance, the mission for them has changed a lot since they were put on the airplanes. In the past they were told to stay out of "minor" disputes and only get involved if the flight was under threat. I don't know for sure, but I think they are allowed to "uncover" for other reasons now, after a few crewmembers and passengers were injured on flights by "idiots" and the Marshals were not allowed to intervene.
Trust me when I tell you these ladies and gentlemen of the Air Marshall service are very well trained, and very proficient at what they do. I would be very surprised if they got involved when they shouldn't have or "overeacted". I think it is much more likely the press reports are in error or don't have all the facts.
-
10-23-10 06:22 #1312
Posts: 140alternative travel documents
Mongers-
The air marshals were without a doubt traveling on "Official" US Passports, which means alternative travel documents were most likely their personal US Passports. All US Passport holders regardless of class of passport are required to have a visa to enter Brazil. It appears the air marshals also had Brazilian Visas in their personal US Passports, which they then used to exit Brazil. Questions remain about the semantics of exiting Brazil without the required entry stamp but if the air marshals were frequent travelers to Brazil with numerous stamps this would not be a problem.
Sorte,
Rock Harders
-
10-23-10 04:04 #1311
Posts: 1243Originally Posted by Sangue Bon
-
10-23-10 02:57 #1310
Posts: 1364Originally Posted by Beach Star
To me this is just another example of how corrupt Brazil is, basically if you have connections you make the law. If it wasn't the fact that she was a judges wife she would have been arrested by the federal police. Even if you are absolutely correct in any your actions and you come up against a connected Brazilian you will be arrested and found guilty.
The corrupt & inefficient Brazilian legal system is the number 1 problem holding Brazil back from sustainable prosperity.
-
10-23-10 02:06 #1309
Posts: 2027Originally Posted by Beach Star
-
10-23-10 01:39 #1308
Posts: 142Originally Posted by Sangue Bon
-
10-23-10 00:33 #1307
Posts: 2027I found this article interesting, hopefully there won't be any retaliation on Americans going through passport control because of this. Continental Airlines was involved, we'll see what happens:
http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/am...rshals/?hpt=T1
-
10-14-10 15:43 #1306
Posts: 71Originally Posted by Sangue Bon
-
10-13-10 16:39 #1305
Posts: 2027Originally Posted by Ricker
The bag is regulation carry on 20" but it weighs 33 lbs, she made a point to tell me they only allow 11.5 lbs.
I really wanted to go carry on this time because I was worried that Tam may lose my bag but it's non stop jfk - gig so I don't think there is much to worry about.
Either way I'll be ok.
-
10-13-10 16:12 #1304
Posts: 2874Originally Posted by Perkele
They will not, however, be alerted as to the weight or over-weight of the bag if the bag is of relatively normal size.
Casually walk on, casually stow it in the over-head bin, everyone contente
-
10-13-10 15:34 #1303
Posts: 2374Originally Posted by Perkele