La Vie en Rose
Masion Close
Escort Frankfurt
Escort News
The Velvet Rooms

Thread: Angeles City

+ Add Report
Page 1428 of 2058 FirstFirst ... 428 928 1328 1378 1418 1424 1425 1426 1427 1428 1429 1430 1431 1432 1438 1478 1528 1928 ... LastLast
Results 21,406 to 21,420 of 30866
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #9461
    Quote Originally Posted by Chocha Monger  [View Original Post]
    The problem with the escalating bar fine structure is the bar business is seasonal and no bar is guaranteed a good night every night during the high season. Pushing girls into higher price brackets and lowering the number of bar fines per girl doesn't make sense when the bar has to pay the girls a salary. Keeping girls in the bar and paying them a base salary is a losing proposition. It would probably result in less girls being hired on for line ups. Then it still doesn't take into consideration the fact that AC's sole attraction is the abundance cheap pussy giving quality GFE not the hotels or anything else. Making Clark an air hub wouldn't necessarily increase the number of mongers especially if prices were to approach Burgos prices. It might actually push mongers into other yet untapped areas of the country. Take away cheap GFE boom boom and concentrated number of bars and the Golden Goose dies.
    An alternative view is that the bars are having to pay the girls more, in order to get them into the bars in the first place. The argument about attracting customers with lower prices assumes supply of the product is in abundance. With competition from internet and free lancing, the bar is faced with the choice of paying the best girls the best amounts for their agreement to be employed. Many of the best looking girls no longer work in the bars, they are free lancing or working the internet (same thing really). Talk to hotel owners, some suggest that upwards of 70% of their guests appear to spend most of their time in their room, and are not out bar hopping all night. One can argue that customers will abandon Angeles if prices increase, on a macro level, what is certain in the short-term is that customers will abandon a bar that does not have attractive girls. I've believed for a long time, the trend customers have taken to save a few peso and buy off the street, will eventuate in increased prices in the bars, as money will be paid to attract the talent to fill a stage.

    Lets also look at the reality of the bars, the most popular bars on Fields are also the most expensive. You may go to Alaska or Gecko's, but in Atlantis, customers call in advance to get preferred seating for their parties. Everything being said about price control, boycotts, sneak outs at the high end bars, becomes so much noise. The most popular bars, the ones with the largest volume, have the best looking girls and that eventuates in more customers. Not 50 peso beer or 1200 peso bar fines.

    Then look at the true price of things. Most of the town does not make its money from the locals on a pension. Its a tourist destination and like they still pack Pattaya, they will pack Angeles. Cause at 50 something plus in your home country, you are not going to get an 20 year old girl to spend the night with you for $150 USA (approx. 6,500 peso). So my opinion is that prices have much room to climb above the dreaded 3, 000 peso being charged for some girls.

    As for the earlier discussion on Gecko's, that bar's reputation seems one of the hidden secrets. Girls at that bar earn an extra day of salary if they leave their customer and return to the bar before quitting time. Its a built in structure that does not exist at most bars.

  2. #9460
    Quote Originally Posted by FurryFriend  [View Original Post]
    Right now, Clark receives direct flights from only four international cities: Hong Kong, Macau, Singapore and Bangkok.
    From Kuala Lumpur and Kota Kinabalu as well. And don't forget Asiana from Seoul.

  3. #9459
    Quote Originally Posted by Chocha Monger  [View Original Post]
    Pushing girls into higher price brackets and lowering the number of bar fines per girl doesn't make sense
    It's already happening. When I first visited Angeles City in 2007, barfines were pretty much maxed out at around P1500. Now it's P3000.

    Let's be honest here. We can say that something "doesn't make sense". But we're not as qualified as bar owners in determining whether a certain policy maximizes revenue. In general, if they're doing something, it's usually because it's in their financial self-interest.

    Quote Originally Posted by Chocha Monger  [View Original Post]
    Keeping girls in the bar and paying them a base salary is a losing proposition.
    Not if they're selling drinks like crazy. If I were a bar owner, I would rather have a girl get 1 barfine a week at P3000 than 2 barfines a week at P1500.

    Quote Originally Posted by Chocha Monger  [View Original Post]
    hen it still doesn't take into consideration the fact that AC's sole attraction is the abundance cheap pussy giving quality GFE
    Do you think Korean guys are in Angeles City to pinch pennies?

    Besides, there will ALWAYS be abundance of cheap pussy to attract budget tourists. As I pointed out earlier, most girls don't get barfined on a given night so not all of them can command a P3000 barfine.

    I'm only saying that the girls who are most in-demand will get to charge more. It's already happening and it will likely be more extreme in the years ahead.

    Quote Originally Posted by Chocha Monger  [View Original Post]
    Making Clark an air hub wouldn't necessarily increase the number of mongers especially if prices were to approach Burgos prices.
    Anything that makes it easier to go to Angeles City will only attract more visitors.

    Right now, Clark receives direct flights from only four international cities: Hong Kong, Macau, Singapore and Bangkok. Once AirAsia is fully operational in Clark, you'll probably increase that to 20 cities. How can that NOT result in more people passing through the area?

    Some guy might fly AirAsia from Hong Kong to Davao, with a layover in Clark. Don't you think some of them may want to check out the bars in Angeles City during a layover?

  4. #9458
    Quote Originally Posted by Ekspat  [View Original Post]
    I guess there are lots of girls now, who see themselves more as entertainer or showgirl, not really as bumbum-provider.
    Men are the ones to blame for this. Men reward girls financially for non-sexual services. I've seen many dancers get 500p tips for just dancing on stage.

    The only power men have over women is physical and financial. The only power women have over men is pussy power. When men give up their power (s) willingly without sexual reward, women gain the upper hand. This is one of the problems with AC today!

  5. #9457
    The problem with the escalating bar fine structure is the bar business is seasonal and no bar is guaranteed a good night every night during the high season. Pushing girls into higher price brackets and lowering the number of bar fines per girl doesn't make sense when the bar has to pay the girls a salary. Keeping girls in the bar and paying them a base salary is a losing proposition. It would probably result in less girls being hired on for line ups. Then it still doesn't take into consideration the fact that AC's sole attraction is the abundance cheap pussy giving quality GFE not the hotels or anything else. Making Clark an air hub wouldn't necessarily increase the number of mongers especially if prices were to approach Burgos prices. It might actually push mongers into other yet untapped areas of the country. Take away cheap GFE boom boom and concentrated number of bars and the Golden Goose dies.

  6. #9456
    Quote Originally Posted by FurryFriend  [View Original Post]
    The pay-to-play scene will never disappear. There's just too much money in it. In fact, the P4P scene will probably expand dramatically in the years ahead.
    FF, I fully agree with you on this. That's why we see the hotels popping up like mushrooms around Fields, investors wouldn't do that without a good reason.

    What I meant was the change in habits and mentality of the girls, the change of the purpose of the bar. The brothel-type bar just to present the girls changed into an entertaining bar with fashion shows, body painting and other action to keep customers staying and drinking. And having customers nowadays, who pay for company only, who go with the girls barhopping for hours, who are happy with one bumbum only per night etc, IMHO this change the behavior of the ladies.

    Of course, I don't like Koreans outbidding me on talent. But it's fair for someone who pays more to get more.
    Also fully agreed. Same for mobiles, houses, cars and for every other product on this planet.

    Cheers!

  7. #9455
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Enternational  [View Original Post]
    And how will it be decided what is "very high quality"?
    Market forces and consumer choice.

    If I were a bar owner, I would group those who get barfined almost every night into a special P3000 catagory. If those girls still get barfined nightly at P3000, they go to P3500 catagory. And if they still get barfined almost nightly at P3500, they go to P4000. This continues until, at a certain price point, she only gets barfined 2-3 times a week.

    That means, a bar can have many groups of girls all charging different prices. We have a P1500 pool here dancing on one stage. A P2000 pool on another stage. And a P3000 pool there in the back. Or maybe they get differentiated by the color of their tag.

    We already have this system in the mega-bars on Fields. With more tourists flooding in, there will likely be wider price ranges simply because the bars can get away with certain dancers who are insanely in demand.

  8. #9454
    Quote Originally Posted by FurryFriend  [View Original Post]
    I support this system, actually. Very high quality girls should get more. Not only is this fair, but it gives mongers who really want her the ability to have her. If she's forced to charge the standard P1500 barfine (for example) , she'd either be plucked offstage immediately by another patron or she will decline barfines repeatedly to collect more commission on drinks.
    And how will it be decided what is "very high quality"?

  9. #9453

    Cherry girls and a visit report

    Been following the threads on the "no sex" bar-fined girls. I have noticed that many guys are now asking upfront (when they first start "talking" with the girls) :

    A) Are you on the rag?

    B) Are you a cherry girl?

    C) Are you a "spot lite" girl (more expensive)

    After that, the sex questions emerge. Anal, etc, etc. I guess its just best to ask up front.

    I was told that the girls have a small "V" on their cards (in red) which is supposed to tell you they are a "cherry" girl. But for some the V is small to unreadable. Not sure if this is a universal thing, since the different clubs seem to have different color schemes with the girls cards.

    So far, the most fun bars this week have been forbidden city (interesting shows, cute dancers) , Lancelot (Good looking waitresses) , International club (hot night crew) , Tropix (fun girls, but many flat chested) , and Dollhouse (decent girls & waitresses). Oh, and we visited a club called Aura. It was off of Fields ave near the Bangkok hotel. There were a few lookers there, and they weren't (for the most part) flat-chested. But I think Lancelot was the best looking girls overall. Going to head back for more tonight.

    Bar-fines or EWR or whatever seemed to range between 1600 and 1850 for "non-spot-lite" girls. The spot-lite girls went for 3000.

    We did skip Geckos.

    Hope this helps. Enjoy!

  10. #9452
    Quote Originally Posted by Ekspat  [View Original Post]
    Sure, nobody can eliminate P4P entirely there, but IMHO the plan is to reduce this more to the smaller bars in Perimeter
    The pay-to-play scene will never disappear. There's just too much money in it.

    In fact, the P4P scene will probably expand dramatically in the years ahead. Clark airport will soon be a hub for AirAsia. Expect heaps of new tourists passing through Angeles City in 2012. There is also talk of transferring some or most of Manila's airport traffic to Clark. Clearly, the outlook for Angeles tourism is very bright.

    With an onslaught of tourists, I foresee a widening of a two tier arrangement already in place (Field v Perimeter). In this widening two tier system, the highest quality girls will get to charge ever higher barfines. Barfines of P4000 are probably just around the corner.

    Before anyone panics thinking AC will become unaffordable, keep in mind that it's impossible for all girls to charge that much. A vast majority of girls on a given night do not get barfined. There will always be girls for any budget.

    I support this system, actually. Very high quality girls should get more. Not only is this fair, but it gives mongers who really want her the ability to have her. If she's forced to charge the standard P1500 barfine (for example) , she'd either be plucked offstage immediately by another patron or she will decline barfines repeatedly to collect more commission on drinks.

    Of course, I don't like Koreans outbidding me on talent. But it's fair for someone who pays more to get more.

  11. #9451
    Quote Originally Posted by Sammon  [View Original Post]
    If all girls get the idea that they can refuse sex after barfining it will become a trend leading to demise of AC as a mongering place.
    Isn't it an ongoing process already? See all this huge bars in Fields with the shows? Nowadays with permission to take photos and videos? Unthinkable of 6 or 8 years ago, those days you shouldn't even think about getting out a camera.

    I guess there are lots of girls now, who see themselves more as entertainer or showgirl, not really as bumbum-provider. Sure, nobody can eliminate P4P entirely there, but IMHO the plan is to reduce this more to the smaller bars in Perimeter or so, and make Fields to a cleaner entertainment area, which is then proudly presented to the NGO's or whoever. Of course the Koreans shall continue spending money for company and they will, let them bf 6 girls and no bumbum, maybe for most of them it's just fine? Or HJ is enough?

    The typical guy, the Swede or German or Aussie, who spend 2 weeks of annual leave once or twice a year to fuck as many pussy as often as possible is totally uninteresting here.

    Just my impression over the last couple of years, maybe beginning around 2007/08.

    Enjoy as long as it lasts.

  12. #9450
    Quote Originally Posted by Amjeck  [View Original Post]
    So how many girls are allowing the guy to barfine only to say no in the room? Is this becoming a new trend in AC.
    So far I have never had this problem. But the last time I was in AC was a year ago. Only one time I refused to take the girl to the room after she started coughing and obviously had a bad cold while having dinner. Did not want to catch the cold.

    If all girls get the idea that they can refuse sex after barfining it will become a trend leading to demise of AC as a mongering place.

  13. #9449
    Quote Originally Posted by Henryv  [View Original Post]
    Forgot to add, no means no, even if you have paid the bar fine. Just take the girl back to the bar, or go yourself. Hopefully you can say: "either give me my money back or, like Gecko's, this will be all over the internet." That is the real reason we should show some solidarity by telling Gecko's we know what happened!
    So how many girls are allowing the guy to barfine only to say no in the room? Is this becoming a new trend in AC.

  14. #9448
    Quote Originally Posted by Henryv  [View Original Post]
    Forgot to add, no means no, even if you have paid the bar fine.
    Yes, but how often does this happen that it needs to be discussed ad nauseam? Generally if a girl is not going to fuck you then she will say in advance that she will only go for barhopping.

  15. #9447
    Forgot to add, no means no, even if you have paid the bar fine. Just take the girl back to the bar, or go yourself. Hopefully you can say: "either give me my money back or, like Gecko's, this will be all over the internet." That is the real reason we should show some solidarity by telling Gecko's we know what happened!

    Quote Originally Posted by Henryv  [View Original Post]
    Notwithstanding the fact I agree no means no, your statement: "they do not have to sex you just because you have paid the bar fine" is somewhat sophomoric. What do they think is behind the reason for bfing, discussing field density and it's relationship to gravitational phenomenon?

    The other point here, again to protect "us," is to let them know "word gets around."

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
 Sex Vacation
escort directory


Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape