Thread: General Info
+
Add Report
Results 2,551 to 2,565 of 14786
-
11-07-17 11:47 #12236
Posts: 236Originally Posted by Jnpr30 [View Original Post]
Unfortunately English is not my native language, but I try to answer you as well as possible. Basically, I agree with you. But mainly I referred to this part of the "BadinSweet" post:
Originally Posted by BadinSweet [View Original Post]
The law says BBBJ is banned and not CBJ is banned.
I do not want to question the decision-making power of management. But I would not fire a WG because it lives up to the law. Another reason should already be found, I agree with you. Above all, a manager has to take care of his operating permit in order to be able to receive customers at all. I think a lot of people here want to have fun in these clubs in the future as well. At least, this is how I am.
I do not know the club which you are talking about, the competition in NRW must be very very high. I would not judge at all that the realities regarding the entry of the girls are likely to be different than they are outwardly portrayed by some clubs. Illegal employment is also a much bigger thorn in the eye of the legislature than a few customers who insist on blowing without a condom. Among other things, the new law, the obligation to register, is intended to prevent such things.
The girls should be free in their decisions and they are allowed to know that.
-
11-07-17 11:05 #12235
Posts: 625There is a club with a penalty for the girls if they do BBBJ. How to find out? I don't know. If a girl is caught repeatedly she'll be fired. That's what management is telling the girls making it harder to get BBBJ. At least for non regulars. Doesn't affect me.
-
11-07-17 07:50 #12234
Posts: 635Originally Posted by Jnpr30 [View Original Post]
-
11-07-17 07:01 #12233
Posts: 2207I think I know the club you're talking about and my friend heard the same thing from the boss himself.
And in another famous club of NRW, the boss told clearly to the girls that he didn't like the new law because the CBJ would make them lose customers.
-
11-07-17 04:43 #12232
Posts: 541Originally Posted by PumDiPum [View Original Post]
Also, like Jnpr30 said, "fired" might not be the term they use but they will "deny" the girl to come back to the club.
-
11-07-17 02:23 #12231
Posts: 236Originally Posted by Jnpr30 [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by BadinSweet [View Original Post]
Imagine what she could do.
This is something like a police officer being fired because he is not corrupt.
It is also no longer possible to complain as a customer at the reception, because a girl only wants to blow with rubber. I would not do that.
The law says BBBJ banned and not banned CBJ.
I do not want to question the decision-making power of management. But I would not fire a WG because it lives up to the law. Another reason should already be there, I agree with you.
Above all, a manager has to take care of his operating permit in order to be able to receive customers at all.
I think a lot of people here want to have fun in these clubs in the future as well. This is how I am.
-
11-07-17 00:55 #12230
Posts: 64Originally Posted by Bitumen [View Original Post]
Or investments. Cash is fine for a few years, but the girls plan on keeping it in cash for retirement years?
-
11-07-17 00:22 #12229
Posts: 6735Originally Posted by Jnpr30 [View Original Post]
-
11-07-17 00:18 #12228
Posts: 1517Originally Posted by PumDiPum [View Original Post]
I don't know about the employee thing. He can definitely deny permission to a girl from plying her trade. He is the manager, he decides who gets to work in the club and who doesn't — no matter if it is an employee or contractor.
-
11-06-17 21:10 #12227
Posts: 4759Originally Posted by CitizenKane [View Original Post]
-
11-06-17 20:48 #12226
Posts: 635Originally Posted by Jnpr30 [View Original Post]
-
11-06-17 20:41 #12225
Posts: 635Originally Posted by McAdonis [View Original Post]
-
11-06-17 20:28 #12224
Posts: 1698Originally Posted by XXL [View Original Post]
It would be how I would do it as well. Back in Romania you can keep it in cash.
-
11-06-17 20:26 #12223
Posts: 1698Originally Posted by Jnpr30 [View Original Post]
Yes, one concern I do have is when the registration does really become mandatory where girls may not enjoy being registered as a working girl on a German record for the police or other authorities to see. We possibly may see a drop in girls waiting to see how far the registration goes.
There is also the possibility that with less girls that the services may become more restricted as there is less girls. Meaning a buyers market becomes a seller's market. Still speculation at this point but I think these new rules, particularly registration, have a long way to run before the full effect becomes apparent.
-
11-06-17 13:30 #12222
Posts: 1517Since one half of BadIn's favorite duo happens to be my fav as well, I am not thrilled with the turn of events. That said, general attendance reports still suggest numbers are holding up. Locals and experts who attend frequently can verify or contradict this.
Bitumen. I think you were concerned that real changes in attendance and quality of service might happen from Jan 1. I hope I didn't misrepresent your view?