German FKK Clubs - Lounge and chat area

[Rithro]

Hello everyone. I need to be in Germany for the first time ever and am trying to determine in which city I should spend my free time in to visit a FKK Club. Of Munich, Hamburg and Frankfurt which would you recommend?

I second Gino's recommendation. Thirty km north of Frankfurt Hbf is Oase. Thirty km south is Sharks. Within Frankfurt are Mainhattan and Palace. Of these, I've only been to Sharks, but had a good time.

NRW-I just visited LivingRoom for the first time and I was fortunate enough to have some fantastic sex with a stunning young woman. I wrote a report from the perspective of a first-timer here:

http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/...234&viewfull=1#post2314234.

When I go back I want to try GoldenTime based on recommendations. Last year I visited Samya, just south of Koeln, and enjoyed it. Would go back.

[Pistons]

The big tattoo lining the breasts may be for hiding a conspicuous breast implant scar.

I like tattoos because to me they mean a girl has mileage and is a wicked sex machine. I think girls would not get tattoos if mongers generally disliked tattoos. Girls usually know which side their bread is buttered on.

It all depends on the tattoo. Most tattoos are pretty harmless. But at certain sizes they harm more than less.

It is like kitch body art if done right, or a drunk bikers gut, if done wrong. I have seen both, on girls and guys. And sometimes I wonder if the line is drawn at 50%. Or maybe the bad examples just stand out more.

[Gino02]

Girls usually know which side their bread is buttered on.

You mean these tattooed working girls, e. G. In FKKs, know what's better for them financially? Same girls who would rather make 300 e in a day by sticking to upselling routines than making 1000 e per day by providing good standard services? Or donating their hard earned money to pimps and lover boys?

Try doing a survey across FKKs and see which girls are financially well positioned after working even as little as one year. You will see the effect of different personalities between girls with and without tattoos. In my experience, girls without tattoos are more responsible types about their future, exactly why they don't like to put some intentional permanent scars or marks on their body that is nearly impossible to remove when that goes bad years later or they don't like anymore, besides potentially losing business.

[Gino02]

Hello everyone. I need to be in Germany for the first time ever and am trying to determine in which city I should spend my free time in to visit a FKK Club. Of Munich, Hamburg and Frankfurt which would you recommend?

Frankfort first, then drive around NRW smaller clubs. Not much in Munchen.

[On The Side]

Hello everyone. I need to be in Germany for the first time ever and am trying to determine in which city I should spend my free time in to visit a FKK Club. Of Munich, Hamburg and Frankfurt which would you recommend?

[XXL]

Liya Silver is a more recent example of tattoos diminishing a very pretty picture. I just hope that she doesn't expand her collection.

The big tattoo lining the breasts may be for hiding a conspicuous breast implant scar.

I like tattoos because to me they mean a girl has mileage and is a wicked sex machine. I think girls would not get tattoos if mongers generally disliked tattoos. Girls usually know which side their bread is buttered on.

[Samplerr]

I have seen several beautiful girls mutilate themselves with tattoos which pains me. They were quite beautiful before they got it, and they knew they were beautiful. Janine Lindemulder was a famous porn star 20 years ago. She was super gorgeous, you should check out her Penthouse spread from 1988. For a while she did girl girl only. Then she got into drugs, bad marriages and got tattoos. Then she looked hideous.

Liya Silver is a more recent example of tattoos diminishing a very pretty picture. I just hope that she doesn't expand her collection.

[Pessimist]

You could also say the same thing about anything that adorns or enhances one's appearance (Rolex, designer suit, expensive sports car, luxury handbag, having WG as arm candy in public, plastic surgery, weightlifting). If one is truly honest with themselves, they should have some sort of deficiency. That said any of the aforementioned, including tattoos, if taken to extremes, might suggest a more serious problem.

There is a generational conflict when it comes to tattoos: millennial 47 percent, versus boomers 13 percent. 15 percent of millennial have at least five tattoos (most of the NBA, Neymar, Messi, etc.) If someone is of the boomer generation and has a tattoo, then chances are they wanted to communicate to the world that they were an outsider, gang-affiliated or member of Motley Crue.

https://www.axios.com/millennials-ar...0ca981d74.html

Generally I agree with the gist of your post. As I said below, in my own opinion tats are more correlated to class, education and income level. Is it also related to age? Perhaps. Maybe there is a greater acceptance of tats among the younger. I would say, people in performing arts and expressive fields are more likely to get tats too. Rock stars and heavy metal guys may always have had them, people doing waitressing jobs are more likely than girls going to corporate law.

[Pessimist]

I've found that tutes with tats are quite likely to provide some dirty, PSE sex with anal more often being on the menu. This is what I like, so I tend to be drawn to otherwise pretty girls who may be tatted up. I don't think that a tattoo necessarily detracts from a girl's beauty. It may, or it may not. For me, it depends. Whereas, I think some guys are just turned off by tattoos altogether. I am not, especially since I have experienced a strong link between tats and PSE sessions.

I personally prefer zero tats. However, a few small tats artfully done and not distracting from the overall skin tone are OK. What does suck is that some girls plaster themselves with badly done, massive sized tats all over arms and front. That takes away from the beauty otherwise. Tats on skin are like noise in music to me. Well placed and not too distracting is tolerable. Too much, the noise overwhelms the music.

As for correlation of tats to PSE sex, I don't know if I can refute anecdotal evidence. In my view, any such correlation is small. The one thing though is that with age, girls are more likely to get more tats and as they age they are also more likely to accept anal and other PSE services as they get less business due to wanting looks.

[Sirioja]

I'm planning a trip to Frankfurt in Aug / Sept. I'm yet to try an FKK in that area. I know there are several, but if I would only try one which would you recommend? Is Oase or World worth the time on the train? Tell me what you think.

Oase shuttle from Frankfurt. From my information, I have to find time to give a look at Sharks, World is still magic for the club, but best looks seem to be at Oase.

[McAdonis]

I think people get tattoos to make up for some perceived deficiency.

You could also say the same thing about anything that adorns or enhances one's appearance (Rolex, designer suit, expensive sports car, luxury handbag, having WG as arm candy in public, plastic surgery, weightlifting). If one is truly honest with themselves, they should have some sort of deficiency. That said any of the aforementioned, including tattoos, if taken to extremes, might suggest a more serious problem.

There is a generational conflict when it comes to tattoos: millennial 47 percent, versus boomers 13 percent. 15 percent of millennial have at least five tattoos (most of the NBA, Neymar, Messi, etc.) If someone is of the boomer generation and has a tattoo, then chances are they wanted to communicate to the world that they were an outsider, gang-affiliated or member of Motley Crue.

https://www.axios.com/millennials-ar...0ca981d74.html

[Pessimist]

I think people get tattoos to make up for some perceived deficiency, may it be feeling of low self esteem due to small dick or lack of strength or confidence or natural beauty. Same reason some women get sillicone boobs (which weirdly I'm not totally opposed to if it's nicely done and gives the girl some enhanced confidence). People may give you all sorts of stories and reasoning, but in the end tattoos are an expression that "I need to put some ink on me to change my perception of me to others". For example, in ancient days many uneducated poor tribes used to get tattoos of jewellery because they couldn't afford real jewellery; basically to make up for being incapable of making enough money to buy real jewellery.

In the US, it is usually the people on the lower end of the economic / education strata that get tattoos. In that sense, it is more of a class thing. Tattoos are looked down upon and could be a hindrance to obtain employment at white shoe firms on Wall St or other such places. High Tech is much more tolerant and you can have a large tattoo up your neck and may still be offered a job at Google or FB, but but not Goldman or Cerberus. By race, tattoos are quite common with Black and Hispanic people and less wealthy, less educated Whites (unkindly referred by many as White trash).

I don't think there is any correlation of tattoo to perceived lack of self belief, or worse yet physical qualities like beauty, dick size or boob size. People can spin such theories as much as they want, but there will never be any proof. To many of those, it is a class thing. They get a tattoo because everyone around them has one. The smart ones get a small tat in a discrete area. The dumb ones plaster themselves with big ugly badly drawn tattoos all over the body and sometimes try to erase them leaving even more mess.

I have seen several beautiful girls mutilate themselves with tattoos which pains me. They were quite beautiful before they got it, and they knew they were beautiful. Janine Lindemulder was a famous porn star 20 years ago. She was super gorgeous, you should check out her Penthouse spread from 1988. For a while she did girl girl only. Then she got into drugs, bad marriages and got tattoos. Then she looked hideous.

[The Cane]

I think in the past few years as I've had more girls with tats that perhaps I've developed a fondness for it.

I've found that tutes with tats are quite likely to provide some dirty, PSE sex with anal more often being on the menu. This is what I like, so I tend to be drawn to otherwise pretty girls who may be tatted up. I don't think that a tattoo necessarily detracts from a girl's beauty. It may, or it may not. For me, it depends. Whereas, I think some guys are just turned off by tattoos altogether. I am not, especially since I have experienced a strong link between tats and PSE sessions.

[Milfotronic]

I'm planning a trip to Frankfurt in Aug / Sept. I'm yet to try an FKK in that area. I know there are several, but if I would only try one which would you recommend? Is Oase or World worth the time on the train? Tell me what you think.

[Gino02]

So, does the dick become smaller after he gets a tattoo?

Or is it that most guys with smaller dicks have a generic predisposition to get a tattoo?

And I am assuming this only applies to the Caucasians? Very few Asian males in FKKs have tattoos and yet they are not super well hung.

Or is this theory also as valid as the correlation between height and latitude?

I think people get tattoos to make up for some perceived deficiency, may it be feeling of low self esteem due to small dick or lack of strength or confidence or natural beauty. Same reason some women get sillicone boobs (which weirdly I'm not totally opposed to if it's nicely done and gives the girl some enhanced confidence). People may give you all sorts of stories and reasoning, but in the end tattoos are an expression that "I need to put some ink on me to change my perception of me to others". For example, in ancient days many uneducated poor tribes used to get tattoos of jewellery because they couldn't afford real jewellery; basically to make up for being incapable of making enough money to buy real jewellery.