D. F. Escorts

[Chris Q Larsen]

Luna DiMarco24 in twitter.

[Telephone Number deleted by Admin]

All photos of her are current and very accurate.

I saw Luna in the super early morning hours of Sunday, or after midnight on Saturday if you please, on Saturday / Sunday July 4th /5th. My flight had gotten in at midnight and I thought I was probably screwed for finding anyone for service that late. But JC, much like the other JC in the Footprints poem that your grandma probably had on her wall somewhere, was metaphorically carrying me on his shoulders when he sent me a whatsapp message about Luna announcing that she was indeed open all night at an incall place in Roma Norte -- a few minutes away from my apartment in Roma Sur. I messaged her (this was around 1 am, I'd say) and she immediately responded with rates, which were higher than I prefer, but it was also 1 am and she had her own place very close, so the premium was justified, IMHO. 2000 pesos for the hour (usually 1700), including vaginal, anal and oral natural. She noted in her messages that she was also down with DATY and DFK, so I told her I was on my way after a quick shower.

A few minutes later I'm at her address and she opens the door, and it's a totally nonstandard setup. The door opens into a big empty garage, but about 30 meters in, there's the edge of a house and a door that opens into a big living room, and it's like a normal house. The living room has 3 more working girls and two random dudes just sitting on the couch drinking and shooting the shit, and Luna leads me through them back to the bedroom. I didn't get a scary or weird vibe off the others -- Luna said the girls were also working, I didn't inquire about the guys -- it was just very different from what you'd expect. Anyway, Luna was super super sweet, beautiful smile / dimples, great DFK, awesome slender but very firm body. Great tattoos if you're into that (I am), extremely well done bolt-ons if you're into that (I'm not, but it didn't ruin anything). She either enjoyed receiving oral from me or faked it very realistically, after which she returned the favor without a condom, then we did mish, cowgirl, some doggie, and back to cowgirl for the finish. Afterward we talked for a good amount of time, 10 minutes maybe, during which she was very charming and fun to talk to, about random Mexico-related stuff, the Viejo Gringo, etc.

Overall, she was a nice start to the trip, given her late availability, a body I'd rate as at least an 8, her proximity to my place and her great personality. She and her friends use this Roma Norte apartment on Thursdays, Fridays and Saturdays for servicing clients, so on other days I assume you'd have to use a hotel.

EDITOR's NOTE: This report was edited or deleted to remove personal telephone numbers. Please do not post personal telephone numbers in the Forum. Instead, please invite other Forum Members to contact you for this information directly via the Forum's Private Messaging system. Thanks!

[Admin2]

If a woman has sex with ANY man for money, she is a hooker for sure. If she has it with only one man or a handful, I am not so sure that definition fits. However, when you start talking about a woman who asks for nothing, and the guy gives her a gift afterwards not a preassigned wage then calling her a hooker is way out of line. In fact now you are into the realm of saying every woman is a hooker.

There is covert and overt prostitution. If a woman won't fuck you unless she's getting some kind of remuneration IMHO she's a prostitute, end of brother. She may be a low volume prostitute she may have a selective clientele but she's a hooker. Like I said, I like hookers, I don't hold that against them.

If you're the only one she's fucking and you're "helping her" or she wouldn't fuck you that's still prostitution.

If she's whatever age and she fucks you so good that you want to give her shit, you're in big fucking trouble, good trouble mind you, but trouble none the less and she would keep fucking you if you gave her nothing, she's not a hooker.

It's about their expectation of getting paid. If it's a condition of fucking you, regardless of what or how much it is, she's a hooker.

This isn't a ruling, it's my opinion.

And again, I really like hookers.

[Elvis 2008]

It's stuff like the above that makes SA aficionados out of touch with reality. All the girls on SA are working girls. Whether a woman accepts $100 for a session or monthly allowance, she is a working girl pure and simple.

Actually, when you make a comment like "all girls on SA are working girls", unless you have interviewed them all, THAT is a stereotype and a very negative one against women.

If a woman has sex with ANY man for money, she is a hooker for sure. If she has it with only one man or a handful, I am not so sure that definition fits. However, when you start talking about a woman who asks for nothing, and the guy gives her a gift afterwards not a preassigned wage then calling her a hooker is way out of line. In fact now you are into the realm of saying every woman is a hooker.

Of the seven or so women I saw on SA in CDMX, prices were set up front with all but three of them. The ones setting the price are certainly working girls. The ones who did not may not be. What makes SA challenging is finding the ones who are worthy of long term commitment. Of the three who did not set a price, one certainly is not a hooker. She contacted me the day after. We hung out all day with no clock being set. When I got her a ticket for a flight for a trip we are going on, she never asked how much but rather told me how excited she was.

So when I say of the seven women I saw, four are hookers, two may be, and one is not. You are lecturing me and telling me all seven are. When you have not even met them? Sorry, dude, I am not naive, but you are cynical.

The three who may not be hookers all lost their jobs because of Covid. They aren't on SA because they are losers who are trying to support a drug habit or some pimp. One is a lawyer; another is a clothing store manager, and one is a business administrator. Two are in great shape: a boxer and a marathon runner. The other is more glamorous than most fashion models. She is over 6 foot in heels.

You want a put a street girl who sees ten guys a day and has a coke habit in the same category as a woman who is seeing only me and has introduced me to her family? Have at it but do not expect me to.

In reality, you are calling me naive because you are just afraid that you are missing out on something, and you want me to pretend your vision of the world is correct because my vision hurts your feelings, and that is pretty selfish.

There is no point in debating it any further.

So I will be putting the escort types from SA on the forum. If you think it is a waste of time and do not think the posts are of value, then do not read what I post.

You an report in this thread about SA girls.

http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?4144-Seeking-Arrangements

[The Guy]

But wanted to report I just spent some hours with DaniSKM, a 21 year old ballerina and student of dance. I always wanted to do a ballet dancer, so happy to check that off. Really nice personality and the body of a ballerina as you would imagine. No tattoos. No pre-negotiations, she was happy to take what I offered at the end. Didn't insist on taxi fare and just used the metro. Nice down-to-earth girl.

[LuvMexicanas]

Let's see: I find a girl on SA. I negotiate a price for her to meet me at a hotel for dinner and sex. She comes, we screw, I pay, she leaves.

Conclusion: I might not be Albert Einstein, but am going out on a limb and suggest she was an "escort. "

Fine as long as I don't have to read anymore simpy SA posts that glamorize SB's and make it seem like they're different than other prostitutes.

[The Guy]

I'll explain it in as simple terms as possible. The title of this thread is DF Escorts, not a general working girls thread that encompasses all. When I'm in the Tijuana section, I post escort related info in the Escorts thread, Streetwalker info in that thread, Hong Kong bar info in that thread, etc. It's basic organization and common sense but I don't expect someone with 4 posts to pick that up off the bat.

Let's see: I find a girl on SA. I negotiate a price for her to meet me at a hotel for dinner and sex. She comes, we screw, I pay, she leaves.

Conclusion: I might not be Albert Einstein, but am going out on a limb and suggest she was an "escort. "

[Admin2]

Personally, I think it's a bad precedent when some posters feel they "own" this thread, that they should be able to determine which types of posts are acceptable and which are not. This is really the job of the actual moderator.

Bullies kill forums, if somebody is doing that please use the Report Post button and they will soon find themselves on moderation.

A2

[LuvMexicanas]

Correct. Which is why confining this forum to only twitter or agency y is asinine.

They are all pay for play which means they all fit under the umbrella of the board. But there are plenty of UDR pros who do not what their contact information spread around to just anyone. There are many instances here where members will only share that kind of information with veteran members or people that have comparable info to trade and its a accepted practice so complaining that SA profiles are not sufficient enough of a lead to reach out these girls is rather hypocritical.

I'll explain it in as simple terms as possible. The title of this thread is DF Escorts, not a general working girls thread that encompasses all. When I'm in the Tijuana section, I post escort related info in the Escorts thread, Streetwalker info in that thread, Hong Kong bar info in that thread, etc. It's basic organization and common sense but I don't expect someone with 4 posts to pick that up off the bat.

[GBN94]

All the girls on SA are working girls. Whether a woman accepts $100 for a session or monthly allowance, she is a working girl pure and simple. It's like a judge once said when a guy I know responded "technically" to a direct question," yeah technically you violated the statute similar to being almost pregnant. "Escort or SA, you're banging a working girl so please stop glamorizing SA as if any portion of the women are not working girls.

Correct. Which is why confining this forum to only twitter or agency girls is asinine.

They are all pay for play which means they all fit under the umbrella of the board. But there are plenty of UDR pros who do not what their contact information spread around to just anyone. There are many instances here where members will only share that kind of information with veteran members or people that have comparable info to trade and its a accepted practice so complaining that SA profiles are not sufficient enough of a lead to reach out these girls is rather hypocritical.

Douchebag simps like you who glamorize SB's (fucking huge eyeroll) and say shit like "that are plenty of UDR pros who do not want..." are well into ruining the hobby in the US so that they can delude themselves into thinking that they aren't fucking a prostitute. I don't really give a shit what you do in the US to complicate what is the simplest thing in the fucking world IE I give you money, then you fuck me because I will never fuck another American women (except maybe Tawney Roberts) as long as I live but I will be god damned before I let you use this forum to export that particular brand of American stupidity to international destinations. Just because you miss begging your ex wife for sex does not mean you have to treat that fetish as if it's not a fetish and that somehow SB's (another huge fucking eyeroll) are somehow different from some 50 year old hag selling blowjobs at a truckstop. They might be hotter but they are both prostitutes.

This in no way is meant to degrade hookers, I fucking love hookers and thank the good lord every day that there are hookers but all hookers are service providers and it's up to them to take care of me, it's not my job to have to worry about their needs. I have lived in LatAm long enough to guaran fucking tee you none of the men who were born in the DF worry about it.

Maybe you should try Club Hombre, I understand they have threads for simpy shit like this.

A2

[The Guy]

I really respect the information you both have generously shared on this forum with other members. You are both in the CDMX Monger Hall of Fame.

However, you're inventing an ISC standard that has never existed: The vast majority of posts on ISC do not contain contact for a girl. Some discuss the best neighborhoods to grab a street hooker. Others discuss strip clubs with extras. Still others ask questions about pricing and services in a given venue. None of these examples, and there are many more, list name and contact info for a provider. Times change, and with Covid-19 raging, a lower mileage escort from SA has some appeal.

In fact, even though he did not need to do so, Elvis made a good faith effort below to address your complaints and list some of his SA escorts. I had thought you guys would at least have thanked him for making an effort to satisfy the old order.

When I read a newspaper, I skip over articles that don't interest me. Not sure why you guys don't do the same in this thread.

[LuvMexicanas]

I once did own this thread. It started out as my User Blog. But here nor there, my complaint about useless crap is self defeating with yet more useless crap arguing back and forth and eating up space that should be devoted to girls. I will here however restate my complaint. If you posted paragraph after paragraph about a restaurant in Polanco and its extensive menu, its ambiance, the dishes your educated palate appreciated and reasonable prices; I would be pissed if you wouldn't nor couldn't nor be willing to reveal its name and location. In my years of helping guys via Direct Message, only one SA guy has ever shared with me a contact. You SA guys are just jacking off in public. Use the private message system, or the SA thread here on ISG, or better yet, demand that SA provide a client chat on its $90 a month paid venue. If you want to argue further with me, send me a Direct Message please. Let's stop wasting thread space with useless crap and arguments, please.

I could not agree more. There are countless threads on ISG and each serves a purpose but that purpose is thwarted when people upload a bunch of tangential posts.

[Juan Carter]

Personally, I think it's a bad precedent when some posters feel they "own" this thread, that they should be able to determine which types of posts are acceptable and which are not. This is really the job of the actual moderator.

I once did own this thread. It started out as my User Blog. But here nor there, my complaint about useless crap is self defeating with yet more useless crap arguing back and forth and eating up space that should be devoted to girls. I will here however restate my complaint. If you posted paragraph after paragraph about a restaurant in Polanco and its extensive menu, its ambiance, the dishes your educated palate appreciated and reasonable prices; I would be pissed if you wouldn't nor couldn't nor be willing to reveal its name and location. In my years of helping guys via Direct Message, only one SA guy has ever shared with me a contact. You SA guys are just jacking off in public. Use the private message system, or the SA thread here on ISG, or better yet, demand that SA provide a client chat on its $90 a month paid venue. If you want to argue further with me, send me a Direct Message please. Let's stop wasting thread space with useless crap and arguments, please.

[The Guy]

Personally, I think it's a bad precedent when some posters feel they "own" this thread, that they should be able to determine which types of posts are acceptable and which are not. This is really the job of the actual moderator.

It is true that a large number of recent posts are from SA mongers (like myself). However, this imbalance was not created by the SA crowd. Rather, the mongers who find their talent on Twitter or Busti have been rather quiet, maybe due to covid 19. When the more traditional mongers step up to the plate again, there will be more balance. It's really on them to post tales of non-SA talent.

Some mongers resent that the only way to contact SA talent is by paying the $90/ month. I wish it were less expensive, but that's the price. That's generally the only way to make initial contact. I could try to provide the whatsapp phone number of an SA girl to some monger, and it might work, but usually the girls screen clients through the site.

Anyway, so long as posts are not disrespectful, racist, hostile, off-topic, etc, let's all let a 1,000 flowers bloom and be tolerant of each other's approaches to this great hobby.

[The Guy]

"However, there are a lot of working girls on SA, good looking and good performing ones at that".

It's stuff like the above that makes SA aficionados out of touch with reality. All the girls on SA are working girls. Whether a woman accepts $100 for a session or monthly allowance, she is a working girl pure and simple. It's like a judge once said when a guy I know responded "technically" to a direct question," yeah technically you violated the statute similar to being almost pregnant. "Escort or SA, you're banging a working girl so please stop glamorizing SA as if any portion of the women are not working girls.

You're right about that. Most on SA are selling sex for $. However, there's a twist from the twitter girls: I've found that SA girls are less hardened, less inked, less pierced and enjoy the date aspect (GFE) as part of the service they provide. Some mongers like that, others don't. (There's a subset within SA who seem to be happy meeting for sex without compensation, tinder-like, but maybe they are hoping for something eventually. I honestly don't know. I've done 3 of them recently in Mexico City).

[LuvMexicanas]

"However, there are a lot of working girls on SA, good looking and good performing ones at that".

It's stuff like the above that makes SA aficionados out of touch with reality. All the girls on SA are working girls. Whether a woman accepts $100 for a session or monthly allowance, she is a working girl pure and simple. It's like a judge once said when a guy I know responded "technically" to a direct question," yeah technically you violated the statute similar to being almost pregnant. "Escort or SA, you're banging a working girl so please stop glamorizing SA as if any portion of the women are not working girls.