Stupid shit in Medellin

[Elvis 2008]

But on Australian TV. The leading journalist on lab leak is Sherri Markson in Australia. Again, she uncovers Fauci being the short sighted fool he is:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0c7vInnhSlY

What Fauci says at the 5:40 mark is unreal.

If Fauci said and did the things he did and was in the private sector, he would be stripped of his medical license, tarred and feathered verbally in court, and forced into bankruptcy.

What is so frustrating to me is that he is going to escape his fate because the Dems used him to make Trump look badly. To the Democratic douches, 4 million deaths was a small price to pay to get rid of Trump.

[Elvis 2008]

We may never know the origin of sars-cov-2; however, we do know for sure that a half million Americans died needlessly and prematurely because of Trump's denialism and Republican complicity.

And this is the definition of being a Democratic douche. Fauci, Dazsak, Andersen, the bat lady and the CCP get off scot free because of these fucking douches.

[Elvis 2008]

You are getting there, Dchrist. This is covered in the medium.com article:

Viruses have all kinds of clever tricks, so why does the furin cleavage site stand out? Because of all known SARS-related beta-coronaviruses, only SARS2 possesses a furin cleavage site. All the other viruses have their S2 unit cleaved at a different site and by a different mechanism.

How then did SARS2 acquire its furin cleavage site? Either the site evolved naturally, or it was inserted by researchers at the S1/ S2 junction in a gain-of-function experiment.

For those who think SARS2 may have escaped from a lab, explaining the furin cleavage site is no problem at all. "Since 1992 the virology community has known that the one sure way to make a virus deadlier is to give it a furin cleavage site at the S1/ S2 junction in the laboratory," writes Dr. Steven Quay, a biotech entrepreneur interested in the origins of SARS2. "At least eleven gain-of-function experiments, adding a furin site to make a virus more infective, are published in the open literature, including by Dr. Zhengli Shi, head of coronavirus research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. ".

Anyone manipulating the SARS2 virus "would probably" have used one of these known backbones, the Andersen group writes, and since SARS2 is not derived from any of them, therefore it was not manipulated. But the argument is conspicuously inconclusive. DNA backbones are quite easy to make, so it's obviously possible that SARS2 was manipulated using an unpublished DNA backbone.

End of quote.

Let's go to Jon Stewart's chocolate example. If there is an outbreak of choclately goodness in Hershey, PA, the FCS is the wrapper around the chocolate and what was found in Hershey? Tons and tons of wrappers, but the wrappers, which can easily be made by man, are a little different than those known to be made by man. But Anderson argues, well argues in March 2020 not January 2020, because no person is known to have made that exact wrapper, man didn't make it. Nature did.

But it is even worse than that because if you think it cannot get even more stupid, it does.

Dr. Kristian Andersen who was "steadfast" that the virus came from nature in JC's article, actually wrote Anthony Fauci a few weeks before the infamous Nature article. And their conversation went something like this.

Andersen: Fauci, my team and I have looked at the chocolate wrapper, and we all think it is man made.

Fauci: Okay, Andersen, let's talk.

Five weeks later, Andersen says to the world via the Nature article: My team and I have examined the wrapper, and it clearly originated in nature and anyone who thinks otherwise is a conspiracy theorist.

Two months later, Fauci says to Andersen: Great job on that paper! Here is a $1. 88 million bribe, I mean grant.

A few weeks ago, the email conversations between Fauci and Andersen become public and Andersen deletes thousands of his online tweets.

Then you get JC's article which is titled, How science demolishes the right-wing fiction of a Wuhan "lab leak" as the source of coronavirus and make Andersen into a hero.

So do the Democratic douches get it? Maybe they do not feel as strongly as I do and want these POS assholes Andersen, Fauci, and Dazsak sued into the next century but could they at least say that Anderson was conflicted or hypocritical?

Nah. All these douches do is hear the right wing thinks one way and they go the other. Somehow anyone attacking Andersen based on Andersen's own words and actions is a Q'Anon nut job per JC.

And JJBee is like "Let me explain Andersen to you. We do not know all the wrappers nature can produce."

All you have to do to get these douches to turn off their brains is wrap everything up in a red-blue conflict. The question I have with the article that JC linked, "Is how much did China pay for it?

[John Clayton]

LMAO Sorry, I'm an idiot. It's double CGG. A genetic scientist I am not. Haha But I have read a lot on this subject and I do believe this issue is as close to a smoking gun as we have.

CGG codes for Arginine -- and your point is? As far as CGGCGG not existing in nature, it does. You can search and find millions of snippets of "...somethingsomethingCGGCGGsomethingsomething... ". As far as, "...read a lot on this subject...", you have to learn to distinguish between sources. I recommend that you study some sort science before you comment with such assurance on it. People, in general, value certainty; whereas, science is about uncertainty. People want an answer. Unfortunately, there is no "smoking gun". The evidence at this point for any origin hypothesis is very thin, which is unsatisfying for most people. The answer, if we ever find it, will probably come from careful analysis done by many scientists -- not by internet sleuths. Based on similar viruses, the odds at this point are that the origin is zoonotic.

The Republicans (e. G. , Tom Cotton, QAnon, etc) have seized on "Lab Leak", "Gain of Function", "Bioengineering" as a way to distract us from their incompetence. We may never know the origin of sars-cov-2; however, we do know for sure that a half million Americans died needlessly and prematurely because of Trump's denialism and Republican complicity.

One other point about "Gain of Function", this virus is gaining a hell of a lot more function than it could have in the lab. Why? Because we have politicized both mask wearing and vaccination and simply let it run wild -- it's mutating like fucking mad every second. Regardless of the origin of this virus, we, as humans, have to get together and crush it. If you're not vaccinated, get vaccinated.

[MarquisdeSade1]

That is not the same study you lying POS. You have been running around proclaiming lockdowns work and are the cure. The study from Stanford I cited showed they did not work and it had nothing to do with fucking masks.

So you lied about not posting about Covid anymore.

You lied about the study.

And worst of all, you and all you Democratic douches lied about what was best for Corona, lockdowns. Colombia did everything you pro-"science" douches wanted and the results were a fucking disaster. You even insulted the Colombian people as noncompliant when they sacrificed more in the name of Corona than we ever did. Thank God they finally rebelled.

You fucking douches are still in denial about what went on. The virus was caused by the very scientists you want us to bend over and worship. Before they could get caught, they tried censoring the truth. Even Jon Stewart went off on the idiotic "there is no evidence it leaked from a lab."

Keep trying to save face douche!

They are selling or giving away vaccines that are 100% h20 jajajajajajajaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/22/b...gtype=Homepage

[JjBee62]

First, and importantly, I'll admit that some of this article is above my pay grade. Perhaps you are a genetic scientist. I am not.

That said, the article, and even your commentary, loses a lot of credibility in my opinion. Why? Because the article takes a political position to discount a theory. Likewise, when you associate a theory with QAnon, it exposes your bias. To be perfectly clear, I laugh at the Q nutjobs probably as much as you. But my larger point, science and politics should not mix. Adding that into the article does nothing more than expose the agenda of the author.

I'll go even further. The lack of curiosity is antithetical to science. There was a clear effort to halt any investigation before it could even start. Is that science? As each day goes by, the lies and coverup becomes more evident. What in the world do we gain by not uncovering the truth? For example, the WHO determined that live bats were not kept in the lab. We now know that's false based on video evidence. I'm going to really trigger some people here but I liken it to global warming. There is a dangerous lack of curiosity. We use the term "settled science". What? That term is almost an oxymoron. But here again, politics (and oh yes, that all important government funding trough) interfere with actual scientific work..

Perhaps you meant to quote a different section of the article.

"There is nothing mysterious about having a 'first example' of a virus with an FCS. Viruses sampled to date only give us a teeny-tiny fraction of all the viruses circulating in the wild. "

I'll try to put that quote into context for you. Although it shouldn't be necessary because the article clearly states that other CoVs have an FCS and gives examples.

Let's connect it to mongering, just for fun. Let's say you only recently started mongering and the small sample of girls you've been with have given pretty much the same service, CBJ, CFS and mechanical performance. It's not speculation to say girls who provide better service probably exist, because there are millions out there and you've only experienced a few. When you encounter a girl who gives 5 star service would you immediately assume she was bioengineered or would you just expand your knowledge base?

This is what Dr. Anderson is saying. Because only a tiny portion of existing viruses have been decoded, it's to be expected that new information will be discovered as new viruses are decoded.

[Dcrist0527]

Okay, I understand what you're saying. GCC is a codon that designates Alanine. GCC-GCC designates two Alanines. There are 35 other codons which also designate Alanine -- and the QAnon theory is that this could only be a result of engineering as this combination of codons would never appear in nature? But, they do. If you're interested (which I admit is unlikely) you can find a very understandable synopsis of the early "Lab Leak" hypothesis here:

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/202.../sci2-j22.html

First, and importantly, I'll admit that some of this article is above my pay grade. Perhaps you are a genetic scientist. I am not.

That said, the article, and even your commentary, loses a lot of credibility in my opinion. Why? Because the article takes a political position to discount a theory. Likewise, when you associate a theory with QAnon, it exposes your bias. To be perfectly clear, I laugh at the Q nutjobs probably as much as you. But my larger point, science and politics should not mix. Adding that into the article does nothing more than expose the agenda of the author.

I'll go even further. The lack of curiosity is antithetical to science. There was a clear effort to halt any investigation before it could even start. Is that science? As each day goes by, the lies and coverup becomes more evident. What in the world do we gain by not uncovering the truth? For example, the WHO determined that live bats were not kept in the lab. We now know that's false based on video evidence. I'm going to really trigger some people here but I liken it to global warming. There is a dangerous lack of curiosity. We use the term "settled science". What? That term is almost an oxymoron. But here again, politics (and oh yes, that all important government funding trough) interfere with actual scientific work.

Beyond that, this article stops FAR short of debunking the hypothesis. For example:

"There is nothing mysterious about having a 'first example' of a virus with an FCS. Viruses sampled to date only give us a teeny-tiny fraction of all the viruses circulating in the wild."

So the author is speculating that since we've only decoded a small sample of viruses, well then a specific code must be out there. Except, that's not science. That's speculation. But yet he throws stones at "conspiracy theories". The irony!

I appreciate you sharing. I have my opinions and information only helps. I don't agree with your synopsis, or the author's premise, but it was interesting.

[John Clayton]

Are you talking about the nucleotides guanine and cytosine? Or an amino acid sequence? (and why do I even try to understand?

Okay, I understand what you're saying. GCC is a codon that designates Alanine. GCC-GCC designates two Alanines. There are 35 other codons which also designate Alanine -- and the QAnon theory is that this could only be a result of engineering as this combination of codons would never appear in nature? But, they do. If you're interested (which I admit is unlikely) you can find a very understandable synopsis of the early "Lab Leak" hypothesis here:

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/202.../sci2-j22.html

[Dcrist0527]

Are you talking about the nucleotides guanine and cytosine? Or an amino acid sequence? (and why do I even try to understand?

LMAO Sorry, I'm an idiot. It's double CGG. A genetic scientist I am not. Haha But I have read a lot on this subject and I do believe this issue is as close to a smoking gun as we have.

[John Clayton]

...We know the double GCC code does not exist in nature...

Are you talking about the nucleotides guanine and cytosine? Or an amino acid sequence? (and why do I even try to understand?

[Dcrist0527]

That is not the same study you lying POS. You have been running around proclaiming lockdowns work and are the cure. The study from Stanford I cited showed they did not work and it had nothing to do with fucking masks.

So you lied about not posting about Covid anymore.

You lied about the study.

And worst of all, you and all you Democratic douches lied about what was best for Corona, lockdowns. Colombia did everything you pro-"science" douches wanted and the results were a fucking disaster. You even insulted the Colombian people as noncompliant when they sacrificed more in the name of Corona than we ever did. Thank God they finally rebelled.

You fucking douches are still in denial about what went on. The virus was caused by the very scientists you want us to bend over and worship. Before they could get caught, they tried censoring the truth. Even Jon Stewart went off on the idiotic "there is no evidence it leaked from a lab."

Keep trying to save face douche!

The personal attacks are simultaneously amusing and frustrating. But I strongly agree with an important point Elvis made.

We know the double GCC code does not exist in nature, yet it's in the CV. So we know it's man made. We know where it originated. And even if you doubt that, ask yourself why Fauci and company rushed to defend that lab, before any legitimate study could be organized, let alone executed. Then ask yourself why Fauci covered up the funding. Why did he first say we didn't then make an incredulous claim that, yes, in fact we funded the lab but not those specific projects. LMAO.

This research was not done in China because of cheap labor. It was done in China because it was illegal in the US. Think about it. Do you really believe the people feeding at the trough from US grants were concerned about cheap labor? No. That's the whole game. Keep the US money flowing.

Doubt me? Go back 8 years when Fauci defended this type of research, saying it was worth the risk. The facts are obvious. And anyone that denies the facts is just a fool, a political hack. There is a lot to be learned. But for political reasons, on both sides, the games and political wins are more important. "Worth the risk".

[Elvis 2008]

Look what came of Elvis' so called "Stanford" anti-mask study. Fake, fraudulent, with misquotes, lies while it was falsely attributed to Stanford. Moral of the story? Don't pounce on everything that comes along on a wingnut blog like a kangaroo in heat. That's asking a lot I know.

That is not the same study you lying POS. You have been running around proclaiming lockdowns work and are the cure. The study from Stanford I cited showed they did not work and it had nothing to do with fucking masks.

So you lied about not posting about Covid anymore.

You lied about the study.

And worst of all, you and all you Democratic douches lied about what was best for Corona, lockdowns. Colombia did everything you pro-"science" douches wanted and the results were a fucking disaster. You even insulted the Colombian people as noncompliant when they sacrificed more in the name of Corona than we ever did. Thank God they finally rebelled.

You fucking douches are still in denial about what went on. The virus was caused by the very scientists you want us to bend over and worship. Before they could get caught, they tried censoring the truth. Even Jon Stewart went off on the idiotic "there is no evidence it leaked from a lab."

Keep trying to save face douche!

[Paulie97]

Look what came of Elvis' so called "Stanford" anti-mask study. Fake, fraudulent, with misquotes, lies while it was falsely attributed to Stanford. Moral of the story? Don't pounce on everything that comes along on a wingnut blog like a kangaroo in heat. That's asking a lot I know.

https://www.stanforddaily.com/2021/0...ed-by-journal/

https://twitter.com/StanfordMed/stat...57123864444930

[MarquisdeSade1]

My guess and it's only a guess is that it was cheaper to outsource the research to China just like everything else.

https://amgreatness.com/2021/06/07/p...t-not-healthy/

[JjBee62]

Before I get to the session, I've got some words to say about Facebook.

On Wednesday on the flight to Bogota, we flew very close to Medellin. The sun had set and the city was all lit up, but at 39,000 feet there was still a lot of color in the sky. I snapped a picture, which turned out better than I hoped and posted it on Facebook. Although I've let a few girls know about my trip, I didn't make any general announcement.

That picture did the trick. By the end of the night, more than 20 girls had hit me up. It's been shared and liked more than any other photo I've posted. It's still getting likes and the number of girls reaching out to me has increased to 35. Most of them are second stringers, but a few are previous girls who I haven't talked to in 3 years or more. Once you build up a Facebook list, if you use it right, you will have more options than you can handle. It makes finding replacements easy.

Yesterday I took it fairly easy. Drove to Santa Fe mall in the morning to get some cash and then walked to La Strada for breakfast at Parmessano. Pretty good food, but more than I usually pay for breakfast. A short walk back and I bought some supplies at Jumbo.

Sent out messages to some local friends to set up some lunch dates. Then drove to Manila and met with one of them. Got caught up on the local gossip. From there, I went to Viva mall for lunch at Hatoviejo. Good Colombian food, but expensive. Usually I'm eating at the cheaper places, but yesterday I splurged.

After a trip back to the apartment to cool down and make sure the jacuzzi was clean and functional, I got back out into rush hour traffic and drove to Parque Lleras. Went to Ay Wey on Calle 10, a sports bar alternative to Patrick's and Hooters. Food was good, but portions were small for the price. Lots of attractive waitresses running around and they seem friendly.

While there I was contemplating whether I wanted some company. I'm still recovering and climbing 5 flights of stairs several times daily had me worn out. Sent out a message to a model, Facebook, Instagram girl who I chatted with in December and got a response at just the right time. Set up for her to meet me at the apartment at 10 pm. She pulled up at 10:25, so I consider that a win.

She's a taller black girl, 1.70 meters, very slender and very fit. Not quite 6 pack abs, but close. Her body is excellent, well proportioned and all natural. We spent the first 30 minutes chatting and drinking wine. Then the foreplay started. She was very responsive to everything I did and quite passionate. From there we moved to the jacuzzi, with lots more foreplay. Finally moved to the bed and got down to business, BBBJ, DATY and CFS. Her head game was decent, but the best part was after the condom went on. She rode me hard, rode me all the way through my nut and kept on riding. She kept grinding on me, kissing my neck and ear for almost 30 minutes, at one point rubbing herself, until she finally got off. Made me wish I'd brought a vibrator.

After she finally wound down, we talked a bit more before heading to the shower for a quick rinse. There was nothing business like or mechanical with her, until it was time to pay and call a taxi. She's got nice sized tits, with just a bit of droop, her ass is small by local standards, but well shaped. The pussy was tight and nicely wet. She did have a stronger than normal odor, but not a bad smell, made the room smell like sex. Overall she stayed almost 2 hours.