American Politics

[Chris P]

posting truthful and accurate information

Multiple fake news media and democrat (but I repeat myself) organizations and figures posted cast-iron guarantees stating that they had prima facie evidence that Trump had colluded with Russian his election. As we now know, this was a lie. Despite years of intensive investigation, no such evidence was ever found, because it did not happen.

Why have these democrats and media liars not had their social media accounts banned for posting these unsubstantiated conspiracy theories that ignited insurrection and violence?

[Chris P]

Here's what will happen in 2024. A Democratic candidate will win the Presidency. But due to fascist voting legislation in red states, they will not certify Democratic electors. Two slates of electors will be sent to Washington. Since there are more red Senators than blue ones, the red senators will choose a Republican president. Chaos will ensue.

Or, perhaps those Senators will grow a pair and upset the Republican base by realizing that making a Republican president would cause a constitutional crisis. They keep the Democratic president. Chaos ensues.

Amazingly, this is actually not a bad post. The only thing you missed out is that the democrats will attempt another fraud in their corrupt shthole cities, and they will claim the "win" through this (let's be honest, there's no way Kamala "Heels Up" Harris could win an honest election: she simply doesn't have time to blow the necessary ten million voters).

The Republican Party will have been de-RINO'd by then, courtesy of primary challengers, and with their spines stiffened by the threat of losing their seats plus four more years of inoculation against the fake news media, will refuse to surrender weakly as they did last time.

This will hopefully begin moves toward secession. Heartland heritage Americans have nothing in common with Salvadoran MS-13 anchor babies or SSRI-crazed barren bluehair feminist socialist fatties. Let them have their country and we will have ours.

[Chris P]

Fascists....blabla....somethingsomething....fascists.

As always, you didn't address Canada's point. Which were more violent: the Jan 6 protest, or the BLM / antifa activities in cities and federal courthouses across the USA over the last year? Try and be honest.

[Chris P]

Unfortunately, 74 million voters believe that January 6th didn't happen. They also believe in Santa, the Easter Bunny and unicorns.

You can lead fascists to wisdom but you can't make them think!

Of course January 6th happened. It came after January 5th and before January 7th, same as every year. This year, a million patriotic Americans went to Washington to protest the election fraud. A tiny proportion of them, organised and encouraged by undercover federal agents, walked peacefully through open doors into the Capitol building, damaging nothing and attacking nobody. They spent a few minutes in the building, took some photos, and left.

As for wacky beliefs that people actually hold, I doubt many of the 75 million Trump voters think that a man in a wig and a dress is a woman. Do you, PVMonger?

[PVMonger]

All republicans acknowledge jan6 protest happened. It is the democrats who claim BLM and Antifa protests are peaceful and not violent or claiming that they never happen and that there is no crises at the border. Everyone knows the Jan 6 demonstration was not near as violent as the average protest by BLM. BLM and Antifa are domestic terrorists who riot and steal and destroy property for their personal gain. Not for the good of USA.

Fascists, aka the Republican party, want to whitewash January 6th. https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-...-riot-n1265613.

The remaining fascists, aka the 74 million who voted for the orange buffoon, hate antifa because those 74 million are fascists.

[ScatManDoo]

I am looking forward to TrumpShit's greatest political failures coming up in 2022 and 2024.

When the idiot with the worst presidential approval ratings suffers the greatest campaign losses in modern history.

Hahahahah.

[Xpartan]

Facebook, Twitter and google are not only banning subscribers from posting about election fraud but are also banning people from posting about the China virus being released from Wuhan. These sites are liberal sites protecting liberals and deciding what free speech is. On these sites free speech is only for democrats.

Show me accounts that have been banned for posting truthful and accurate information about voting fraud. Prediction: you can't and you won't.

As long as they're banning liars and lunatics who post unsubstantiated conspiracy theories that ignite insurrection and violence, they're finally doing the right thing after washing their hands for many years.

The media, including social media, are full of stories of isolated voting irregularities, and no one bans those posts, as long as they're based in fact, rather than phantasies of the Red Menacing Buffoon.

[Canada]

Unfortunately, 74 million voters believe that January 6th didn't happen. They also believe in Santa, the Easter Bunny and unicorns.

You can lead fascists to wisdom but you can't make them think!

All republicans acknowledge jan6 protest happened. It is the democrats who claim BLM and Antifa protests are peaceful and not violent or claiming that they never happen and that there is no crises at the border. Everyone knows the Jan 6 demonstration was not near as violent as the average protest by BLM. BLM and Antifa are domestic terrorists who riot and steal and destroy property for their personal gain. Not for the good of USA.

[Canada]

Facebook, Twitter and Google are the names of the corporations. Claiming that Facebook, Twitter and Google say "election fraud can't happen" is beyond "unintelligent," it's outright dumb. And no, you will not be banned if you thoughtfully write about an election fraud with evidence backing it up.

No, comrade, free speech is not absolute. You can't yell "fire" in a crowded theater, and you can't incite insurrection and violence by lying through your teeth on the social media. It took Facebook and Twitter 6 years of unabated Putin-sponsored pro-Trump sabotage campaign to have finally arrived at that station.

Sounds like a threat to me. Are you planning to hang your opponents or gun them down? One of your soulmates favors

https://www.salon.com/2021/06/24/oan-host-suggests-mass-execution-of-those-who-oppose-trumps-voter-fraud-claims

Nah, one crazy dude at a time.

Facebook, Twitter and google are not only banning subscribers from posting about election fraud but are also banning people from posting about the China virus being released from Wuhan. These sites are liberal sites protecting liberals and deciding what free speech is. On these sites free speech is only for democrats.

[Paulie97]

https://youtu.be/jWJVMoe7OY0

The actual footage from the event will always overturn any and all attempts to whitewash history.

[Chris P]

You win the prize. There are literally hundreds of videos that dispute this BS.

Shouting and pushing is not "violence". The Capitol protests were significantly less violent than your everyday antifa / BLM "mostly peaceful" riots, cheered on by Kamala "Heels Up" Harris and the fake news media, which resulted in cities being burned to the ground, federal courthouses coming under sustained violent assault, and cost billions of dollars of damage in the last year.

Nothing was burned in the Capitol. Nobody was killed other than unarmed protesters Ashli Babbitt. The damage was a couple of broken windows and bookshelves, which was probably done by some of the dozens of FBI operatives we now know to have been involved for several weeks beforehand.

Again, here is a video showing police opening the doors of the Capitol and standing aside to let protesters walk in. One of the officers says "I don't agree with it, but I respect it", indicating.

That the order to open the doors and stand aside came from his superiors: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUQhcrdV50U.

Youtube heavily suppresses and often deletes these factual videos showing what actually happened on January 6th. As opposed to the fake news narrative. Which brings us back to the point of my previous post about the problem of Big Tech censorship.

[Chris P]

free speech is not absolute.

If you are a private publisher, that is true. Jeff Bezos is under no obligation to allow anyone he dislikes politically to write a column in his fake news Washington Post, for instance. That is his editorial decision. It is also why the Washington Post does not benefit from the wide protection of Section 230. The Washington Post can be sued for the content it chooses to publish.

Verizon or Sprint, on the other hand, cannot be sued if someone says something defamatory or illegal on one of their phone lines. That is because they do not choose who uses their networks or what those people say. They simply provide a communication platform to anyone who wishes to use it.

Facebook, Twitter and Youtube / Google are attempting to have their cake and eat it. They are claiming innocently to be nothing but a neutral platform, like Sprint or Verizon, and benefitting from similar legal protection.

However, as can be seen by the mass bannings and shadowbannings of conservatives and right-wingers, both high profile and regular users, they are anything but a neutral platform. They are making editorial publishing decisions in order to promote their leftist globalist political agenda of open borders, anti-white racism and demographic replacement, political correctness, affirmative action, third-wave feminism, child trannnies, cancel culture, attacking the First and Second Amendments, etc. They cannot continue to pretend to be neutral, and enjoy the legal protections of Section 230, while doing this.

It is also deeply unhealthy for so much information, power and censorship ability to be concentrated in the hands of so few. The removal of Section 230 protections, and antitrust to break up these monoliths, is the necessary remedy.

[Xpartan]

Facebook, Twitter and Google do. At least, they do in the case of the 2020 US election. If you suggest it occurred, you will be banned.

Facebook, Twitter and Google are the names of the corporations. Claiming that Facebook, Twitter and Google say "election fraud can't happen" is beyond "unintelligent," it's outright dumb. And no, you will not be banned if you thoughtfully write about an election fraud with evidence backing it up.

This is an editorial decision by the globalist leftist democrats who control those companies; it is in breach of Section 230, which states that they are platforms not publishers. The fact that they are making editorial decisions by deleting legal and constitutionally protected free speech for political reasons goes against the protections they enjoy under Section 230.

No, comrade, free speech is not absolute. You can't yell "fire" in a crowded theater, and you can't incite insurrection and violence by lying through your teeth on the social media. It took Facebook and Twitter 6 years of unabated Putin-sponsored pro-Trump sabotage campaign to have finally arrived at that station.

This will be remedied.

Sounds like a threat to me. Are you planning to hang your opponents or gun them down? One of your soulmates favors hanging.

OAN host suggests mass "execution" of those who oppose Trump's voter fraud claims

"America had a very good solution for dealing with such traitors: execution," an OANN host said Wednesday

https://www.salon.com/2021/06/24/oan-host-suggests-mass-execution-of-those-who-oppose-trumps-voter-fraud-claims

For a thorough rebuttal of the rest of your wrong-headed and unintelligent post, I refer you and others to the excellent Elvis 2008.

Nah, one crazy dude at a time.

[PVMonger]

https://youtu.be/jWJVMoe7OY0

Unfortunately, 74 million voters believe that January 6th didn't happen. They also believe in Santa, the Easter Bunny and unicorns.

You can lead fascists to wisdom but you can't make them think!

[Canada]

Here's what will happen in 2024. A Democratic candidate will win the Presidency. But due to fascist voting legislation in red states, they will not certify Democratic electors. Two slates of electors will be sent to Washington. Since there are more red Senators than blue ones, the red senators will choose a Republican president. Chaos will ensue.

Or, perhaps those Senators will grow a pair and upset the Republican base by realizing that making a Republican president would cause a constitutional crisis. They keep the Democratic president. Chaos ensues.

You can't fix stupid?