Thread: American Politics
+
Add Report
Results 10,921 to 10,935 of 14659
-
07-05-21 23:01 #3739
Posts: 540Opinion vs fact
It may seem obvious to many but not the Trump worshippers apparently. To Chris P, Canada et al: Your posts would carry a bit more weight (not to mention veracity) if you would post even a few verifiable points instead of "everyone knows", "of course", "the only logical explanation", etc, along with a few whoppers like this one " A tiny proportion of them, organized and encouraged by undercover federal agents, walked peacefully through open doors into the Capitol building, damaging nothing and attacking nobody. " You obviously have not seen some of the same videos of the situation as many of the rest of us have, or you are deliberately lying or deluded, I don't know which. I am not sure there is an answer to this as you refuse to believe any evidence provided by others (fake news) and when you make statements like the one above, well it is pretty clear you aren't going to be convincing anyone either.
I am waiting for the results of the Arizona "audit" with great anticipation. I think we will hear the collective heads of the Trumpsters exploding all the way across the border. You know, where the real "Canada" is.
-
07-05-21 18:10 #3738
Posts: 1044Why were there dozens of unindicted, unnamed co-conspirators on Jan 6?
The charging documents currently being used to crucify Trump supporters for trespassing in the Capitol (while BLM / antifa have charges dropped after burning cities and assaulting people) have revealed something very interesting: dozens of unnamed, unindicted co-conspirators who were present in the Capitol building.
Given the zeal with which the feds have hunted down every last grandma who wandered through open doors and spent a couple of minutes looking round before leaving, how and why is it that there are so many people who were at the heart of the unrest, and even involved in its planning and organisation, who have not only not been charged but not even named?
The only realistic explanation is that these people were FBI operatives.
We now know that many of these unindicted, unnamed co-conspirators were part of the tiny group of hotheads who were planning to rush (unarmed) the Capitol as part of the protest. The FBI clearly had advance warning that some people were going to try to do this. Why did they not ensure sufficient policing at the building to prevent it?
Again, the only logical explanation is that the FBI, along with the media, democrats, anti-Trump RINOs and the rest of the Washington establishment, wanted it to happen.
The entire thing was a psy-op. Undercover FBI agents wound up some hotheads, and led them into the Capitol through open doors after the undermanned police stood aside. No doubt they were disappointed that they didn't try and burn the place down and attack people, but that is how antifa / BLM communists conduct themselves, not patriotic Americans.
Then the fake news media and democrats (but I repeat myself) kicked into their part of the plan, screeching hysterically and trying to create a fake narrative that never happened.
The fact that so few Republicans believe this Big Lie (or the Big Lie of Biden's "election") despite the full-court press from the fake news is fantastically encouraging. We have 75 m+ patriotic Americans, inoculated against the fake news democrat establishment lies, with more waking up every day and realising how much those people hate us. There is real hope for the future.
-
07-05-21 17:54 #3737
Posts: 1044Originally Posted by Xpartan [View Original Post]
Why have these democrats and media liars not had their social media accounts banned for posting these unsubstantiated conspiracy theories that ignited insurrection and violence?
-
07-05-21 17:48 #3736
Posts: 1044Originally Posted by PVMonger [View Original Post]
The Republican Party will have been de-RINO'd by then, courtesy of primary challengers, and with their spines stiffened by the threat of losing their seats plus four more years of inoculation against the fake news media, will refuse to surrender weakly as they did last time.
This will hopefully begin moves toward secession. Heartland heritage Americans have nothing in common with Salvadoran MS-13 anchor babies or SSRI-crazed barren bluehair feminist socialist fatties. Let them have their country and we will have ours.
-
07-05-21 17:00 #3735
Posts: 1044Originally Posted by PVMonger [View Original Post]
-
07-05-21 16:57 #3734
Posts: 1044Originally Posted by PVMonger [View Original Post]
As for wacky beliefs that people actually hold, I doubt many of the 75 million Trump voters think that a man in a wig and a dress is a woman. Do you, PVMonger?
-
07-05-21 03:30 #3733
Posts: 1604Keep on drinking the koolaid
Originally Posted by Canada [View Original Post]
The remaining fascists, aka the 74 million who voted for the orange buffoon, hate antifa because those 74 million are fascists.
-
07-04-21 22:54 #3732
Posts: 2344I am looking forward to TrumpShit's greatest political failures coming up in 2022 and 2024.
When the idiot with the worst presidential approval ratings suffers the greatest campaign losses in modern history.
Hahahahah.
-
07-04-21 21:47 #3731
Posts: 2026Great. Now prove it
Originally Posted by Canada [View Original Post]
As long as they're banning liars and lunatics who post unsubstantiated conspiracy theories that ignite insurrection and violence, they're finally doing the right thing after washing their hands for many years.
The media, including social media, are full of stories of isolated voting irregularities, and no one bans those posts, as long as they're based in fact, rather than phantasies of the Red Menacing Buffoon.
-
07-04-21 21:08 #3730
Posts: 1068Jan 6
Originally Posted by PVMonger [View Original Post]
-
07-04-21 14:39 #3729
Posts: 1068Facebook, Twitter and Google
Originally Posted by Xpartan [View Original Post]
-
07-04-21 12:33 #3728
Posts: 1680Yep
Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
-
07-04-21 08:24 #3727
Posts: 1044Originally Posted by PVMonger [View Original Post]
Nothing was burned in the Capitol. Nobody was killed other than unarmed protesters Ashli Babbitt. The damage was a couple of broken windows and bookshelves, which was probably done by some of the dozens of FBI operatives we now know to have been involved for several weeks beforehand.
Again, here is a video showing police opening the doors of the Capitol and standing aside to let protesters walk in. One of the officers says "I don't agree with it, but I respect it", indicating.
That the order to open the doors and stand aside came from his superiors: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUQhcrdV50U.
Youtube heavily suppresses and often deletes these factual videos showing what actually happened on January 6th. As opposed to the fake news narrative. Which brings us back to the point of my previous post about the problem of Big Tech censorship.
-
07-04-21 08:10 #3726
Posts: 1044Originally Posted by Xpartan [View Original Post]
Verizon or Sprint, on the other hand, cannot be sued if someone says something defamatory or illegal on one of their phone lines. That is because they do not choose who uses their networks or what those people say. They simply provide a communication platform to anyone who wishes to use it.
Facebook, Twitter and Youtube / Google are attempting to have their cake and eat it. They are claiming innocently to be nothing but a neutral platform, like Sprint or Verizon, and benefitting from similar legal protection.
However, as can be seen by the mass bannings and shadowbannings of conservatives and right-wingers, both high profile and regular users, they are anything but a neutral platform. They are making editorial publishing decisions in order to promote their leftist globalist political agenda of open borders, anti-white racism and demographic replacement, political correctness, affirmative action, third-wave feminism, child trannnies, cancel culture, attacking the First and Second Amendments, etc. They cannot continue to pretend to be neutral, and enjoy the legal protections of Section 230, while doing this.
It is also deeply unhealthy for so much information, power and censorship ability to be concentrated in the hands of so few. The removal of Section 230 protections, and antitrust to break up these monoliths, is the necessary remedy.
-
07-04-21 04:11 #3725
Posts: 2026And the lies go on.
Originally Posted by ChrisP [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by ChrisP [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by ChrisP [View Original Post]
OAN host suggests mass "execution" of those who oppose Trump's voter fraud claims
"America had a very good solution for dealing with such traitors: execution," an OANN host said Wednesday
Originally Posted by ChrisP [View Original Post]