FKK Oase - Burgholzhausen

[Sirioja]

No idea if cuteness is a gene or not. But it somewhat seems to be mainly seen in short girls maybe 1.49-1. 62. Maybe up to 1.65 in fewer and fewer cases. Or 1.70 in the extremely rare case as with Samia who worked at GT.

The 2 ex pornstars I mentioned as smack in the middle of that range.

In my definition it is impossible to be cute and not be also pretty. But one can be pretty without being cute.

Big silicon with so long extensions Samia at Bruggen. Estefania now Myriam Sharks would be one of the prettiest face now at Globe, land of many average faces, but not my type for behavior and not woman type enough.

[Clodius1]

Might be something to do with the possibility that the girls we see as classically pretty were not all that pretty to begin with. Often that classic pretty look can be created with good make up techniques such as canvasing. Cute is more often a natural look. Outside of pigtails and schoolgirl outfits, not many working girls can artificially create the cute look.

The techniques that the girls use to create that classic pretty look might just become ineffective when the canvas that is the face and body of an otherwise aging average woman deteriorates while the cuteness of the naturally cute girl perseveres because it was real to begin with.

I especially see this in Asian women. Some are cute their entire lives, all the way until they become cute little grandmothers. However, I certainly would never call those grandmothers pretty. And no amount of make up can make that cute little Asian grandmother pretty in my eyes.

Truth there. Mein Stadtviertel hat viele Asiaten. Many of them have attractive features, even as MILFs.

[Pistons]

If my memory serves me well, Estephania said she was 1.52 or 1.53 by the way.

[Pistons]

Totally agree with that. The CUTE ones hold their SMV for a longer number of years. The classic beauties crash and burn early, not sure why. Odd.

No idea if cuteness is a gene or not. But it somewhat seems to be mainly seen in short girls maybe 1.49-1. 62. Maybe up to 1.65 in fewer and fewer cases. Or 1.70 in the extremely rare case as with Samia who worked at GT.

The 2 ex pornstars I mentioned as smack in the middle of that range.

In my definition it is impossible to be cute and not be also pretty. But one can be pretty without being cute.

[Escape Artist]

Can Anyone confirm if Oase still Open?

Thanks.

Confirmed open.

[Sirioja]

The quality for me is also comprehensive. It's all about having clubs and girls that make me feel better. I don't really care about the cost. Beauty and hospitality are absolute requirements. Each person has a different way of playing and spending time. There is no doubt that this club is the best in Frankfurt at the moment.

Not for me on 2021 because I didn't see beauties there to have a room. Only beauties worth I pay for.

[Escape Artist]

Totally agree with that. The CUTE ones hold their SMV for a longer number of years. The classic beauties crash and burn early, not sure why. Odd.

Might be something to do with the possibility that the girls we see as classically pretty were not all that pretty to begin with. Often that classic pretty look can be created with good make up techniques such as canvasing. Cute is more often a natural look. Outside of pigtails and schoolgirl outfits, not many working girls can artificially create the cute look.

The techniques that the girls use to create that classic pretty look might just become ineffective when the canvas that is the face and body of an otherwise aging average woman deteriorates while the cuteness of the naturally cute girl perseveres because it was real to begin with.

I especially see this in Asian women. Some are cute their entire lives, all the way until they become cute little grandmothers. However, I certainly would never call those grandmothers pretty. And no amount of make up can make that cute little Asian grandmother pretty in my eyes.

[Clodius1]

If by cute, one means a youthful look that won't age badly, then that just means they will stay pretty for a longer time.

Say someone like the pornstars Dora Venter or Christina Bella. Aside from if they gain too much weight, they both age well. So both are pretty for a longer time. But both are / were also cute.

Totally agree with that. The CUTE ones hold their SMV for a longer number of years. The classic beauties crash and burn early, not sure why. Odd.

[Pistons]

If by cute, one means a youthful look that won't age badly, then that just means they will stay pretty for a longer time.

Say someone like the pornstars Dora Venter or Christina Bella. Aside from if they gain too much weight, they both age well. So both are pretty for a longer time. But both are / were also cute.

[Escape Artist]

Estephania has a cute face, not really pretty.

[Einhorn]

From what I saw on 2021, we really don't have same tastes for looks, but eyes are subjective. I agree I also prefer quality than quantity, but quality for me is fresh natural looks without silicon, nor duck lips, nor big tattoes, and full GFE, not speaking about money. Do you know many now at Oase? When desk say club rate is 50/30.

The quality for me is also comprehensive. It's all about having clubs and girls that make me feel better. I don't really care about the cost. Beauty and hospitality are absolute requirements. Each person has a different way of playing and spending time. There is no doubt that this club is the best in Frankfurt at the moment.

[Sirioja]

This club still maintains the best cast. Even if there are many girls like sharks, it is useless if it is not fun. I don't strongly recommend my favorite clubs or favorite girls to others in various threads. As the number of customers increases, comfort is lost.

From what I saw on 2021, we really don't have same tastes for looks, but eyes are subjective. I agree I also prefer quality than quantity, but quality for me is fresh natural looks without silicon, nor duck lips, nor big tattoes, and full GFE, not speaking about money. Do you know many now at Oase? When desk say club rate is 50/30.

[Sirioja]

Estephania is actually not always upselling. Her upselling is usually selective. Then again, it's probably 3 years since I saw her now, so chances are a 50 won't do any longer.

There was a group back in 2019 of a few 18-19 year old Barbie dolls I recall. 3 of 4 of them. A few guys I was there with had bad experience with two of them. So it ruined my go with one of them also since I went in with low expectations. But when I returned a few months later one of those Barbie dolls were excellent in the room. Name was something on L I think? Laila or something similar? Hmm. Dark hair. The first one was a blonde. But given good chemistry I'm sure one could have a great time.

The general idea here on ISG is that just because they are upselling you, or trying to suck you dry, they do that to everyone else too. Doesn't always work like that.

Estefania who became Miriam at Sharks is not my type even pretty face. She is told to try to upsell and rush, all what I hate. Girls like her killed business making empty Oase. On 2019, I saw many fresh beauties arriving at Oase but most leaving fast because almost empty except shisha. On 2019 , from April, I was nearly weekly. On 2021, only 2 visits on July and August, and 0 girl for me, even worst than at Globe where I could find a fresh natural super GFE for me Swiss. I loved Oase on 2014 and 2019.

[Einhorn]

Keyword here is payment.

Oase and Palace are the original price gouge clubs way before Sharks girls started doing it. But with their attendance dwindling due to customers opting to go to Sharks and with long time upselling girls opting to work privates, now would be a great time for the current Oase girls to undercut Sharks prices and bring in more guests.

I don't believe that Sharks can maintain their status as the top club with their current pricing system. The locals who continue to visit will not continue paying these prices without a drop off in number of rooms taken. As such, the money spent will be funneled into fewer girls, causing many girls to either leave or accept lower prices. As more girls return to work, this effect will become more profound and pronounced.

If Oase wants to reclaim the Hessen throne, now is the opportunity for the girls there to siphon visitors away from Sharks by providing more affordable prices.

That would be a welcomed development as I prefer Oase's facilities over Sharks anyway. More intriguing layout, cooler rooms in summer, better discount entry system, better garden, better pool, cheaper beer, sleep room, more sexual atmosphere, 24-hour Sparkasse ATM en route, pizza option, etc.

Unfortunately I disagree with your opinion as I have never thought of Sharks as a top club.

I went to various clubs in the past. What I learned there is that the fun of a club is more about quality than quantity. No matter how much junk you collect, it's just junk. Is the facility small? Are there few girls? I know they have nothing to do with the satisfaction I get when I leave the club.

[Einhorn]

I don't know on 2022, but for sure not best casting on July and August 2021 , far below 2019 and almost empty except shisha at night. Iranian was too big ass for me and no wow for her face except sophisticated hairstyle. Who are your beauties at Oase? Some 2019 Oase girls moved to Globe. Upselling Estefania moved to Sharks. One moved to 6. But I like the club.

This club still maintains the best cast. Even if there are many girls like sharks, it is useless if it is not fun. I don't strongly recommend my favorite clubs or favorite girls to others in various threads. As the number of customers increases, comfort is lost.