American Politics

[Villainy]

ROFL. I must admit I kinda admire Hunter. He is a ZFG dude. He wants to smoke crack and bang supermodel-looking hookers in Ukraine, he gets his dad to send him money and probably gets the secret service to ferry over the girls and gear. He wants to bang his dead brother's wife and diddle his nieces, he just does it. He wants to get megabucks kickbacks from China and Ukraine, he just tells them he will fuck their shit up unless they give it to him (with 10% for the big guy) and they do. He wants to shoot some shit up, he illegally obtains a firearm then orders the secret service to get rid of it for him.

He knows that there are no rules if you are related to a top-level democrat, and so he does whatever the fuck he wants with zero consequences. What a life.

I think he learned it from the Trump kids.

[EihTooms]

Hahaha republican women are smarter, they don't fuck around without being on pill or without protection. That 67% is by your MSM pollsters hoping for getting a bounce from the failed Buyden actions, just wait till November for real numbers LOL.

Clarence Thomas, a very Republican man married to an even more Republican woman, has already put contraception in the bullseye for the Very Big Government Everywhere Especially In Your Bedroom Repub majority SCOTUS. Probably under orders from his wife.

See, once they ruled there is no Right To Privacy under the law, this Repub majority SCOTUS essentially ruled that if and when your birth control method of choice fails, which they all can at anytime even my vasectomy, it's Happy Father's Day to you with financial support for the next 18 years.

If they succeed as hoped for and planned, there will be no exceptions to that outcome and no ultimate legal remedy anywhere in the country.

Which marks the end of Sex-For-Pleasure and restricts it to For The Purpose of Preocreation in America whether you wanted it that way or not.

[Villainy]

GOP women are not baby butchers

I guess in your high-school biology class you were absent the day they discussed the difference between a baby and a fetus.

[Villainy]

But you know someone who died of a heart attack, cancer, or car accident right?

Not for several years. So did you have a point?

The facts are that 9 out of 10 people who die in a hospital have blood clots in their lungs upon death, and that was before Covid.

Do you ever use Google?

Roughly 1 out of 10 hospital deaths are related to blood clots in the lungs.
Blood clots are a leading cause of preventable hospital death in the United States.

https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/dvt/hospi...fographic.html

So with just this one fact, nine out of ten hospital deaths can be attributed to Covid even if Covid had nothing to do with the clots.

Oh my God! Were you sober when you wrote this? You're still trying to rationalize that your prediction of 80,000 US deaths from CoVid wasn't a foolish uninformed guess.

"You see it wasn't my fault, I didn't take into consideration all the comorbidities. They were destined to die anyway. "

But worse than that, there was financial incentive for those making the cause of death decision to say it was Covid.

Another falsehood spread by (so called) conservatives.

Do hospitals get more money when they list COVID-19 as a patient's cause of death?

No, hospitals do not get more money when they list COVID-19 as a patient's cause of death.

https://www.verifythis.com/article/n...2-0ff482593afd

If you were to verify the information in detail you would see that in 2020 Congress passed a bill to pay hospitals more for Medicare's care and treatment of CoVid patients. Which kind of made good sense. Isolation and treatment in ICUs sometimes with Ventilators are costly.

Sweden is in the bottom 25% of Covid cases in Europe. Saying Sweden's Covid policy was a failure as it pertains to the general population is just beyond stupid. If you want to reward government policy as the only thing that matter with regards to Covid, a Democratic invention and dubious one at that, Sweden did great.

And if Sweden had acted more responsibly as did their neighbors they would have been in the bottom 10% and saved many lives.

Wrong! You are trying to credit the vaccines with "doing something". The virus was mutating before the vaccines, and the vaccines do not prevent transmission.

The vaccines stopped most people from catching CoVid in for first place, and those that did have had a far higher survival rate. That seems like "doing something". Oh and your constant battle-cry. the vaccines do not prevent transmission is nonsensical. If people don't get the virus because they were vaccinated how are they going to transmit something they don't have??

THAT is the reason the original strains of CoVid disappeared and mutated into a more virulent but less harmful strain. The vaccines are not very effective against the Omnicron variant but the death rate is dramatically lower.

Americans were told repeatedly by the news media that Asian nations were models with regards to the prevention of Covid and how stupid Trump was. My projection on deaths was based upon the data patteren available at the time and then the data changed. When you Dems were holding Asian nations up as models (like you bash Sweden and its model), I was saying just you wait those countries will get theirs. It is funny how you do not remember that.

We all remember how wrong you were. China had, perhaps, the most severe lockdown anywhere. The whole Wuhan province was isolated and everyone was tested and every positive test had contact testing and contacts of contacts testing. China had far less deaths as a result. So now they are having a resurgence of CoVid but it is the Omnicron strain. I suppose Asians are more compliant in these situations.

As usual you blather on and on and on. I eventually get tired to doing the research and correcting all your misstatements. So, I'm sure you'll forgive me if I didn't rebut the rest of the garbage that you wrote.

[PVMonger]

Exactly. When the vaccine was first given, it met the FDA's criteria. When the effectiveness of the vaccine plunged below 50%, the vaccine really should have been pulled off the market or at least called experimental. To me, if people wanted to take it at that point, if they gave informed consent, that would have been fine, but that is not what happened. The vaccine was mandated. Worse, new criteria were used for effectiveness and the control group which is supposed to be identical or as close as possible to the treated group was just pulled out of thin air. It was the unscientific unvaxxed versus vaxxed.

And then there were no control groups at all for the third and fourth vaccine. There were also no double blind studies done on the newer variants. Even though the vaccine was made for the alpha variant, we were just told to pretend it was as good for the newer variants even though we knew that was not true.

You remember the comparisons of the Covid vaccine to the polio vaccine?

Polio was once one of the most feared diseases in the USA In the early 1950's, before polio vaccines were available, polio outbreaks caused more than 15,000 cases of paralysis each year. Following introduction of vaccinesspecifically, trivalent inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) in 1955 and trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) in 1963 the number of polio cases fell rapidly to less than 100 in the 1960's and fewer than 10 in the 1970's.

Now look here, https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/.

Do you see any difference in death rates and case rates since the vaccine was developed?

Based on the shape of the graphs, and if you did not know when the vaccines were developed and deployed, can you tell when the vaccine was widely deployed?

I sure as hell cannot, but I sure as hell can with polio. You literally have to dive deep into the data to show any benefit at all, but the reason the vaccine was approved, a 95% decrease in transmission, is totally gone. All other claims of benefit have not been scientifically proven. All you have are claims of benefit and unknown risk. No one can make an accurate risk-benefit assessment of the vaccine right now unless you are a Democrat. Then you know.

It is funny though how Covid even as it hitting 100,000 cases now miraculously is out of the news and all that venom against anti-vaxxers has left the building.

We'd all better listen because ELVIS the MD knows all. He doesn't provide any sources for any of this BS because when you make stuff up, there aren't any sources.

[PVMonger]

LOL. Stanford University professor of medicine Jay Bhattacharya noted last year that in years to come lockdowns will be looked back upon as the most catastrophically harmful policy in all of history.

The epidemiologist added Every single poor person on the face of the earth has faced some harm, sometimes catastrophic harm, from this lockdown policy, adding that "We will be counting the catastrophic health and psychological harms, imposed on nearly every poor person on the face of the earth, for a generation.

A peer reviewed study by Stanford researchers found that mandatory lockdowns do not provide more benefits to stopping the spread of COVID-19 than voluntary measures such as social distancing.

The researchers found no clear, significant beneficial effect of more restrictive measures on case growth in any country.

As we also previously reported, Academics from Duke, Harvard, and Johns Hopkins have concluded that there could be around a million excess deaths over the next two decades as a result of lockdowns. Kluge's warning matched that of the WHO's special envoy on COVID-19, Dr David Nabarro, who told the Spectator in an interview that world leaders should stop imposing lockdowns as a reflex reaction because they are making poor people an awful lot poorer.

Here's an article from the #1 newspaper in Palo Alto. Palo Alto, for all RethugliKKKans who don't know where California is, is the location of Stanford University. "Other studies have oppositely determined that lockdown orders have saved lives. For instance, a Imperial College London study published in the journal Nature found that some 3. 1 million deaths had been averted due to lockdowns across Europe early on in the pandemic. "This data suggests that without any interventions, such as lockdown and school closures, there could have been many more deaths from Covid-19," said Dr. Samir Bhatt, an author of Imperial College London study. " https://padailypost.com/2021/01/18/s...clear-benefit/.

So even Palo Alto knows (and you obviously don't) that there are just as many "pro lockdown" studies as there are "anti-lockdown" studies. But that wasn't my point as I pointed out in my post. My point (that you obviously missed for lack of reading comprehension) was that RethugliKKKans will always choose the approach that makes them money. RepubliKKKans would be absolutely pro-lockdown if the Orange Buffoon told them to be or if Tucker told them to be or if some study told them to be or whatever. https://theconversation.com/why-nobo...orth-it-161154..

And the Stanford study referred to voluntary measures working. What you failed to point out (probably because you don't know) was that voluntary measures only work if virtually everybody volunteers to do them. Voluntary measures do not work if 35% of the population fails to use them. RethugliKKKans didn't want to do something simple like wear a mask because the Orange Buffoon told you not to wear them. Really? RethugliKKKans are the only political party in history who believes that dying is the best way to win (Jim Jones notwithstanding, but he didn't lead a political party).

[MarquisdeSade1]

I like this "them" thingy.

Like republican women won't suffer from the Roe. Only women with certain party affiliation will suffer. Yay!

67% of American women believe their life will be worse after this travesty.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/america...ll-2022-06-26/

Tribalism at its finest.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/03/u...on-rights.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LI4...lTAQ7a33jVq6Fk

[DramaFree11]

Democrats won't lose control of the Senate at the midterms.

They might even gain one or more seats.

If the Dem. Leadership keeps this up they will lose control of everything and hopefully they will set there party back 10-20 years. Hopefully people will realize this liberal crab does not work. Look at the mess we are in now, (Crime is out of Control, the drug problem is getting worse daily, incredibly high inflation and even higher gas prices), but we do have extreme political correctness. Great job Dem's.

On top of Bidden fighting with Gas Companies, now he is asking gas stations to cut prices, (lose money), to do there part. This is one of is most ridiculous statements. It is very simple, dramatically increases gas production, but the Dem's refuse. They would accomplish 2 things bring down prices and would also put pressure on Putin. Too easy.

[EihTooms]

I like this "them" thingy.

Like republican women won't suffer from the Roe. Only women with certain party affiliation will suffer. Yay!

67% of American women believe their life will be worse after this travesty.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/america...ll-2022-06-26/

Tribalism at its finest.

Yes, I only WISH Harry Reid and the Dems had years ago brilliantly masterminded and dug this colossally politically damaging spear and snake pit for Big Government Everywhere Especially In Your Bedroom Repubs to blunder, stumble, bumble and step into with gusto.

Unfortunately, no, this was all brilliantly engineered by those lovable stable genius Repubs themselves starting with blithering Alzheimer's Reagan, painstakingly constructed by Moscow Mitch and then polished off to a fine finish by none other than "anominus, oranges (origins), Yo! Semite!" Donald J. Trump.

Sadly, the Dems do not deserve credit for this one.

[Chris P]

LOL. Stanford University professor of medicine Jay Bhattacharya noted last year that in years to come lockdowns will be looked back upon as the most catastrophically harmful policy in all of history.

The epidemiologist added Every single poor person on the face of the earth has faced some harm, sometimes catastrophic harm, from this lockdown policy, adding that "We will be counting the catastrophic health and psychological harms, imposed on nearly every poor person on the face of the earth, for a generation.

A peer reviewed study by Stanford researchers found that mandatory lockdowns do not provide more benefits to stopping the spread of COVID-19 than voluntary measures such as social distancing.

The researchers found no clear, significant beneficial effect of more restrictive measures on case growth in any country.

As we also previously reported, Academics from Duke, Harvard, and Johns Hopkins have concluded that there could be around a million excess deaths over the next two decades as a result of lockdowns. Kluge's warning matched that of the WHO's special envoy on COVID-19, Dr David Nabarro, who told the Spectator in an interview that world leaders should stop imposing lockdowns as a reflex reaction because they are making poor people an awful lot poorer.

The devastating effects of the lockdowns will last for generations to come. Perhaps forever, unless we take the major social upheavals necessary to restore our liberties.

Millennia-old basic freedoms and norms were destroyed. Since time immemorial people have had the right to go out for a walk in public spaces; children have congregated with others for education and conditioning. Now we are seeing small children whose development is massively stunted during these important formative years, and whose immune systems have not gained the vital exposure to bugs that others have throughout history.

The vast majority of people have been impoverished, weakened and rendered less free by this. One can only conclude that that was the plan, as the likes of Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab have pretty much stated.

[Chris P]

Exactly. When the vaccine was first given, it met the FDA's criteria. When the effectiveness of the vaccine plunged below 50%, the vaccine really should have been pulled off the market or at least called experimental. To me, if people wanted to take it at that point, if they gave informed consent, that would have been fine, but that is not what happened. The vaccine was mandated. Worse, new criteria were used for effectiveness and the control group which is supposed to be identical or as close as possible to the treated group was just pulled out of thin air. It was the unscientific unvaxxed versus vaxxed.

And then there were no control groups at all for the third and fourth vaccine. There were also no double blind studies done on the newer variants. Even though the vaccine was made for the alpha variant, we were just told to pretend it was as good for the newer variants even though we knew that was not true.

You remember the comparisons of the Covid vaccine to the polio vaccine?

Polio was once one of the most feared diseases in the USA In the early 1950's, before polio vaccines were available, polio outbreaks caused more than 15,000 cases of paralysis each year. Following introduction of vaccinesspecifically, trivalent inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) in 1955 and trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) in 1963 the number of polio cases fell rapidly to less than 100 in the 1960's and fewer than 10 in the 1970's.

Now look here, https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/.

Do you see any difference in death rates and case rates since the vaccine was developed?

Based on the shape of the graphs, and if you did not know when the vaccines were developed and deployed, can you tell when the vaccine was widely deployed?

I sure as hell cannot, but I sure as hell can with polio. You literally have to dive deep into the data to show any benefit at all, but the reason the vaccine was approved, a 95% decrease in transmission, is totally gone. All other claims of benefit have not been scientifically proven. All you have are claims of benefit and unknown risk. No one can make an accurate risk-benefit assessment of the vaccine right now unless you are a Democrat. Then you know.

It is funny though how Covid even as it hitting 100,000 cases now miraculously is out of the news and all that venom against anti-vaxxers has left the building.

It really is Emperor's New Clothers-tier stuff.

They developed a vaccine for smallpox, based around injecting people with dead smallpox cells, and smallpox went away.

They developed a vaccine for measles, and measles went away.

They developed a vaccine for polio, and polio went away.

They developed a "vaccine" (actually untested RNA-altering fuckery with no long-term safety studies, as we are tragically finding out) for covid. And covid is still just as prevalent as ever.

And yet the fake news media tell you it's a total success, lionise the liar Fauci, and have late night TV skits with dancing needles.

Rather like telling you trannies are women, the border is secure, inflation is caused by Putin, and the world is going to end in ten years, it's yet another example of the complete divergence of the democrat / media / left narrative from factual reality.

[Chris P]

https://stormer-daily.rw/joe-biden-h...riced-hookers/

ROFL. I must admit I kinda admire Hunter. He is a ZFG dude. He wants to smoke crack and bang supermodel-looking hookers in Ukraine, he gets his dad to send him money and probably gets the secret service to ferry over the girls and gear. He wants to bang his dead brother's wife and diddle his nieces, he just does it. He wants to get megabucks kickbacks from China and Ukraine, he just tells them he will fuck their shit up unless they give it to him (with 10% for the big guy) and they do. He wants to shoot some shit up, he illegally obtains a firearm then orders the secret service to get rid of it for him.

He knows that there are no rules if you are related to a top-level democrat, and so he does whatever the fuck he wants with zero consequences. What a life.

[Gino02]

I like this "them" thingy.

Like republican women won't suffer from the Roe. Only women with certain party affiliation will suffer. Yay!

67% of American women believe their life will be worse after this travesty.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/america...ll-2022-06-26/

Tribalism at its finest.

Hahaha republican women are smarter, they don't fuck around without being on pill or without protection. That 67% is by your MSM pollsters hoping for getting a bounce from the failed Buyden actions, just wait till November for real numbers LOL.

[Xpartan]

When they lost the Senate majority, it cost them not just three seats on the court but the Roe ruling, too.

I like this "them" thingy.

Like republican women won't suffer from the Roe. Only women with certain party affiliation will suffer. Yay!

67% of American women believe their life will be worse after this travesty.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/america...ll-2022-06-26/

Tribalism at its finest.

[EihTooms]

Dems should read this article:

"So you say you want a revolution? You can count me out" (https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...out/ar-AAZ6Qc0).

"The current composition of the court is due to Democrats killing the filibuster rule on Supreme Court nominations despite warnings that it would cost Democrats dearly. When they lost the Senate majority, it cost them not just three seats on the court but the Roe ruling, too. Now, with predictions of Democrats losing both houses, Biden is calling to end the legislative filibuster. It is akin to the Titanic's captain spotting the iceberg and immediately ordering the lifeboats to be burned."

It took just a 7 second Google Search and the very first result to thoroughly debunk Turley and your contention that it was Harry Reid and the Dems and not Moscow Mitch and the Repubs who eliminated the filibuster rule on SCOTUS nominees:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...es/3573369001/