Thread: Stupid shit in Medellin
+
Add Report
Results 2,701 to 2,715 of 7280
-
07-15-22 01:40 #4580
Posts: 675Originally Posted by Paulie97 [View Original Post]
-
07-15-22 01:01 #4579
Posts: 3304Originally Posted by MrEnternational [View Original Post]
-
07-15-22 00:21 #4578
Posts: 1816Originally Posted by Nounce [View Original Post]
Why do they get under my skin? Bcos I am me and you are you, and we have had this part of the discussion before. .
-
07-14-22 23:58 #4577
Posts: 1680Well
Originally Posted by JustTK [View Original Post]
-
07-14-22 23:40 #4576
Posts: 2958Originally Posted by JustTK [View Original Post]
-
07-14-22 23:28 #4575
Posts: 675Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
Lesson #1: You don't win points in an argument by calling the other person (or side) childish names. All it does is suggests that you are losing the argument and are frustrated. Intelligent adults learn to make their points and support them. Pulling your "facts" out of thin air or with "non substantial support" and then calling the other side names if they don't agree is so high-school.
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
Naturally you wanted to start a fight about it but you've been unable to acquit yourself creditably (because you were wrong) and you've tried to pivot to everything else under the sun.
Understandable. But remember. You started this.
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]Originally Posted by Villainy [View Original Post]
Lesson #2: A question by definition can't be a lie. It may be deceptive, it may be inappropriate it may be a lot of things. But it can't be a lie.
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
I'm sure your new story is that you bought them at exactly the lowest point a few weeks before and that is how you got to 40%.
Why would I have doubts??
1. If you are such a partisan (and we all know you are) then you would have bought them at the beginning of Biden's presidency. On inauguration day. But NO. You waited a year and 3 months to exactly the time when the market started falling. Not a chance you're Monday morning quarterbacking is there? Hmmm??
2. I don't know the size of your portfolio but for your entire portfolio to be up 40% you would have had to put everything into those inverse ETFs. Those ETFs use options to create enormous leverage. Leverage cuts both ways. You can make big gains and you can lose big also. No one in their right mind would put everything they own into something that by definition is super risky. Unless your "portfolio" is so small that big percentage losses wouldn't mean anything to you.
3. Posting something whereby you claim you made the purchases after the fact isn't exactly compelling evidence. Send me your brokerage statements for the last 3 months with your name and address and account number redacted and then I might actually believe you. But I have a feeling you can't (not won't but can't).
This was Lesson #3 BTW. Saying something in a forum on the internet doesn't make it true. Show me or blow me.
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
Now Sri Lanka has relevance? BTW It was called Ceylon when I was a teenager collecting stamps. I didn't care about Ceylon then either.
That was Lesson #4: Don't introduce Sri Lanka into the middle of any argument. Guaranteed no one thinks that makes a compelling point.
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
Second of all, investing doesn't mean you don't ever have losses. It means over time your portfolio grows consistently.
Third, you want to compare a 2 1/2 month result. Do you think you're a better investor than Warren Buffett? I bet your claimed 40% gain is a lot better than he did over the last 2 1/2 months.
But do you want to compare your record with his over the last 20 years? I will give you a break. I bet my 20 year record is a lot better than yours. But mine sure isn't as good as Buffett's.
That was Lesson #5. 2 1/2 month results are meaningless for comparative purposes. Investment performance is measured over years sometimes decades but not weeks.
Now, as to the pictures you posted. Are those your girl friend? Or someone you saw? I don't find her attractive at all. I think she's fu**ing stunning. Send her my way jajajajaja.
-
07-14-22 23:18 #4574
Posts: 1816Originally Posted by Nounce [View Original Post]
"Do you ever get mad at someone on the internet that you have never met?
If so, yes!! Here, Facebook, Whatsapp groups. Hell, it's the bane of social media, isn't it? People can just be arrogant AR $3 holes and think they can get away w it.
-
07-14-22 20:26 #4573
Posts: 2958Originally Posted by JustTK [View Original Post]
-
07-14-22 17:54 #4572
Posts: 1816Originally Posted by Nounce [View Original Post]
-
07-14-22 17:23 #4571
Posts: 15986Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
-
07-14-22 17:10 #4570
Posts: 2958Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
-
07-14-22 04:03 #4569
Posts: 3304Originally Posted by Villainy [View Original Post]
This is when I made fun of you all and made my 10 rules of the Medellin forum. Among the rules, there is no objective criteria for beauty and if you pay more than 30 k, you are overpaying. Nounce got mad at my rules. He actually made non-specific compliments about my women, but he was the only one in your crew who even ventured out a little bit and called these women anything more than average.
And after you jealous, pathetic dumb shit douches called these women average, I had like a dozen guys PM me for their numbers.
That is why I considered putting up a photo of someone else and calling her my gal just to see you douches call her average and unattractive.
And V, anyone who looks at your history can see probably half your posts are negative comments towards me. You are not capable of being objective with anything with me, and you are a liar. You want a lie? Here you go.
Originally Posted by Villainy [View Original Post]
http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/...eply&p=2719562
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
And besides accusing me of lying, you say this.
Originally Posted by Villainy [View Original Post]
There is a really simple way the USA gets to be Sri Lanka. Some dumbshit Dem douches like you and your crew looks at our power, water, and food supply being down 50% and says, "I went to college. My analysis is great. I know what I am doing. The numbers being down were just bad luck. It will turn around. ".
Dramafree asked why can't you guys learn from me. I know why. You dumbshit Democratic douches have swallowed the Kool Aid so badly that anyone right leaning is stupid and not worth listening to.
The reason these women are average looking is they are not on the arm of a Democrat.
And as far as having skill with investing, that is not possible either. It has to be luck. Anytime a Republican does anything well it is luck. It has to be because of how fucking stupid we all are.
So was it a mistake not selling all your stock and buying everything I did?
I already know the answer is no. You would rather be down 50% and have the illusion of thinking you are right than being up 50%, and that makes YOU a narcissist.
-
07-13-22 17:40 #4568
Posts: 5494Originally Posted by FunLuvr [View Original Post]
Every day, everyone does things they don't want to do. You probably don't want to put on that adult diaper every day, but you do it anyway because you know what happens when you forget.
As always, you ignore the content and merely pounce on something your feeble, failing mind sees as a weak point and embarrass yourself (although not as badly as on "no diaper day."
If you think about it, although that requires a skill you've long neglected, doing something you don't want to do often illustrates self control, not the lack thereof. Most people don't want to work, they would rather do other things. According to your understanding anyone who chooses to get drunk instead of going to work is exercising self control.
Shall I go on? If so, put on a fresh diaper, because you're certain to shit yourself again.
-
07-13-22 17:00 #4567
Posts: 675Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
Which sentiment (fear) is moving the Dollar / Peso market? Is it fear of Colombian inflation? Is it fear of an economic slowdown because the Colombian Central Bank has raised rates? Is it fear of what Petro might do despite constitutional protections? Is it fear the Peso will fall further so moving into US Dollar denominated government securities is safer?
Are you getting the concept? Currency markets are moved by a whole host of factors, very rarely only 1. You want it to be all about Petro's presidency because you wanted to argue. You can't change the way the world works because you want to foment a squabble.
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
Fortunately I don't need to take those kinds of obtuse risks. I've invested my whole adult life and I have a very nice retirement. If social security disappears, I'm still extremely comfortable here or in any other country I might choose to live.
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]Originally Posted by Villainy [View Original Post]Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
So tell me where you went to College? Clearly you didn't take finance / banking or statistics courses. You also seem especially lacking in analytical skills. What was your field of study? Or did you even go to college?
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
The real question is why are you trying to diffuse the argument? You claimed that the Colombian Peso was going through an unparalleled devaluation because of Petro's election win. I confronted you the YTD statistics on several South American and other countries currencies as well. The big reveal was that a large number of currencies have suffered similar declines relative to the Dollar YTD. As usual when another of your bombastic blunders gets exposed as the absurdity that it is. You try to pivot to a different argument.
-
07-13-22 10:51 #4566
Posts: 1643Correct
Originally Posted by JjBee62 [View Original Post]
Any single reasonably intelligent person can make his analysis fit the situation with superficial plausibility, after the fact. There are as many different versions of that as there are analysts. Hate to break it to ya' gently but this is just another form of mental masturbation.