Thread: American Politics
+
Add Report
Results 4,321 to 4,335 of 14501
-
09-15-22 09:57 #10181
Posts: 1136Bothsidesism that lies with dogs...
Originally Posted by JustTK [View Original Post]
However, it obvious to many of us here, as to why your "bothsidesism" politics is seen as QAnon/Repubs dogma. Your posts are self-evident, no explanation need, for those who see clearly past any Repub rhetoric/dogma dressed up as "bothsidesism".
Let me put it like this. Wrongly or rightly, perhaps it's simply a case of, "He that lies with the dogs, riseth with fleas".
And BTW, me saying you have something in common with dogs and fleas, by no means, I'm I trying to insult you or call you names.
Originally Posted by JustTK [View Original Post]
-
09-15-22 05:52 #10180
Posts: 5510No, I don't believe in spurious correlations
Originally Posted by Tiny12 [View Original Post]
The POTUS runs for election on a set of largely economic propositions. In addition to Executive Orders, they then present that agenda to Congress, often outlining specific details to be included in a budget and tax policy. They can and often do lobby individual members of Congress to move legislation negotiations in the direction they want. When placed on their desk they can and often do request a revision to legislation before signing or exercise their veto powers.
Add the incomparable Presidential Bully Pulpit and Fed Chair appointments and a POTUS can easily be more responsible for the economic direction and results than any other federal entity.
The most common denominator in the major economic downturns and job losses of at least the past 100 years is the Party that was in the White House when it started. It was the Repub Party. Every time.
The most common denominator in starting the major economic expansions and jobs creation during that same timeframe has also been the Party in the White House. It was the Dem Party. Every time.
You think that is a spurious correlation?
I used to think the same thing. Pre Reagan. I was an ignorant, ill-informed Bothsider back then. I even stupidly voted for Reagan in 1980. Yes, I was that ignorant and ill-informed.
In my defense, we did not have nearly the consistent pattern to review and consider in 1980. Sure, we had Hoover's Great Repub Depression, Eisenhower's triple Recessions and one of the worst jobs creation records ever. Not really enough data to come to an inevitable and unavoidable conclusion.
However, by the middle of Reagan's first term and noting every Repub vs Dem results before and since over the past century, whooboy, it is now impossible to ignore; Economic disaster, huge balooning deficits accomplishing nothing and skyrocketing unemployment and / or massive job destruction is the Repub Party / s agenda and goal. It must be. No other way to explain the pattern. They can't all be that blundering and incompetent, can they?
You know, it turns out not every player at a crap table has their chips placed on the Pass Line or the Come Bar banking on the shooter to make his point rather than not making it and crapping out. So too it turns out one of the major Parties does not see economic success for the country as its ticket to election victory, power and personal wealth. If they did, they would all be Dems and govern that way.
Besides, wiping out millions of jobs and flushing billions and trillions down the shitter with nothing to show for it is so much easier than creating millions of jobs and improving people's lives for the money. The latter is hard work and you really need to know what you're doing. With little glory and reward for it. It requires a rare dedication to Public Service. So that's why lazy, increasingly addle-brained former Dems like Reagan and Trump switched to the Repub Party when they pursued a career in politics.
-
09-15-22 05:15 #10179
Posts: 2344Originally Posted by JustTK [View Original Post]
Your question was irrelevant.
-
09-15-22 04:48 #10178
Posts: 5510Momentum. When it counts. Previously, that is.
For the first time since last year the FUX News Poll shows Dems have surged ahead of Repubs on the Generic Congressional Ballot question, 44% to 41%, a huge swing in their favor since April, June and July:
https://www.pollingreport.com/2022.htm
And, yes, the Dem advantage momentum continues in the Poll of Polls version of that question on the RealClearPolitics and FiveThirtyEight sites.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...vote-7361.html
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com...eneric-ballot/
Now, it should be pointed out that kind of momentum only mattered in the past before the Repub Party decided their one and only current and future potential winning election "platform" and campaign strategy is to pack state and local ballot collecting and vote counting entities with Big Liars, Election Denying Repub QAnon loons proud and loud about their intentions to announce Repubs as the "winners" of every election going forward no matter what the actual votes were.
So that's a problem.
-
09-15-22 02:28 #10177
Posts: 1822Originally Posted by ScatManDoo [View Original Post]
-
09-15-22 02:20 #10176
Posts: 1807Originally Posted by CaliGuy [View Original Post]
Besides, Trump is so much more entertaining. I find myself watching a lot more MSNBC and CNN these days than Fox, for that reason, their coverage of Trump.
-
09-15-22 02:13 #10175
Posts: 1807Originally Posted by PVMonger [View Original Post]
-
09-15-22 02:08 #10174
Posts: 1807Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
"On a year-over-year basis, headline PPI increased 8. 7%, a substantial pullback from the 9. 8% rise in July and the lowest annual gain since August 2021. ". So I guess you could have just as well said, "Wholesale prices rose 8.7% in August amid inflation fears."
Yes, gasoline prices are down from their peak. Grocery prices are up 13.5% YoY though. Scott Brave, lead consumer-spending analyst at market research company Morning Consult says, "We have yet to see a peak in food inflation. And the longer that goes on, the higher it gets, the more difficult it becomes for lower-income individuals in particular to afford those price increases. ". The workingman's being left behind.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/we...ar-11663097731
To be fair, I'm busting your balls. The CPI on a MoM basis in August was only up 0.1%, and was flat in July from the previous month. Previously, since 10/31/2020, it had been running in the 0.6% to 1.3% range except for April. So maybe inflation is about to moderate. The market didn't like what it saw yesterday though, with the Dow down about 1200 points. I suspect that's because most of the decline in CPI was from gasoline prices, and other items kept rising. I'm not sure whether those numbers are seasonally adjusted.
-
09-15-22 01:59 #10173
Posts: 1807Slap some lipstick on that pig Joe
Originally Posted by CaliGuy [View Original Post]
-
09-15-22 00:51 #10172
Posts: 1807Originally Posted by PVMonger [View Original Post]
How could you possibly maintain the shots were ineffective? They were 95% effective at preventing infection before COVID started mutating. And 75% to 85% effective against hospitalization and death since.
I clearly said that Trump didn't set a good example and should have done more to encourage people to wear masks and social distance.
That said, you apparently don't understand the mentality of hard core Trump supporters. I do. I live and work among them. Trump won the county where I live by a 60% margin. The plurality of residents here are Hispanics and the majority people of color, so you can't attribute that to this place being a hotbed of white nationalism.
They are not sheep. Most were not going to base their decisions as to whether to wear a mask on Donald Trump. Trying to get some to wear masks would be akin to trying to take their guns. A lot didn't get vaccinated, even though Trump was encouraging that, the initial shots anyway.
The majority of the Trumpsters don't do what Trump tells them to. Rather, Trump does what they want him to. Trump in his heart is a Democrat. Earlier on, when he was a registered Democrat, he implied he had no problem with partial birth abortion. And he favored a wealth tax, like what Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have proposed. When Republicans were formulating the 2017 TCJA (the tax cut act), Trump wanted to raise taxes on higher earners. He probably figured that would win him votes in 2020, and since he doesn't pay income taxes anyway, it was no sweat off of his back. Gary Cohn, a Democrat and his chief economic advisor, had to talk him out of it. He said something like, "Mr. President, you can't raise taxes. You're a Republican. " Trump just basically says whatever he thinks will help him with Republican voters. If he hadn't changed parties and had run for president as a Democrat, he would have said and done things that were pleasing to Democrats. You might have been one of his supporters, but I doubt it, you seem too smart.
Onto PPE. Yes PPE was in short supply in the months after COVID hit. But by December of 2020, I could buy KN95 masks in large quantities for $0. 27 a piece. (I checked the ads in my email.) And the majority of deaths in the USA occurred after 2020, after Biden came into office. The Biden administration didn't do very much with masks. To much fanfare, it distributed 25 million around February of 2021. Then it waited until the first part of 2022, after Omicron had hit, to make another 400 million available to Americans. Yeah, I agree with you, Biden didn't do a very good job with that. It's refreshing to hear you actually say something negative about the leader of your tribe.
And the tests. Yes, like Tooms and the economy, I guess you can blame the CDC's failure to provide tests early in the epidemic on the Republicans. Well, at least Trump had an excuse. He didn't want a lot of tests out there because he figured that would make the official number of COVID cases higher, and that would reflect badly on his administration. The public health bureaucracy and / or the Biden administration in 2021 and the first part of this year were just incompetent. You couldn't find tests when Omicron hit. And tests are important. You test positive and you staid home. Or if you're at risk of hospitalization from pre-existing conditions, you got monoclonal antibody treatment, or now Paxlovid. But tests were nowhere to be found.
As to detergent, HCQ, etc. , I agree. That was pretty stupid. I don't recall Ivermectin being discussed during Trump's time in office. I don't doubt that they're saying that on MSNBC though, as it fits into the theory that all Trumpsters are sheep.
Apologies, I'll get around to your other replies when I get some time.
-
09-15-22 00:39 #10171
Posts: 428MSNBC and CNN
Originally Posted by Canada [View Original Post]
-
09-15-22 00:29 #10170
Posts: 2344Originally Posted by JustTK [View Original Post]
A child becomes her burden to bear, so she deserves her choice.
Pro Choice.
-
09-15-22 00:28 #10169
Posts: 428Still Trump
Originally Posted by PVMonger [View Original Post]
-
09-15-22 00:11 #10168
Posts: 1807Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
Well, if you believe in spurious correlations, you should go all in and put all your savings in USA Stock index futures. Every year in January, if an NFC team wins, go long, and if an AFC team wins, go short.
The primary determinant of whether the economy performs well or poorly over a 4 or 8 year period is whether the USA went through a recession. If you kick out the recessions and the recoveries, I bet you wouldn't see much of a correlation between GDP growth or real household income or whatever and the party of the president. There are exceptions, like Reagan's second term, Clinton's second term, and, for median household income and wages (but not GDP), 2019. Please note that, perhaps coincidentally, no one party controlled government during these periods. The presidency and at least the House were controlled by different parties.
So, when you boil it all down, the question is when were the recessions? You're clearly blaming COVID and the 2020 recession solely on Trump. You appear to be blaming the collapse of the housing market and the consequent 2008/2009 recession solely on George W. Bush. As well as the collapse of the internet boom. George H. W. Bush is responsible for the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait and the subsequent increase in oil prices. And then of course there was the most diabolical of Republicans, Ronald Reagan. He too was responsible for high energy prices. And stagflation and the Fed's actions to control it.
It's so simple isn't. It's like you said, they're Republicans, and "that is what they do for a living. It is the only thing they do, know how to do and want to do. " Nuke the economy. Satan has hardened their hearts.
As to economic performance during COVID, when Trump was president, we can look at how other countries did, comparatively. Here's YoY GDP growth at 12/31/2020 for the five largest developed countries in the world:
USA: -2. 3%.
Japan: -4. 68%.
Germany: -3. 70%.
France: -7. 8%.
UK: -9. 28%.
And as to Trump being a liar, yeah, he's a big liar, even by the standards of politicians. We agree on that.
I haven't forgotten your other posts. I'll be back with you on those - it's pretty busy with work.
-
09-14-22 22:22 #10167
Posts: 1822Originally Posted by Spidy [View Original Post]