Rants and WTF are you talking about and Coronavirus!

[Pistons]

Mark my words when I say it will have a target value of 100 $ per share in the next 15 months! That is up about 120% from their current value!

1000 $ and up 145%.

[Escape Artist]

You are so dumb, the majority of your post is pure ramblings. Never have I said degrees make anyone into anything. I have actually stated the exact opposite here several times. And I turn it into a joke time after time.

Your degree still makes you useless. That must hurt like hell!

Clear example pf a man who can't even see his own inconsistencies.

This guy who repetitively makes posts on subjects which no one cares as evident by no one ever actually responding. You think someone who claims to be some communications expert would actually have people skills, or at the very least read one's audience. Dunce.

[Pistons]

Once every year or two I find a stock that is a complete no brainer to buy.

Two years ago it was ASML. It went up 40% before I coined the day it started falling again. And I coined the transfer over to buying energy stocks.

Now we have reached the end of energy stocks growing on behalf of the IT downselling. And it is time to return to the IT sector for the best gains.

Nvidia has been the greatest player so far the past 9 months. But in percentage growth the train might have left.

However, the no brainer company to buy right now is kinda on the backs of Nvidia, and is still down 50% from its heights almost 2 years ago.

It is Adobe Systems!

Mark my words when I say it will have a target value of 100 $ per share in the next 15 months! That is up about 120% from their current value!

[Pistons]

Umm, no, it doesn't at all. This claim doesn't even make logical sense. Facepalm emoji.

Your IQ is lower than a worm. Must be tough.

[Pistons]

Careful, your revisionist tendency keeps cementing your future of becoming your cycling, race car driving father here.

Kinda ironic to reference degrees as a measure usefulness coming from someone who seems to take a cliche position on institutional education. Even more absurd coming from someone who studied "communications" over half a decade. Even more ironic when individual is so terrible at communicating.

Most people I knew in college who studied "communications" were not the most book smart but were actually generally sociable and attractive people who were probably able to salvage a useless field with their natural attributes. Must be terrible to be the oddball who has neither of the latter attributes.

Sorry that I used so many 3 syllable words. You can get through it, just have an adult help you read it.

You are so dumb, the majority of your post is pure ramblings. Never have I said degrees make anyone into anything. I have actually stated the exact opposite here several times. And I turn it into a joke time after time.

It is a communication trick to make people fooled into thinking their education defines them. A brainwashing technique in order to label people by which brainwashing books dealing with which agenda the communication masters can put the sheeps into.

You don't even know that people at the 1990 WEF meeting discussed adding toxins into most 'medicines' supplied to the entire world. In order to kill people, or at least cripple them. Especially infant vaccination programs. And you seem to think you are helping people. Fool!

[Escape Artist]

It is tough to know if you are really as retarded as you consistently appear in this forum or intentionally dumb your comments down for some weird purpose. You have no fucking clue what a cartel even means and hence copy pasting dictionary which you don't understand followed by a bunch of typical MurseShit. Have it your way. You do have to get paid for your troll farm posts, so I guess that makes sense in some universe.

According to your recent assessments, I'm a drug dealer who doesn't know what a cartel is. Appreciate the irony dumb dumb.

[Escape Artist]

Not really. But this shows how unscientific it is.

Umm, no, it doesn't at all. This claim doesn't even make logical sense. Facepalm emoji.

[Escape Artist]

- I had to lecture you on Crispr.

- I had to lecture you on covid-vaccine issues.

- I had to lecture you on side effects.

Your degree still makes you useless. That must hurt like hell!

Careful, your revisionist tendency keeps cementing your future of becoming your cycling, race car driving father here.

Kinda ironic to reference degrees as a measure usefulness coming from someone who seems to take a cliche position on institutional education. Even more absurd coming from someone who studied "communications" over half a decade. Even more ironic when individual is so terrible at communicating.

Most people I knew in college who studied "communications" were not the most book smart but were actually generally sociable and attractive people who were probably able to salvage a useless field with their natural attributes. Must be terrible to be the oddball who has neither of the latter attributes.

Sorry that I used so many 3 syllable words. You can get through it, just have an adult help you read it.

[Pistons]

Not to mention that he inserted his own personal belief in the end while mischievously attributing it as a statement made by the author. You can easily forgive ignorant people because, by definition, they just don't know any better. The worst people however are the ones who knowingly, or perhaps even pathologically, create false realities and push it onto others. Numerous people fitting the latter category on this forum.

- I had to lecture you on Crispr.

- I had to lecture you on covid-vaccine issues.

- I had to lecture you on side effects.

Your degree still makes you useless. That must hurt like hell!

[Pistons]

That's not how science works.

You can't just choose the findings you like and claim others are fake.

I don't think about Dunning-Kruger a lot but maybe this has been a thorn in your side? You've been told about it a lot, haven't you?

Not really. But this shows how unscientific it is.

[Escape Artist]

Poor analysis as always, not surprising. A cartel always implies some amount of discussion and agreement between cartel members to divvy up the market, control supply, and control the prices in a collusive manner.

I am not aware of any cartels in which the key cartel members do not explicitly have a formal or informal agreement to not only collude but also agree on the terms. Such as who gets how much territory / demand, what the pricing should be and so on.

This article talked about Romanian authorities cracking down on trafficking and making some progress. If that brought down supply (for which no reliable data is available. Pre and post anti trafficking), then I postulated that could have led to a higher trajectory of prices. There were discussions on this board in the past that a potential supply decline (due to a rise in Romanian living standards) could lead to supply limitations and hence price increases. Those did not come to pass yet enough to make an adverse impact but possibly regulatory crackdown did.

And most importantly, none of that implies any existence of a cartel nor their ability to influence prices. This was not a pro active measure by the cartel, let alone that there was a cartel. Govt choked off the supply routes. The alleged cartel did not sit together and agree to limit supply or price at higher level.

Webster:

"Cartel: combination of independent commercial or industrial enterprises designed to limit competition or fix prices. ".

Prices suddenly rose in Fall 2021, not gradually over several months or years.

Pretty sure no one with common sense thinks that each girl coincidentally, independently decided to raise prices because they independently felt an organic shift in the price-supply relationship. Price increase happened rather abruptly and to think that it happened organically without any collusion between individual girls is quite naive.

Neither does the existence of an external stimulus negate collusion. In combination with the choke on supply, the abrupt price increase actually gives more plausibility that there were active measures to raise prices.

Proactively raising prices: no; deliberate reactionary raising prices in unison, yes.

Asserting otherwise is just obviously ignoring the most likely scenario in favor of a much less likely possibility in order to be argumentative for the sake of ego.

[Pessimist]

Poor analysis as always, not surprising. A cartel always implies some amount of discussion and agreement between cartel members to divvy up the market, control supply, and control the prices in a collusive manner.

I am not aware of any cartels in which the key cartel members do not explicitly have a formal or informal agreement to not only collude but also agree on the terms. Such as who gets how much territory / demand, what the pricing should be and so on.

This article talked about Romanian authorities cracking down on trafficking and making some progress. If that brought down supply (for which no reliable data is available. Pre and post anti trafficking), then I postulated that could have led to a higher trajectory of prices. There were discussions on this board in the past that a potential supply decline (due to a rise in Romanian living standards) could lead to supply limitations and hence price increases. Those did not come to pass yet enough to make an adverse impact but possibly regulatory crackdown did.

And most importantly, none of that implies any existence of a cartel nor their ability to influence prices. This was not a pro active measure by the cartel, let alone that there was a cartel. Govt choked off the supply routes. The alleged cartel did not sit together and agree to limit supply or price at higher level.

But anyway, none of this matters. Your intent as always is to be a destructive gadfly, bring up the CCP trollfarm talking points and generally show that you continue to be a useless, shit eating pest. Any detailed explanation will be called mental gymnastics; even a two syllable word is mental gymnastics to a retard like you. Then the conversation meanders into a series of time wasting nonsense. Which for you is ok because you get paid a couple of remnimbi per thousand messages by MacShitBing.

[Sirioja]

Thank you for the entertainment, it's funny when you are doubling down.

There is no Gran San Bernardino. I understand it's (Gran San Bernardo vs San Bernardino) an easy mistake to make when having bad eye sight and just driving through. Of course if you actually cycle there, you can't confuse them.

Great St Bernard (FR: Col du Grand St-Bernard, IT: Colle del Gran San Bernardo) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_St_Bernard_Pass..

Little St Bernard (FR: Col du Petit Saint-Bernard, IT: Colle del Piccolo San Bernardo) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_St_Bernard_Pass..

San Bernardino (IT: Passo del San Bernardino): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Bernardino_Pass..

First two are named after Bernard of Menthon (1020-1081) founder of the hospice at Great St Bernard.

Third one is named after Bernardino of Siena (1380-1444).

Once again, take your expensive bicycle with electric gears to help you and come to climb with me on my bicycle with mechanical manual gears, when you want, same like I chose V8 S5 with manual gearbox, when V6 compressor with tiptronic would never resist, if you want to come to play in Germany, compare to swiss snails. Truth is in the steep and on autobahns with everything jumping so fast in your face, then obvious if you know race techniques or not. Bugatti are high quality, high performing, but not sporty and I doubt some try to put over the grip more than 1800 kgs inerty, when I feel how S5 is so heavy, fortunately with great mechanical quattro, when Audi lost this quality now.

[PaulInZurich]

Al those who are able to push to limit of grip.

Well, you are not one of those since you were never on a race track. Passing a grandma on her way to Aldi doesn't count as car racing.

shit Haldex

So "top level number 1 Bugatti" , "Bugatti which are the highest level cars", "Bugatti which have no competitor" is using "shit Haldex". So the cars that you praise so much use shit all wheel drive by Haldex. Got it.

[PaulInZurich]

Gran San Bernardino, you know between Wallis and Aosta, up to 2425 high?

Thank you for the entertainment, it's funny when you are doubling down.

There is no Gran San Bernardino. I understand it's (Gran San Bernardo vs San Bernardino) an easy mistake to make when having bad eye sight and just driving through. Of course if you actually cycle there, you can't confuse them.

Great St Bernard (FR: Col du Grand St-Bernard, IT: Colle del Gran San Bernardo) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_St_Bernard_Pass..

Little St Bernard (FR: Col du Petit Saint-Bernard, IT: Colle del Piccolo San Bernardo) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_St_Bernard_Pass..

San Bernardino (IT: Passo del San Bernardino): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Bernardino_Pass..

First two are named after Bernard of Menthon (1020-1081) founder of the hospice at Great St Bernard.

Third one is named after Bernardino of Siena (1380-1444).