Stupid Shit in Brazil

[Arthasboi]

Confusion about prices and services.

Hey guys. I'm planning a trip to brasil, and I want to state this so you know what kind of monger I am. I like to get the most service for the least amount of money. That being BBBJ with a hottie or BBFS / anal etc for as little money as possible. As I understand it, a 'boate' is some kind of nightclub? I've read alot about the Scandelo place and it looks like American prices with better service, so that might be a once in a lifetime thing for me. For context, I've cruised the streets of kensington, philadelphia.

I'm not about getting with extremely hot women unless its price appropriate. So for a street girl in RIO or SP, would 20 USD generally cover me for these services? I monger in Tijuana usually, so most of my experience is $20 USD street for basic prices and then up it for the services that I want, when offered.

I see some wild reports on the brasilian side of how much money people are paying. I'm planning a trip that will last likely 2 weeks in brasil, so I'm thinking one week each in SP and RIO. I'm familiar with using translators and negotiating with the girls, but there are a lot of acronymns used here that seem different for me, like GPS. That is 'golden pussy syndrom' ie. A girl charging a lot of money, but its used differently here.

Also I've read a lot of stories in Colombia of hiring non-pros after getting to know them. Does that work here in Brasil too? Are almost all local non-pros expecting 'gifts' or straight cash? I'm not a wealthy person, so you might guess why I only do this when travelling to cheap countries.

Thank you guys for any help offered!

[Xpartan]

I'm off to Brazil in a month, to Rio to be precise. Are there any good sex spots there? I imagine it's not too difficult to find women to fuck?

No. No good spots, no fucking. That era is gone. Nowadays, Brazilian women are shy and rather puritanical, and they only make love to their husbands about once a month.

[Did1972]

I'm off to Brazil in a month, to Rio to be precise. Are there any good sex spots there? I imagine it's not too difficult to find women to fuck?

[MaddTraveler]

How am I being defensive when there is nothing for me to defend against? Seems you are the one being defensive since you have to call people names and stuff. It is you that is coming to the conclusion as to why certain women will not date an older age group is due to something psychological deep inside of them instead of admitting that maybe it is just not their thing and they maybe just do not like old ass men. I tend to not worry about the people that do not want to date me and what could possibly be their reasons, and focus on the ones that do. Everything is not for everybody. So what is your reason for not dating old ass women? I am sure it is nothing derogatory or offensive.

Everyone on ISG knows you always jump into every discussion pretending you know it all, always correcting people. You basically said the same thing I said, we're not even in disagreement but you can't help it. You assumed when I mentioned some girls in some areas are more picky (arrogant) vs others I meant that as a bad thing or I'm disapointed. First, I am young and wasnt referring to me, it was just a general state or "in parentheses" info. Or maybe you just didn't like the way I worded it. I write in a way to entertain, to sound extreme at times but I do my best to write accurate info. But your comments wasnt to debate or disagree on the main point; you just want to elaborate and to correct in your own way. Like your word is final or the way to say shit is what's final. You didn't have to explain why some girls don't want old ass men. LOL. You are not in their heads, you're not their pimps, dads, so how would you know why? We can all assume, that's it. But what I said remains true, and what you said confirms that it is still true regardless. See my point so far? You said nothing new or useful.

[Vagabundo1]

Maybe I am the wrong person -- definitely, I am the wrong person to say this, but.

IMHO, MaddTraveler has shared some super helpful information on the board, especially about blue house and paris and recreio.

We have to take the good with bad as to the information we get on this board and through interacting with board members.

That said, mr e is our most prolific poster for a reason, he's almost always right.

Just trying to see and value from both mr e and madd traveler.

How am I being defensive when there is nothing for me to defend against? Seems you are the one being defensive since you have to call people names and stuff. It is you that is coming to the conclusion as to why certain women will not date an older age group is due to something psychological deep inside of them instead of admitting that maybe it is just not their thing and they maybe just do not like old ass men. I tend to not worry about the people that do not want to date me and what could possibly be their reasons, and focus on the ones that do. Everything is not for everybody. So what is your reason for not dating old ass women? I am sure it is nothing derogatory or offensive.

[Mr Enternational]

Are you a Colombian with a vagina? Why get so defensive? Arrogance doesn't have to be a derogatory term or offensive.

How am I being defensive when there is nothing for me to defend against? Seems you are the one being defensive since you have to call people names and stuff. It is you that is coming to the conclusion as to why certain women will not date an older age group is due to something psychological deep inside of them instead of admitting that maybe it is just not their thing and they maybe just do not like old ass men. I tend to not worry about the people that do not want to date me and what could possibly be their reasons, and focus on the ones that do. Everything is not for everybody. So what is your reason for not dating old ass women? I am sure it is nothing derogatory or offensive.

[Vagabundo1]

I concur Mr E.

Maybe they don't like old ass men, to which I would add.

Men who don't speak brazilian carioca portoguese, which has lots of pronunciation nuance.

I mean, I do speak portoguese but every day, I slam into the language barrier.

I teach at a you, but my seniors tell me I need better formal porto.

To which I say, fine, I work on it with fine ass college girl tutors smoking weed at the liberal fraternity sorority, and manage my money and then catch a bus to centro and fuk hoars for 30 usd, two pops one hour 75 r cost per fuck, making most weekdays, a nice combination of being a dirty old man professor like clint eastwood in eiger sanction and the main character from the great novel.

Marquez, memories of my meloncholy hoars.

Had to use the hoar spellling to avoid getting whacked by the change machine.

Or maybe they just do not like old ass men. It does not mean they have arrogance and pride when they reject something they do not like or want. Or is it that arrogance and pride are what is holding you back from living with an 80 year old woman?

[MaddTraveler]

Or maybe they just do not like old ass men. It does not mean they have arrogance and pride when they reject something they do not like or want. Or is it that arrogance and pride are what is holding you back from living with an 80 year old woman?

Are you a Colombian with a vagina? Why get so defensive? Arrogance doesn't have to be a derogatory term or offensive. I just spent 8 mos in Col and when I brought it up to women there they admit that it is true. Personally I prefer to date those women which are all my exes. Sassy attitude and all. Cause that's strength and pride and they're usually loyal and don't fall for games. Instead of having an input about the main point of my post, which was pointing out that older gents can find more humble wives in certain places you just picked one line to argue. This is something sensitive and emotionally damaged women do. LOL. They'll take one word from a subject to cry about another topic. If you read some prior posts I've defended women countless of times here. This is just the truth and again wasn't stated as an attack. Chill and calm your tits my dude.

[Mr Enternational]

DR and Thailand are the best places for 60+ mongers since those women don't have an issue to have a real relationship with you, like living together. Much harder to find that in Col or Bra since they're more sophisticated with arrogance and pride.

Or maybe they just do not like old ass men. It does not mean they have arrogance and pride when they reject something they do not like or want. Or is it that arrogance and pride are what is holding you back from living with an 80 year old woman?

[Spidy]

Yikes!

It seems, the latest Godzilla x King Kong movie, has Rio de Janeiro being destroyed. Should be an interesting watch!

Can't wait to see, which iconic landmarks are destroyed. Hopefully, gonna be FUN to watch!!

Godzilla X Kong: The New Empire Trailer (2024)
https://youtu.be/5wyqrlkF1Cs

Rio destrudo em cena de novo filme com King Kong e Godzilla; veja vdeo
https://diariodorio.com/rio-e-destru...la-veja-video/

Viva Rio?

[Mr Enternational]

I didn't really understand your question but you got your facts mixed up a bit. First Taquara is a part of the Jacarepagu region. In the Jacarepagu region there are several favelas, like the famous one Cidade de Deus.

I was about to say the same damn thing Nevertheless, I still did not understand what he is asking.

[Sperto]

What separates a family who lives in a favela vs one that lives in say Jacarapaga or Taquara or Maracana areas from an economic and educational standpoint? Educational meaning that in a perfect scenerio, young Bruno goes to college for accounting, later becomes an accountant, and uses his salary to rent in a decent apt before moving to the suburbs and starting a family.

I didn't really understand your question but you got your facts mixed up a bit. First Taquara is a part of the Jacarepaguá region. In the Jacarepaguá region there are several favelas, like the famous one Cidade de Deus. It's a bit strange to compare a favela to Jacarepaguá region. The Jacarepaguá region is more violent and problematic than many favelas, E. G Praça Seca have shootings regularly between milicia and bandits or police.

[FlappyGilmore0]

What separates a family who lives in a favela vs one that lives in say Jacarapaga or Taquara or Maracana areas from an economic and educational standpoint? Educational meaning that in a perfect scenerio, young Bruno goes to college for accounting, later becomes an accountant, and uses his salary to rent in a decent apt before moving to the suburbs and starting a family.

I don't like broaching this topic with Brazilian work colleagues because it's not really appropriate plus they are so touchy when it comes these things.

Hoping one of the long time locals here can just inform with no BS spin.

[Vagabundo1]

I tend to agree Senor Axel.

As Sperto has said, I ignore members like Spidy who do not improve my ISG experience.

That said, there is a political economic topic of use to Brazil and we mongers, namely BRICS+ trends as they impact currency, Foreign Exchange (FX), and legal (immigration) visa etc.

One observation is that since Lul at, the president of Brazil is talking the USD down, and is more hostile to tourists, especially from "the west " (more tourists from Chile, Argentina, etc); and especially about the requirement to submit bank statements for a visa, which my best travel buddies from ' the west ' are citing as a reason not to travel to Brazil this year.

Let's see. I checked your recent posts on ISG. It took me around 30 seconds and guess what? Only 2 out your last 60 posts on the International Sex forum have anything to do with girls or travel. And those 2 posts were not original reports containing any useful information to be passed on to fellow members but were merely thanks for posting types to the original BM's. In other words, less than 3% of your output in the last 3 months have anything to do with mongering and 97% of your posts are political diatribes and personal attacks on anyone who disagrees with you. And so, true to your nature, you attack me for what? Posting an honest film review? Go fxxx yourself little man.

By the way, to put it in context, my mentioning of "White Lotus" came about thanks to an ongoing conversation I was having with another BM who had recommended several books by a famous Brazilian author that happened to have working girls in the story lines. I brought up the work of Federico Fellini, one of the greatest film directors of all time, who had prostitute characters in 4 of his master works including "Nights of Cabiria" (1957) which feature a prostitute with a heart of gold as the main character.

Then to bring conversation back up to the present time, I mentioned and gave a favorable review to White Lotus 2nd season which had 2 delightful Sicilian prostitute characters featured in that story line. But not to mislead anyone, I mentioned that the 1st season of "White Lotus" sucked ie it was not so good due to its "wokeness" because I didn't want to mislead anyone into seeing the 1st season based on my positive review of the 2nd season. Got it? So, instead of attacking me, you should be thanking me for turning you on to "White Lotus" 1st season. The story line is right up your alley. You are welcome, A-hole.

Lastly, do I have to remind you that the name of this forum is the "International Sex Forum" and that its main reason for its existence and popularity is that it provides a space where heterosexual men (mongers) can exchange stories, reviews, trip reports, girly information, insights, and travel info related to OUR favorite sport. The key defining words: sex between heterosexual men (XY) and natural born girls (XX). Hence this website is anti-woke by its very nature. In fact, one of the rules of the ISG is no posts are allowed relating to ladyboys or Trannys, no reports on tranny sex, tranny brothels, massage parlors, escorts or their procurement of any kind. Did you miss the memo?

Obviously, you support the tenants of Wokism since you attack anyone who opposes the Woke doctrine or even mentions Wokism in a passing, negative light. This is very interesting because one of the fundamental tenants of Wokism is that there is no difference between a man and woman. That any man (XY) or boy (XY) can be a woman (XX) or girl (XX) whenever he or she feels like it. Nature has nothing to say on the subject. Nature is irrelevant. KKK. Thus, a man can compete in woman's sports, shower in girl's high school bathrooms, and 3rd parties are encouraged to indoctrinate minors in grade school with this insane ideology and even give minors sex changing hormones at a very early age all without parental approval. It is truly shameful! P.S. The Wokes insist on changing the English vocabulary to eliminate what they consider offensive pronouns like "he" or "she". Did I miss anything?

So once again, I ask, what the fuck is a Woke ideologue believer like yourself doing on the International Sex Forum posting nothing but radical left wing talking points and attacking anyone who disagrees with you? And simultaneously never posting personal trip report or reviews that have anything related to heterosexual mongering? It is a fair question and before you launch another one of your personal attacks at me, I will add that you know nada about me. For all you know, I may have scores of ladyboy sexual romps in my more than 30-year experience in Thailand. 555/ KKK. You know nada. So, I will end this, my final communique to you, with one more fact: when a monger asks a BKK Sukhumvit ladyboy street walker if she is a girl, 99% of the time the ladyboy will say no, she is not a girl. Ha Ha! Ladyboys apparently have a firmer grip on reality than American Wokes.

[Spidy]

By the way, to put it in context, my mentioning of "White Lotus" came about thanks to an ongoing conversation I was having with another BM who had recommended several books by a famous Brazilian author that happened to have working girls in the story lines. I brought up the work of Federico Fellini, one of the greatest film directors of all time, who had prostitute characters in 4 of his master works including "Nights of Cabiria" (1957) which feature a prostitute with a heart of gold as the main character.

Then to bring conversation back up to the present time, I mentioned and gave a favorable review to White Lotus 2nd season which had 2 delightful Sicilian prostitute characters featured in that story line. But not to mislead anyone, I mentioned that the 1st season of "White Lotus" sucked ie it was not so good due to its "wokeness" because I didn't want to mislead anyone into seeing the 1st season based on my positive review of the 2nd season. Got it? So, instead of attacking me, you should be thanking me for turning you on to "White Lotus" 1st season. The story line is right up your alley. You are welcome, A-hole.

Fair enough! However, that ongoing convo w/r to books art and TV-shows..etc, could have, just as easily been placed in the "appropriate" thread, such as General Info. But of course that's my opinion, just like you, exercised your opinion, when you asked of me, to move my "political shit".

Who knows, perhaps next time, I'll interject and politely ask, to move the "artsy" convo, over to a more appropriate forum? Naturally, without categorizing another ISGer/BMs convo/politics or points of view on the subject matter as "shit".

Lastly, do I have to remind you that the name of this forum is the "International Sex Forum" and that its main reason for its existence and popularity is that it provides a space where heterosexual men (mongers) can exchange stories, reviews, trip reports, girly information, insights, and travel info related to OUR favorite sport. The key defining words: sex between heterosexual men (XY) and natural born girls (XX). Hence this website is anti-woke by its very nature. In fact, one of the rules of the ISG is no posts are allowed relating to ladyboys or Trannys, no reports on tranny sex, tranny brothels, massage parlors, escorts or their procurement of any kind. Did you miss the memo?

Obviously, you support the tenants of Wokism since you attack anyone who opposes the Woke doctrine or even mentions Wokism in a passing, negative light. This is very interesting because one of the fundamental tenants of Wokism is that there is no difference between a man and woman. That any man (XY) or boy (XY) can be a woman (XX) or girl (XX) whenever he or she feels like it. Nature has nothing to say on the subject. Nature is irrelevant. KKK. Thus, a man can compete in woman's sports, shower in girl's high school bathrooms, and 3rd parties are encouraged to indoctrinate minors in grade school with this insane ideology and even give minors sex changing hormones at a very early age all without parental approval. It is truly shameful! P.S. The Wokes insist on changing the English vocabulary to eliminate what they consider offensive pronouns like "he" or "she". Did I miss anything?

If just so funny these days, how some people love to classify everything they dislike, are ignorant of, homophobic to, disagree with or don't understand, as "woke". Let's conveniently place everything we can't comprehend or don't care to understand, along with all the "undesirable" people we're intolerant of, into the proverbial "woke box" (or whatever the latest political term is currently being kicked around).

FYI, those on the right, "woke" or is it "anti-work (who can tell?), that are "burning" and banning books and even banning dictionaries (for heavens sake!), I doubt very much, they'd even be able to look-up the word "woke" to know what it means, in all it's forms, definitions and contextual history. Or even look-up the word "sex" or what any "sexual" related words mean, for that matter.

But hey, you seem to have a "lock" on what is "woke" and "anti-work", as it suits your narrative. So good for you, for being so secure in your "wokeness" or lack thereof? I can't decide, which it is YET!

So once again, I ask, what the fuck is a Woke ideologue believer like yourself doing on the International Sex Forum posting nothing but radical left wing talking points and attacking anyone who disagrees with you? And simultaneously never posting personal trip report or reviews that have anything related to heterosexual mongering? It is a fair question and before you launch another one of your personal attacks at me, I will add that you know nada about me. For all you know, I may have scores of ladyboy sexual romps in my more than 30-year experience in Thailand. 555/ KKK. You know nada. So, I will end this, my final communique to you, with one more fact: when a monger asks a BKK Sukhumvit ladyboy street walker if she is a girl, 99% of the time the ladyboy will say no, she is not a girl. Ha Ha! Ladyboys apparently have a firmer grip on reality than American Wokes.

Okay, but not really sure where you're going with this line of thinking? Everything from "Woke Ideologue" to something about posting/not posting according to the world of "Axel Heyst", to personal attacks, and then something about "Ladyboys"? Sorry I didn't grasp the gist of the overall theme of what you were trying to convey, here.

Anywho, I'll attempt an answer:

• First, it's seldom personal for me. Sure certain ISGers get under my skin, at very rare times, but for the most part, it's like water of a duck's back. You'll be hard pressed to find me calling other ISGers/BMs names or throwing profanity at them. Although it has happened on the very odd occasion. But I typically don't make a habit of it.

• Second, you've been here at ISG, long enough to know, what an actual personal attack looks like vs. a disagreement w/r to where conversational content should be "appropriately" placed. So when you use the word "attack" about a half-dozen times, is this you claiming "victimhood"? If so...have at it!
  
  But let me remind you, this is the second (2nd) time you've called me out for "inappropriately" posting to the wrong thread. The first (1st) time, rightly so, since I was trying to make a point, about the inconsistencies of posting "correctly". I knew then somebody was eventually, going to call me out. Coincidentally, it just so happen to be you. The second (2nd) time, I did post in the "appropriate" forum. But again it was YOU, calling me out for said infraction. So was that just a coincident? Or something more at play here?
  
  Don't forget, I did commend you on the first (1st) time.. So hardly the "attacker", you imagine or make me out to be. If I am this big, bad "attacker", you claim, please identify the multitude of times (prior), in posts where I've "attacked" you, in a response to a post of yours? Let alone posted a response to anything of yours, you're posted!
  
  So back to that initial point I was trying to make. It's funny how when ISGers/BMs post pages and pages of off-topic "where-to-find-pussy/sex" stuff like "financial stock/bonds/Forex trades" (even when they do dress it up to sound like sex/pussy talk) or "Real Estate talk" or "Arts-n-craft talk", in the RJ/SP thread, its suddenly okay. However, as soon as a few posts w/r to "political talk" or anything on "views about on race, cultural, or ethnic talk" crops up, it's suddenly, "inappropriate" for the forum/thread.
  
  Again, when we call out other ISGers, it sure would be nice for a change, to have a little consistency. Hence why I called you out for said hypocrisy. And to be clear General Info has always had political content in it, as an appropriate forum/thread. Just check its history!

• Third, the rest of this paragraph on Thailand and "Ladyboys sex romps", interwoven with "American wokes" (whatever that is?), I just wasn't sure what to think. As guess better minds than I, will figure it out?
  
  But it does sound like those are some "happy times" in Thailand...I hope that what I was reading. Thanks for sharing! I'm sure someone will make use of the info.

Finally, by now you should realize, that when you post on an open discussion/debate forum, your written posts/reports/ideas, are going be praised, applauded, congratulated and thanked. And we all love the praise and attention, if and when, it comes our way. But...

At other times NOT so much! As things get contentious, wildly debated, judged, scrutinized and criticized to the nth degree. That is the Nature of the ISG beast, get used to it! If ISGers that want to refute my posts, that's okay with me and I don't get too emotional or take it personally. But to each his own!

Having explained and addressed, that I posted appropriately in the General Info forum and why IMHO, I rightly criticized your post for being hypocritical, would this be a good time to open up a discussion and start totally separate posts here, and REALLY debate the topic of "woke"?

Or should we "appropriately" take it over the the "American Politics" forum, since "woke" is after all an American "political football" and NOT a Brazilian one? But more importantly since we all know, YOU are a very big policing advocate for posting "appropriately" in the "correct" forums/threads, which shall it be?

So to "communique" or NOT to "communique", that is the question?

Okay, the deafening silence of crickets it is then!!! ...Which now put this to bed!!!