Monterrey - UnospongeBob's Reports

[Mill Just]

Uno, is it just me or were you a helluva lot happier and happy-go-lucky when you just posted trip reports?

I think there's a real danger of ruining a good thing when we start to over-think the world of mongering. Too much analysis makes this whole thing a bit too laborious and needlessly complicated when, in reality, mongering is quite beautiful in its simplicity: Find a hot chica, give her some money and have a blast! That's why my experiences on the ISG are a lot sweeter when I just stick to talking about the chicas and my fun with said chicas.

Mill.

Whom69 and Regio73,

Guys I sent you "thank you" notes and brief comments within the PM system, but you may not have checked them. I would like to formerly acknowledge all that appreciate my comments, and to thank all that have commented to me within the forum, and also behind the scenes, via email, etc...

Muchismas Gracias...Is that spelled correctly Carlos?

To the hecklers, I don't desire confrontational relationships, quite the contrary. So, I have decided to attempt to limit my comments in the Monterrey section unless someone has asked a question in the forum seeking information. In that instance, I WILL comment thoroughly.

[Member #3453]

Whom69 and Regio73,

Guys I sent you "thank you" notes and brief comments within the PM system, but you may not have checked them. I would like to formerly acknowledge all that appreciate my comments, and to thank all that have commented to me within the forum, and also behind the scenes, via email, etc...

Muchismas Gracias...Is that spelled correctly Carlos?

To the hecklers, I don't desire confrontational relationships, quite the contrary. So, I have decided to attempt to limit my comments in the Monterrey section unless someone has asked a question in the forum seeking information. In that instance, I WILL comment thoroughly.

I have been following this board for awhile. Even paid the Dues: . USB is a great asset to this Board. Granted, he can be long winded BUT considering the message that he is conveying. They need to be. I can relate to him in many ways along with the dialogue with other members on this forum. Have actually helped me focused my own feelings.

Considering the time that he (and others) spend in composing their posts, a "heckler" doesn't bother me and it shouldn't bother them. However, considering THEIR time spent, I can understand why a heckler upsets them. Remember they are writing their hearts and souls on the Board. It is only natural, to respond in a negative way from an attack. Actually, he and others respond to attacks with a true debate rebuttal. Not a "screw you" response. IMO, they shouldn't waste their time in defending themselves. Their history automaticaly gives them large amounts of credibility in my books.

Since I live in McAllen which is only about 2 hours from Monterrey, I look forward of meeting the "Monterrey Crew" one of these days. Especially when USB will be in attendence. I will even buy the first round. Maybe even the Lunch Buffet. : . Cheaper than spending a couple of hours with Psychologist. If he gets USB gets his Butt to McAllen, maybe I will fly him to Montterey?

[Member #3453]

Leave some space in the noose for me...

DO NOT hang your collective selves quite yet... :-)

I have not made my travel arrangements for the end of the month yet. Please check guys, Carlos and Wasted, when you have the opportunity, to determine whether my Angel Girl is going to be available to me or whether she is going to have "other" commitments.

If she is busy, that does not mean that I will not revisit, but it does mean that I will visit Monterrey with a modified agenda. I want to get my head straight before I return. Time is slipping away. I should have made my plane reservations two weeks ago, so I could be delayed in my arrival.

Let me know if you need anything Carlos.

[MonterreyDude]

Leave some space in the noose for me...

I guess I should go hang myself.

[El Cabron 007]

I guess I should go hang myself.

[El Cabron 007]

When 2 kids argue, the judge will hang himself.

When 2 adults discuss, an intelligent solution is usually reached for all to like.

I commend both, Bob and Jackson, and I thank all the members who had kind words to say. Like Jackson said, if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all...... dang, this sounds familiar, where have I heard that before?

I was wondering where my posts went. Here they are. Does Bob even know he has his own thread? Someone should tell him.

Yeah, I too will continue to post on the Monterrey thread as well but will direct discussions with Bob here.

Bob, we need a thread warming party. Buy us all round trip tickets so we can come down and celebrate. Whome69 is welling to fly you down. You then fly the rest of us in.

Congratulations USB, but don't let it go to your head. It's bad enough that you understand each one of us more than we 'think' we understand you.

Wasted

I like it this way.
Leave this Thread to USB.
We'll all be happy...
... and I'll keep updating the Monterrey thread as will all the visitors to the city too.

[MonterreyDude]

I like it this way.
Leave this Thread to USB.
We'll all be happy...
... and I'll keep updating the Monterrey thread as will all the visitors to the city too.

Greetings everyone,

First, let me address some of the comments herein:

1. Some people have suggested that my perspective is somehow influenced by Nibu Raphael. All I can say to this is that I am ROTFLMAO.

2. Some people have suggested that I should have sent my comments directly to USB. I don't generally send unsolicited emails because a very high percentage of email address in the forum are bogus, closed, or unread, and I long ago get tired of composing emails that are so often rejected.

Now, back to the subject at hand:

Okay, I get it. USB has a number of supporters.

That's not my issue. My issue is that he apparently is not aware that his aggressive posting style is chasing away potential contributors.

Specifically, I would like USB to stop intimidating other members from participating in the forum, stop with these long, philosophical discourses, stop criticizing other forum members, and stop using the Forum to conduct experiments that involve coercing others into withholding information.

Am I wrong?

More importantly, how would the forum members suggest that I accomplish these goals?

-Perhaps I should let him post whatever he wants with absolute impunity?

-Perhaps I should give USB his own thread?

-Perhaps I should give him his own forum to moderate?

What do you think?

Thanks,

Jackson

===========================================

BTW, did any of you read his latest dissertation:

http://www.internationalsexguide.inf...914#post617914

[Admin]

Greetings everyone,

First, let me address some of the comments herein:

1. Some people have suggested that my perspective is somehow influenced by Nibu Raphael. All I can say to this is that I am ROTFLMAO.

2. Some people have suggested that I should have sent my comments directly to USB. I don't generally send unsolicited emails because a very high percentage of email address in the forum are bogus, closed, or unread, and I long ago get tired of composing emails that are so often rejected.

Now, back to the subject at hand:

Okay, I get it. USB has a number of supporters.

That's not my issue. My issue is that he apparently is not aware that his aggressive posting style is chasing away potential contributors.

Specifically, I would like USB to stop intimidating other members from participating in the forum, stop with these long, philosophical discourses, stop criticizing other forum members, and stop using the Forum to conduct experiments that involve coercing others into withholding information.

Am I wrong?

More importantly, how would the forum members suggest that I accomplish these goals?

-Perhaps I should let him post whatever he wants with absolute impunity?

-Perhaps I should give USB his own thread?

-Perhaps I should give him his own forum to moderate?

What do you think?

Thanks,

Jackson

===========================================

BTW, did any of you read his latest dissertation:

http://www.internationalsexguide.inf...914#post617914

[MonterreyDude]

Yes of course the girls ask for a Wasted.... as in "where the f**k is Wasted... MF owes me money!!!!!"
That you???

Hey Carlos, where do you get off saying we are not good writers? Speak for yourself.

I'm curious. Do guys ask the girls if they know someone called "Wasted"? I wonder how they would say that in Spanish? (Malgastado?) What the hell is a "Squandered". Am I "misspent", "Idle", "Fruitless", "Frivolous"? Which is it?

I support giving our buddy his own thread (?). Is that what it's called?

OR, for what it's worth, if someone is not happy with his posts, let them do the hard labor of ...... put him on the "ignore" list. If they are so much willing to write a note to the admin, it would be a lot faster and simpler and less of a headache for all of us if they ignore what they do not like.

We like USB's posts. Yes, he drive me crazy sometimes, it's true. And I sometimes want to grab him by his shirt and knock some sense into him. But hey, I always wait for him to post. Then I see how long his post is on a simple phrase as "ahorita vengo". But I want him to post and I think MTY thread will be dead, dull, boring and lifeless without him.

Carlos is the "king" of Monterrey.

USB is the "sweetheart" of Monterrey.

Can I claim the position of the Cabron/Bastard of Monterrey?

and we can give Mr. "L" the "Stud" of Monterrey?


Wasted

[Whome69]

I have been following this board for awhile. Even paid the Dues: . USB is a great asset to this Board. Granted, he can be long winded BUT considering the message that he is conveying. They need to be. I can relate to him in many ways along with the dialogue with other members on this forum. Have actually helped me focused my own feelings.

Considering the time that he (and others) spend in composing their posts, a "heckler" doesn't bother me and it shouldn't bother them. However, considering THEIR time spent, I can understand why a heckler upsets them. Remember they are writing their hearts and souls on the Board. It is only natural, to respond in a negative way from an attack. Actually, he and others respond to attacks with a true debate rebuttal. Not a "screw you" response. IMO, they shouldn't waste their time in defending themselves. Their history automaticaly gives them large amounts of credibility in my books.

Since I live in McAllen which is only about 2 hours from Monterrey, I look forward of meeting the "Monterrey Crew" one of these days. Especially when USB will be in attendence. I will even buy the first round. Maybe even the Lunch Buffet. : . Cheaper than spending a couple of hours with Psychologist. If he gets USB gets his Butt to McAllen, maybe I will fly him to Montterey?

[El Cabron 007]

Hey Carlos, where do you get off saying we are not good writers? Speak for yourself.

I'm curious. Do guys ask the girls if they know someone called "Wasted"? I wonder how they would say that in Spanish? (Malgastado?) What the hell is a "Squandered". Am I "misspent", "Idle", "Fruitless", "Frivolous"? Which is it?

I support giving our buddy his own thread (?). Is that what it's called?

OR, for what it's worth, if someone is not happy with his posts, let them do the hard labor of ...... put him on the "ignore" list. If they are so much willing to write a note to the admin, it would be a lot faster and simpler and less of a headache for all of us if they ignore what they do not like.

We like USB's posts. Yes, he drive me crazy sometimes, it's true. And I sometimes want to grab him by his shirt and knock some sense into him. But hey, I always wait for him to post. Then I see how long his post is on a simple phrase as "ahorita vengo". But I want him to post and I think MTY thread will be dead, dull, boring and lifeless without him.

Carlos is the "king" of Monterrey.

USB is the "sweetheart" of Monterrey.

Can I claim the position of the Cabron/Bastard of Monterrey?

and we can give Mr. "L" the "Stud" of Monterrey?


Wasted

Contary to that, Wasted and me, well... we love having fun, we are not good writers but I always had the idea that our posts help showing the action available in the city, keeping it up to date.

Well Jackson, you are the owner of the store.
Perhaps as our neighbor Nibu Raphael has a Thread of it's own, couldn't we have a "Pure Montrerrey BS" or a "Unospongebob's Monterrey Adventures" Thread????

[MonterreyDude]

I can't believe am reading this.

Jackson, who is filling you with ideas?

(Is it the guy with he's own Thread???)

Your 5 point exposition is intresting, valid cause you are the owner of the site. To be considered seriously, again cause you are the Administrator, but it is faulty due to lack of solid knowledge and tangible facts.

Jackson I don't know if you know that Iam a local Monterrey boy, born and bred, always willing to help anyone coming down here.

You sir, have not met the people that I have.

People that seldom post, that are only lurkers and that I have met here in the City.

You know how I get to meet them?

Cause they ask the girls for some guy nicknamed "Unspongebob" and the girls of course know that Iam friends with this guy. The friendly American that carries cookies around, giving them away to girls, waiters and managers (a habit Iam trying to make him get rid off...).

Unspongebob is an will be a tremendous asset to this, the Monterrey Thread cause he helps a lot of guys that read his posts, guys that wil PM him for advice or that will try to look him up if they are in Monterrey at the same time.

Contary to that, Wasted and me, well... we love having fun, we are not good writers but I always had the idea that our posts help showing the action available in the city, keeping it up to date.

Next, pertaining me, I insist that Mongers visiting should meet face to face. That really helps in establishing a rapport that in turn will help the Monger within the strip clubs.

I tell Mongers at other Forums, to move to this one cause it is the one with the best info on the city.

And you know what they specially like of the Thread? Unspongbobs posts.

Well Jackson, you are the owner of the store.

Perhaps as our neighbor Nibu Raphael has a Thread of it's own, couldn't we have a "Pure Montrerrey BS" or a "Unospongebob's Monterrey Adventures" Thread?

I guess that would solve any trouble, any quarrel, any heated argument and it's respective rethoric?

Hope you read this Jackson.

Greetings UnospongeBob,

1. Please stop intimidating other members from participating in the forum.

2. Please stop with these long, philosophical discourses espousing your opinions of the other forum members.

3. Please stop using the Forum to conduct experiments that involve coercing others into withholding information.

4. Please continue to report on the P4P scene in Monterrey and your own experiences, to include logistics, personal trip reports, opinions about individual girls, clubs, perceptions of the venue, the strategic issues involving P4P in Monterrey, logistics, and other venues in comparison.

5. If you don't have anything nice to say, then please don't say anything.

Thanks,

Jackson

[El Cabron 007]

Before I comment here, allow me to set the stage:

1- Love this board. We use it heavily and enjoy seeing new posts.
2- I am typing with a smile on my face. I am not angry with anyone.

Now, I must come to the defense of my friend, UnospongeBob. My first reaction when I read your post was "Why in the public?"

I do agree with UnospongeBob that, maybe, with all due respect, your post to him should have been in a private message. Not in the open forum. Regardless of it being right or wrong. I do not see why you needed to go public with it.

I somehow feel responsible for this because of the exchanges of opinions we have been having lately regarding strategies. Even while I post, I felt this might have been inappropriate. Nevertheless, it was a discussion about dealing with sex providers.

Again, UnospongeBob is a great friend and a heck of a guy. Not to mention his fabulous cookies . If I was in any way responsible for your decision to post your comments, then I apologize to him. In either case, I really think you were wrong to go public.

Peace

Wasted.

Greetings UnospongeBob,

Okay, you asked, so here it is:

.
.
.
.


Thanks,

Jackson

[Member #3453]

Sorry...this is my last long one. You owe me that much, right? After over 500 posts on your site, posts you directly profit from, you owe me.

I feel that if I am to be publicly ridiculed in the forum in such a way, I am most surely entitled to also be heard. I would have preferred to respond to you without having to reply here in the forum, obviously. But, you brought this up in your chosen manner, and I am curious to see if you will permit me to also comment directly with respect to your public accusations of me. This will be a direct testiment to your fairness.

I will gladly adhere to the published guidelines, and I will make every effort to clean up my act to the best of my understanding, which at this juncture is almost total confusion.

First, lets reiterate a few of the published rules from your own website's "Rules Section." These are reiterated just as they are written in your "Rules Section."

"No Chat Room Style: Please do not write in CHAT ROOM style with all small letters and no punctuation. Please review the Posting Guidelines below for more information."

I always attempt to spell correctly and punctuate properly, and I strive to produce phrasing that is grammatically correct, with the exception of occassional and unintentional typos. I will attempt to limit the cross talk, and have attempted to do so to the same extent as the rest of our regular posters to this section.

"No Flaming: Please do not post any messages that harrass, insult, belittle, threaten or flame another member."

I always respond to other posters with the proper level of written etiquette and cordiality, and I NEVER attacK them, not even so much as what has been done to me here within the forum by this most recent posting of the Administrator's comments. IMHO, you have violated your own RULES with respect to having publicly admonished me in such a way, choosing instead to do so at my expense rather than contacting me directly via the PM system or email.

"No Trolling: Please do not post any topic that disrupts the peace and harmony of this board. Don't create meaningless threads with the sole purpose of starting a dispute."

This is not something I do. I do respond to posts that are directly aimed at me specifically, circumstances that are directly soliciting my commentary. I do respond with agreement, polite rebuttal, or polite disagreement. But, never would I attempt to stiffel the comments of others, and NEVER have I been abusive to another poster except in very limited circumstances where the other poster was perhaps also abusing me.

And, even in the case where ONE (1) relatively minor incident occurred, and even though that circumstance is now relatively long past, my policy is to usually remove posts from the forum that I believe in retrospect may have had any hint of malice to them whatsoever, choosing instead to attempt to get along. And, as a personal policy, even though the frequency of such things occurring has been almost non-existent, I always attempt to mend those fences to the best of my ability through conciliatory conversation behind the scenes...and have done so with respect to the one (1) instance of such a dispute occurring.

"No Offensive Posts, Links or Images: Please do not post any messages, images or links that are vulgar, hateful, threatening, racist, or discriminatory."

Where did I do this???

Now, with respect to the issues that you refer to that are not specifically listed as violations of your published rules, but apparently, in your eyes, apply only to me:

"1. Please stop intimidating other members from participating in the forum."

When did this occur? It simply DID NOT HAPPEN!!! I welcome the participation of other members. Other posters have the same access to post their opinions as I do. How is it possible that other contributors are limited to submitting commentary if I contribute my comments, opinions, and trip reports. That does not make sense. They are not limited in any way. They can post and "save" to the forum without any physical restraint from me. How is it that my comments squelch their participation?

If you mean that disagreement or comments about a conclusion they reach while mongering in Monterrey is a violation of your rules, or that I can not nicely articulate a disagreement or comment with respect to mongering strategy, then there are many others here in this same forum that are equally guilty of the same thing.

WHY HAVE YOU SINGLED ME OUT? Am I not entitled to a polite opinion, or is it preferable that I agree with everything said, even when the commentary leads future readers to make huge mistakes when visiting the venue. I would have thought you would prefer to have accurate and valid information on your site.

"2. Please stop with these long, philosophical discourses espousing your opinions of the other forum members."

I do NOT have long philosophical discussions espousing my opinions "of" other members. I do have thorough discussions about my opinions concerning P4P, mostly concerning strategy, psychology, sociology, logistics, etc...But, in most instances, I have simply defended my own opinions, and only with respect to opinions that are P4P issue related, and usually in cases where those opinions are directly squarely at me for commentary. I have never posted personal opinions about the character, writing style, value of content, or anything else about my "opinions of other forum members," certainly not specifically, and not even in generalities with respect to other members. THIS IS NOT A VIOLATION OF THE RULES.

I must also point out that with the thoroughness of my trip reports there is also a thoroughness in my commentary as well. If you don't want to read what I have to say, then maybe you should also add to the rules a clause that limits how much we can say. But, to date, having lengthy commentary simply isn't a violation of the rules. If you can show me in the rules, by my having lengthy commentary, lengthy trip reports, etc...all of which are directly related to P4P, not "politics, religion, etc...," are a violation of the rules, then I graciously succomb to your accusations with the humblest apologies, and a sincere desire to rectify my behavior.

But, all of my comments are related to P4P. So, if you respond to me with justification that you are bored with my comments, or don't enjoy reading them in full, then fine. That is a subjective judgement on your part and on the part of my detractors. But, that's not a violation of the rules.

"3. Please stop using the Forum to conduct experiments that involve coercing others into withholding information."

I would never advise other members to withhold information other than to protect the innocent, and comply with the rules as stated in the "Rules Section" concerning personal information. The purpose of the forum is to "find women." But, I do not interpret that to mean that you mean to provide a forum for us to find them specifically, by individual name. I assume you mean to find women in the general sense. Is that right? or are you advocating that ISG is not a site to find women, but more a site to pimp women. I doubt you are advocating that ISG be a site to Pimp women. If so, then I stand entirely corrected in my assumptions.

With regard to my decision to contribute specifics, or to request specifics of other members, that is my decision as to how much information I wish to contribute or solicit, and to what specific degree I want requested specific information to be disclosed back to me in a public forum.

My decision to post specific details about girls, or to refer to them in synonyms is entirely my business, as it is also my business when requesting information of another monger that requires them to use intellegent discretion with respect to divulging specifics in a public forum. Again, the use of synonyms is not against the ISG Rules.

"4. Please continue to report on the P4P scene in Monterrey and your own experiences, to include logistics, personal trip reports, opinions about individual girls, clubs, perceptions of the venue, the strategic issues involving P4P in Monterrey, and other venues in comparison."

YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS!!! You can't appeal to me to make contributions to your forum because the content of my reports is helpful to your business while simulaneously asking me to squelch what I have to say within some narrowly defined criteria that is specifically designed to "regulate" only ONE member, Unospongebob and no others.

If you have some individuals here that can't stand the content of my opinions, opinions and commentary that I always post with politeness and decorum, and they are hassling you because they don't want to read it, or don't agree with it, or they don't like what I have to say, or they are too lazy to advance the slide bar past my posts, or they are simply too lazy to enter my screen name into their ignore list, then fine. BUT, I AM NOT VIOLATING THE RULES by submitting lengthy relevant commentary.

I have over 500 posts, many of which, along with Carlos, WastedG, MillJust, several other regular posters, and my many friends and other accomplished occassional visitors to Monterrey, all of which, have contributed so much information about Monterrey, and the Mexico P4P scene, that it literally staggers the imagination. Information that you directly profit from as a result.

I am simply a part of what makes this section viable...period. I don't say that to boast or be self congratulatory, but...give me a break...I have 500 posts at the Monterrey forum alone, information that you directly profit from.

I think that with respect to my numbers of posts, and the longevity of my contributions, the reputation that preceeds my screen name, you would have thought twice about reaching what seems to me a very premature conclusion with respect to the value of my overall contributions to your site, and that you as a business man, would have used a great degree of discretion in appealing to my desire to be a good citizen of the on-line community. Instead, you abuse my participation and insult me by posting a public ridicule where the charges are totally unfounded.

This is the first and only time you have directly contacted me with any kind of admonission regarding my participation. WHY DID YOU CHOOSE TO MAKE SUCH A PUBLIC STATEMENT? And, do you really have such distain for those of us that contribute prolifically to your overall success?

Fact is, I am truly hurt and offended, not because you or others might not like the content of my postings, but more so because of the way in which the message has been so crassly delivered, with apparently no consideration given for the contributions made over the last five years, contributions that you directly benefit from.

You will probably do the easier thing by accepting the criticisms of my detractors as valid, and I am simply going to be at your collective mercy. Your accusations are totally false and misguided, and you obviously do not read the content of my posts to establish whether the content is in fact as I have been accused, nor have you even made the simple effort to determine that most of the "discourse," as you call it, is directly related to P4P issues, which in NOT a violation of your published rules.

"Discourse" definition per Websters New World Dictionary:
"a formal treatment of a subject, verbal or written."

Are you not aware that all of my recent posts have been in rebutal or agreement with regard to P4P strategy in MTY, opinions between me and my close personal friends, all of which, if even appearing to be malice in nature in the first place, which I doubt, is entirely delivered tongue in cheek?

"5. If you don't have anything nice to say, then please don't say anything."

When did I not have anything nice to say? Where are you coming from, Jackson? Where do you get these accusations? YOU ARE TOTALLY OFF-BASE!!!

My opinion is that your accusations are lazy, uninformed, unfounded, and arbitrary, the result of a few jealous and vindictive types that advocate my admonission by hassling you through the "reports to the moderator" button, and ones that undoubtedly now enjoy my being publicly ridiculed in the forum for having expressed my views on issues that you say, in your own "Rules Section," need to be related to P4P.

All of my posts fit that description regardless of whether some like or dislike my content. ALL of my posts pertain directly to P4P. I am not discussing religion, politics, gardening, golf, television programs, movies, or any such other extraneous unrelated material other than to directly address P4P, and all it's many nuances. Again, where are you getting your accusations? Have you even read my posts to determine whether the complaints of my detractors have even a hint of validity? Of course not.

Rather than submit to the mercy of my detractors, you and my detractors will be pleased to learn that I might just as easily contribute elsewhere. It is no big deal. Lets watch the forum for the next thirty days to see where it goes. I will just hang back and let the forum proliferate with all the huge volumes of additional information that my commentary is supposedly squelching.

I would not want my comments to be a futher burden on the plethera of information that is out there with regard to Mongering in MTY, and the apparent huge numbers of ISG members that have been formerly stiffeled from posting due to my contributions. God knows, I don't need the information from ISG. I, along with a very select few, produce it. I certainly won't suffer as a result of taking a little vacation from the ISG board to demonstrate that it has an otherwise "dead" existence.

I really doubt if you will permit this post to go to the board to be permenantly published. I realize that this final post is akin to espousing that the "emperor has not clothes." Fairness in being heard is apparently not part of the ISG Rules. None-the-less, I will earnestly make every attempt to adhere to your requests through my own voluntary abstencia from the ISG site in the future.

Here is a little experiement that I, as the only targeted contributor, have every right to engage in. Lets see how the forum progresses in the next thirty days without my contributions. I challenge you to visit the forum in the next thirty days to see just how many formerly "restrained" members have posted here without my participation. I already know the answer.

[Admin]

Unless I hear directly otherwise from Jackson himself, there will be NO CHANGES in the way I conduct myself in the forum, nor with respect to the content of my comments.

Greetings UnospongeBob,

1. Please stop intimidating other members from participating in the forum.

2. Please stop with these long, philosophical discourses espousing your opinions of the other forum members.

3. Please stop using the Forum to conduct experiments that involve coercing others into withholding information.

4. Please continue to report on the P4P scene in Monterrey and your own experiences, to include logistics, personal trip reports, opinions about individual girls, clubs, perceptions of the venue, the strategic issues involving P4P in Monterrey, logistics, and other venues in comparison.

5. If you don't have anything nice to say, then please don't say anything.

Thanks,

Jackson