Thread: 2007 Thai Women - Opinions & Advice
Closed Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 515
-
12-18-07 11:30 #515
Posts: 1749Originally Posted by Mick Licker
"of, relating to, or constituting the biogeographic region that includes Asia south and southeast of the Himalayas and the Malay Archipelago west of Wallace's line" http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/oriental
Re the pics of girls, I'm not sure that I'm understanding your point. I'd assume that probably your first sentence is true, but don't see how the second follows from it, my view being that the ladies at those two places are as lovely as those on the website. Perhaps you meant to reiterate your opinion from another thread that these women in BKK are ugly. And that those on the site are so much superior to them that there is no comparison.
-
12-17-07 11:01 #514
Posts: 3823Originally Posted by PinkPearl
Obviously the pics are intended to be superior, in somebody's taste.
Obviously they all look "oriental" which basically means "Far-East-Asian" looking. Perhaps you meant to say "Chinese" looking?
Even though I don't normally go for the obviously Chinese oriented look myself, I can see that some others might.
-
12-16-07 10:58 #513
Posts: 1749Originally Posted by Need More Gas
Re the pics of girls at the link, I'd say they are comparable to the crowd at Thermae coffee shop or Nana car park. About 50% average looking with a higher percentage of Oriental types than the latter location.
-
12-15-07 18:11 #512
Posts: 150Pov
I have been to Thailand a few times as a backpacker, and never been in mongering scene. I have been reading the forum for some time now to get some ideas. I came across this Japanese website:
http://www.gdiary.com/g-girl.cfm
These girls on photos are probably selected biased towards Japanese clients, but in general they look stunning IMO; some look demure, innocent enough to be a girl just from next door, and some even "classy". You can call me naive, but can't they get a job in department stores, or even in banks? I am sure pay from MP/SW is much better than those places. But do they really have to do this, taking all sort of risks? Are they just lazy?
Was it Posterlion some time ago? (probably in a different context but) who said "I am a river and go to the ocean, taking the lowest and easiest path".
I know I am contradicting myself; if all these gilrs work for banks etc, there will be no good looking girls left for mongering scene.
-
12-15-07 11:43 #511
Posts: 1749Male Orgasms
Originally Posted by Opebo
http://en.allexperts.com/q/Great-Sex...Oral-Sex-2.htm
http://www.contentmart.com/articles/...sms/Page1.html
Btw many, but not all, TGs will not feel like they've satisfied you if you don't cum. Consequently, they may keep trying until you do. That is a plus for those who take a long time to ejaculate or who have the control to extend the pleasure.
-
12-15-07 10:32 #510
Posts: 2102Originally Posted by Member #2041
-
12-15-07 05:26 #509
Posts: 1600Originally Posted by Old Thai Hand
-
12-15-07 02:46 #508
Posts: 2102"Hi honey, I'm Homo-erectus!"
I'll leave this discussion to the 'enlightened' men that, because of Opebo's remarks have momentarily escaped from their caves.
-
12-15-07 02:43 #507
Posts: 4050Orgy time - need one more guy
Originally Posted by Gladiator
-
12-15-07 01:03 #506
Posts: 588I don’t think Opebo’s view of women is anachronistic, on the contrary, he usually shows women as what they are per se: sex toys.
I know the view of women as unintelligent sex toys may not appeal to everyone, but we have to be realistic: they spent thousands of years in the caves, cooking and looking after children, while the males of the species went out hunting and developed their brain further. It shouldn’t surprise anyone that they have ended up with a less developed brain and, as a result, a lower intellectual level.
Women are good for cooking, gardening, cleaning, sex… and little else.
-
12-14-07 20:50 #505
Posts: 1642Blow!
Really!
Women only cum when they want to. They decide yes or no.
With us... It doesn't matter who strokes it - we blow the load. Whether we want it or not. Unless of course you're a useless piece of Weak Meat.
I guess it has to do with the fact that historically we are a bunch of fuckers of everything that moves. Reproduction is the key word. We don't care who's the mommy. Women (...) actually care who is the daddy of their little foodprocessor. And yes, a female orgasm during intercourse up the chances of a pregnancy manyfold.
-
12-14-07 19:39 #504
Posts: 1641Originally Posted by Old Thai Hand
Anyway, I don't see what is 'low' about my opinion of women, as expressed. People's genes tell them to like sugar, or sell sex, or seek as much pussy (or reasonable facsimiles) as they can find, or run away from threats. None of these things make them low or high, or better or worse. They just are. You're the one who seems to be applying some rather ill-fitting subjective valuations to people.
Someone once told me disapprovingly 'you think all women are is sperm-receptacles!', and I replied 'not at all, that is merely all they are TO ME'. And after all, why should that matter to anyone?
Originally Posted by Freeler
-
12-14-07 15:04 #503
Posts: 1642OTH,
Originally Posted by Old Thai Hand
BTW
Planning to Tour the Kingdom once more starting next week.
-
12-14-07 12:33 #502
Posts: 2102Originally Posted by Bumholes1
Oh, and I appologize for calling you an idiot. Immature and out-of-line. sorry.
-
12-14-07 11:51 #501
Posts: 1749Originally Posted by Old Thai Hand
BTW, I was wondering, of the 500 TGs you've banged, how many are P4P?
Also, Casanova, would you mind listing their names.