Thread: Safe Sex and Sex Related Discussions in Thailand
+
Add Report
Results 571 to 585 of 2918
-
10-20-17 12:02 #2348
Posts: 60Hepatitis treatment.
Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
-
10-20-17 10:06 #2347
Posts: 5447Originally Posted by Soroche [View Original Post]
-
10-20-17 08:22 #2346
Posts: 2204Originally Posted by Soroche [View Original Post]
-
10-20-17 00:16 #2345
Posts: 60Originally Posted by Syzygies [View Original Post]
-
10-19-17 12:25 #2344
Posts: 12856Originally Posted by Crocodilexp [View Original Post]
The Red Cross then perform a subsequent backup Virus Amplification test. This takes several days to get a result. However the result is significantly more reliable in that any HIV contracted more than two weeks prior is almost certain to be detected. If you test positive to the backup more certain test, they will contact you, in order to do another independent verification test. If no contact occurs, then you are clean.
So your certificate from the initial test does not mean so much, in reality. You have to wait for several days of no contact from them, e. G by email, to really have the all clear signal. So when you show the girl your paper printed test result, it really means you did not have HIV for over 3 months, and unlikely over a month.
The amplification test would be expensive in some clinics. Red Cross are able to do it much cheaper using a sneaky scientific technique. They can take everyone's blood samples from a specific time period or number of testees, each person's samples split into two. Let's call then the A and the be sample. Then perhaps they mix the A samples for say 100 people together and run the virus amplification procedure. If the A sample 100 batch tests positive to HIV, then they have to retest all 100 be samples on an individual basis. If the A sample 100 batch test is negative, then testing the 100 be samples can be avoided as the entire batch of 100 persons get the all clear. I don't actually know the optimal size of each batch and how many persons are in it.
Nothing gives you an absolutely clean bill of health unless you abstained for 2 weeks prior to your test. Then as soon as you fuck again you are not longer 100% clean.
So in the end, the practical reality of testing is merely to greatly reduce the probability of having caught HIV.
Statistical number do not have significant cases of HIV proven to have arisen through oral sex (and always harder for man to catch it anyway relative to a woman). So I therefore don't consider BBBJ or DATY to be a significant risk to a male (for HIV). Just doesn't happen. Other diseases are much easier to contract.
I am therefor far more concerned about new diseases coming along like the Mycoplasma Genitalium, and the very easy to catch traditional STDs like Chlamydia (as example). I once had non-specific Urethritus (causing painful peeing) and my only BB partner at the time had nothing. In fact I think I had no other sex partners for a significant time then. So I never knew exactly what sort of bacterial infection it was or how I got it. I was probably better off to say nothing to her till I got the test results which did not identify a known definite STD.
Next Red Cross visit I can test for HIV, and Mycoplasma, and do long term IgG test for ever having contracted Herpes HSV-2 (long ago) or not. I don't really know if ever had it. Certainly no specific symptoms.
Maybe I had a common cold sore HSV-1, maybe not. No clear symptom experienced, but 80% of mongers should have had a cold sore contracted at some point, even if not aware of it being that for certain.
-
10-19-17 11:50 #2343
Posts: 113Re safe sex
Look into preexposure prophylaxis for std, in google. , truva#the for hiv. Doxycycline for syphilis, chlamydia, and most gonorrhea.
-
10-19-17 11:38 #2342
Posts: 12856Originally Posted by BionicMan [View Original Post]
-
10-19-17 09:45 #2341
Posts: 6079Originally Posted by DudesOnTre [View Original Post]
The two girls might be your exclusive partner (supposing the whole process of checking is feasible and working, also time-wise), but who guarantees you are the esclusive partner for the two girls?
All this aside the need to find two girls ready for bareback.
If by culture and education they are not into it, your "story" will not convince them.
If money will convince them, it means many other can persuade them (past and present).
If by attitude they are ready for it, without too much hesitation, maybe not even money (I experienced it is quite normal amongst philipina working girls to enjoy if not even demand bareback) then, it is part of their daily working routine.
It is still a Russian roulette. You can mitigate it with plastic or rubber bullets, but still one csn shoot into your head.
-
10-19-17 07:27 #2340
Posts: 74Window
I believe it is 6 weeks now.
Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
-
10-19-17 06:17 #2339
Posts: 5447Originally Posted by Crocodilexp [View Original Post]
That might not match the consensus of thought among the worldwide community of HIV testers, I don't know. But that is what the testers in Thai's Red Cross feel is enough. And chances are they are being overly cautious about it anyway, might even be enough to check again in just two weeks. Just my opinion there, of course.
-
10-18-17 11:48 #2338
Posts: 1232Originally Posted by DudesOnTre [View Original Post]
Testing for other STDs things like Gonorrhea or Chlamydia is not that quick, it takes a few days or even weeks for the results to come back. Those things are not lethal, but there are some antibiotic-resistant strains in Thailand that are not at all easy to cure.
Summary is, if you do some testing beforehand, you can be safer, but not really safe. If you have a regular partner, I wouldn't risk bringing something nasty back to them, and would stick with a condom. However, if you're single, you may well get an HIV test, do your bareback thing, and take the risk of catching something (and later curing it).
For mongering, I think an ED pill plus thin condom combination works way better (safer and more bang for the buck) than trying to concoct all kinds of schemes to decrease the risk of going bareback.
-
10-16-17 12:45 #2337
Posts: 12856Originally Posted by DudesOnTre [View Original Post]
So I don't concur with Lefeu exactly, except for sure there is no 100% guarantee of anything (especially monogamy in the mongering world).
Actually the biggest risk you would face is getting girls pregnant, if all of you are pre-tested for a wide variety of diseases (a bit expensive to get all tests for 3 persons. HIV only is cheap). As example some girls use 3 month vaccination against pregnancy. Some still get pregnant. "The pill" fails when girls forget to take it or not on time.
A very significant proportion of Thai P4P girls have been accidentally pregnant, and a high proportion of those did not get an abortion for religious reasons, or because it's illegal, or because they were in denial, or unaware, etc.
-
10-16-17 05:30 #2336
Posts: 1136No luck
Originally Posted by DudesOnTre [View Original Post]
-
10-15-17 14:04 #2335
Posts: 3STD test in Pattaya
Not sure if this is the correct thread, but let's see.
So I'm looking to have safe bareback sex in Pattaya, meaning to find a couple girls to spend the week or so, get tested and be safe.
Anyone have info if this is a working plan?
How much time does it take to get the results and where could one get those done?
-
06-10-17 03:58 #2334
Posts: 12856Use of non obvious abbreviations.
Originally Posted by XXL [View Original Post]
E. g. HSV1 or 2 (Herpes Simplex Virus Types 1 or 2) or HPV (Human Papilloma Virus. Many different strains).
Now HSP1 and 2, I think that is meaningless to most of us. We can only guess you intended HSV-1 and HSV-2.