Thread: General Reports
+
Add Report
Results 3,751 to 3,765 of 13861
-
01-15-19 02:28 #10111
Posts: 5461New proof of monthly income requirement for retirement visa
As of January 1, 2019, the U.K., USA and perhaps a couple of other Embassies will no longer issue Notarized Income Verification forms to be given to Thai Immigration when we are renewing our annual NON-IMM/Retirement visas. According to the latest I have heard or read (Stickman Weekly's January 6, 2019 column, last third of the article), those of us who rely on a monthly income stream to qualify for that visa rather than an extended 800,000 baht deposit in a Thai bank will be asked at the time of the visa renewal to produce written evidence from our Thai bank account showing a minimum of 65,000 baht per month from a Foreign Transfer (the deposits MUST come from outside of Thailand) for the previous 12 months. No clarification yet what will actually happen this time around when many people will be hit with this news for the first time when they show up to renew or have not even established a Thai bank account.
But I wanted to pass along that, on an unrelated matter about a month ago, I happened to need Bangkok Bank to provide me with a print out of all transfers to and from my account over the past 6 years. So I went to the branch nearest to my apartment (not my original account branch), filled out a form to make the request starting on such and such date and ending on such and such date, paid 500 baht and the full printout was there for me to pick up in about 3 business days. Maybe the cost for just 12 months prior rather than 6 years prior would have been less than 500 baht, no idea. Could be more or less, even free with Thai banks other than Bangkok Bank.
Anyway, you can request the printout to be in English or in Thai. The "Foreign Transfers" are clearly marked as such. I have not heard but I imagine if one month shows less than 65,000 baht in a Foreign Transfer but the next one shows a larger than 65,000 baht transfer, the immigration officer will average it out and let it pass. However, I don't imagine one could get away with dumping 780,000 baht (12 X 65,000) into an account just one month before requesting a renewal in hopes that the immigration officer will average that out for you and let it pass. Just guessing, though.
-
01-15-19 00:55 #10110
Posts: 15937Originally Posted by Franga [View Original Post]
-
01-15-19 00:51 #10109
Posts: 15937Originally Posted by BananaBoi [View Original Post]
-
01-14-19 23:18 #10108
Posts: 552Originally Posted by Franga [View Original Post]
-
01-14-19 17:45 #10107
Posts: 6315I recently tried to explain to a gogo girl that one of the reasons guys aren't spending as much is because the Thai baht is going up against other foreign currencies. Never seen anyone more confused than she was. She told me 100 Thai baht is still worth 100 Thai baht in Thailand, Europe, and Korea. "It no go up".
-
01-14-19 16:42 #10106
Posts: 343Originally Posted by Slaol [View Original Post]
If not, then you may be okay. For example I rent a room on a monthly basis in Pattaya which costs on average 200 baht per day. So that is 5 Pounds daily rent in 2019. Back in 2006 it would have cost 3 Pounds. Can you afford 5 Pounds per day rent? If not then you may have to stay in London where rents are much cheaper, right?
Today I had a fuck in Pattaya for 1000 baht. Back in 2006 that would have cost 13 Pounds. Now in 2019 it costs 25 Pounds. It must be a lot cheaper for a fuck in London then if you think thai prices are too high?
Brits complaining about the weakness in the Pound are probably a contrarian indicator and the Pound may strengthen from hereon in. Or not!
-
01-14-19 08:12 #10105
Posts: 842Taking a pounding.
Perhaps my dream of living in Thailand was just that, a dream. Taking a look at the chart makes sobering reading as the Baht continues to strengthen against the UK Pound. The graph does not lie, since 2005 the Baht has been on a relentless climb against the UK Pound. Many of you British expats will be very concerned as am I. There is no indication according to this graph of the £ gaining back any lost ground at all in the future. Oh dear.
-
01-14-19 06:19 #10104
Posts: 5461Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
Here is what the U.S. FDA had to say about the product of that name in 2014:
Public Notification: Gold Vigra Contains Hidden Drug Ingredient.
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resourcesf.../ucm401540.htm
FDA laboratory analysis confirmed that Gold Vigra contains sildenafil, the active ingredient in the FDA approved prescription drug Viagra, used to treat erectile dysfunction (ED). This undeclared ingredient may interact with nitrates found in some prescription drugs such as nitroglycerin and may lower blood pressure to dangerous levels. Men with diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, or heart disease often take nitrates.
I am not recommending anyone take it or any other boner drug found in or out of a pharmacy. But I might give this one a try just to see if it offers something of a faster or longer lasting nature than what I have been taking lately. I will report on the results if I ever do give it a try. Assuming I survive long enough to reply, that is. LOL.
I am not taking any of the nitrates or high blood pressure, high cholesterol, etc. drugs mentioned above nor do I need to take them according to my most recent thorough medical check up just a few months ago. Well, I have seen this product on the tables for years now and have not heard or read of a bad reaction to it. Has anyone else?
-
01-12-19 05:17 #10103
Posts: 309Originally Posted by Nyezhov [View Original Post]
-
01-12-19 05:02 #10102
Posts: 5461Originally Posted by Syzygies [View Original Post]
If it turns out the claimed 5000 MG pill, taken once for, as I vaguely recall, less than 100 baht, produces the same result as a 100 MG Viagra but for 48 hours instead of less than 24 hours, why not try it and find out? I didn't know Black Ant King would do for me what it does until I tried it.
Again, I don't see the boner pills sold over and over again in or out of the pharmacies to be potential poison or dangerous unless you already have a serious heart condition or some other serious ailment. Which I don't.
-
01-12-19 02:31 #10101
Posts: 1351Originally Posted by PointyStick [View Original Post]
I feel bad that you are an ATM. Perhaps you will get to know the right people in the future.
-
01-11-19 18:01 #10100
Posts: 12856Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
-
01-11-19 08:56 #10099
Posts: 309Originally Posted by Nyezhov [View Original Post]
-
01-10-19 17:50 #10098
Posts: 5461Originally Posted by Crocodilexp [View Original Post]
I never count on the claimed dosage of active ingredient in these copies being accurate. But I do tend to assume the ones from the same source claiming to have, say, 200 MG instead of 100 MG will have more of the active ingredient in them. I agree that the claim of one having 500 MG in it had to be a joke but had no qualms about trying one or two to see if it had something closer to perhaps actual 100 MG in it. But it felt to me like it had nothing in it. No big deal.
There is a Viagra-category product on the vendor tables now claiming to have 5000 MG of the active ingredient in it! LOL. I have not tried it but I might some day.
-
01-10-19 15:18 #10097
Posts: 1233Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
There is a Thai-made generic Sildenafil Citrate called Sidegra, it costs 100 baht for 4 x50 MG or 200 baht for 4 x100 MG pills. Since it's so cheap, and domestically produced, it doesn't pay to make fakes, and the product seems consistent. Since I discovered that one, I don't mess with other generic or "real" Viagra pills any longer.