Thread: American Politics
+
Add Report
Results 9,706 to 9,720 of 14404
-
09-16-21 06:23 #4699
Posts: 1119Camala Harris was spot on...in this instance
Originally Posted by Golfinho [View Original Post]
HARRIS on VACCINE: "If Donald Trump Tells Us to Take It, I'm Not Taking It"
and then immediately said;
"If the Doctors tell us that we should take it, I'll be the first in line to take it, absolutely." "But if Donald Trump tells us to take it, I'm not taking it.".
I for one, wouldn't believe a fucking word out of Agent Orange's Clorox bleach mouth, let alone take medical advice. Have at it, if wish to take medical advice from the "Orange Pied Piper".
-
09-16-21 04:28 #4698
Posts: 1604This again?
Originally Posted by ChrisP [View Original Post]
-
09-16-21 03:40 #4697
Posts: 2374Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
Fast forward to post-election and she's singing a different tune. Completely shameless to play politics in the midst of a pandemic while people are dying.
Tell your sob story about how Trump kept you from being able to find hookers you can afford -- tell it to Camala Harris.
-
09-16-21 03:11 #4696
Posts: 5452Originally Posted by PVMonger [View Original Post]
This won't be the last virus that can be manipulated into as deadly and as ISG goal-destroying a Pandemic or worse than this one through typical Repub incompetence, cowardice and lies.
And there is an unlimited number of ambitious private sector failures eager to run for office as a Trump Repub Clone in all future elections, rigging them in every way possible to make sure they "win" and therefore can and will continue to produce those results.
I submit the primary reason new posters are showing up here to promote more election wins for Repubs, however small any single push and promotion might seem here, there or anywhere, matters to their goal of producing the very results I just cited. That is why they have nothing to say about mongering on any other forum.
You think "American Politics" has only a tangential relationship to the purpose of this website? Lol. I wish that were true. Maybe prior to Trump's ride down that escalator to announce his candidacy. But not anymore.
-
09-16-21 02:52 #4695
Posts: 1956Originally Posted by ChrisP [View Original Post]
Approved for what? Aspirin was approved long before then, and has treated billions of people. Why not use it to treat Covid then?
Not the point, my ass. Why did then your piece of shit "maverick" article lie by omission? It was the monoclonal antibodies that save his life, not useless ivermectin.
Originally Posted by ChrisP [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by ChrisP [View Original Post]
https://www.covid19treatmentguidelin...ables/table-2c
-
09-16-21 00:23 #4694
Posts: 1044Another humiliation for Biden's handlers' America
In the aftermath of the most disastrous and humiliating American defeat in history, brought to you by Joe Biden's handlers, another disastrous blow to American strategic power, wealth and prestige quietly went below the radar. Last week, Russia completed its Nordstream gas pipeline to Germany.
President Trump had previously brought the huge influence of America to bear and blocked the project. As the leading member of NATO and effective protector of Germany, America holds significant sway in the country, and Trump had been pushing for the Germans to increase their shipments of American energy resources over Russian gas. Much of these American resources would have used the Keystone pipeline.
Just a few months into his fraudulent regime, Biden's handlers not only approved the Russian pipeline, giving Putin an enormous boost in both wealth and power as he can now effectively turn off Germany's lights; but also cancelled the Keystone pipeline, destroying tens of thousands of American jobs and billions in potential energy earnings.
Great job, Kremin Joe!
https://www.defensenews.com/smr/ener...y-is-complete/
-
09-15-21 23:45 #4693
Posts: 1044Originally Posted by CaliGuy [View Original Post]
Of course now that it's their side which has capitalized on the above fraud, they've changed their tune and say it's all dandy. LOL.
Running a secure election is incredibly simple. Citizens register to vote if they wish to do so. They show up at the polling station on election day (all stations should be open from 7 am to 10 pm, so anyone who cares can find time to go vote) with a photo ID to verify themselves. They go into a private booth and mark their choice on a paper ballot which they push into a secure box.
Anyone who is legitimately unable to get to a polling station (housebound due to illness or injury; stationed or working overseas) can apply in advance for an absentee ballot. Their identity will be verified and they will receive the ballot. This will be a tiny fraction of total voters.
At the end of the day, the secure boxes are taken to a local counting centre, where volunteers tally the votes in the open. Election scrutineers from both parties are free to observe as they wish. Each batch of ballots is overseen by two counters, one Republican and one Democrat, both of whom must sign off on the tally before it is added to the total.
There is no need for fancy machines, magical algorithms, transferring of data round the world, pallots of 98% democrat ballots showing up at 4 am, etc. It is incredibly simple math: 1+1+1+1+1+1+1 etc. Even a product of a democrat city public school could manage it (well, as long as he was in advanced math class). That is exactly how elections work all round the world: Britain, France, Japan, etc.
The only reason anyone would want to deviate from this logical, tried, tested and trusted system is to rig an election and take power fraudulently against the wishes of the population. It might work in the short term, but in the long run it will lead to the downfall of the country.
-
09-15-21 04:37 #4692
Posts: 1604So what
Originally Posted by ChrisP [View Original Post]
The study you referred to said ivermectin showed promise against COVID in a laboratory. That's what "in vitro" means. Drug company archives are full of drugs that showed promise in the lab but failed clinical trials. Some problems were discovered after the drug hit the market. Remember thalidomide? Fen-phen?
And besides, Big Pharma doesn't give two hoots if $5 per pill ivermectin is authorized as a COVID treatment some time in the future. They'll just jack up the price to $1000 per pill. And Republicans will be OK with that because Government shouldn't force corporations to do things.
But Rogan received much more than ivermectin. He received monoclonal antibodies as well. Probably 2 injections at $1250 a pop. All told, his treatment probably cost $3,000. All so he wouldn't take two $20 vaccine shots. WTF? Really? He, of course, can afford it. What about the uninsured who can't? Seems like the party of limited government spending has got things backwards, don't you think?
-
09-14-21 23:56 #4691
Posts: 3852Originally Posted by CaliGuy [View Original Post]
Total Witch Hunt.
-
09-14-21 23:45 #4690
Posts: 2344Originally Posted by Kadeem [View Original Post]Originally Posted by Xpartan [View Original Post]
-
09-14-21 23:33 #4689
Posts: 1044Originally Posted by Xpartan [View Original Post]
Furthermore, the scientific papers also showed that Ivermectin is beneficial against covid.
Why did the media mention none of this? Why did they not mention that it has been used by humans for three decades, was known as a wonder drug, and studies have shown it to be beneficial against covid?
If the media was even-handed and unbiased, they would have stated all of those facts.
But unfortunately they, like the leftist douches on this board, are mendacious fake news hacks following a bolshevik agenda.
-
09-14-21 22:57 #4688
Posts: 1119Mongering Forum ONLY to talk politics...hmmm...smells fishy...
Originally Posted by PVMonger [View Original Post]
For example Agent Orange, Matt Gaetz, Pres. Clinton, Elliot Spitzer and one of my all-time favs, Alabama USA Senate candidate, Judge Roy Moore. (BTW, was it just me or did no one see the resemblance to Max Hardcore...kkkk).
But I'll have to agree to solely come to a mongering forum to ONLY post about US politics, just doesn't pass the smell test.
-
09-14-21 22:41 #4687
Posts: 2344Originally Posted by CaliGuy [View Original Post]
Of those over 22 million registered voters (a November 2020 measure) 46.1% are registered democrats. 24 years ago democrats were 47.2% of registered voters, so it holds pretty steady.
Republicans seem to be a dying breed out here, as their number of registered voters in California has steadily dropped over the years from 36.4% of CA registered voters in 1996 to only 24.2% in November 2020.
But with shitty GOP candidates and bad policies, it is easy to understand why that has happened in just one generation.
The ballots have not been counted yet, but as the mail-in ballots arrive a constant tally is made of how many ballots arrive from democrats, as well as the minor parties, like the GOP.
Mail-in ballots from democrats are outpacing republicans by an easy to predict 2:1 ratio in this current republican recall effort.
Gavin Newsom won in 2018 with (as I recall) over 60% of the votes, and he will probably be kept in office (and re-elected) with repeats of this +60% measure.
-
09-14-21 21:51 #4686
Posts: 1604This is all fake news
Originally Posted by CaliGuy [View Original Post]
Second, since signatures are checked, the fact that someone had 300 unopened ballots is meaningless. https://thehill.com/homenews/state-w...recall-ballots.
Why do you cultists even bother? You realize, right, that just because you say something is true doesn't make it true.
-
09-14-21 19:56 #4685
Posts: 1956There're only a zillion of dedicated political forums and boards out there
Originally Posted by PVMonger [View Original Post]
Why does a new member come to a forum called "International Sex Guide" and the only things he ever posts are about politics?
And then all his 'political' posts consist of wild conspiracy theories.
That makes me even more curious. I don't know, just can't help it, I guess.
Considering, again, that there are zillions of dedicated political forums out there where he can exercise his First Amendment.
So why?