Melbourne

[Projector]

Oh yes, sorry. KIK is what most people use to message. That's all I meant.

Even telegram is used by people if they don't want to reveal their number using WhatsApp. But we are so used to using WA that we it takes time to get used to. Most of the girls I find are more comfortable with WA.

[Projector]

Kik is just a messaging platform. It's not setup for finding suitable profiles.

I did try a few of the Kik chatrooms. I felt these were being run by keyboard warriors at home getting their own rocks off.

So, the strategy after finding the contacts on websites is to use Kik as people can message you without you having to reveal your phone number as is the case with Whatsapp.

Pp.

Can you suggest some good website similar to SA?

[Gamer76]

Kik is just a messaging platform. It's not setup for finding suitable profiles.

I did try a few of the Kik chatrooms. I felt these were being run by keyboard warriors at home getting their own rocks off.

So, the strategy after finding the contacts on websites is to use Kik as people can message you without you having to reveal your phone number as is the case with Whatsapp.

Pp.

Yes that's true.

[MisterMischief]

Out of SA and Kik, don't you think Kik takes a lot of time to find genuine profile?

Oh yes, sorry. KIK is what most people use to message. That's all I meant.

[PilotPaul]

Out of SA and Kik, don't you think Kik takes a lot of time to find genuine profile?

Kik is just a messaging platform. It's not setup for finding suitable profiles.

I did try a few of the Kik chatrooms. I felt these were being run by keyboard warriors at home getting their own rocks off.

So, the strategy after finding the contacts on websites is to use Kik as people can message you without you having to reveal your phone number as is the case with Whatsapp.

Pp.

[Gamer76]

Especially concerning the time / money logic. My guess though is that if I'm lucky, the SB I find won't be concerned about the time, otherwise, what's the point of GFE.

Thanks.

I agree too.

[Gamer76]

I concur PP. I haven't checked it out for a couple of months, but I have made plenty of contacts. KIK is often the messenger of choice.

There are some gorgeous girls there. Although many profiles indicate a desire for long-term, the opportunities for those relationships are rare (in my view anyway).

Don't take it too seriously, have fun, be generous and decent. I agree $500 usually gets you over the line. You just don't need to go any higher than that given the quality.

Some of the backpacker girls are amazing. Or at least they were! I don't have much advice for a long-term, ongoing arrangement. A couple looked promising for me, but there's often an impediment.

What I'm curious about in the current environment is how easy a meet-up is. As you can imagine the businessman / hotel scenario suited a lot of people. Being single I could either pick-up a girl, or uber to mine, but I'm not exactly sure how it's functioning at the moment.

Best of luck.

Out of SA and Kik, don't you think Kik takes a lot of time to find genuine profile?

[Blueballed]

I am a fan of seeking.com . It is worth doing a paid membership there (and on ISG of course).

Lots of guys on there trying to get freebies. So a serious guy that is willing to splash $500/ week on a girl will be well catered.

Watch our for the GPS. Golden pussy syndrome. Quite a few girls do join the site thinking that they are worth more.

Remember that if the commodity is a pussy then the comparison price is the casual by the hour brothel price. My logic is if a brothel rate is $200/ hour and the girl gets in hand $100 so the sugarbabe needs to perform for 5 hours. This 5 hours may not all be sex of course.

My SB would prepare a lunch at her house, the dining and wine, then an afternoon romp for $500/ week.

On seeking don't be an a-hole. They are normal girls that need money.

Find your sweet spot.

PP.

Especially concerning the time / money logic. My guess though is that if I'm lucky, the SB I find won't be concerned about the time, otherwise, what's the point of GFE.

Thanks.

[PilotPaul]

$500 week /26 k a year LOL, this is the wrong thread for this, where haggling over $50 or $20 is the game for a cheap extras.

Sorry I didn't mean for that to be like that. I'm middle aged, worked, studied & saved hard since I was 15 years old. No kids on my payroll. Paid off house etc. Have an old car. Basically I have no other overheads.

On a seeking arrangement I am not locked into any contractual arrangement. If I change MY mind I just tell her it's paused. I've had one that I turn on & off which was agreed. I've had a SB as short as a day, another was just for an agreed weekend of specific travel. It's a case of getting what I want. But it does add up. One year I calculated I was spending $12 k on shop and privates.

$500 is at the higher end of what girls would likely be getting on going.

MisterMischief I don't know the current state of play. I did consider booking a local hotel last week but technically that is non-essential so the girl and I put that on hold. I think it would be ok for a sugarbabe to host.

In Qld I am getting more comfortable with the lockdown reducing my chances of catching the virus. I'll maybe try a local provider in a few weeks.

PP.

[TheSainter]

I am a fan of seeking.com . It is worth doing a paid membership there (and on ISG of course).


My SB would prepare a lunch at her house, the dining and wine, then an afternoon romp for $500/ week.

PP.

$500 week /26 k a year LOL, this is the wrong thread for this, where haggling over $50 or $20 is the game for a cheap extras.

On an other note I am surprised how well the shops are following the rules, I have seen Kingston Council really coming down hard with a few notices up on shops.

[MisterMischief]

I am a fan of seeking.com . It is worth doing a paid membership there (and on ISG of course).

Lots of guys on there trying to get freebies. So a serious guy that is willing to splash $500/ week on a girl will be well catered.

Watch our for the GPS. Golden pussy syndrome. Quite a few girls do join the site thinking that they are worth more.

Remember that if the commodity is a pussy then the comparison price is the casual by the hour brothel price. My logic is if a brothel rate is $200/ hour and the girl gets in hand $100 so the sugarbabe needs to perform for 5 hours. This 5 hours may not all be sex of course.

My SB would prepare a lunch at her house, the dining and wine, then an afternoon romp for $500/ week.

On seeking don't be an a-hole. They are normal girls that need money.

Find your sweet spot.

PP.

I concur PP. I haven't checked it out for a couple of months, but I have made plenty of contacts. KIK is often the messenger of choice.

There are some gorgeous girls there. Although many profiles indicate a desire for long-term, the opportunities for those relationships are rare (in my view anyway).

Don't take it too seriously, have fun, be generous and decent. I agree $500 usually gets you over the line. You just don't need to go any higher than that given the quality.

Some of the backpacker girls are amazing. Or at least they were! I don't have much advice for a long-term, ongoing arrangement. A couple looked promising for me, but there's often an impediment.

What I'm curious about in the current environment is how easy a meet-up is. As you can imagine the businessman / hotel scenario suited a lot of people. Being single I could either pick-up a girl, or uber to mine, but I'm not exactly sure how it's functioning at the moment.

Best of luck.

[PilotPaul]

Greetings,

Long time lurker here. I'm on the same page mate (Sharpshoot). Do any fellow punters have experience in sugar dating? I think this could be the closest thing to finding 'independent' girls if the going keeps getting tough.

I am a fan of seeking.com . It is worth doing a paid membership there (and on ISG of course).

Lots of guys on there trying to get freebies. So a serious guy that is willing to splash $500/ week on a girl will be well catered.

Watch our for the GPS. Golden pussy syndrome. Quite a few girls do join the site thinking that they are worth more.

Remember that if the commodity is a pussy then the comparison price is the casual by the hour brothel price. My logic is if a brothel rate is $200/ hour and the girl gets in hand $100 so the sugarbabe needs to perform for 5 hours. This 5 hours may not all be sex of course.

My SB would prepare a lunch at her house, the dining and wine, then an afternoon romp for $500/ week.

On seeking don't be an a-hole. They are normal girls that need money.

Find your sweet spot.

PP.

[OlderPlayer]

Struggling big time but lots of money going into RnT future fund.

I will do my bit to kit start the economy.

[DanTheMan]

Who else is struggling during these dark times.

I know I am.

[AussieGaigin]

Can you suggest some good and authentic ones?

Search for sugar daddies or sugar babes / girls. They don't come cheap, and there is no guarantee you will be exclusive.