Printable View
[QUOTE=A158]Hey Slackerslacker,
Try Pleasure Plus. Its maker is the Global Protection Corporation of Boston. Good quality without the rubber odor.
Cheers
A158[/QUOTE]
Thanks for info. Do you know if it can be found in Thailand?
If not, I will check it out next time I am in USA
Sagami 0. 02 millimeter super strong super thin. Every girl I used it with keeps checking if I was still wearing a condom. You really can't tell the difference. It has great heat transfer too. I buy mine through japan mail order. GET IT you will never use anything else even Bareback again.
[QUOTE=A158]Hey Slackerslacker,
Try Pleasure Plus. Its maker is the Global Protection Corporation of Boston. Good quality without the rubber odor.
Cheers
A158[/QUOTE]
Hi Folks,
This is a very interesting thread and I think I will learn more about safe mongering in Thailand.
I always use condom both for pussy and ass fucking, better with some lube to ease friction, so I consider myself quite careful.
On the other hand, I like to get BBBJ and I am eager to experience it with a see. I. M. Or see. O. F. Ending, which I am not used to do in my country since it costs twice.
So my question is: which chances are involved in see. I. M. If girl was infected?
Sagami Original 002 is available in BKK? If yes where.
As always. Thanks for the help.
AK
these quotes are from the pattaya thread.
[quote=trevor2522; 1097402]no problem. i have been using master mineral supplement for the past 2 years. knocks out all pathogens. also brush my teeth with it. taking the maintenance dose of 4-6 drops daily is highly protective against stds as well as being a general tonic. if required the dose can be increased until symptoms are gone. also cleans out dengue and malaria within hours. why isn't everyone using mms? because the globalist-controlled big pharma and media ignore it.
[url]www.infowars.com[/url]
do your homework and live life to the full!
[url]http://jimhumble.biz/site/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2&itemid=21[/url]
thailand supplier.
[url]http://miraclemineral.org/suppliers.php[/url]
stds are nothing. the real challenge is finding tight girls without babies or an attitude! [/quote][quote=dinghy; 1097975]sorry to tell you this trev but "minerals" are totally ineffective against stds.
you might as well drop snake oil into / onto yourself. will work just as well. [/quote][quote=mouse1; 1097444]i drink neat bleach for breakfast, and i have never had hiv / aids. can't be a coincidence.
alternatively you could believe the fda:
on july 30th. 2010 and again on october 1, 2010, the united states food and drug administration warned against the use of the product "miracle mineral supplement" or "mms". which when made up according to instructions produces chlorine dioxide. mms has been marketed as a treatment for a variety of conditions. the fda warning told consumers that this industrial bleach can cause serious complications, including severe dehydration, nausea and diarrhea. there have been no reported deaths from use of mms; however the fda has received numerous reports of nausea, severe vomiting, and life-threatening low blood pressure caused by dehydration. [22] the makers of mms do state that nausea and vomiting is a sign that it is working. licensed medical professionals and toxicologists would not agree with this statement.
but they laughed at galieo, didn't they? [/quote]i tried mms twice. the first time i took 4 drops and was okay. the second time i took 8 drops and got severe nausea followed by one week of diarrhea. i guess i should have stuck with 4 drops like the first poster. perhaps there is a better alternative.
[url]http://healthyoldcodger.com/[/url]
iodine, pathogen killer extraordinaire.
as far back as 1905 iodine was recognized as a treatment for consumption / tuberculosis. even though iodine has been recognized as having the ability to kill most pathogens on the skin within 90 seconds, it has been ignored by modern medicine for all that time, does not that tell you something? going even further back to the american civil war, iodine was used extensively for treating battlefield wounds and with much success, in fact, without iodine many more soldiers from both sides would have died from wound infections, no antibiotics back then.
"iodine is by far the best antibiotic, antiviral and antiseptic of all time." dr. david derry.
[url]http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_iodine01.htm[/url]
nascent iodine is a scientific term for iodine where the iodine molecule has the diatomic bond broken and has a high amount of electromagnetic energy associated with it.
once diluted and inside the body this atom is readily absorbed and utilized by the body. this charged atom of iodine starts a process where it gradually loses its energy over 2 to 3 hours. after the atomic iodine has made its rounds, whatever then remains and is unable to be used is excreted in the [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url]. the [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url] will turn bright yellow from the excess, similar to what happens with water-soluble b-vitamins that the body doesn't need.
"the atomic iodine is perhaps the least toxic and least irritating of all the iodine formulas available."
"iodine has many positive therapeutic actions. it is a potent anti-infective agent. no virus, bacteria or parasite has been shown to be resistant to iodine therapy," writes dr. brownstein.
this is an incredible statement but one that can easily be backed by hardcore medical science. it is the reason hospitals use iodine by the gallon and in reality the only reason hospitals are not like ground zero sites contaminated in an infectious sense is because of iodine's broad spectrum anti-infective power.
few are the doctors who have realized that iodine can be taken internally in large quantities and that it will have the same effect internally as it does on external surfaces.
there has been a lot of commotion in health circles about a product called miracle mineral supplement (mms). it is being advertised as the answer to aids, hepatitis a, b and c, malaria, herpes, tb, most cancer and many more of mankind's worst diseases.
the claim about how the chlorine (a poison, not what would be considered a mineral for health) interacts with pathogens is the same claim we can make about iodine (a safe nutritional mineral) , which is known to also kill pathogens of all types on contact.
If you think for maybe 15-20 seconds you'll figure out that there is no such thing as a magic chemical that can tell the difference between a "pathogen" and your dick. Anything that kills a "pathogen" is inherently a poison. This includes antibiotics. The world is full of quacks eager to sell you a bottle of something that either won't work, might kill you, or both. We take small doses of these poisons under certain circumstances because it leads to better outcomes than not taking the poisons. Doing this without killing yourself requires actual science, not voodoo. That's why there are regulations, clinical trials and publication of research data. I do not imagine Big Pharma to be my friend, but don't be so eager to dismiss it and run to the pharmaceutical equivalent of a tuk-tuk driver.
[QUOTE=Etaoin2003;1103817]I do not imagine Big Pharma to be my friend, but don't be so eager to dismiss it and run to the pharmaceutical equivalent of a tuk-tuk driver.[/QUOTE]Very well said
Please be warned, I've seen consumer programs on television test the MMS and its basically just industrial cleaner.
It won't do you any good, it will do you harm if you take more then just a few drops.
The only way to be safe is to practice safe sex. Bring your condoms, I do!
[QUOTE=Etaoin2003;1103817]If you think for maybe 15-20 seconds you'll figure out that there is no such thing as a magic chemical that can tell the difference between a "pathogen" and your dick. Anything that kills a "pathogen" is inherently a poison. This includes antibiotics. The world is full of quacks eager to sell you a bottle of something that either won't work, might kill you, or both. We take small doses of these poisons under certain circumstances because it leads to better outcomes than not taking the poisons. Doing this without killing yourself requires actual science, not voodoo. That's why there are regulations, clinical trials and publication of research data. I do not imagine Big Pharma to be my friend, but don't be so eager to dismiss it and run to the pharmaceutical equivalent of a tuk-tuk driver.[/QUOTE]
I would be most interested on some feedback on the above condom, couple of members have posted of their satisfaction when using Sagami 0. 02 condoms. In fact it felt like bareback to one chap. Sounds encouraging?
Prior to ordering, I would like to be sure.
[QUOTE=Noddy; 1106536]I would be most interested on some feedback on the above condom, couple of members have posted of their satisfaction when using Sagami 0. 02 condoms. In fact it felt like bareback to one chap. Sounds encouraging?
Prior to ordering, I would like to be sure. [/QUOTE]I tried them and I also had the experience of the girl thinking I had nothing on. They also felt better than my normal Trojan Magnums in that regard. I have one complaint though. Even though I bought size large they were very tough to get on and too small in diameter. I mentioned this to a friend and he told me that Trojan also has an ultrathin that is larger. I do not know what the thickness is and have not tried them but would like to.
[QUOTE=Edward M;1106658]I mentioned this to a friend and he told me that Trojan also has an ultrathin that is larger. I do not know what the thickness is and have not tried them but would like to.[/QUOTE]You cannot compare SAGAMI condoms with the rest, it; s not a Fair Fight!
Sagami are made of Polyurethane which is Flexible, Tough and Resistant. it is Thinner, Tougher (3x tougher than Latex), conducts heat Better, is odourless and oh very important in Thailand: Oil Resistant.
once you try one, Going back to Latex will be very difficult ;)
HIV Drugs May Prevent Infection in Healthy Individuals.
By Alice Park Tuesday, November 23, 2010
As effective as the antiviral drugs have been in controlling the spread of HIV, the ultimate goal of any AIDS therapy is to prevent infection with the virus in the first place. And so far, nothing — from vaccines to gels — has proven up to the task of holding off HIV.
But in an exciting study published in the New England Journal of Medicine, researchers report that the very drugs that have helped to quell HIV in already infected patients may be effective in blocking infection in healthy, uninfected individuals as well. (More on Time. Com: How Not to Get Sick)
In a trial involving nearly 2, 500 HIV-negative gay men who were at high risk of contracting HIV, in six countries, scientists found that those who took the currently prescribed treatment dose of a combination anti-HIV medications known as Truvada had a 44% lower rate of HIV infection than those taking a placebo during the study's longest follow up of nearly three years. Among those who took their medications more faithfully on a daily basis, the benefit was even greater; their risk of acquiring HIV dropped to 73% compared to placebo.
'These results represent a major advance in HIV prevention research, ' said Dr. Kevin Fenton, director of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) National Center for HIV-AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention in a statement. 'For the first time, we have evidence that a daily pill used to treat HIV is partially effective for preventing HIV among gay and bisexual men at high risk for infection. '
The excitement was echoed by others in the HIV community, who have been pushing for a stronger preventive strategy to combat the growing epidemic of cases, particularly in the developing world. 'The study is really quite impressive, and the data are very robust, really strong, ' says Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institutes of Health's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. The NIH, along with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, funded the study, which took place at 11 different sites. (More on Time. Com: Are HIV Rates in Gay Men Really 'Out of Control'?)
Fauci is particularly encouraged by the data, since a closer look at the difference in HIV infection rates among those taking medications suggests that any exposure to the potent anti-HIV drugs can be effective in thwarting infection. For instance, among those in the drug arm, the volunteers who showed any measurable level of medication, no matter how faithfully they were popping their daily pills, had a 13-fold lower rate of HIV infection than those who showed no measurable level of drug in their system. 'This is really huge; this is a very impressive result, ' he says. 'As with any new treatment strategy, it's all about whether you adhere to the regimen. '
In fact, Fauci suspects that many physicians are already prescribing antiretroviral medications this way, in an attempt to head off infections in uninfected but high-risk individuals. These findings should bolster that practice, he believes, even as government health officials decide whether the results are robust enough to justify recommending anti-HIV drugs as a prevention strategy.
In the meantime, while the positive results suggest that antiretroviral drugs may be a critical part of a strong prevention program, experts note that the findings are not a license to abandon safe sex with condoms. The drugs do not alter the immune system in any way, nor does it prime the body the way that a vaccine would against HIV. These medications act only in the presence of HIV, to block its ability to infect and replicate in the body's healthy cells, so the prevention strategy simply ensures that the drugs are in place, ready to act at the first encounter with the virus. The study participants were also all educated about risk-reduction practices, such as safe sex, and were provided with condoms and counseling as well as treatment for sexually transmitted diseases. (More on Time. Com: Portugal's Drug Experience: New Study Confirms Decriminalization Was a Success)
'[The] results are exciting, but it is not time for anyone to stop using condoms or stop following proven prevention methods, ' said Fenton. '[The study] cannot be seen as the first line of defense against HIV. '
Fauci agrees, adding that more research will be needed to assess the effectiveness of the drugs in preventing infection among women, as well as heterosexual men. And because the drugs do have side effects, including potentially unhealthy changes in lipid levels, other studies will also investigate whether people could use the drugs intermittently as a prevention-based strategy — only, for example, when they plan on being sexually active.
Read more: [url]http://healthland.time.com/2010/11/23/hiv-drugs-may-prevent-infection-in-healthy-individuals/[/url]#ixzz1CL7lo7Cs
All highly dubious in my opinion. What a laugh. So who benefits. Pharmaceutical Industry does.
Preventative medicines. Broad grin. The cash register goes. Sching!
Has anyone tried them on a BG see how much of laughter you can get out of them? But seriously, does anyone think they would object to it for DATY?
Hey guys,
I'm posting here as I'm not sure where to post and it seems there are as many experienced guys in here as anywhere.
A side note: I have not been to Thailand so this question is general. Hopefully that doesn't offend anyone.
I recently noticed some irritation and went to the doc to see about what I thougth was just a UTI problem. After some testing it turned out I had gonorrhea and a touch of vaginosis of all things (not even considered an std by some). He gave me 7 days of the dioxycine (sp?) and symptoms disappeared. A follow up test came up totally clean on everything. I should mention that the list of stuff I don't have (negative tests) is long. No HIV, herpes, on and on.
Unfortunately, I had to go back to see him as I'm experiencing the beginning symptoms again. Zero partners so I know it's not a re-infection. This time he did the prostate / massage test and I'm expecting results this coming week. I can't imagine how it won't come back as re-infected.
My question is how worried should I be and has anyone had good luck with more serious anti-biotics and had %100 clean bill of health afterwards?
I'd greatly appreciater any feedback you can give. I'm trying not to freak out too much about it. Thanks for help or relaying any experiences.