Printable View
Bitumen and TT123 Surprised anyone remembers my reports.
A relevant story. I had a favourite and I agreed to meet her outside for an indeterminate amount of time (deciding to rely on her good nature). After about 2.5 hours eating and shopping she terminated the meeting. Afterwards she expected me to continue to spend 300 to 400 a day on her in the club: needless to say, that never happened. That was by far my worst ripoff in all my 15 years in FKK.
[QUOTE=Optimist;2102746]Bitumen and TT123. Surprised anyone remembers my reports. [/QUOTE]No memory needed. Message you requested below was dutifully relayed at that time. She responded that you will dutifully still return to her; and she will be waiting for you on the date you specified to her!
I regret that I totally forgot to relay the latter part until I read your very recent post. I have failed miserably as an intermediary, and apologise profusely if that slip results inadvertently in a relational rupture.
[QUOTE=Optimist;2091164]If you see Betty tell her I am now spending my money on a beautiful girl who appreciates my money.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=TankTank123;2102755]No memory needed. Message you requested below was dutifully relayed at that time. She responded that you will dutifully still return to her; and she will be waiting for you on the date you specified to her!
I regret that I totally forgot to relay the latter part until I read your very recent post. I have failed miserably as an intermediary, and apologise profusely if that slip results inadvertently in a relational rupture.[/QUOTE]Probably best that you didn't relay my message. I hadn't expected anyone to take up my slightly acidic request.
[QUOTE=Optimist;2102762]Probably best that you didn't relay my message. I hadn't expected anyone to take up my slightly acidic request.[/QUOTE]Since I was going to Sharks the day after I read the request, I did send you a PM stating that I would relay that message. As you did not object, I assumed you were serious. Sorry anyway.
[QUOTE=Optimist;2102746]Bitumen and TT123 Surprised anyone remembers my reports.
A relevant story. I had a favourite and I agreed to meet her outside for an indeterminate amount of time (deciding to rely on her good nature). After about 2.5 hours eating and shopping she terminated the meeting. Afterwards she expected me to continue to spend 300 to 400 a day on her in the club: needless to say, that never happened. That was by far my worst ripoff in all my 15 years in FKK.[/QUOTE]Maybe I'm overly curious but I suppose you paid for the restaurant and the shopping spree.
[QUOTE=BigBuddy69;2102768]Maybe I'm overly curious but I suppose you paid for the restaurant and the shopping spree.[/QUOTE]It was only a cheap restaurant: I paid. Didn't pay for the shopping.
No problem about the message.All ok.
[QUOTE=NF4591;2102733]I visited Sharks yesterday, just had one session:
Serena (Ro): skinny blonde, very cute with knee-high socks. She pushed for an hour before we went in the room, and said it was needed if I wanted a massage and kissing. I knew this was BS, but had already passed on a few girls and had been waiting for one I was attracted to, so I went for it. The session really wasn't good: terrible massage, kissing wasn't even LFK, no touching pussy. It was a nice sight to fuck in missionary, but she really had no skills. Rating 4/10, would not repeat.[/QUOTE]Your conclusion is the same result that I received with the small difference that I got some tongue action in the kissing category, but the kissing was at my initiation and not of Serena's own volition.
DATY was available and she was amendable to other requests too with no further up-sell much to my relief.
The deal was the kissing was only on offer in the one hour package. Yes, I caved in to the request. My game was off. The regular status factor did not work either.
She does look good, small tits though but otherwise a young tight body and pretty face.
Serena and I still make contact but then it is only that. Passing contact.
[QUOTE=Optimist;2102746]Bitumen and TT123 Surprised anyone remembers my reports.
A relevant story. I had a favourite and I agreed to meet her outside for an indeterminate amount of time (deciding to rely on her good nature). After about 2.5 hours eating and shopping she terminated the meeting. Afterwards she expected me to continue to spend 300 to 400 a day on her in the club: needless to say, that never happened. That was by far my worst ripoff in all my 15 years in FKK.[/QUOTE]Hey, Optimist, there are others who have been there as well. She did a flip on you, she took the money and ran providing little to no services.
There is a lot of gall in this girl to think that nothing wrong has happened, especially as there was expectations involved, maybe not clarified but at least out there. It is so interesting that girls doing this type of tricks expect you to come back to them as if nothing has happened. She needs to learn from what she did to you or else it will perpetuate this scenario again and again. History repeats. Break the wheel (cycle).
[QUOTE=Bitumen;2102945] She needs to learn from what she did to you or else it will perpetuate this scenario again and again. History repeats.[/QUOTE]Each hustle gives her more practical experience, and she will perpetrate the scenario better next time. The good ones know how to read men. I posted this article once I believe. It's about how American strippers profile their customers. I believe it is relevant to WG-monger dynamics, because the same men that would frequent the strip clubs would more than likely go to brothels if they were a legal option.
Eight customer archetypes:
[URL]https://www.xojane.com/sex/strip-club-science-anatomy-of-a-hustle[/URL]
One monger that I spoke with Saturday said that he heard from two different Sharks WGs, that the attacks were orchestrated by a rival club.
McAdonis and Bitumen. I had to break with the girl as a matter of self-respect, or the pattern of exploitation would intensify, as it had been doing over a period of many months. She could not understand that such behaviour would not encourage clients to invest in her: we had many discussions about it and she explained to me all the ways she was ripped customers off.
Did you pay her the standard rate for the time out together?
[QUOTE=BigBuddy69;2102960]Did you pay her the standard rate for the time out together?[/QUOTE]I said I would give her 500, and she said she would charge less than the club rate for the time. I wanted to see how she coped with the situation. Unfortunately she did not behave honourably.No big deal
[QUOTE=McAdonis;2102955]One monger that I spoke with Saturday said that he heard from two different Sharks WGs, that the attacks were orchestrated by a rival club.[/QUOTE]A rival club to both Oase and Sharks? Since both clubs were attacked by stink bombs.
[QUOTE=Bitumen;2102966]A rival club to both Oase and Sharks? Since both clubs were attacked by stink bombs.[/QUOTE]Either that, or by Oase. Doesn't really matter though. A stink bomb attack more or less isn't what makes people leave a club to go to a new one. It is mainly the girls at the clubs that draw customers. So why not focus on improving services and making it easier for the girls working in your club, as opposed to creating some bad odor at a local competitor? I recall I used to do this at school when I was 10 or 11. That is the level the people behind this is at now.