American Politics

[QUOTE=SubCmdr;2959266]Democrats are sore losers. Republicans are bad winners. Good bad or indifferent; [B]the country will get what they voted for[/B].[/QUOTE]Yes, the primary voters did a pretty piss poor job of selecting candidates. It's wild isn't it? Trump tried to steal the Presidency four years ago. And he won!

As to Harris, I'll take a couple of excerpts from a post on another political thread on another hooker board. The poster, who's one smart SOB, explains what happened (bold text), and offers solace and advice to the losers. I like his description of how the Democrats left a ticking time bomb (budget deficits) that may explode at about the end of Trump's term. In general this is an excellent political strategy on the part of the Democrats, which over the decades has caused observers like EihTooms to believe Republican stewardship sucks and vice versa. You'll like what he says about the bond vigilanties. That is, how it fits with your thoughts about the merits of Bitcoin.

Here's the excerpt.

"Progressives managed to ratchet up federal government spending very impressively indeed over the last three years, handing the Trump team a very hot potato -- with a trend structural deficit / GDP ratio close to 7%.

What if Republicans mismanage the situation in almost as reckless and irresponsible a fashion as Democrats did in 2021-22? (If history is any guide, that's a real possibility!

Or what if the "bond vigilantes" Yardeni first spoke of way back in the 1980's return from their long sabbatical, precipitating a housing industry fiasco? In that event, it might be pretty difficult for Republicans to hold the house or for J. D. to win the presidency in '28.

That's the beauty of the American system! If one team fucks up and gets fired by the voters, it gets to plan the comeback soon enough. How many times has the political pendulum swung over the last three four decades?

[B]The Blue Team better find a less disastrous candidate, though. Perhaps a Bay Area uber-progressive who's expressed the desire to ban fracking, jettison any semblance of border security, spend money in trillion-dollar chunks on almost every element of an AOC/Bernie-style wish list, and even use public funds to finance sex-change surgery for condemned prisoners just isn't the wisest choice.[/B]

So, Democrats would do well to encourage people like California's "Governor Brylcreem" to stay out of the limelight!"

Yes, this dude's so smart he knows how to spell Brylcreem! I had to look that one up.

[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2959166]BTW I am a huge fan of Hegemonic Masculinity!! No Beta Cucks Allowed!![/QUOTE]Of course you are. And a Sanders voter too. I agree with him on foreign policy and social liberties. But some of his ideas about the economy that attract you would make the USA like France, or worse. Meaning we'd all be poorer, except for the select few who work for the federal government or are too lazy to work.

[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2959350]Here we go, another soy boy. Kamala lost because of sexism. Of course, that overlooks the fact that female voters outweigh male voters. Just like most of Spidy's dates, many of the women stayed home.

How about women did not like Kamala? Or were just too damned lazy to vote? Don't wory, S, if you pony up all that Trump tax cut cash, I am sure you will find a woman willing to peg you.

Maybe you should say racist America was not ready for a 75% white president.[/QUOTE]An old black dood sat next to me a very young white dood sat in front of me sideways, the train is jam packed.

They start talking about the election, the old black dood says I knew he would win, the young guy says yes Sir, never any doubt.

Then the black guy says I would never vote for a female, they just don't have what it takes to run this country.

Then I hear someone say what the fuck did you say?

It was an older black woman I thought she was a man, with a covid mask and very very short hair (a lesbian).

She starts screaming in his face, they are yelling for several minutes.

I thought he was going to blast her ass to the moon ([URL]https://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/nation/2012/10/12/1630847/[/URL]) and finally he says get the fuk out of here and pushes her to get thru the crowd to get off the train as he is leaving I'm yelling no simpin here with my White Power first in the air and many men are laughing hard!

As I got off the train a few stops later I start yelling again with my first pumping in the air, no fuckin simpin here!! To loud ass laughing.

This was an epic battle of the sexes. Kamala Harris ended her campaign with Beyonc, Oprah and Lady Gaga. Trump and Vance went down the rabbit hole of the bro ecosystem and ended with Joe Rogan's embrace.

[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/06/opinion/trump-white-young-men.html[/URL]

[QUOTE=Tiny12;2959410]Yes, the primary voters did a pretty piss poor job of selecting candidates. It's wild isn't it? Trump tried to steal the Presidency four years ago. And he won!

As to Harris, I'll take a couple of excerpts from a post on another political thread on another hooker board. The poster, who's one smart SOB, explains what happened (bold text), and offers solace and advice to the losers. I like his description of how the Democrats left a ticking time bomb (budget deficits) that may explode at about the end of Trump's term. In general this is an excellent political strategy on the part of the Democrats, which over the decades has caused observers like EihTooms to believe Republican stewardship sucks and vice versa. You'll like what he says about the bond vigilanties. That is, how it fits with your thoughts about the merits of Bitcoin.

Here's the excerpt.

"Progressives managed to ratchet up federal government spending very impressively indeed over the last three years, handing the Trump team a very hot potato -- with a trend structural deficit / GDP ratio close to 7%.

What if Republicans mismanage the situation in almost as reckless and irresponsible a fashion as Democrats did in 2021-22? (If history is any guide, that's a real possibility!

Or what if the "bond vigilantes" Yardeni first spoke of way back in the 1980's return from their long sabbatical, precipitating a housing industry fiasco? In that event, it might be pretty difficult for Republicans to hold the house or for J. D. to win the presidency in '28.

That's the beauty of the American system! If one team fucks up and gets fired by the voters, it gets to plan the comeback soon enough. How many times has the political pendulum swung over the last three four decades?

[B]The Blue Team better find a less disastrous candidate, though. Perhaps a Bay Area uber-progressive who's expressed the desire to ban fracking, jettison any semblance of border security, spend money in trillion-dollar chunks on almost every element of an AOC/Bernie-style wish list, and even use public funds to finance sex-change surgery for condemned prisoners just isn't the wisest choice.[/B]

So, Democrats would do well to encourage people like California's "Governor Brylcreem" to stay out of the limelight!"

Yes, this dude's so smart he knows how to spell Brylcreem! I had to look that one up.[/QUOTE]So now the reason virtually every Repub presidential administration ends with a shitstorm of a Great Repub Depression, a Great Repub Recession, Wiping Out Millions of Jobs, Skyrocketing Unemployment Rates, maybe a New Repub Quagmire, Unwinnable War or Two etc, etc and none so much in so many ways as Trump handed Biden the last time and more than likely will hand the next incoming Dem is because "the Democrats left a ticking time bomb (budget deficits) that may explode at about the end of Trump's term. In general this is an excellent political strategy on the part of the Democrats, which over the decades has caused observers like EihTooms to believe Republican stewardship sucks and vice versa"?

Lololol. That might be the most oblivious, slavishily pro Repub pretend "Bothsider / Neithersider" load of crap you have ever posted.

Gee, if only an outgoing Dem president would sometimes hand an incoming Repub president economic conditions as rosy and workable as the outgoing Repubs always hand incoming Dems. Then America would not have to suffer the consequences of those "ticking time bombs" they leave behind that are magically and brilliantly timed just right to coincide with the 4 years, 8 years, 12 years or however long Repub administrations take to blow up the American economy and sometimes that of the whole world as well, right "Bothsider / Neithersider" Tiny?

Lololol.

[QUOTE=SubCmdr;2959395][B]The Democratic Party got its collective ass handed to them[/B] Because of policy and focus on issues that the average citizen of The United States of America does not give a fuck about!

The United States of America is full of working people. The Democratic Party has forgotten that. They want to tax you until you only have spare change in your pocket and begging for food on the street.

The United States of America is full of people figuring out how to put meat in the pot for dinner. The Democratic Party is focused on the meat between the legs of men who want to be girls.

The United States of America is full of people who are invested in crypto. These are people who have put their money where their mouth is. The Democratic Party ignored the crypto vote. They are focused on building a "Anti Cyrpto" army. The Senator who said that is a Democrat and still holds her seat. In the minority. Oops!

Trump is considered pro crypto. 261 Pro crypto candidates elected to the House of Representatives. 17 Pro crypto candidates elected to the Senate.

[B]Do crypto holders have the attention of the Democratic Party now[/B]?[/QUOTE]Has Trump's New crypto venture folded yet? Or scammed millions of its early investors and left them bankrupt and broke yet?

I haven't been following along with that one. Still waiting for him to sucker someone into buying one of his $100,000 gold watches.

[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2959353]Yeah, right. Trump has gotten 74 million votes in the 2020 and 2024 elections. In this election, Kamala is at 69 million. Hiliary got 66 million, and Obama got 62 million in 2012. You see any statistical outliers because I sure as fuck do not.

And then there is Biden in 2020. How many votes did he get? 81.4 million!

You mean Harris lost because one in eight Democrats sat out 2024? Give me a fucking break! The pattern is you get 3 or 4 million more votes per election, but in 2020, Biden supposedly got 15 million more votes than Hiliary.

I do not know how anyone with a functioning brain can look at these numbers and not conclude there was MASSIVE cheating that went on in 2020.[/QUOTE]Please explain how after leaving "open borders" to let in millions more immigrants to "vote for Dems" as Repub loons have been asserting for decades and never so much as in the past 3 1/2 years, the by now expert "cheating" that way to win elections turned out millions fewer Dem voters last Tuesday.

Did the busses hired to transport those millions more "cheating" voters from polling place to polling place just not show up?

I see typically pro Repub forces pretending to be unbiased "Bothsiders", "Neithersiders" or Both are still promoting their beloved bullshit about Harris' or any other Dem leader's position on public funding of "sex change operations for prisoners. ".

Therefore, it is time to do a bit of Factchecking on this issue which, lo and behold, turns out to simply be holding to the law, Constitutional rights and a program fully supported and signed off on by, are you sitting down for this, the Trump Administration:

[B]Trump administration signed off on sex-change surgeries for transgender prisoners.
Officials in the justice department gave the green light to procedures in 2018 while Donald Trump was in the White House.
Oct. 17, 2024[/B]

[URL]https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/politics/2024/10/17/trump-signed-off-trans-prisoner/[/URL]

[B]Harris Position on Health Care for Transgender Prisoners and Detainees.
Oct. 18, 2024[/B]

[URL]https://www.factcheck.org/2024/10/harris-position-on-health-care-for-transgender-prisoners-and-detainees/[/URL]

[QUOTE]Vice President Kamala Harris expanded on her position on gender-affirming care for prisoners during an Oct. 16 Fox News interview, following a question prompted by a Trump television ad on the topic.[b] "I will follow the law, and its a law that Donald Trump actually followed"[/b], Harris said, likely referring to [b]legal requirements[/b] that the government provide medical care to prisoners, including necessary gender-affirming care. [B]"Youre probably familiar with, now its a public report, that under Donald Trumps administration, these surgeries were available to, on a medical necessity basis, to people in the federal prison system.[/b] And I think frankly that ad from the Trump campaign is a little bit of like throwing, you know, stones when youre living in a glass house.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Tiny12;2959411]Of course you are. And a Sanders voter too. I agree with him on foreign policy and social liberties. But some of his ideas about the economy that attract you would make the USA like France, or worse. Meaning we'd all be poorer, except for the select few who work for the federal government or are too lazy to work.[/QUOTE]I never said Bernie is perfect (save the trite scare tactics France Venezuela etc al), but I would vote for him (and I have) over any puppet for the oligarchy any day ie, Bubba Bush / Cheney Barry Hussein Biden Harris.

Poor people typically should be banned from the White House, they are too cheap to buy ($2 putas), that's why the oligarchs want to Kill Trump and blame Iran, they can't buy him, they are losing their shit, AGAIN.

There is a wide political spectrum in the USA but I must say the most vile position on the whole spectrum is the one Chase Oliver represents.

I've never been afraid of hard work I was roofer in HS, one of the hardest jobs I know of, and I also worked in a plant that cut steel one summer, that was a "real" back breaker.

I've never held any type of guberment job, I couldn't afford to take that kinda pay cut, besides I don't have the right skin tone for it.

"Meaning we'd all be poorer, except for the select few who work for the federal government or are too lazy to work".

Here's some grammar school level Projecting, Libertarians are the laziest cocksuckers on the planet, and add to that greedy, and lazy, a very toxic combination.

That's why they love slave labor, they are too fucking lazy to work themselves!!

Has anyone yet read or heard in widely distributed Mainstream Media even one mention of a couple of things I posted here with fully substantiated report links?

Namely that the immediate response to Trump's election was for banks to increase their mortgage lending rates by a whopping 9 basis points and for major retailers to assure us they will increase the prices for a huge variety of ordinary goods even well BEFORE Trump enacts his across-the-board tariffs as is always their policy?

I mean perhaps somewhere in the MSM's 24/7 drive to trash Dems and glorify Trump and Repubs, repeating the BS about any Dem ever running for office on sex change operations for prisoners and so on?

Just checking.

[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2959353]Yeah, right. Trump has gotten 74 million votes in the 2020 and 2024 elections. In this election, Kamala is at 69 million. Hiliary got 66 million, and Obama got 62 million in 2012. You see any statistical outliers because I sure as fuck do not.

And then there is Biden in 2020. How many votes did he get? 81.4 million!

You mean Harris lost because one in eight Democrats sat out 2024? Give me a fucking break! The pattern is you get 3 or 4 million more votes per election, but in 2020, Biden supposedly got 15 million more votes than Hiliary.

I do not know how anyone with a functioning brain can look at these numbers and not conclude there was MASSIVE cheating that went on in 2020.[/QUOTE]Tiny12 needs some help.

[QUOTE=SubCmdr;2959266]Democrats are sore losers. Republicans are bad winners. Good bad or indifferent; [B]the country will get what they voted for[/B].[/QUOTE]First thing Democrats said after their astonishingly undeserved defeat was that they'd respect the choice of the American people. Are they screaming and kicking, are they starting a litany of lawsuits, are they sending violent threats to their political opponents? Please advise if you have heard about such instances.

You know what else Democrats haven't done? They never accused Trump of rigging the election; they never asked their supporters to fight like hell; they never demanded their stuffers to fight regardless whether they won or lost. And they didn't do it in 2016 either.

So I have no idea what you're seeing, but I see no evidence that Democrats are sore losers unlike you know who. If he lost it would be a full-blown hysteria once again.

[B]Trump Is Setting the Stage to Challenge the Election[/B]

[URL]https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2024/08/trump-rally-crowd-challenge-election/679448[/URL]

[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2959358]MDS, your inbox is full.

Besides the ridiculously rigged vote in 2020, the lawfare campaign and the assassination attempts were from a deep state determined not to let Trump get into power and hide all their illegal activity. Now we see the Democratic legal rats, engaged in the disgusting and real threat to Democracy lawfare campaigns, scurrying to dismiss their cases as fast as possible.

I hope Trump disbars all that legal scum who engaged in the disgusting lawfare campaign and fines the shit out of them.[/QUOTE]It looks to me like they are trying to establish a backstory for his (possible) murder, they can step back and let Iran do it, or say fuck it and do it themselves and make sure to kill whoever fires the deadly shot.

Like the dead scumbag In Pa. This summer.

DEAD MEN TELL NO TALES!!

Post script Scumbag Nancy is out trying to lay the blame on Scumbag Joe for Harris being the nominee LMFAO.

[URL]https://newrepublic.com/post/188225/nancy-pelosi-joe-biden-donald-trumps-kamala-harris[/URL]

[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2959332][URL]https://amgreatness.com/2021/10/31/how-the-2020-election-was-rigged/[/URL][/QUOTE]Sorry, I'm not reading your hot sheets. I trust primary sources, in this case your LAS. Who can possibly know better, right?

[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2959353]Yeah, right. Trump has gotten 74 million votes in the 2020 and 2024 elections. In this election, Kamala is at 69 million. Hiliary got 66 million, and Obama got 62 million in 2012. You see any statistical outliers because I sure as fuck do not.

And then there is Biden in 2020. How many votes did he get? 81.4 million!

You mean Harris lost because one in eight Democrats sat out 2024? Give me a fucking break! The pattern is you get 3 or 4 million more votes per election, but in 2020, Biden supposedly got 15 million more votes than Hiliary.

I do not know how anyone with a functioning brain can look at these numbers and not conclude there was MASSIVE cheating that went on in 2020.[/QUOTE]Dam that is some crazy shit. I am surprised more people haven't pointed that stat out.

[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2959350]Here we go, another soy boy. Kamala lost because of sexism. Of course, that overlooks the fact that female voters outweigh male voters. Just like most of Spidy's dates, many of the women stayed home.

How about women did not like Kamala? Or were just too damned lazy to vote? Don't wory, S, if you pony up all that Trump tax cut cash, I am sure you will find a woman willing to peg you.

Maybe you should say racist America was not ready for a 75% white president.[/QUOTE]Obama was elected twice in row, but no election for Kamala Harris who lost all swinging states Biden won on 2020 . Latinos men and Black men don t want to be governed by a woman. They preferred to vote for a guy who hate them. I think Hilary got more votes than Trump on 2016 .