4 photos
Ranking of asses in South America
Nice subject, south american butts. First of all, you must taste flesh from all countries, so going to Colombia and Brasil is a must.
And don't forget argentinians. They have a different vibe, but quality of talent is incredible.
A fellow ISG monger emailed me a few weeks ago asking for info about Argentina, and I told him that the sport there is Models only, and promotional models before pandemics. Not cheap to take the first bite, but once you have the contacts, flesh will not stop flowing.
Real argentinian models pictured by me on the three attached pics.
On the first composite, there are bikini contest winners and playboy models. As you may know, Buenos Aires was the city where Playboy Tv Latam was produced. The other two pics, a promo model who gave personal escort services after working hours. And the fourth pic, promotional models from car races as TC2000 (most of them escorts). There was a saying in the car races among the pilots and mechanics "la que no gatea, aquí no dura" (The girl who does not sexwork, doesn't last here).
Those asses are a crazy thing indeed, but as you mention: Brasil, Argentina and Colombia will always be in the top 3 countries.
1 photos
Setting the reality straight
[QUOTE=Nounce;2791144]There is no single answer. I think you should go to both to decide. I will put it this way.
If you have a large budget like USD 300 a day, Sao Paulo.
If you want best of everything, room, bed, drink, and food, at the establishment, Sao Paulo.
If you have minimum budget, Rio.
If you like dark skinned girl, Rio.
It's difficult to compare cost because they are not exactly the same. I don't mean Rio is cheap in the above comparison but if you want to spend, Sao Paulo is better.
For living expenses, Sao Paulo has more expensive places but that does not mean Sao Paulo is more expensive. I actually think Sao Paulo is cheaper because it does not have as many tourists as Rio.[/QUOTE]As someone who is in Brazil at this moment on my 7th visit, I can honestly say EVERYTHING you have posted here is so wrong. I will address your statements individually.
"If you have a large budget like USD 300 a day, Sao Paulo. ".
If you have a large budget, why would you even want to stay in Sao Paulo? If you have the money to travel, then flying out of SP is the best use of your funds.
"If you want best of everything, room, bed, drink, and food, at the establishment, Sao Paulo. ".
That statement tells me all we need to know about your experience in Sao Paulo. Specifically, its obvious to me that you have never been there. SP is a large, nasty, filthy, dangerous and ugly place. Really. It has the highest costs for everything and an overflowing population of homeless that shit on the sidewalks. SP is the only place where I have had to use the flashlight on my cellphone at night to ensure I wasn't stepping in human shit, because the neighborhood was a habitat for the homeless. SP has virtually no colonial buildings, just lots of ugly architecture in 15 shades of grey. It is the drabbest city in Brazil. And no, it has no mountains, no beaches, no ranges of lovely green hills. So, how can it have the best of everything? What it does have is the worst, most unpredictible weather in Brazil, going from extreme heat to chilly weather within a week. The rain has already ruined two days of Carnaval this year. And when it rains, it can rain for weeks and make the experience miserable. Then you will be at the airport with a ticket up north. And then there is that random downpour which leaves you drenched on the street, which I experienced today. In my experience, SP has the worst climate in the world. And then there is traffic and pollution. But, don't get me started on that. The only thing I like about SP is that it is home to Brazil's most ecletic and edgy music. Lots of good concerts here. Culturally, it is actually a bit lacking as there isn't a real Cultura Paulistana whereas the rest of the country as its unique cultural characteristics. So, if you have money, you'd be a fool not to catch a flight out of Sao Paulo. Brazil is an extremely rich and diverse nation. The punting just happens to be exceptional, as well.
If you have minimum budget, Rio.
Wrong! Rio is still expensive. BTW, you actually stated that you thought SP was actually cheaper. But seriously, if you have a minimum budget, catch a bus out of SP into any other nearby cities. Any Brazilian will tell you that Rio and SP are far more expensive than other cities. I indicate SP as 90% of all international flights arrive at GRU. Direct flights into Rio are limited and expensive. Cities like Belo Horizonte, Curitiba, Florianopolis are less expensive (though Floripa can be higher during the high season) in most aspects. Punting costs are around HALF the price. The local food is interesting in those places and the cities more tranquil, with few filthy, homeless agressively pestering you for money or sleeping on the sidewalk. I prefer the Northeast myself, though you will need to fly to those cities. The bus trip would be brutally long! The Northeast has many amazing, uncrowded beaches, as well as triving urban beaches. The Northeast will always be warm enough for swimming! Plus some cities like Joao Pessoa and Recife (along with its neighbor Olinda) have lots of colonial buildings. Forget Salvador, as it is a pricey, overrated, tourist destination and possibly the most dangerous city in Brazil. The Bahian food and beaches are excellent, but access to other cities outside of Salvador is time consuming and / or expensive.
If you like dark skinned girl, Rio.
WRONG AGAIN. Both Rio and SP have a wide selection of woman of all shades. You would have a hard time going through all the morenas in either city during your visit. Perhaps the average population of Rio is darker, that doesn't indicate nor limit your choices by any means. If you only like morenas, I suggest Recife as the population is overwhelmingly on the darker side and its an amazing city. If you like brancas, the southernmost states are the place to go. If you like variety, SP has a significant number of Japanese mestizas and a small number of pure Japanese girls. The ethnic variety of women is the only thing that SP excels in.
"It's difficult to compare cost because they are not exactly the same. I don't mean Rio is cheap in the above comparison but if you want to spend, Sao Paulo is better. ".
Excuse me, but who actually wants to spend money for the sake of spending money? If you did, I would suggest Las Vegas as a better and more accessible option.
"For living expenses, Sao Paulo has more expensive places but that does not mean Sao Paulo is more expensive. I actually think Sao Paulo is cheaper because it does not have as many tourists as Rio. ".
Sao Paulo is the commercial capital and has a lot of business travelers. Unlike tourists, they aren't paying the hotel bill. Business travelers have expense accounts, which makes for expensive hotels. Plus real estate in general is expensive in SP compared to the rest of the nation. SP is just expensive with little that justifies the tourist or the punter lingering there.
BTW I have attached my latest passport stamps.
