2 photos
Trump's Voters Love That Gaetz Nomination
[QUOTE=TheCane;2960844]There is zero room to be criticizing the Democrats for being sore losers. None! That's the absolute ultimate in hypocrisy! And have you seen Chump's cabinet picks? The only qualification seems to be no hesitance to suck his dick and lick his ass! Gaetz as Attorney General? Just insane![/QUOTE]The Religious Right MAGA Repubs are just fine and dandy with that Gaetz nomination from the litigated rapist.
As long as Trump delivers the usual Great Repub Depression or Great Repub Recession and Massive Repub Jobs Destruction, his critical Religious Right MAGA Repub demo is delighted with anything Trump wants to do.
End Times!
Lost to a 'Pepsi Generation', are we?
[QUOTE=Tiny 12;2960751]Take a Tiny Challenge Spidy. [/QUOTE] Didn't dumb challenges, like yours, disappear from the zeitgeist of the Pepsi era? [b][i](....kkkk!) [/i][/b]
Yeah, good luck with that and promoting the [b]'BIG LIE'[/b]!
But I'm sure many of your MAGA buddies, would love to take your 'Pepsi Challenge'? [b][i](....kkkk!) [/i][/b]
[b]PS:[/b] FWIW, I always thought Coke was better!
'Pepsi Challenge' ends in a fizzle... (...kkkk!)
[QUOTE=Tiny 12;2960933]I've always maintained Biden won the 2020 election fair and square. You believe the Republicans cheated in 2024, the bold text in my Spidy quote...[/QUOTE] Sure dude, sure!
Read it again, Tiny 12! You'll see I pointed out the reasons for poor Dem turnouts, and overall a poor election turnout of only 63% of registered voters, compared to 2020 for Dems.
Get it! Got it!...Good!
And so it begins, continued
Trump's Inflationary American Consumer Tax Increases and Price Hikes are already in the works and generating the usual unpleasant ripple effects.
[B]3 companies preparing to raise prices if Trump's trade plan is enacted.
Nov. 12, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.businessinsider.com/companies-raising-prices-trump-tariffs-inflation-goods-getting-more-expensive-2024-11[/URL]
[QUOTE]President-elect Donald Trump proposed broad tariffs on imports, including up to 60% on goods from China.
Economists say his tariff proposals could spike inflation as companies tend to pass costs on to consumers.
Some companies have already said Trump's proposals would force them to increase prices.
...........
Several companies have already begun responding to Trump's election victory and the implications his tariff proposals would have on the costs of their goods. Executives have told analysts on earnings calls that it would be difficult to maintain current prices under Trump's broad tariffs.
............
"We don't like tariffs because they are a tax on the American people," Amin said, adding that the company had been subject to a 25% tariff [b]since 2019[/b] because of policies from Trump's first term. "And at that time," he said, "we pulled all the levers available to us to minimize the effects to our company and our community."[/QUOTE]Some companies won't wait for Trump to officially raise those inflationary American Consumer Taxes before they raise their prices for American Consumers in order to, you know, "get ahead of the game" on a Trump Inflation and Increased Prices Surge.
For example:
[QUOTE][b]Auto Zone[/b]
Philip Daniele, the CEO of the auto-parts company AutoZone, told analysts on a September earnings call that tariff policies had "ebbed and flowed over the years," and if Trump implemented more tariffs, "we will pass those tariff costs back to the consumer."
[B]"We generally raise prices ahead of that,"[/b] Daniele said, adding that prices would gradually settle over time. "So, that's historically what we've done," he said.[/QUOTE]Good Move, MAGAs. You put "smart budinessman" Donald Trump back into the White House to work his Historic Great Repub Economic Downturn magic. Again.
Elections have consequences.
Thank you for your vote.
Oh, and a special bonus attraction for any of you MAGAs who monger internationally; In order to get around any potential tariff slowdown in sales and imports into USA, targeted countries like China merely set up factories in other countries like Thailand, Mexico, maybe Columbia, Jakarta, the Philippines and so on and ship their products tariff-free to the USA from there. A real industrial revolution-style cultural change for some of the poorer regions of those countries. Nice.
Oh, and they aren't waiting for Trump to officially enact those Inflationary American Consumer Tax and Price Increases either:
[B]Southeast Asia prepares for factories fleeing Trump tariffs on China.
Nov. 9, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.bangkokpost.com/business/general/2898713/southeast-asia-prepares-for-factories-fleeing-trump-tariffs-on-china[/URL]
[QUOTE]Companies have been moving factories from China to Southeast Asia, anticipating Donald Trump would slap high tariffs on Beijing if he regained the White House, a move set to accelerate with his election win, industrial park developers in the region say.
Trump, who won a resounding victory on Tuesday, has threatened 60% tariffs on goods coming into the United States from China, much higher than the levies of 7.5% to 25% he imposed in his first term, a major risk for the world's second-largest economy.
Southeast Asia - with auto and electronics factories from Thailand to Vietnam and Malaysia - will likely benefit at China's expense, said two executives, two business groups, a lawyer and an analyst in the region.
..............
There was (already) a relocation to Southeast Asia, but [b]this round is going to be more intense," she said, referring to Trump's 2017-2021 first term.[/b][/QUOTE]Which also means all those cute young girls who used to leave their poor provinces for the red light districts to give great, low-cost P4 P service to "rich" foreigners no longer have to do any of those things as long as they, their mom, dad, brother, boyfriend or husband get a job in one of those nice, big, shiny new Chinese factories.
But don't worry, there will be no shortage of ladies showing up to work P4 P in those destinations, the ones who are too old and too untrainable to work in those new factories or too old and ugly to have a boyfriend or husband working in one.
I can assure you many, many disgruntled Thai punters saw that happening first hand in my part of the world since Trump's first go-around with his Trump's Tariff American Consumer Tax Increases.
Again, MAGAs, elections have consequences.
Thank you for your vote.
Little Marco wants to be president in 2028 he may just get my vote, Allahu Akbar
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2960754]Even if Trump gets slapped back by horrified Senate Repubs and drops this nomination, the damage has been done!
[B]Trump picks Rep. Matt Gaetz as attorney general.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/11/13/trump-taps-rep-matt-gaetz-as-attorney-general.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
Lololol. The Clown Trump-Musk Administration has now defined itself as such for all the world to see. No backing up and out of it now.
LOL. For one hot minute Little Marco and his supporters basked in the illusion that, hey, his nomination for Trump's Secretary of State could have been worse, it's kinda' sorta' plausible. Lolol.
Then the Tulsi Gabbard and that Fux News Weekend Host nominations came in.
And now THIS! LOL.
So now even poor Little Marco can only count himself among the Clown Trump Administration's Gallery of Freaks.
Honestly, proud MAGAs and Bothsider / Neithersider MAGAs, can you imagine Putin, Xi, Kim, name your favorite Anti-America, Anti-democratic Authoritarian, reacting to what is taking shape as the Clown Trump Freak and Clown Show with anything but total satisfaction and pleasure?
Of course not. Nobody could.
Kim Kardashian for Secretary of the Agriculture!
Rudy Giuliani for Secretary of the Treasury!
Lolol. Your overriding MAGA Repub mission to "own the libs" has resulted in only "owning" anyone the same way an arrogant fat man "owns" the passers-by who can not stifle their giggles when they see him slip on a banana peel and land smack on his fat, arrogant ass.[/QUOTE]He is going to completely tear Chinas collective asshole wide open, Allahu Akbar.
[URL]https://www.newsmax.com/finance/streettalk/marco-rubio-trump-china/2024/11/14/id/1188017/[/URL]
Allahu Akbar MOTHERFUCKERS!!
The Uyghurs are wailing Allahu Akbar in Xinjiang, Xi can hear them all the way in Beijing.
Iran and the evil parasites on Wall Street want Trump dead.
The CCP and the evil parasites on Wall Street want Little Marco dead.
Yes, I answered that already.
[QUOTE=SubCmdr;2960884]EihTooms,
Since you want to post about taking credit for stuff the party you identified with hasn't done, back it up with some data on the money flow into the World Wide Crypto market.
[B]This is not the first time I have asked you to do that[/B]!
You good as one of those Democrats that don't have to pay attention to putting meat in the pot. I get that. That allows you to worry about who has a dick that identifies as a girl and where they get to goto the bathroom and who they can play sports with.
Don't you EVER think that your (compound profanity redacted) [I]dick politics[/I] takes precedent for me over the party that support the industry that allows me to take care of my loved ones. I support the current Republican Government elect because they support the industry I use for my support. Full Stop. When the (compound profanity redacted) get a clue and learn to take crypto and the crypto voters seriously then they might have a chance of getting someone like me (a crypto voter) to give their candidates some consideration. There is an organization that is called stand with crypto the rate every candidate for national office by the stances on crypto. I follow their information and use it as a guide. Republicans are overwhelmingly crypto friendly. If democrats don't recognize that then they better ask somebody. During the time I have been posting here my focus has been on how politics relates to crypto. I don't care about [I]democratic dick politics[/I]. Show me some policies that are going to put meat in my pot.
No EihTooms you don't get to just [I]change the subject[/I]. The Democrats did not support the crypto vote. I have provided plenty of examples. You have NEVER addressed the issue. That is was bad policy and the Democrats forgetting their roots and that lost them the election.
[I]Its the economy, stupid[/I]
What was the name of the brilliant democrat that ran a winning campaign for his candidate for the office to the Presidency of the United States.
Democrats got swept in the best of three game series. Don't kill the messenger. Deal with it. Keep my name out of your posts about dick politics please. The dick I worry about is mine and where which orifice of the girl that is willing to take it the moment I am going to put it in.[/QUOTE]Answered and substantiated already. See my [B]No problem[/B] response post here:
[URL]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?2467-American-Politics/page2[/URL]
At this writing, the shift in Trump to Harris votes in the only three states required to result in a President-elect Harris rather than a President-elect Trump would have been 0. 9 point in PA, 0. 7 point in MI and 0. 4 point in WI, plus 1 additional vote for Harris in each of just those 3 states.
Hardly a Trump landslide, Red Tsunami or Trump / Repub Policy Mandate.
You want to claim that piddling, razor-thin "victory" for Trump was all about crypto investors who are now plowing Bidenomics money into it over the past few days.
To which it is now my turn to request, [B]Prove it.[/B].
I would attribute it to pro Repub pretend "Bothsider / Neithersider" pundits who became MAGA darlings for their undying, weekly pro Repub, pro Trump and pro Repub election campaign efforts over the past 4 years to suppress their generally Dem audience votes and produce just enough shift in the votes to deliver election wins to their beloved preferred Repubs.
Bill Maher comes to mind. Even Michael Moore for much of this past year for his passionate rants against Biden for whatever relatively immaterial gripe he had stuck in his craw.
A maximum of the 0. 9 point shift in votes from Harris to Trump as it was in PA and even less than that in the other two states is not difficult for Maher and Moore-style pretend "Bothsider / Neithersiders" to deliver. They did it for GW Bush in 2000 easily enough and by a greater shift margin in the EC.
Even IF there were some pro crypto voters in that mix, Maher and Moore's contribution was such that it was hardly needed to have that razor-thin margin tilt toward Trump anyway.
Hey Democrats you lost; deal with it!
[URL]https://copestake.info/workingpaper/cryptofinance/CryptoFinance.pdf[/URL]
Here is a rigorous analysis of the actualreason the crypto markets are moving worldwide. It has nothing to do with the retail sector of the crypto space. Google searches for Bitcoin is still no where close to the highs of the last cycle. Either retail investors with that funny money counterfeited by the FED and distributed by the last administration is being held onto (I doubt it) or the citizens of the United States of America are collectively broke.
[I]Household Saving Rate in the United States decreased to 4.80 percent in August from 4.90 percent in July of 2024. Personal Savings in the United States averaged 8.44 percent from 1959 until 2024, reaching an all time high of 32.00 percent in April of 2020 and a record low of 1.40 percent in July of 2005[/I]
[URL]https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/personal-savings[/URL]#text=Household%20 Saving%20 Rate%20 in%20 the, percent%20 in%20 July%20 of%202005.
[B]The Democrats are sore losers[/B] I have no proof of that. [B]It is my opinion[/B]. Note to party, focus on the economy and stay away from [I]dick politics[/I]. The Democrats ignored the crypto vote. My proof was presented here:
[QUOTE=SubCmdr;2959395][B]The Democratic Party got its collective ass handed to them[/B] Because of policy and focus on issues that the average citizen of The United States of America does not give a fuck about!
The United States of America is full of working people. The Democratic Party has forgotten that. They want to tax you until you only have spare change in your pocket and begging for food on the street.
The United States of America is full of people figuring out how to put meat in the pot for dinner. The Democratic Party is focused on the meat between the legs of men who want to be girls.
The United States of America is full of people who are invested in crypto. These are people who have put their money where their mouth is. The Democratic Party ignored the crypto vote. They are focused on building a "Anti Cyrpto" army. The Senator who said that is a Democrat and still holds her seat. In the minority. Oops!
Trump is considered pro crypto. 261 Pro crypto candidates elected to the House of Representatives. 17 Pro crypto candidates elected to the Senate.
[B]Do crypto holders have the attention of the Democratic Party now[/B]?[/QUOTE]
The Cmdr makes his closing arguemet
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2961027]Answered and substantiated already. See my [B]No problem[/B] response post here:
[URL]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?2467-American-Politics/page2[/URL][/QUOTE]This is a non answer. The quote above is a non answer.
I asked to to [B]prove[/B] your statement about the money flow into the crypto markets worldwide. Here is the answer:
[B]Institutional investors pile into crypto[/B]
[I]The rise in Bitcoins value has also been driven by growing interest from institutional investors. Earlier this year, the United States approved Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs), allowing institutions easier access to Bitcoin, which has boosted demand. ETFs let individual and institutional investors gain exposure to Bitcoin without directly handling the cryptocurrency.
Trumps pro-Bitcoin stance has further encouraged institutions to invest, anticipating regulatory changes that might benefit them. Trump noted that nearly 30-40 per cent of Americans already hold crypto, suggesting that a favourable government stance could spur even more demand.
The rally is also attributed to the Federal Reserves recent rate cut of 25 basis points in November, which shifted investor sentiment towards alternative assets. The change in monetary policy signals a more accommodative approach, boosting interest in assets like Bitcoin as inflation concerns ease.[/I]
[URL]https://www.business-standard.com/finance/news/what-is-driving-bitcoin-s-rally-as-it-surges-past-the-89-000-milestone-124111200500_1.html[/URL]
[I]Another major driver is institutional adoption. This was an important shift in the market over the last five years as major financial firms like BlackRock and Goldman Sachs began adding Bitcoin to their balance sheets. This trend is growing. Nearly 40% of international investors had at least some exposure as of last year, up from 31% in 2022, and the recent approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs, like Wood's own ARK 21 Shares Bitcoin ETF, is further accelerating the trend.
Her $3. 8 target would require all of these with an especially aggressive buy-in from institutional investors. She believes if the firms, on average, allocate 5% of their portfolios to Bitcoin, it would be enough to drive the price all the way to $3.8 million.[/I]
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2961027][b]You want to claim that piddling, razor-thin "victory" for Trump was all about crypto investors who are now plowing Bidenomics money into it over the past few days[/b].
To which it is now my turn to request, [B]Prove it.[/B].[/QUOTE]A real man knows his limitations. I have no empirical evidence to present to says the crypto vote swung the election. But the Democrats ignored the crypto vote. So if you are saying it is irrelevant then I suggest members of the Democratic party continue to ignore us. Money Trumps (pun intended) identity politics. When I put a trade on the crypto market no one knows who I am. I pays my money and I take my chances. No nanny state to hold my hand. No safety net: No bail outs. No one cares if I have a dick or not or if I identify as a girl. No one is asking me about my pronouns nor whom I prefer to pay sports with.
[B]The Defense Rests[/B]
Republicans approve long distance cockblock!
[URL]https://www.bangkokpost.com/business/general/2898713/southeast-asia-prepares-for-factories-fleeing-trump-tariffs-on-china[/URL]
Check this post out from member of the party of the losers (Excuse I meant: Losing Democratic Party) that has now moved the discussion to a new low.
EihTooms; American Politics; post #16252.
[QUOTE]Which also means all those cute young girls who used to leave their poor provinces for the red light districts to give great, low-cost P4 P service to "rich" foreigners no longer have to do any of those things as long as they, their mom, dad, brother, boyfriend or husband get a job in one of those nice, big, shiny new Chinese factories.[/QUOTE][B]What the fuck[/B]? Republicans are now being blamed for the decline of the satisfaction of [B]International Tricks[/B] and [B]Sexpats[/B] in Thailand and other Asian Countries? That is a long distance cockblock of world record proportions. Never seen anything like it. When I said Democrats need to get away from [I]dick politics[/I] here is a prime example of what I meant.
ROTFLMAO!
