General Info

In Thailand, the rules are fairly well-defined in the pay-for-play market but, in The Philippines, one is dealing with a 65%-higher population (115 m vs. 70 m, in just 42% of the Thais' land): quite-poor women just seeking a meal-ticket / ATM in life. The ageless saying: "Men want a woman's first love; women want a man's last love" & Professor Dawkins' 'The Selfish Gene', highlight the disparity between male and female behavioural directives.

Although there is a spectrum of hooker-to-harlot-to-hopefuls, they are all fundamentally seeking the economic security of permanent relationships. Time works relentlessly against them: Asian men consider women over 25, who are still single, to be potentially-poor marriage material. After age 30, there is a distinct loss-of-attractiveness, especially in mothers.

So, what do we have to offer for the puki? Certainly not marriage in a no-divorce country, with imprisonment for adultery! Meals, gifts, money, some attention (mostly sexual); possibly a mixed-race child to a single mother. Hardly the objectives of their dreams and long-term support imperatives. For guys with a conscience, it is a bit of a conundrum. I personally don't expel any wrigglies to worsen the country's overpopulation problem and, contrary to most nationalities, Filipinas are mostly okay with that, if a supportive relationship is present.

It is very easy to play the field, especially with provincial gals, whom amorous males could visit in endless rinse-and-repeat cycles across the republic, or merely in the capital. Actor Michael Caine (91), rhetorically asked in Alfie (1966, aged 32): 'What's it all about?" How do you reconcile male sexual imperative with females' desire for permanence? And what is fair compensation for their short, or long, time company?

[QUOTE=Trevor2522;2986454]And what is fair compensation for their short, or long, time company?[/QUOTE]Fair compensation will be different per gent, the same way that beauty is different for each gent. You or I might think that both 2000 and 2500 are both reasonable or fair amounts for a given time with a given girl. But to her, one of those numbers is a 25% increase over the other (or a 20% drop).

OTOH, I could make the point that p400 is fair compensation for the same girl in the same situation. What if the same girl, whom I'd paid p2000 to before, had such an extreme emergency today that she told me she would do ANYTHING for a fast p400. Should I commit with her to give her 400, then have her, and then give her P400? Or P2000? Or something between? I think there might be multiple right or wrong answers there.

[QUOTE=Goferring;2986291]This is where a little patience is of great assistance. A platonic coffee or Jollie burger on day 1 for a shy girl often results in her coming over to say thanks on day 2. This is a lot better than scaring her off by insisting to meet straight in your hotel room.

Of course, we also have the other extreme: girls who do not want to risk being seen with a foreigner in the wild so will suggest coming straight to the hotel.

It's not difficult to play both ends of the game.

G.[/QUOTE]For online strangers that can be ladyboys, or look totally different in reality, I never tell them where I stay, I always met them at some restaurant close by, that way, I'm protected, and they are also protected from being seen at the the mall in the company of an old and ugly man (that by the way is still in his 30's in his head).

[QUOTE=Trevor2522;2986454]Asian men consider women over 25, who are still single, to be potentially-poor marriage material. After age 30, there is a distinct loss-of-attractiveness, especially in mothers.
[/QUOTE]Poor marriage material in what aspect? The way you say, they are only looking for someone to be attractive for the first 5 years of marriage. After that, what do they do with them? A woman is going to age the same whether she is married or not at a certain age.

To me, there would be more to marrying a person than their attractiveness. Is she helpful? Do we enjoy some of the same things? Do we like being around each other? I married her because she is young and pretty are ridiculous qualifications. That is like buying a car because it looks good. Damn how it performs and the reliability and maintenance.

I am 52 and would personally never get married. But if I did then it would probably be to a woman who is at least 30 because she has had some life experiences and has shown some resilience. I do not want to be trying to train anyone, especially someone that may not even be trainable. I want someone who is already prepared for the job.

A couple of days ago my mom had me go buy tires for her car. She was insisting on Michelin. I said mom with Michelin you are paying for their advertisement. There is more to a tire than a name. Tires actually have grades written on them, and as to the grading these Falkens are a better tire and cheaper to boot. There is more to a woman than how pretty she looks.

[QUOTE=OldAndUgly;2986512]For online strangers that can be ladyboys, or look totally different in reality, [/QUOTE]Why not just ask if they are bakla and videocall to see if someone looks totally different in reality? That would save you time and money.

[QUOTE=WestCoast1;2986476]Fair compensation will be different per gent, the same way that beauty is different for each gent. You or I might think that both 2000 and 2500 are both reasonable or fair amounts for a given time with a given girl. But to her, one of those numbers is a 25% increase over the other (or a 20% drop).[/QUOTE]Fair is what you agree on with the woman. The other day I had a chick at Manila Bay Cafe (or whatever it is called these days) first try to get me for 4000, then 3500. In the end, it turned out that 2000 was actually fair compensation.

[QUOTE=Trevor2522;2986454]In Thailand, the rules are fairly well-defined in the pay-for-play market but, in The Philippines, one is dealing with a 65%-higher population (115 m vs. 70 m, in just 42% of the Thais' land): quite-poor women just seeking a meal-ticket / ATM in life. The ageless saying: "Men want a woman's first love; women want a man's last love" & Professor Dawkins' 'The Selfish Gene', highlight the disparity between male and female behavioural directives.

Although there is a spectrum of hooker-to-harlot-to-hopefuls, they are all fundamentally seeking the economic security of permanent relationships. Time works relentlessly against them: Asian men consider women over 25, who are still single, to be potentially-poor marriage material. After age 30, there is a distinct loss-of-attractiveness, especially in mothers.

So, what do we have to offer for the puki? Certainly not marriage in a no-divorce country, with imprisonment for adultery! Meals, gifts, money, some attention (mostly sexual); possibly a mixed-race child to a single mother. Hardly the objectives of their dreams and long-term support imperatives. For guys with a conscience, it is a bit of a conundrum. I personally don't expel any wrigglies to worsen the country's overpopulation problem and, contrary to most nationalities, Filipinas are mostly okay with that, if a supportive relationship is present.

It is very easy to play the field, especially with provincial gals, whom amorous males could visit in endless rinse-and-repeat cycles across the republic, or merely in the capital. Actor Michael Caine (91), rhetorically asked in Alfie (1966, aged 32): 'What's it all about?" How do you reconcile male sexual imperative with females' desire for permanence? And what is fair compensation for their short, or long, time company?[/QUOTE]I think it all comes down to what your intent is? If you are just wanting sex with someone who is selling it, then that is what it is. Most women know about condoms and birth control and have the choice to insist on using it or not. As does the man. If she doesn't use it and gets pregnant, then that is on her. For every man that would turn her down for wanting to use a condom, there is one who wouldn't turn her down. But, contrary to what some people think, fucking a hooker (or even taking her out for dinner and an activity before fucking her) isn't a date. Some YouTuber has a whole series about dating a bar girl. How to get her to go out with you for bar fine, etc. That isn't dating!

If you want a relationship with a girl, then treat it like a relationship. But don't fake it just to fuck her, especially when it is so cheap to find a lady for a couple thousand pesos if that's all you want. When you pay a prostitute, you pay them for their time, but you also pay them so they go away; it's part of the game. But it isn't like this for a relationship. That's about giving your time, care, and attention. It's not just sex. I'm blessed with two awesome Filipinas who are about a real relationship, and I have children with both. Of course money becomes part of that equation then, like it does in any relationship. But, as one should be in a relationship, I was careful before committing to either woman. Both women are too proud to rely on just me. In fact, the second one wanted nothing at all. I had to convince her to let me help some with building our house, and then opening a bank account to put money up to save for our child. And she sends me picture of her account balance each month just to show that she isn't using that money.

[QUOTE=Aml3740;2986533]I think it all comes down to what your intent is? [/QUOTE]Having read positive reviews of it, I tried to watch Anora, a movie about a rich Rusisan kid (Xpartan?) who falls for a New York stripper. Do yourself a favour and miss this tripe, which is a cross between Pretty Woman and a bad report here. The start of it is good with the bored lap dancers milking the punters but, after that, it is tripe which Wikipedia informs us is "comedy / romance". Outside of some good boob jobs, I se no upsides Maybe it is me as guys falls for hookers with or without good boob jobs.

[QUOTE=Trevor2522;2986454]In Thailand, the rules are fairly well-defined in the pay-for-play market but, in The Philippines, one is dealing with a 65%-higher population (115 m vs. 70 m, in just 42% of the Thais' land): quite-poor women just seeking a meal-ticket / ATM in life. The ageless saying: "Men want a woman's first love; women want a man's last love" & Professor Dawkins' 'The Selfish Gene', highlight the disparity between male and female behavioural directives.

Although there is a spectrum of hooker-to-harlot-to-hopefuls, they are all fundamentally seeking the economic security of permanent relationships. Time works relentlessly against them: Asian men consider women over 25, who are still single, to be potentially-poor marriage material. After age 30, there is a distinct loss-of-attractiveness, especially in mothers.

So, what do we have to offer for the puki? Certainly not marriage in a no-divorce country, with imprisonment for adultery! Meals, gifts, money, some attention (mostly sexual); possibly a mixed-race child to a single mother. Hardly the objectives of their dreams and long-term support imperatives. For guys with a conscience, it is a bit of a conundrum. I personally don't expel any wrigglies to worsen the country's overpopulation problem and, contrary to most nationalities, Filipinas are mostly okay with that, if a supportive relationship is present.

It is very easy to play the field, especially with provincial gals, whom amorous males could visit in endless rinse-and-repeat cycles across the republic, or merely in the capital. Actor Michael Caine (91), rhetorically asked in Alfie (1966, aged 32): 'What's it all about?" How do you reconcile male sexual imperative with females' desire for permanence? And what is fair compensation for their short, or long, time company?[/QUOTE]Have you considered that you may be slightly overthinking things? Just a little?

I'm just having a good time getting laid.

Enjoy. G.

[QUOTE=MrEnternational;2986519]Why not just ask if they are bakla and videocall to see if someone looks totally different in reality? That would save you time and money.[/QUOTE]Ooo, I always do, and I do it in a nice deceptive way, so they may take it as I'm into the ladyboys, and answer truthfully: "you look gorgeous, are you a ladyboy by any chance?" , also I do the videocall, but still, I want to see the goods before letting them into my room. I'm a very nice guy, and even if they don't meet the standards, I refuse them nicely, making up some excuse, and give them few hundred peso for the trouble, you never know how you may run into them, or their friends in the future.

[QUOTE=OldAndUgly;2986743]Ooo, I always do, and I do it in a nice deceptive way, so they may take it as I'm into the ladyboys, and answer truthfully: "you look gorgeous, are you a ladyboy by any chance?" , also I do the videocall, but still, I want to see the goods before letting them into my room. I'm a very nice guy, and even if they don't meet the standards, I refuse them nicely, making up some excuse, and give them few hundred peso for the trouble, you never know how you may run into them, or their friends in the future.[/QUOTE]I am not so nice with it. I rub it in and make them feel ashamed for trying to pull some bullshit. I especially would not give them money for wasting my time.

[QUOTE=Goferring;2986617]Have you considered that you may be slightly overthinking things? Just a little?

I'm just having a good time getting laid.[/QUOTE]LOL. The beef at McDonald's is 90% lean while the beef at Burger King is 80% lean. At Burger King they tend to flame grill which locks in the flavor from the fat. At McDonald's they have a special sauce in which they have combined mayo, ketchup, relish, and Worcestershire.

At what point do you stop the analysis and technical shit and just buy a burger and eat it? Dude has to be an engineer or statistician. I know one board member who is an engineer, and after his trips he compiles all these stats. Hell, I can't even remember the names of the chicks I fucked.

Got to love this place.

The land of sweet brown nipples and the immaculate vagina.

_ Phil.

[QUOTE=PhilJoy;2986818]Got to love this place.

The land of sweet brown nipples and the immaculate vagina.

_ Phil.[/QUOTE]"Immaculate" may be a bit of a stretch. Especially when we're done with them.

[QUOTE=MrEnternational;2986801]I am not so nice with it. I rub it in and make them feel ashamed for trying to pull some bullshit. I especially would not give them money for wasting my time.[/QUOTE]I know that I'm nice when I don't supposed to be, but I'm just thinking how desperate they must be and I don't want to put them down more than they are already, few dollars doesn't mean nothing to me, and my time is already wasted. To top it off I must say that also I'm not the confrontational type, and now that I'm old I try to avoid embarrassing situations where yelling may be involved.