With liberty and justice for the RICH. Fuck the rest of dem mother fuckers!
[QUOTE=AxelHeyst;2981582]Have you ever been to Thailand? Katoeys have been in the royal court for a thousand years or longer. I think the Thais have a firmer grip on reality than idiot leftwingers in the USA. Go to Soi Sukhumvit on any night and talk to some Ladyboy SW's. They won't bite unless you want them to. Ask them if they are girls or not. Their almost universal answer to that question should enlighten you. The Japanese have it straight too. Ha Ha, pun intended. Ladyboys in Japan are referred to as "Newhalfs". So, if trannys want to compete in sporting events no one is preventing them from organizing their own leagues and competing amoung themselves. If people want to watch them compete in these sporting events these leagues will prosper. That is the American way! Duh.[/QUOTE]There is a beauty contest in Thailand each year for Ladyboys. [B]In western countries they be trippin[/B].
Personally I don't think the average voting person in the United States of America could give a fuck about [I]dick politics[/I]. I think they care about housing, feeding and clothing themselves. Something the current [B]Plutocracy[/B] does not give a fuck about because they have theirs. When the three richest men in the United States of America has the POTUS' back, it does not bode well my fellow citizens.
Jan 2025 EV Sales DOMINATE the Germany Car Market...
[QUOTE=Sirioja;2979747] ... In Germany, when administration support fell for electric cars, Germans then buy much less electric cars, showing they only buy when not expensive, otherwise they prefer thermic cars. ... [/QUOTE]
Oh Really?...Well, NOT according the the latest sales figures for Germany, in Jan 2025.
BEVs were the best-performing powertrain in January 2025 (beating Petrol & Diesel), in terms of growth. Registrations jumped 53.5% (yoY), reaching 34,498 units, [b]without[/b] gov't consumer subsides. This marked an increase of 12,024 deliveries from 12 months ago.
Yes, EV sales in Germany plummeted by 27.4% in 2024, with only 381,000 EVs (YoY) were registered in Germany. The decline in 2024 that you talk about, only happened after FIVE (5) years of strong EV registration growth, but yes with gov't consumer subsides.
But you also failed to mention that Petrol and diesel car sales also dropped significantly in 2024 and still lost market share to EVs.
So far in 2025, EVs are on pace for another great year of sales, while Petrol and diesel car sales are slowing and plummeting.
QAnon/MAGA Right-Wing "Woke"...where COMMON SENSE really goes to die...
Same right-wing QAnon/MAGA zealots, that brought you imbecilic "culture wars" on purple dinosaurs, purple teletube babies and ban dictionaries, are same ideological gun-toting fascists, that support the Nazi-whitewashing of Jewish and Holocaust history (like Musk recently was doing in Germany, with outside interference, supporting the far right AfD), and are trying to do the same thing with U.S. American Black/Slavery history.
Buying into all those right-wing idiotic and imbecilic "culture war" ideologies...hook, line and sinker, really only plays into their overlords, billionaire buddies and robber baron's hands. This is just all perfect subterfuge and a pretext, while they blindly pick their pockets clean, while their gullible masses, blind themselves, with all their hate, misogyny, homophobia, fear mongering and racist platitudes and proclivities, against their fellow Americans.
The REAL hypocrisy is...how the right, are [i]"so concerned", "livid"[/i] and [i]"get fired-up"[/i], when family members or individuals, who have the right, to do "untold harm" themselves if they wish; but somehow, when a right-wing Incel, QAnon/MAGA AR-15 gun-toting extremists, mow-down, murder and kill, countless kids, women and men on mass,...not a peep to ban such automatic weapons of destruction from civilian use, but instead rally to support their use.
• So while [i]"woke"[/i] may have morphed and weaponized into something else, by both left and right (mostly) and it is (I think) primarily now in a twisted way, used to mean, [b][i]"where COMMON SENSE goes to die",[/b][/i] it should be be noted, that while there's a lot of truth to that, unequivocally, we all know [i][b]"COMMON SENSE" died a long time ago, [u]on the right![/u] (...kkkk!)[/b][/i]
France needs USA both back then and NOW!
[QUOTE=Sirioja;2981761]Do You always live in 80 years ago?[/QUOTE]I live in the here and the now. Can France defend itself alone? The answer is no. Otherwise they would not be in NATO. Countries in NATO want BIG DADDY USA to come sailing across to ocean to save their asses once things go kinetic.
[QUOTE][b]France will reach NATO defense spending target in 2024[/b]
France will reach NATO's target of spending 2 percent of GDP on defense in 2024, hitting the goal earlier than previously forecast, French Armed Forces Minister Sbastien Lecornu announced today.
Paris is dramatically increasing spending. In 2017, France spent 30 billion on its military but it "will eventually reach 69 billion, which allows me to confirm that France will meet the 2 percent target set by NATO this year," he said, speaking ahead of a NATO defense ministers meeting in Brussels.
The French defense budget this year is 47.2 billion and is expected to steadily increase in the next years under the country's seven-year military planning law.
According to previous forecasts, France was initially slated to spend 1.94 percent of GDP in its defense budget in 2024 and wasn't expected to reach the 2 percent figure before 2025 at the earliest.
On Wednesday, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg announced that 18 NATO member countries are on track to reach the alliance's spending target. He called on the 13 others to help achieve a "fair" burden sharing with the U.S.
Lecornu said that earmarking 2 percent of GDP for defense is not enough, as that money also has to be directed toward buying more kit. NATO has a target of 20 percent of defense funds going for that purpose while France already spends 30 percent.
"We need to look at the actual share of investment in equipment," Lecornu said.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Sirioja;2981761] I don t think electric cars are a good solution, out of towns.[/QUOTE]I disagree with you. That might be the solution I use for transport in the Dominican Republic. My concern is the battery packs. I will do a deep dive into the long term ownership costs of EV's. The only thing that matters to me is the cost per mile of moving down the road. I have long since lost my love for driving. I cannot wait for self driving cars to get here. I'll by a van. Set it up as an office. And post up in the back seat. While my AI driver takes me down the road. If that is not the hight of decadence I simply do not know what is.
EV's verses Carbon Based engines is not the answer. Hydrogen seems like a much better solution. But Green Hydrogen is hard to produce. The idea that fuel produced from vegetation ignores the amount of petroleum used during production. Don't try to go toe to toe with me on energy issues. I power my entire business with solar. I designed, procured and install the components myself. One of the advantages of me using a EV might be because I can easily set up a charging station at my business and modern EV's have plenty of range for round trip travel. On top of that, most of my destinations have charging stations available.
At this point it is really a matter of personal preferences. On a long trip it depends entirely on the infrastructure of the charging stations along your route. Takes a bit more planning that driving a petrol car. Filling up that Audi V8 is easy with stations everywhere. LOL!
4 photos
But thank God he got that paper straw crisis handled
How many millions of tax-payer dollars were spent so Trump could get boo'd at the Super Bowl, fall asleep and then leave early in humiliation when his team and that quarterback he lied about got slaughtered?
How many more millions of tax-payer dollars has Trump been blowing in order to fly fewer undocumented immigrants back to their home country per flight than Obama and Biden did?
President Musk has surely placed those at the top of his list for citing Waste, Fraud and Abuse of American Tax-Payer Dollars, right?
And this must REALLY piss off President Musk and his assistant Trump:
[B]S&P 500 is little changed as Powell comments, trade tensions weigh on market.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2025/02/10/stock-market-today-live-updates.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]"With our policy stance now significantly less restrictive than it had been and [b]the economy remaining strong[/b], we do not need to be in a hurry to adjust our policy stance, Powell said in his first of two appearances this week on Capitol Hill. The central bank leader called [b]the economy strong overall with a solid labor market, and said inflation is easing [/b]but remains above the Feds 2% goal.[/QUOTE]How do we know that accurate assessment REALLY pisses them off?
Because they are choosing to do this:
[QUOTE]Trump on Monday signed new tariffs on all steel and aluminum imports to the U.S. The European Union responded by saying it would retaliate with levies of its own if the U.S. tacks on tariffs against products from the country bloc.[/QUOTE]And this:
[B]Ford CEO says Trump's tariffs are causing 'chaos' in auto industry.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2025/02/11/ford-ceo-says-trumps-tariffs-are-causing-chaos-in-auto-industry.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]Farley described announced 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum as well as threatened levies on Mexico and Canada as currently adding [b]a lot of cost and a lot of chaos[/b] to the industry.[/QUOTE]Meanwhile, how are the prices for eggs, groceries, damn I'm glad Trump invented that word, gas, rent, Mortgage loan rates, etc doing lately?
Has Trump ended the Russia-Ukraine War yet? A lot of "24 hours" have passed by since the election.
As a landlord, I have yet to get a terse memo or audio recording of Trump's hilariously "menacing" monotone voice demanding I reduce the rent for my tenants. So I guess I won't.
And why are there so many deadly aircraft crashes since President Musk demanded the head of the FAA resign? Just another wild coincidences I suppose.
4 photos
Did Bitcoin Love Biden More Than Trump?
I suppose the Bitcoiners here will rush in to tell me I just don't understand their Love, how it manifests itself in unconventional ways, that a down line on an historic chart is "good" and an up one is "bad" and all that.
But is this what supposed "winning" looks like in Bitcoin World under Trump vs the supposed "losing" it suffered under Biden?
Just asking.
The screenshots of charts below show what happened with the price of Bitcoin all during Trump's 1st so-called presidential term, after Biden was elected in 2020, since Trump was elected for his 2nd so-called presidential term in November 2024, on Biden's last day in office on January 19 and since then.
Oh and as a bonus I threw in a screenshot for the average price of a gallon of regular gasoline because it was handy.
As a reminder, for over a year under Bidenomics and before President-elect Musk's assistant Trump launched into his constant blather about increasing Trump Tariff Taxes on the American Working Men and Women Consumer, the average price of a gallon of regular gasoline had been steadily declining to within about a dime above where it was in mid 2019, right before Trump's historically disastrous economic and national security decisions laid the groundwork for, ushered in and exacerbated Trump's Pandemic and all of the hyper-inflation and skyrocketing prices for everything that followed.
Again, I suppose the Trumpsters here will rush in to assure me that steadily rising prices for gasoline under Trump's economic stewardship is "good" while those steadily declining prices we were seeing under Biden was "bad". For sure a plurality or majority of those latest CBS poll respondents would see it as great that Trump "kept his promise" to increase prices on almost everything for Americans with his across-the-board Trump Tariff Taxes blather.
When you are a hammer everything in life looks like a nail!
[QUOTE=Sirioja;2982087]When you really drive, EVs are not best adapted for more than going buying bread.[/QUOTE]When you are really poor you can only afford on vehicle. I have many vehicles. Just like in my tool box I have many different tools for different purposes. Argue all you want about range. I don't have a EV where I can even drive 1000 KM or would want to. So, why would I be concerned about that?
[B]You are saying The United States of America made money on World War II[/B]? France cannot defend itself. That is why it is part on NATO. History taught them a lesson.
The stupidest comment I have read in this thread is attaching credit for movement of markets to who is POTUS. [B]ALL MARKETS![/B]. Presidents don't move them. The market participants move them. I am surprised to see such stupidity proffered in order to forward a political cause that is lost for the next 4 year. I've written that Democrats are sore losers. Even the ones that don't even live in The United States of America.
If a man lives in the [I]land of smiles[/I] from reading his posts I do not see any signs of it. Plus he does not know the law in the county now calls home.
Just the FACTS ma'am! ...And what's love got to do with it?
[QUOTE=Sirioja;2981812]You don t know yet for whole 2025 , when Niagara fall for Tesla, when many Europeans feel shameful because of what is Musk. EV are not real cars, [b]when You love cars,[/b] and they also pollute with batteries. [/QUOTE]As I've previously explained to you, when you first made that [B]"I love cars"[/B] argument. I explained to you then, that people will buy and drive cars, trucks and vehicles of all kinds, for different reasons. Most times, I would guess 95% of people buy/drive their vehicles for practical reasons.
So as the reasons for buying/owning an EV are becoming increasing more compelling, by contrast, the reasons for buying/owning an ICE vehicle are decreasing. As the [B]DATA[/B] and [B]FACTS[/B] for new sales/registrations of EV vs ICE purchases playout in the biggest car markets, around the world.
What is apparently evident to everyone (except Sirioja, Toyota and other ICE manufacturers with their heads stuck in the sand), is that the trend is increasingly towards buying EVs, the [B]FACTS, DATA[/B] and [B]NUMBERS[/B] show that. And BTW, those very same European/USA Car manufacturers, that still make petrol/diesel/ICE vehicles, also make EVs that Europeans (and Americans) buy and drive, not just China.
Almost 96%, 54% and 53.5% of new cars registered in Norway, China and Germany, respectively last month (Jan 2025), were EV/PHEVs or Hybrids. That's the trend, and those are the FACTS, dude! Yes, that overall trend my change, but not at this present time.
So while I appreciate the overt "I love cars" tears, emotions and overtures,...it's all perhaps, a bit much. May I suggest, a little less "emotion" and [U]more [b]FACTUAL[/b][/U] arguments are preferable, when debating. Not weak "I love cars" arguments, with nothing to back it up!
Good on you, dude, but so what if you love cars? What's love got to do with the data that shows, EV sales/registrations outpacing ICE vehicles in some of the biggest car markets in the world?