[QUOTE=MrHo;2488366]Right, taste can have different standpoint, but I must say my definition of stunner is very typical straight out of vogue magazine model type beauty, and another can be most beautiful girl in university type of stunner, these are best way to describe it and I tend to like sportive fit body that are rather on thin side than thick side or slim girl, as for tit I do not mind big or small, but has to be beautifully shaped, no wrinkle and beautifully shaped nipple, and I like my pussies shaved, but never saw hair on pussy in FKK anyways! So I do like classic beauty that let say fashion magazine editor would love to put her on cover of the magazine! Kind of got what I mean? I tend to prefer white beauty, but I also do love exotic type stunner from Romania to satisfy my tanned cafe au lait skin beauty too!
However, now that you know I prefer classic stunner that are young straight out of fashion magazine, there are many occasions where I find stunner like that then when I was about to approach from the couch I have been sitting on for hours LOL! Then other monger get to near her first, so I am like no she is gone, then guess what? That monger go for the girl next to that stunner who is more older, fat, tattoos, silicone fake tit, plastic surgery ugly face girl and take that one to the room LOL! This happened so many time for me in FKK that I do not understand why! But I guess it is matter of taste! I stick to my definition of stunner LOL!
Sharks never worked for me as I mention before, if I had two stunners that I recall from that club, one is from moldova and natural blonde girl and wow she was stunner and dirty, very good service in room, I think this one was in 2017 and another one was long ago in 2014 or 2013, she was from Poland and she also was amazingly dirty in room and did everything as I wanted, but for such a big club with big line up, stunner is hard to find and somehow, I tend to prefer other mega clubs like Artemis or even oceans worked for me though oceans line up is smaller but clubs size is similar, somehow sharks never worked fully for me and I hate the distance of about 15 min I walk from the station! And taxi was never there! Etc so sharks I never returned.
Now I tend to prefer Artemis once again, palace, globe Zurich and I will give another shot at Oase if I get bore with palace line up as recently palace only gives me one stunner per night that last for usually two night! Before there were 2 or 3. So I may do what I do in nrw, goto gt which is day club to hunt, then end up in oceans at 8 pm to keep on hunting for stunner! Many complaint about oceans, but I find one stunner always so far, but most of girls there are like LR level, but I found one stunner there always.
I do miss Artemis and palace at their peak, they used to have 3 stunners minimum sometimes even 5 or more! I am glad that in those days I could do 7 rooms all with cum! Good younger days, but I got science world from 4th room if there are stunners LOL!![/QUOTE]Seeing women in magazines and in person are two different things. Never judge a woman's looks by how she looks in a magazine. There's a lot of retouching that is deceptive. Always judge looks by what you have seen in person. That being said my desire to make love to a woman is a mixture of looks and attitude. For me one of the hottest girls in Sharks was Esther before she enlarged her breasts and her lips. I found her hotter than Megan. However, when I had a choice I always went with Megan instead of Esther because Megan gave much better GFE. Most times I would choose an ordinary girl with a super attitude than a looker with poor behavior.
