Same thing with BBBJ or covered, it all depends on if people are clean or not. Anal or not, depends on the size. Gpuia is accurate up to an extent. Need lots of reviews and sample size to be more accurate. It is useful in that if 9 out of 10 reviews are saying that this person is a fraud then most likely they're a fraud.
[QUOTE=TheCane;2881506]As useful (and entertaining) as GP-Guia is, it's not always definitive. What I mean by that is that I love to go there and read reviews about girls I sessioned with to see how somebody else's experience compared to mine. Usually if I thought the girl was hot and a good provider, the other reviewer did as well. But, what I noticed is a lot of the guys saying a girl doesn't do anal when I know good and damn well I had been all up in her A-hole! LOL! So, the moral to the story is don't limit yourself based on what somebody else on GP-Guia said a girl will or will not do.
Because I'm here to give witness that I butt fucked a number of girls that several GP-Guia reviewers said the girl told them they didn't do anal. I guess you just have to catch them at the right time on the right day or something. Or maybe earlier in their short careers before the thrill to them from getting cornholed in a termas is gone LOL! Don't get me wrong. I think GP-Guia is hella useful, but don't take it as the gospel truth. If you want something (anal) then ask for it, and you just might receive. I know I did from a lot of those fine young ladies who supposedly "don't do anal". YMMV.[/QUOTE].
