A simpletons view of the election
I am no political scholar like you guys but I think Biden won the same way Trump did in 2016. Back in 2016 the last thing this country wanted or needed was Hillary Clinton as president while she was embroiled in her scandals. It would have been bad for the country to start off like that.
This election IMO the electoral college gave it to Biden even if the number were so very close. WHY? Every city in America was boarded up prepared for what looked like a category 5 hurricane. Was this for a Biden win? NO.
If Trump was declared winner cities would have been turned upside down. A horrible way to start a presidency. Especially during Covid.
So far Biden has said and done all the right things. Unfortunately once his crew takes charge a whole new set of problems will arise and he and his administration will be blaming Trump for 4 years.
Are the elections 100% legit? I doubt it but I do believe the electoral college or whoever has the best interest of the country which is reflected in these presidential election results.
Mexican View. Mexican President Is Angry Trump's Twitter Is Silenced
"One explanation I haven't heard for Trump's strong performance among Hispanic voters in 2020 has been the high regard in which the leftist president of Mexico, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, holds Trump. If your cousins back in Mexico are big AMLO fans and they tell you AMLO likes Trump, that cuts across ideological lines pretty well. . . I think the Trump-AMLO friendship was an enemy-of-my-enemy thing involving the Bush family in the US and the various neoliberals in Mexico like the Salinas family, with whom Jeb Bush used to vacation.
On election night 1988, the Mexican party of the left was finally about to win a Presidential election when suddenly the lights went out at the vote counting central. When the power finally went back on, the ruling Institutional Revolutionary party was somehow in the lead.
When the Cold War ended, the PRI president Carlos Salinas went to George H. W. Bush with a message the Bush family had long dreamt of: Mexico would open up to American business if it could be included in the free trade pact the US was (boringly) negotiating with Canada. This has been the Grand Strategy of the Bush family ever since GHWB had to hire front men to nominally own his Zapata oil company in Mexico because Americans have been banned from the Mexican oil biz since 1938. It's not widely recognized in the USA Media that the Bush dynasty's fundamental strategic vision over the last half century has been to knock down the barriers keeping American business out of Mexico in return for lowering the barriers keeping Mexican people out of America. (It's not a coincidence that two President Bushes' oil firms were named Zapata and Arbusto.) This is not an irrational plan, but it benefits elites (who own oil companies) more than the American public (that works for a living).
AMLO especially sympathizes with Trump's complaints about election fraud, in part because Lopez Obrador believes the 2006 Mexican presidential election was stolen from him by a late-arriving vote dump. He led a year of protests outside the capitol, then finally was elected president in 2018 . . . Steve Sailer.
From the Associated Press: Mexican president mounts campaign against social media bans.
MEXICO CITY (AP) — Mexico's president vowed Thursday to lead an international effort to combat what he considers censorship by social media companies that have blocked or suspended the accounts of USA President Donald Trump.
President Andrés Manuel López Obrador's administration is reaching out to other government to form a common front on the issue.
"How can a company act as if it was all powerful, omnipotent, as a sort of Spanish Inquisition on what is expressed?" he (AMLO) asked. . . "
Baseless and Unsubstantiated Election Claims
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2522253] Confusion arose when election workers thought they were done for the night, but then were instructed to continue scanning ballots... [/QUOTE]There was no confusion when ALL the facts, procedures and evidence you state here, was put forth in the courts. They were found baseless and unsubstantiated. In EACH and EVERY state, jurisdiction and court room throughout the country, where they were contested.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2522102] Qualified lawyers (on both sides Rep. / Dem.) have argued and deliberated, many of the same arguments you've mentioned (especially Georgia) and Republicans lost in every case and were overwhelmingly defeated in every state they contested. I am not a lawyer, but if you happen to be pretty good lawyer and know the ins and outs of electoral constitutional voting laws. Then perhaps your arguments have more weight than I give them credit. By all means enlighten us, some more. [/QUOTE]If you choose not to accept the outcome, and cling to some other alternative reasoning, then that your choice. We all take solace in what we believe to be true.