Bangkok Reports

[QUOTE=GentleBoner; 1277438]Context doesn't matter. This is a p4p forum. Having their photos seen here by family or employers (whose english might not be great) could be enough to cause serious problems for people. I would expect an expat to know this. Especially since the photos are often suggestive, even if not pornographic. I personally know a girl who was fired just for being seen flirting with tourists on khao san at night.

Bargirls are one thing, but leave civilians out of it. Their photos don't belong on ISG.

And yes frequently photographing girls on the street is something only serious creeps do.[/QUOTE]I am just curious. If this site is so taboo then how would someone explain that they had seen her photos here in the first place.

"Oh I just stumbled on this P4P site and by mistake found myself in the Thailand Photo pages or Bangkok reports. Give me a break!

Your friend was fired for conduct in public. By your own admission not from some photos on this or any other site.

I can't even begin to fathom, how Fon Tok's photos (or any other person photos of the girls in public) are "suggestive". They show a lady walking down the street! Now I will agree that they look good, but they walked out the door that morning dressed looking that way knowing full well they would be seen in public!

One thing I am SURE of is that you have absolutely NO standing to decide what does and does not "belong" on ISG, you don't own the board anymore than any of the rest of us and until you do, then the ONLY person who has that right is Jackson, that is not debatable!

One other thing that at least in my opinion is certainly up for debate is your assertion that taking pictures of ladies on the street somehow constitutes deviate behavior,

I wholeheartedly disagree with your position, but hey it is just that, your opinion, of no more value than mine!

If that is in fact the case, the CREEPS UNITE! WE want MORE "CREEPY" pictures!

Viva la difference!

[QUOTE=GentleBoner;1277438]And yes frequently photographing girls on the street is something only serious creeps do.[/QUOTE]Tell me something, Mr. GentleBoner; I'm curious.

What does it feel like inside your head to have it so full of shit?

[QUOTE=GentleBoner;1277438]Especially since the photos are often suggestive, even if not pornographic. .[/QUOTE]Are you saying a girl walking in the streets, by her own will, wearing a miniskirt and eventually high heels (to look nice and please everybody's eyes, including her owns) is offering PORNOGRAPHIC views? Are you nut or what?

[QUOTE=GentleBoner;1277438]Context doesn't matter. This is a p4p forum. Having their photos seen here by family or employers (whose english might not be great) could be enough to cause serious problems for people.[/QUOTE]I once was browsing on a web site "specialized" in voyeur images, majority were amateur exposing themselves in public. There was a section called "seen in the streets" or something like that. Often beach pictures. Pictures just framing what anybody could see with his own eyes, anybody of any age, BTW. And not standing smartly at the bottom of a star to catch if th girls were wearing undies. Lo and behold I bumped into a beach picture of two girls I knew very well for working reasons and they were both topless (not a big deal in a sunny beach!). The website was obviously kinky, no doubt. But those pictures were absolutely innocent, albeit I could see the tits I could never see when they were working. It never passed to my mind to comment negatively on the girls, with their employers or what. Was the publication on the site making the sluts all of a sudden? Or porn models exposing tits? Was I then entitled to hav dirty thoughts on the girls and approch them with a blackmail? Is that what are you implying or suggestung? To make things clear, as I aint no hypocrit, I don't hide with god friends, even at work, I am reading ISG. And on that specific case I showed the web page to a few common friends and we all had a laugh on "big brother". I didn't show it to the girls to avoid them embarrassment. And kept looking at them just as before, not as porn models, as they weren't.
I would rather be more concerned about a picture of a girl sucking a dick in a farang's hotel room when when says at home that she is the cashier at 7-11..Be it on ISG or anywhere, even on a sex manual. Even if she is consenting to the picture... If we have to out some moral in this story.
Get a life, dude.

[QUOTE=GentleBoner;1277438]Especially since the photos are often suggestive, even if not pornographic.[/QUOTE]


[QUOTE=Bionicman;1277491]Are you saying a girl walking in the streets, by her own will, wearing a miniskirt and eventually high heels (to look nice and please everybody's eyes, including her owns) is offering PORNOGRAPHIC views? Are you nut or what?[/QUOTE]

English likely isn't your first language. Probably not your 2nd either.

[QUOTE=GentleBoner;1277438]Bargirls are one thing, but leave civilians out of it. Their photos don't belong on ISG.[/QUOTE]Ahahahahahahah Civilians? CI VI LIANS? Hahahahahahahahaha. Shit, I got to scroll through all 80 of your posts, if they're all as Hilarious as this one, I'm in for a Treat.

How old are you? Fucking 70? We're in 2012, nowadays people take pics of Everything and report them on various Blogs / Forums / Websites. If you don't like it, then keep your high morals out of here and go find Jesus somewhere, I am sure the two of you will get along just fine.

Civilians. Ahahahahahaha

[QUOTE=NicFrenchy; 1277505]Ahahahahahahah Civilians? CI VI LIANS? Hahahahahahahahaha. Shit, I got to scroll through all 80 of your posts, if they're all as Hilarious as this one, I'm in for a Treat.

How old are you? Fucking 70? We're in 2012, nowadays people take pics of Everything and report them on various Blogs / Forums / Websites. If you don't like it, then keep your high morals out of here and go find Jesus somewhere, I am sure the two of you will get along just fine.

Civilians. Ahahahahahaha[/QUOTE]

Quite a low threshold for humor you have. Quite a bizarre system for capitalizing words also. But glad you enjoyed my post so much.

I'm likely younger than you are. Not so interested in morality, Jesus, or endless photographs of women in skirts walking down the street.

[QUOTE=GentleBoner;1277502]English likely isn't your first language. Probably not your 2nd either.[/QUOTE]. The releveance of this last comment with the debate?

Are you suggesting that anyone whose English is not his first or even second language should be denied the right to post? BTW, English is my 3rd language.

[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Burqa_IMG_1127.jpg[/url]

[QUOTE=NicFrenchy; 1277371]I beg to Differ. It actually makes me happy that some members don't like my views or my posts. If they get angry or sarcastic in public, makes me smile even more. I love that people don't get along, that you're always going to have idiots like gentle boner and the other guy whose name I forgot (and can't give enough of a fuck to scroll down and verify) who will CONTRIBUTE nothing to this forum and criticize the people who actually POST.

(snip).[/QUOTE]Ahem, Mr. 3,689 posts. Or whatever the number is. It's clear to me that posting is not the same as contributing. Whiners! WHERE the fuck is LBM and his seasoned words of wisdom? Now THAT GUY contributes. What exactly brought you back? Was it the forum structure? Like Annies and Tulips and All Other Fuckshops Claiming to be Massage?

[QUOTE=Etaoin2003;1277563][url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Burqa_IMG_1127.jpg[/url][/QUOTE]I disagreee. It is too fancy! Should be black!

[QUOTE=Crazy4Thai;1277571]Ahem, Mr. 3,689 posts. Or whatever the number is. It's clear to me that posting is not the same as contributing. Whiners! WHERE the fuck is LBM and his seasoned words of wisdom? Now THAT GUY contributes. What exactly brought you back? Was it the forum structure? Like Annies and Tulips and All Other Fuckshops Claiming to be Massage?[/QUOTE]Even if 1% of Nic's posts are considered "useful", (and I think the real number is far higher) , it's aready far more than yours. So practice what you say, and post something useful.

[QUOTE=Dreams; 1277562]. The releveance of this last comment with the debate?

Are you suggesting that anyone whose English is not his first or even second language should be denied the right to post? BTW, English is my 3rd language.[/QUOTE]He misunderstood me. I specifically said the photos were NOT pornographic, then he called me a nut for saying they're pornographic.

May I offer a easy suggestion. If you see the post is from Fon Tok then skip the bloody thing. Easy enough.

[QUOTE=GentleBoner; 1277510]Quite a low threshold for humor you have. Quite a bizarre system for capitalizing words also. But glad you enjoyed my post so much.

I'm likely younger than you are. Not so interested in morality, Jesus, or endless photographs of women in skirts walking down the street.[/QUOTE]