1 photos
Courts heard and saw the evidence in the election cases? Which courts?
Courts to Voters: Election Fraud Is 'Too Big to Fail' by Karen McQuillan.
The courts have spoken, one after another. Some 74 million Americans have been denied our day in court. The Democrats' crime of stealing a presidential election is too big to fail. . . " According to this author, the courts refused to hear the evidence due to "laches" and untimely filing. I. e. Should have sued before the election fraud took place. . . Sort of like calling the police before the burglars rob your house, otherwise it is untimely. . . So which courts heard "ALL the facts, procedures, and evidence you state here, was put forth in the courts. They were found baseless and unsubstantiated. . . " So which courts heard the evidence and issued rulings? From what I read, the courts were afraid to get involved. . . And accepted no cases and thus heard no evidence or made any rulings. I do think Trump should take the blame for not pushing through basic reforms like Mexico has for free government issue voter ID cards or requiring each voter in a federal election to either put their finger in purple ink or get a notarized signature on the election mail envelope. . .
A more useful guide is the BBC article on Vote Rigging: "Vote rigging: How to spot the tell-tale signs".
BBC World News. Africa.
2 September 2016.
BBC World News. Africa www dot bbc dot com / news / world-africa-37243190.
Too many voters Watch the turnout figures ‒ they can be a big giveaway.
You never get a 98% or 99% turnout in an honest election. You just don't.
Voting is compulsory in Gabon, but it is not enforced; even in Australia where it is enforced, where you can vote by post or online and can be fined for not voting, turnout only reaches 90-95%.
The main reason that a full turnout is practically impossible is that electoral registers, even if they are recently compiled, can rarely be 100% up-to-date.
Even if no-one gets sick or has to travel, people still die. And when a register is updated, new voters are keen to add themselves to the list.
No-one, however, has any great enthusiasm for removing the names of those who have died, and over time the number of these non-existent voters increases. ."
A simplified version of this is a classroom of 30 kids votes for class president. Suzy gets 21 votes; Tommy get 152 votes. Over votes are a giveaway as to vote rigging. You do the math. Another giveaway is to watch the inauguration on TV. If the number of soldiers surrounding the new "elected" leader "protecting" him from the public exceeds the number of his supporters, you might have had a stolen election. . . Time for Americans to grow up and realize that there is no Santa Claus and the people who counted the votes are the ones that matter, not the people who voted, just as Stalin said.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2522563]There was no confusion when ALL the facts, procedures and evidence you state here, was put forth in the courts. They were found baseless and unsubstantiated. In EACH and EVERY state, jurisdiction and court room throughout the country, where they were contested.
If you choose not to accept the outcome, and cling to some other alternative reasoning, then that your choice. We all take solace in what we believe to be true.[/QUOTE]
Republicans repeating past FAILURES. Politically insanity?
In 2002 when then former President G. W. Bush, made finding voter fraud his top priority. He had his attorney general, John Ashcroft, assign voter fraud as a top priority for the Department of Justice. After years of trying, the federal prosecutors kept coming up empty. They charged more people with violating migratory bird laws (when people change states) than voting statutes.
They found nothing! No Fraud! No Violations! [I]Even after several years of searching and examining [u] over a BILLION votes[/u] spanning more than a decade and they found 31 cases of voter fraud. [b] Only 31 Cases! .[/b][/I].
In October 2006, President Bush told Mr. Ashcroft's successor, Alberto are. Gonzales, that he had heard about fraud in Albuquerque, Milwaukee and Philadelphia. Karl Rove, Mr. Bush's aide, warned Mr. Gonzales he had these so called "concerns" about voter fraud.
In several highly unusual moves, seven United States attorneys were forced to resign, on top of two more pushed out earlier. Events unfold and soon a scandal erupted and those involved in the scheme to manufacture voter fraud, found themselves in congressional hearings. Those involved, resigned, quit or were fired in disgrace.
So true to form with regards to losing an election, the Republicans, proceed to tell lies, spread falsehoods and try to manufacture the evidence to support said voter frauds. [B][i] If you can't find the crime, then fire the attorney generals and prosecutors, install your own people and make shit up. [/i][/B] Sound familiar!
Certainly does seem like the Republicans, relish repeating the FAILURES of the past. Political insanity, perhaps. Political suicide?
