So Trump is a fucking liar?
[QUOTE=AxelHeyst;3014702]Hey Elvis, remember when Covid cases in China 1st started being reported in the US media. It was in November 2019. President Trump banned flights out of China and what was the idiotic Demfuck reaction? Nancy Pelosi organized a rally in front of SF's Chinatown to protest Trump's racist policy against Chinese people. So, anyone who blames Trump for Covid is a liar and a fool. The Demfucks would have handled it worse because if Hillary, the ugly, had been President, her reaction would have been slower and far less effective due to her blinding political correctness. And yes, at the time, November 2019, I thought Trump had not gone far enough. He should have quarantined the entire country IE no international flights, but in all likelihood that would not have worked either because by November 2019, the cat was already out of the bag. Fuck China and fuck their criminal laboratories.[/QUOTE]Trump was recorded saying if only someone had told us about those Covid cases "two months earlier" the world would not have had Trump's Pandemic in the first place because we could have stopped it "easily".
Zero about Nancy Pelosi or his NON ban of flights from China or any other nonsense.
Was Trump just flat out lying about that?
Neither Nancy Pelosi nor any other human on the planet is responsible for Trump NOT being told about those earliest cases in those Chinese labs other than Donald J. Trump himself.
Nice try, though.
Well, not really. Actually, it was a ridiculously lame try.
[B]Exclusive: U.S. slashed CDC staff inside China prior to coronavirus outbreak.
March 26, 2020[/B]
[URL]https://www.reuters.com/article/world/exclusive-us-slashed-cdc-staff-inside-china-prior-to-coronavirus-outbreak-idUSKBN21C3NE/[/URL]
[QUOTE]WASHINGTON(Reuters) - The Trump administration cut staff by more than two-thirds at a key U.S. public health agency operating inside China, as part of a larger rollback of U.S.-funded health and science experts on the ground there leading up to the coronavirus outbreak, Reuters has learned.
Most of the reductions were made at the Beijing office of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and occurred over the past two years, according to public CDC documents viewed by Reuters and interviews with four people familiar with the drawdown.
Americas preeminent disease fighting agency, provides public health assistance to nations around the world and works with them to help stop outbreaks of contagious diseases from spreading globally. It has worked in China for 30 years.
The CDCs China headcount has shrunk to around 14 staffers, down from approximately 47 people since President Donald Trump took office in January 2017, the documents show. The four people, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the losses included epidemiologists and other health professionals.[/QUOTE][B]Trump admitted to Woodward he downplayed coronavirus threat in early days of outbreak.
September 10, 2020[/B]
[URL]https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-woodward-book-claims-downplayed-covid-19-threat/[/URL]
[QUOTE]Washington President Trump admitted to journalist Bob Woodward in March that he publicly downplayed the dangers of the coronavirus as it silently spread around the world, hoping to avoid a panic even as he recognized how "deadly" the virus could be.[/QUOTE][B]AP FACT CHECK: Trump and the virus-era China ban that isnt.
July 18, 2020[/B]
[URL]https://apnews.com/article/asia-pacific-anthony-fauci-pandemics-politics-ap-fact-check-d227b34b168e576bf5068b92a03c003d[/URL]
[QUOTE]WASHINGTON (AP) President Donald Trumps ban on travel from China is his go-to point when defending his response to the coronavirus pandemic. The problem with his core argument starts with the fact that he did not ban travel from China. He imposed porous restrictions.[/QUOTE]Good god, man, get a grip. This stuff has been well reported and known for more than 5 years.
I can see Elvis totally missing it because he says he lives off the land in the hills of wherever with no connection to the civilized world, paved roads, Federal funds, nothing.
But I assumed you have access to at least an internet connection not powered by a hamster spinning a wheel as Elvis presumably does.
Don't you give a shit about a million dead Americans, more around the world and worldwide economies brought to a standstill by the economic and national security decisions made by Trump as fully reported in those links above?
Are they all "Fake News"? LOL.
Damn. That fat orange fuck is trying to repeat that spectacularly horrific result again by employing some of the same tactics!
2 photos
Why can't Trump tell the truth? Ever.
I just posted a couple of up-to-date tables and charts from AAA and GasBuddy Gas Station Price Chart, Local & National showing that the average price of a gallon of regular gas in the USA has gone UP under Trump and not DOWN.
USA Tariff tax payments are NOT made by the exporting country, they can only be paid by the USA. There is no such thing as a USA Tax paid by another country. The Billions of dollars "coming in" to America can only "come out" of the pockets of American Consumers. Period.
And now we see that there IS still Trump's Pandemic Inflation in the USA Economy:
[B]Inflation picks up again in June, rising at 2. 7% annual rate.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/15/cpi-inflation-report-june-2025.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[B]Inflation hits highest level since February as toll of tariffs begins to appear.[/B]
[URL]https://fortune.com/2025/07/15/june-inflation-highest-level-since-february-consumer-price-index-tariffs/[/URL]
So when Trump stands there like a clown and says, "The price of gas is down, we're taking in Billions from tariffs, there is NO Inflation" and so on, he is obviously lying his fat ass even fatter. Or he is simply incredibly stupid. Or both.
And every other World Leader, the real ones, even the ones from countries Trump and his MAGAs consider to be "asshole" countries, knows it.
Consequently, how can anybody take seriously the last thing he says in that blather, the part about his puppet master and Repub Party Election Campaign Director Vladimir Putin when it has supposedly finally dawned on Trump he has been played mercilessly by Putin for at least 10 years, since Putin eked out a razor-thin election victory for him back in 2016?
Answer: nobody can.
Donald Trump the Greatest Man to Ever Walk the Earth
[QUOTE=AxelHeyst;3014702]Hey Elvis, remember when Covid cases in China 1st started being reported in the US media. It was in November 2019. President Trump banned flights out of China and what was the idiotic Demfuck reaction? Nancy Pelosi organized a rally in front of SF's Chinatown to protest Trump's racist policy against Chinese people. So, anyone who blames Trump for Covid is a liar and a fool. The Demfucks would have handled it worse because if Hillary, the ugly, had been President, her reaction would have been slower and far less effective due to her blinding political correctness. And yes, at the time, November 2019, I thought Trump had not gone far enough. He should have quarantined the entire country IE no international flights, but in all likelihood that would not have worked either because by November 2019, the cat was already out of the bag. Fuck China and fuck their criminal laboratories.[/QUOTE]Opinion.
Guest Essay.
'Trump Owns It All Now'.
July 15,2025.
The Capitol viewed through orange and red filters.
Credit. Aleksey Kondratyev for The New York Times.
Listen to this article · 17:03 min Learn more.
Share full article.
852.
Thomas be. Edsall.
By Thomas be. Edsall.
Mr. Edsall contributes a weekly column from Washington, the. See. , on politics, demographics and inequality.
Capitalizing on Democrats' weakness, President Trump is winning his battle to undermine democracy in this country.
But he has not won the war.
A host of factors could blunt his aggression: recession, debt, corruption, inflation, epidemics, the Epstein files, anger over cuts in Medicaid and food stamps, to name just a few. Much of what Trump has done could be undone if a Democrat is elected president in 2028.
But for federal workers, medical and scientific researchers, lawyers in politically active firms, prominent critics of Trump — thousands of whom have felt the sting of arbitrary firings, vanished paychecks and retracted grants, criminal inquiries and threatened bankruptcies — the 2028 election may prove too late to repair the damage.
And that's before we even begin to talk about the anti-immigration crackdown.
Trump's assaults are aimed at targets large and small, some based on personal resentments, others guided by a more coherent ideological agenda.
Advertisement.
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT.
The brutality of Trump's anti-democratic policies is part of a larger goal, a reflection of an administration determined to transfer trillions of dollars to the wealthy by imposing immense costs on the poor and the working class in lost access to medical care and food support, an administration that treats hungry children with the same disdain that it treats core principles of democracy.
Trump has succeeded in devastating due-process protections for universities, immigrants and law firms. He has cowed the Supreme Court, which has largely failed to block his violations of the Constitution. He has bypassed Congress, ruling by executive order and emergency declaration. He is using the regulatory power of government to force the media to make humiliating concessions. He has ordered criminal investigations of political adversaries. He has fired innumerable government employees who pursued past investigations — and on and on.
He has moved with determination toward the destabilization of American democracy.
"Our institutions are not acting as if American democracy is under threat," Donald Moynihan, a professor of public policy at the University of Michigan, contended in an email. It has become routine, Moynihan wrote.
For Trump to fire people in independent agencies or civil servants, or to impound funds and even close agencies. All of these things were widely assumed to be illegal. While the courts are not making definitive rulings on such powers, they are allowing Trump to exercise them. Maybe they will clip Trump's wings later, but in the meantime enormous damage will be done and undoing that damage will be extraordinarily difficult. For example, ending USA I. The. Without congressional action is illegal, but it is happening, and millions will die as a result.
Many Democrats and liberals have been banking on economic forces to press Trump to back down, but the administration is not paying the price many on the left and center expected to emerge in response to his tariffs and the immense expansion of the national debt resulting from his "One Big Beautiful Bill. ".
Sign up for the Opinion Today newsletter Get expert analysis of the news and a guide to the big ideas shaping the world every weekday morning. Get it sent to your inbox.
Instead, the economy remains strong: Unemployment is at 4. 1 percent; the stock market has reached record highs; the rate of inflation increased by a modest 0. 1 percent from April to May for an annual 2. 4 percent rate.
"I am worried Trump is seemingly wearing down the opposition," Brendan Nyhan, a political scientist at Dartmouth, wrote by email in response to my queries about Trump's successes and failures. "His political position is objectively weaker — he's a lame duck who is more unpopular than he was at this point in his first term — but he's using the powers of the presidency more effectively in pursuit of his authoritarian goals. ".
Editors' Picks.
Yes, Gen Z Is Staring at You. The Question Is Why.
On Colorado's Wild Prairies, the Rest of the World Disappears.
To Afford Montauk, he Went on 'Jeopardy!
Advertisement.
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT.
Trump, Nyhan argued.
Is pushing the boundaries of his institutional powers in ways that are less likely to catalyze opposition, especially as they become more familiar. I am most concerned about the direction of the Supreme Court. The lower courts have held up well in challenging the administration, but the nationwide injunction decision (among others) suggests that SCOTUS is becoming a key enabler.
Nyhan is one of four directors of the Bright Line Watch report, which tracks support for democracy using surveys of 760 political scientists as well as of 2,000 voters. The most recent report, "Threats to Democracy and Academic Freedom After Trump's Second First 100 Days," is based on data collected in late April 2025. It found that from late 2024 to April 2025, "overall ratings of American democracy dropped significantly among every group surveyed — academic experts, the public overall, and Republican and Democratic members of the public. ".
From September 2024, two months before the election, to April 2025, with Trump in the White House for three months, the Bright Line surveys showed an eight-point drop, from 57 to 49, in the public ratings of democracy in the United States and a sharper, 17-point decline, from 70 to 53, among the political scientists.
Instead of authoritarianism, Theda Skocpol, a professor of government and sociology at Harvard, has coined two phrases to describe the Trump agenda:
Trump's immediate goal is better described as creating a governing system I call "competitive sycophancy," where all power centers inside and beyond the federal government are run by competing sets of people vying to flatter him and manipulate resources and rules to his personal and family advantage. They do one extreme thing after another, try to outdo each other, and he chooses who to back, with shifts and chaos and unpredictability week after week.
"Patrimonial corruption" is the only through-line result, along with sheer inefficiency and incompetence at key institutional and public-regarding tasks.
Trump, in Skocpol's assessment, has so far been successful:
Thanks to the fawning of the G. O. P. And of most elite-run USA Institutions, he already basically has this system in place. One part of it that is a possible route to pure coercive authoritarianism is the new ICE-centered private army run without limits by Stephen Miller — and there will be constant efforts to push that into a centralizing and terrifying threat against all political opposition.
But, Skocpol contended, "we are not there yet":
We need to stop proclaiming how smart and victorious Trump has proved to be. The real issue is how ineffective and opportunist USA Elites in general are proving to be, each sector and institution trying to protect its own narrow interests to the detriment of any longer-terms interests, their own or the nation's.
If Trump's "sheer incompetence and corruption" result in economic or natural disaster, the one advantage Trump critics have, Skocpol wrote, is that.
Trump owns it all now; that is the silver lining in all of this. Let him get all the blame for the messes that will unfold, let his childish efforts to shift blame look more and more desperate, silly and weak. Weak is the key.
There are a number of experts on the study of democracy who argue that Trump has succeeded in turning the United States into what they call a "competitive authoritarian" state.
Lucan Way, a political scientist at the University of Toronto, wrote by email:
When Trump was elected in 2024, I was confident that the United States would become competitive authoritarian. But I did not expect this transition to occur so quickly or easily or with this little resistance by those with the power to fight back.
The strength of American democracy has been revealed to be something akin to the power of the Wizard of Oz: seemingly all powerful but in fact much weaker than almost anyone imagined.
In an essay in the Opinion section of The Times written with Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, political scientists at Harvard, Way asks and answers the question "How can we tell whether America has crossed the line into authoritarianism? We propose a simple metric: the cost of opposing the government. ".
These costs can run the gamut:
Citizens and organizations that run afoul of the government become targets of a range of punitive measures: Politicians may be investigated and prosecuted on baseless or petty charges, media outlets may be hit with frivolous defamation suits or adverse regulatory rulings, businesses may face tax audits or be denied critical contracts or licenses, universities and other civic institutions may lose essential funding or tax-exempt status, and journalists, activists and other critics may be harassed, threatened or physically attacked by government supporters.
When citizens must think twice about criticizing or opposing the government because they could credibly face government retribution, they no longer live in a full democracy.
By that standard, Way, who is an American citizen, wrote:
We no longer live in a liberal democracy. We live in a competitive authoritarian regime. Yes, there are elections and yes, the constitutional order has not been explicitly overthrown. However, the costs of opposing the government have increased.
Ziblatt, Way's co-author, was more outspoken in an email:
There is no question that American democracy faces its most severe test in my lifetime. The scale, scope and speed of the onslaught within the first year (of Trump's second term in office) is like nothing I have seen among the similar recent cases of democratic backsliding that I have researched — Hungary, Turkey, Poland or India. The degree of lawlessness of America's current democratic decay is particularly striking.
Ziblatt argued, however, that all is not lost:
American civil society possess the civic resources to confront this challenge. America's vast civic infrastructure includes labor unions, religious organizations, business, universities, the nonprofit sector, not to mention an opposition party that is better organized and more well financed than opposition parties in other 21st-century cases of democratic backsliding.
Yet, I worry. The question is not whether these groups exist but rather whether civic leaders will develop the courage to work collaboratively and effectively to reverse America's authoritarian turn.
In a reflection of the uncertainty surrounding the future of American democracy, Kim Lane Scheppele, a sociologist at Princeton, wrote: "Trump is already far along toward establishing an autocracy in America, but that doesn't mean that democracy is totally lost. ".
Advertisement.
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT.
Scheppele voiced particular concern over.
The militarization of immigration controls, which also includes militarization of responses to protest and is another very serious indicator of democracy in danger. So is the universal surveillance regime growing out of the DOGE access to personal data that is already becoming entrenched.
Scheppele concluded her email: "Yes, the USA Is barreling toward autocracy. But democracy isn't done yet. ".
In an essay in The New Republic, "What if the Pendulum Doesn't Swing Back? Michael Brenes, a lecturer in history at Yale, suggests that the election of Trump last year and the aggressive policies he has adopted in office signal that "a new age of conservative ideology is here, and it is not just illiberal and revanchist but repressive and hostile to the idea of natural rights drawn from the Enlightenment. ".
In the past, Brenes writes, "cutting federal programs to the predominant benefit of the rich" had "dire political consequences," often restoring liberals to power. But, Brenes asks, "what happens when large numbers of Americans are indifferent to that suffering? Or seek to exacerbate it?
In an email, Brenes warned that "Trump is winning" by profiting.
From the Democrats' inability to put their house in order. They have no party leader, their coalition is fractured, and they have no long-term strategy. Even if Democrats win the Senate and the House in 2026, Trump is unlikely to let that stop him from continuing his policies.
Trump will enact executive orders, claiming executive privilege or national security concerns, particularly on immigration. Donald Trump has proved that he is willing to invoke wartime measures to justify executive power in peacetime. Invoking the Insurrection Act, claiming that the USA Is being invaded on its southern border, his interest in suspending habeas corpus, are just a few examples.
Kurt Weyland, a political scientist at the University of Texas-Austin, agreed that "there has been significant democratic backsliding under Trump," but argued that "Trump is still far from establishing autocratic governance, and the declarations of Levitsky & Co. That the United States has already descended into competitive authoritarianism are premature, exaggerated and arguably counterproductive. ".
Trump, Weyland contended.
Has brought reductions in the quality of USA Democracy. But USA Democracy has survived, in my view; it is not about to sink into authoritarianism, far from it. There has been a corrosion of the rule of law, but the core of democracy — freedom of political action, electoral competitiveness, free and fair elections — have clearly persisted.
Weyland voiced his faith in the Supreme Court, which, he contended, "will defend the rule of law, the Constitution, etc. , against Trump's arbitrariness. ".
Advertisement.
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT.
Others do not share Weyland's confidence in the court. The evidence so far suggests that the court is more on Trump's side than arrayed in opposition.
In a July 10 Substack posting, Stephen Vladeck, a law professor at Georgetown, described "The Appeasement Thesis," the dangerous logic some are using to legitimate Supreme Court decisions to grant the Trump administration 16 "straight requests for emergency relief. ".
One group of legal scholars, Vladeck writes, argues "that the court is letting the president win these 'small' fights in the hope that it will either moot the need for big fights down the road or, at the very least, arm the court with a larger reservoir of good will and capital to spend when those big fights come. ".
Vladeck sees three problems with this line of reasoning:
First, these aren't one-off disputes; they're a flood of cases. As opposed to letting the president or Congress get away with one maneuver in one case, the net effect of the court's 16 interventions in favor of Trump to date has been to greenlight a truly unprecedented amount of lawlessness by the executive branch.
Second, and as a result, the court's interventions are causing an enormous amount of real-world harm — whether with respect to over a million individuals losing their previous immigration status; countless migrants being removed to third countries; federal employees being fired; grants being canceled; or otherwise.
Third, and most important, whereas the court's appeasement in prior episodes helped to defuse constitutional crises, the behavior here only enables continued bad behavior by the executive branch — both at the policy level and with regard to defying adverse lower-court rulings.
Adam Bonica, a political scientist at Stanford, goes further than Vladeck, making the case in "How to Dismantle a Democracy, Legally," posted July 9 on his Substack, that the Supreme Court has become a crucial enabler of Trump's autocratic agenda.
According to Bonica, there are two key elements in the Supreme Court's empowerment of the Trump administration.
The conservative majority's support of the unitary executive theory of presidential power which, Bonica writes, "asserts that the Constitution's Article II gives the president total, unchallengeable control over the entire executive branch. ".
And the 2024 decision in Trump v. United States granting the president "absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority. And he is entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts. ".
The most dangerous step, Bonica writes.
Is the fusion of the unitary executive theory (U. E. T.) with presidential immunity. This creates a toxic, autocratic feedback loop. You. E. T. Gives the president the sword: total control over the Justice Department. The Supreme Court's immunity ruling provides the shield: defining any use of that control — such as ordering the the. O. J. To prosecute a rival or drop a case against an ally — as an "official act" protected from criminal prosecution.
There is one clear consequence of Trump's second term in the White House, one that will have real consequences for millions of Americans: he will leave behind a legacy of wreckage. Trump will have demonstrated the weaknesses of American democracy when it is confronted by a malignant, amoral chief executive.
Advertisement.
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT.
The possible Republican successors — including, among many others, JD Vance, Josh Hawley, Marco Rubio and Glenn Youngkin — have been Trump cheerleaders, showing no signs of dissent or criticism of his approach to governing. All are likely, if not certain, to campaign on the promise of continuing Trump's agenda.
"Talented and ambitious presidents have pushed the boundaries of the office, adding new powers that were seldom surrendered by their successors," Benjamin Ginsberg, a political scientist at Johns Hopkins, writes in "Presidential Government," which was published in 2016, before Trump beat Hillary Clinton and took office. He adds that "every time Congress legislates, it empowers the president to do something, thereby contributing, albeit inadvertently, to the onward March of executive authority. ".
If a Democrat wins the presidency in 2028, there is no guarantee he or she will fully abandon Trump's approach. In the case of executive authority, a broken precedent is hard to repair. For politicians of all stripes, power is habit-forming and the appeal of exercising it will be very strong.
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: Europe tipping point?
Is this a turning point for Europe as an "electrostate"?
[B]Solar became the EUs largest source of electricity for the first time in June 2025[/B]
[URL]https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/solar-is-eus-biggest-power-source-for-the-first-time-ever/[/URL]
As the USA Unfortunately, languishes under [B]the MAGA Fuhrer's shit-show governance,[/B] European solar installations projected to hit 110 GW in 2025, much like China, the push towards a forward progressive European electrostate is well underway. [URL]https://www.pv-tech.org/europe-to-install-110gw-of-solar-in-2025-sp/[/URL].
The Joke that is Musk's Pedo President and MAGA...
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3014620][b]Wait til the Repub MAGAs find out there is no Deep State and never has been, [/b]that Russiagate was real but the Dem Cabal of child cannibalism and blood drinking was bullshit, that the average price of a gallon of regular gas in the USA is higher today under Trump than it was a week ago, which was higher than it was a month ago, which was higher than it was the day Trump took office, higher than on election day and higher than it was for months and months under Biden before Trump took over, that apparently Repub presidents love Great Depressions, Great Recessions, Massive Job Losses and stock market crashes and cannot or simply won't produce the opposite results, that "wokeism" and men stealing trophies away from women in women-only sports is not even a thing in our daily lives, that red states have had higher violent crime and homicide rates than blue states for decades, that deportation of truly violent illegal immigrants was far greater under Biden than under Trump and for much less cost to American tax-payers while Trump seems to be trying to break the record on deporting nail salon staff and farm workers, that the Billion $ "coming in" from Trump's Tariffs only "came out" of American Consumers' pockets, etc etc etc.
[b]But then, in order to discover the truth about those things they would have to start exposing themselves to real news sources and avoid their favorite Fake News sources. [/b]We can't count on Trump himself and his Cabinet members blurting it out over and over again in public on every bullshit lie he and his Repub Party has been floating over the years.[/QUOTE]
Absolutely Right!
The same movement that spent years screaming about a "Deep State" cabal, "government waste" and the "millions of immigrant criminals" boogeyman myths, is now learning the hard way that the monsters under their bed were myths they created.
MAGA's obsession with the files shows how a [u]fringe QAnon conspiracy theory[/u] has taken root in the pro-Trump movement and has rot and laid waste to the Repub/GOP party.
[b]How the Trump administrations handling of the Epstein files became a vehicle for QAnon,[/b]
Jul 15th, 2025[LIST][i]The scale of the current MAGA meltdown certainly shows the significance of Epstein conspiracies within the broader QAnon pantheon, said Lewis, and [b]should lay bare just how deeply the disease of the QAnon movement has seeped into a Republican party[/b] which has welcomed its most conspiratorial, antisemitic, reactionary fringe into Congress and the executive branch with open arms. [/i][url]https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/15/trump-epstein-files-maga[/url][/LIST]
[u]The QAnon/MAGA Punchline:[/u]
And get this, ...it would seem [b]the QAnon/MAGA punchline[/b] is, that their own leaders are the one's, [i][b]"...pulling back the curtain"[/b][/i] to reveal (you guess it) ...nothing!!!
All the while, bungling incompetence, rank corruption, blatant cronyism and monumental grifting and lying to the American people, runs amuck. And this is somehow to believed as "governing"? Or servicing the American people?
Put simply, the MAGA Fuhrer and QAnon/MAGA cult punchline, is that they are indeed, [b]the butt of their own joke![/b]
My apologies if you don't know how to read
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3014859]MDS, you know that thing about a "China ban" or that Trump "banned flights from China" asserted by AH and that you quoted from his post is a stone-cold total lie, right?
No such thing happened under Trump.
It has been known that is a stone-cold total lie for more than 5 years already. No intelligent, well-informed American could possibly have missed that so thoroughly that he is to this day repeating it as if it actually happened.
I did not respond to your post where you quoted AH repeating that long, long debunked stone-cold total lie with a quote / reply to it and decided to do it this way because to quote your blithering, blathering full article that nobody is going to bother reading just to figure out what your bizarre MAGA World point is would likely threaten pushing every other post worth reading here back to the previous 3rd or 4th page.[/QUOTE]Because you "attended" those shitty California public schools lololol.
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/joe-rogan-ambushes-gavin-newsom-text-covid-question-he-never-saw-coming[/URL]
I love the smell of burning flesh (Victory)
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3014859]MDS, you know that thing about a "China ban" or that Trump "banned flights from China" asserted by AH and that you quoted from his post is a stone-cold total lie, right?
No such thing happened under Trump.
It has been known that is a stone-cold total lie for more than 5 years already. No intelligent, well-informed American could possibly have missed that so thoroughly that he is to this day repeating it as if it actually happened.
I did not respond to your post where you quoted AH repeating that long, long debunked stone-cold total lie with a quote / reply to it and decided to do it this way because to quote your blithering, blathering full article that nobody is going to bother reading just to figure out what your bizarre MAGA World point is would likely threaten pushing every other post worth reading here back to the previous 3rd or 4th page.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/so-this-might-be-what-tired-of-all-the-winning-feels-like/[/URL]
Silly antics of a petulant 5th grader...
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3014859]MDS, you know that thing about a "China ban" or that Trump "banned flights from China" asserted by AH and that you quoted from his post is a stone-cold total lie, right?
No such thing happened under Trump.
It has been known that is a stone-cold total lie for more than 5 years already. No intelligent, well-informed American could possibly have missed that so thoroughly that he is to this day repeating it as if it actually happened.
I did not respond to your post where you quoted AH repeating that long, long debunked stone-cold total lie with a quote / reply to it and decided to do it this way [b]because to quote your blithering, blathering full article that nobody is going to bother reading just to figure out what your bizarre MAGA World point is would likely threaten pushing every other post worth reading here back to the previous 3rd or 4th page.[/b][/QUOTE]Excellent observation!
Thanks for echoing, once again, how MDS1's blatant 5th grader, childish attempts to disrupt and hide his nonsensical rants, with REAMS and REAMS of "cut-and-paste" plagiarized articles, only goes to show, the temperament and silly antics of a petulant 5th grader.
