German FKK Clubs - Lounge and chat area

[QUOTE=Mursenary;2532778]Like Turgid mentioned in a list, apparently all you guys only fuck stunners. I'd fuck anything above a 7.[/QUOTE]On the other hand, why would you not fuck the best you can get? You're paying for it. Your own market value is almost only determined by your abillity to pay so unless you're one of the stalkers I don't see why a compromise is necessary.

Of course, I know lots of guys like stuff I don't particularly like such as silicone or tattoos. Maybe someone thinks some of these are stunners.

[QUOTE=Ararat;2532814]On the other hand, why would you not fuck the best you can get? You're paying for it. Your own market value is almost only determined by your abillity to pay so unless you're one of the stalkers I don't see why a compromise is necessary.

Of course, I know lots of guys like stuff I don't particularly like such as silicone or tattoos. Maybe someone thinks some of these are stunners.[/QUOTE]Because the best looks don't come always with the best attitude and the best service. If you're only excited by the looks of the girls it's not a problem but if you care about service it may be. Some girls rely only on their looks and they end up doing 20 minutes rooms with a shitty attitude but who cares? They always find some guys ready to pay for their looks.

And for some reason or another, you can be more attracted to a girl looking more GNDish than to a stunner because she has some kind of charm you cannot explain.

Ho qualified Jenna Jameson as a stunner.

I've looked through some pictures found here: [URL]https://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/sns-special-jenna-jameson-pictures-photogallery.html[/URL].

For me she looks like a caricature of the typical us porn actress, even on the oldest pictures everything about her looks fake. Maybe she looked better earlier but even on the 1997 picture, she's not appealing to me.

[QUOTE=Ararat;2532814]On the other hand, why would you not fuck the best you can get? You're paying for it. Your own market value is almost only determined by your abillity to pay so unless you're one of the stalkers I don't see why a compromise is necessary.

Of course, I know lots of guys like stuff I don't particularly like such as silicone or tattoos. Maybe someone thinks some of these are stunners.[/QUOTE]Because stunners only make up a small percentage of all hookers in clubs. If they're all stunners who give great service and there are enough of them to occupy my rough quota of 3 rooms per day for 2 weeks (with some repeats), then I'd probably only take stunners to rooms.

Given that's not the case and that you don't have to be a stunner to be attractive, taking an attractive 8 to a room perfectly makes me happy. If I see a girl in a club that I would find attractive in a normal setting, but she is not a stunner, would I pay the 50 e per half hour to fuck her? Of course I would.

[QUOTE=BigBuddy69;2532830]Because the best looks don't come always with the best attitude and the best service. If you're only excited by the looks of the girls it's not a problem but if you care about service it may be. Some girls rely only on their looks and they end up doing 20 minutes rooms with a shitty attitude but who cares? They always find some guys ready to pay for their looks.

And for some reason or another, you can be more attracted to a girl looking more GNDish than to a stunner because she has some kind of charm you cannot explain.

Ho qualified Jenna Jameson as a stunner.

I've looked through some pictures found here: [URL]https://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/sns-special-jenna-jameson-pictures-photogallery.html[/URL].

For me she looks like a caricature of the typical us porn actress, even on the oldest pictures everything about her looks fake. Maybe she looked better earlier but even on the 1997 picture, she's not appealing to me.[/QUOTE]I don't think Jenna Jameson was that attractive either. I don't particularly like the GND look per se but I prefer girls who can pass as younger colleagues / subordinates / support staff where I work so I guess that's kind of where I end up anyway. This is also where my comments about makeup and hair comes from. I agree with you about attitude and service.

[QUOTE=Mursenary;2532831]Because stunners only make up a small percentage of all hookers in clubs. If they're all stunners who give great service and there are enough of them to occupy my rough quota of 3 rooms per day for 2 weeks (with some repeats), then I'd probably only take stunners to rooms.

Given that's not the case and that you don't have to be a stunner to be attractive, taking an attractive 8 to a room perfectly makes me happy. If I see a girl in a club that I would find attractive in a normal setting, but she is not a stunner, would I pay the 50 e per half hour to fuck her? Of course I would.[/QUOTE]You also make some good points but I think the difference is that you seem to operate under the assumption that there are girls who objectively are stunners for all men. If I don't like tattoos then such a girl with a perfect body will fall in my ranking. Not as much as someone with a bad attitude but it will happen.

I should probably rephrase myself to say the best available according to your own preferences. If that's what you're doing then we do it the same way.

[QUOTE=Ararat;2532881]You also make some good points but I think the difference is that you seem to operate under the assumption that there are girls who objectively are stunners for all men. If I don't like tattoos then such a girl with a perfect body will fall in my ranking. Not as much as someone with a bad attitude but it will happen.

I should probably rephrase myself to say the best available according to your own preferences. If that's what you're doing then we do it the same way.[/QUOTE]Yeah everyone has different tastes for sure. However racial preferences, fetishes, and chubby-chasers aside, there probably is a reasonable standard for what is considered top tier that applies to most mongers' tastes profiles. The biggest divide would probably be separating the racial-ethnic preferences for fit girls and BBW type girls.

But that isn't really the crux of the statement. You don't appear to be one of the guilty parties but the ones who repeatedly feel the need to proclaim that they only pay for the best of the best seem to be doing it from a place of self grandeur. Self awareness would probably prevent then from saying it the way they do. Recognizing that tastes vary, a way of stating one's preferences would be to say something like "I like fresh-faced, younger, fit WGs with curves in the right places." It gets the point across that you prefer the natural looking, non-fat girls who have some tits and ass without the off-putting," I have better taste and am more selective than you" energy.

What about A. J. Applegate? Damn it pretty white girl with a big, plump, round booty is my kryptonite! Why I love Brazil so fucking much! All those pretty, big butt blonde "princesses" LOLOLOL!

[QUOTE=Turgid;2532772]I notice you, Expat lover and Sirioja say that you only fuck stunners. I hope you guys realize that one man's stunner may be another man's 5.[/QUOTE]Well as I mentioned before, my taste is very classic as in I tend to like straight out of fashion magazine looks like model or hottest girl in college kinda look and I like body that is sportive fit, or thin side like model, I do not need big curve or big tits, I prefer slender and tits being nicely shaped with nice shaped nipple than just being disgustingly big! I like beauty whether it is in clothing, interior design, watch or car etc, I like beauty in life and I stick to more classical understanding of beauty, so I would say my taste fit all without some fetish taste!

However, I have witnessed fetish taste of other mongers! Like I finally spotted stunner in club, then other monger walk toward her before as I begin to approach her, then I am like ah no, she is taken, then all of a sudden he approaches fat or thick plastic surgery tattooed up girl sitting next to stunner and take that fat one to the room LOL! And I am like whatta! LOL! So I know what you mean by people having different taste LOL! I stick to my good taste LOL!

Oh and I do not mind nationalities or skin color as long as she is stunner beauty to my classic taste! Like the cane said, varieties of beauties are spice of life! I love beautiful things and people and food and places in life, only beauty!

[QUOTE=Ararat;2532881]I don't think Jenna Jameson was that attractive either. I don't particularly like the GND look per se but I prefer girls who can pass as younger colleagues / subordinates / support staff where I work so I guess that's kind of where I end up anyway. This is also where my comments about makeup and hair comes from. I agree with you about attitude and service.

You also make some good points but I think the difference is that you seem to operate under the assumption that there are girls who objectively are stunners for all men. If I don't like tattoos then such a girl with a perfect body will fall in my ranking. Not as much as someone with a bad attitude but it will happen.

I should probably rephrase myself to say the best available according to your own preferences. If that's what you're doing then we do it the same way.[/QUOTE]I liked Jenna Jameson when she was young like more than 25 years ago, she had what I call blonde fallen angel look! Now she is horrible as she is old!

White girls age badly mostly and for me all women after let say around age 27 are not best looking anymore! After 30, it is finished!

[QUOTE=ExpatLover;2532781]For me a stunner is first a natural beauty unfortunately many men have the same taste and those kind of girls are often over booked in the clubs.[/QUOTE]I agree, more natural is better, but in FKK, it is hard to find after a girl being in FKK for more than one year, she usually do a bit of fixing, usually put something in her lip or do nose job! So you got to catch her during her first year in business! Or go to LR or GT where many girls are young and natural, but the line up at LR and GT is not good enough for me! No stunner there to my level unfortunately!

[QUOTE=BigBuddy69;2532830]Because the best looks don't come always with the best attitude and the best service. If you're only excited by the looks of the girls it's not a problem but if you care about service it may be. Some girls rely only on their looks and they end up doing 20 minutes rooms with a shitty attitude but who cares? They always find some guys ready to pay for their looks.

And for some reason or another, you can be more attracted to a girl looking more GNDish than to a stunner because she has some kind of charm you cannot explain.

Ho qualified Jenna Jameson as a stunner.

I've looked through some pictures found here: [URL]https://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/sns-special-jenna-jameson-pictures-photogallery.html[/URL].

For me she looks like a caricature of the typical us porn actress, even on the oldest pictures everything about her looks fake. Maybe she looked better earlier but even on the 1997 picture, she's not appealing to me.[/QUOTE]Well simply because you have bad taste with bad upbringing LOL!

[QUOTE=MrHo;2532901]I liked Jenna Jameson when she was young like more than 25 years ago, she had what I call blonde fallen angel look! Now she is horrible as she is old!

White girls age badly mostly and for me all women after let say around age 27 are not best looking anymore! After 30, it is finished![/QUOTE]White girls peak at 22-23, they hit the wall at 30. Unless you have serious bank and game galore, you cannot hit anything under 30 at my age. This is why FKK is such a special place. A yummy buffet with plenty of pre-wall hotties, Ro or not. Pretty face, good skin, good feet, and a spinner. BAM! I'm there.

[QUOTE=Clodius1;2532911]White girls peak at 22-23, they hit the wall at 30. Unless you have serious bank and game galore, you cannot hit anything under 30 at my age. This is why FKK is such a special place. A yummy buffet with plenty of pre-wall hotties, Ro or not. Pretty face, good skin, good feet, and a spinner. BAM! I'm there.[/QUOTE]Yeah, I am into stunner beauty as well, in this era we live in, which is filled with freedom comparison to 20th century or even early 21st century, why not take initiative to be more free that is granted to us and when it comes to the hobby of ours, we just have to fly and also this, thanks to globalization of 21st century enabling us to fly so easily at reasonable cost!

With bit of money, creative mind, free spirit and will to discover and information, men can be so free in this era we live in!

[QUOTE=TheCane;2532896]What about A. J. Applegate? Damn it pretty white girl with a big, plump, round booty is my kryptonite! Why I love Brazil so fucking much! All those pretty, big butt blonde "princesses" LOLOLOL![/QUOTE]You are more on thicker side with curve and big bubbly butt, but me, I like more slender sportive body, though we do agreed that Ivana Sugar is or now was a beauty!

I would say my blonde type is Russian or Swedish or Danish or norther German stunner blonde who has sportive slender body or model type body is good for me too! I understand more meat can be turn on for some people, but for me I prefer more sportive fit slender body!

However, that is blonde, and for Romanian, I use them for my more exotic little bit tanned brunette or more darker hair exotic taste that remind me of roman empire time or half Arab beauty or Latino kinda looks, Romania has so many different ethnicity mixed that cater to all taste really, even found natural blonde beauty from Romania few times!

All races has beautiful girls, we just have to look hard to find the one that pushes your button!

[QUOTE=Mursenary;2532778]Like Turgid mentioned in a list, apparently all you guys only fuck stunners. I'd fuck anything above a 7.[/QUOTE]Then you won't have my problem of going to three FKKs in one single day amost everyday when I am doing mongering trip in NRW LOL! Plus getting lost in forest at like 7 pm in middle of winter without wifi trying to reach my third FKK LOL!

[QUOTE=Ararat;2532881]I don't think Jenna Jameson was that attractive either. I don't particularly like the GND look per se but I prefer girls who can pass as younger colleagues / subordinates / support staff where I work so I guess that's kind of where I end up anyway. This is also where my comments about makeup and hair comes from. I agree with you about attitude and service.

You also make some good points but I think the difference is that you seem to operate under the assumption that there are girls who objectively are stunners for all men. If I don't like tattoos then such a girl with a perfect body will fall in my ranking. Not as much as someone with a bad attitude but it will happen.

I should probably rephrase myself to say the best available according to your own preferences. If that's what you're doing then we do it the same way.[/QUOTE]Well, I do not idolize Jenna Jameson, but if I see her in German FKK as Jenna Jameson as she was 25 years ago when she was young and just began in the industry with no surgery with only one small heart tattoo on her butt, then I would definitely take her to room! If you do not, then it is super welcome by me as less hassle for me to get her when I want to the room, which is how I want LOL!

I would make her suck and lick my dick and my anal and tell her to look into my eyes while she is doing that LOL!