Girl-type: Artemis / Sharks / Oase / Palace
[QUOTE=Danny227;2206589]Girls type is different from Sharks or other clubs, the mix is more towards silicone girls vs natural girls. [/QUOTE]What are you guys view of type for the bigger clubs at the moment: Artemis / Sharks / Oase / Palace are big clubs that seem to be more full of barbie / bimbo type girls (silicone, big lips, long nails and heavy make-up) with Artemis in the lead. As I like barbie looks I am wondering where I should go after my artemis trip? Sharks is my number one contender. When it cools down, perhaps in sepember.
Advise / Help Required for first Sharks visit.
After visiting Artemis several times I'm now off to Sharks for the first time next Tuesday.
My review reports are not brilliant (done a few on Artemis) but if anyone who hasn't been to Sharks before is interested I will do a review upon my return?
Reading ISG the main differences between Artemis & Sharks seems to be Sharks having cheaper fee's with the girls, cheaper entrance fee, better food, better outdoor area and the club being less smoky.
I gather The Sharks staff can be a bit unfriendly although not sure about any differences in the wellbeing facilities?
The main perceived negatives I have is that around 80% of the girls at Sharks are Romanian & that it can be a "sweat box" at this time of the year?
Any Sharks visitors that have some tips specific to Sharks before I go, I would greatly appreciate their advise?