Living on your hard-earned money.
You paint a horrible but actually very possible story. I can just imagine the consulate woman: 40-something, fat, ugly, short blue hair, ugly glasses, wearing a tent for a dress, angry that every woman in Kiev is far more attractive than she is, angry that her male colleagues completely ignore her and date hot girls in their 20's (Actually, there might not be any male colleagues, as she might have already accused them of sexual harassment and got them fired), angry that the few men that are left avoid her like the plague, angry at male sex tourists who have found a way to flee, albeit temporarily, the crushing oppression of western gynocentric societies. Just angry. At you.
Two things to add. As explained, it is up to the judge to interpret the law, and the judge will likely be another man-hating feminist.
First, you do not even have to be the father. There have been instances in which the woman has simply claimed that the guy was fulfilling a paternal role in the child's life. The poor bastard was just dating a single mum and maybe got a little attached to the kids. That is enough! So, the woman has to just say that she told the kid that the foreigner who came twice a year for sex was actually "daddy", and the kid considered him as such. A few photographs of the two of you playing catch complete the argument.
Second, whether you are the father or not, she can wait until the day before the kid's 18th birthday to file papers. She would then get a lump sum for 18 years of support, at the appropriate levels in your country, not hers. Why would she wait? Well, because it is better to get you when you are at the peak of your career. The amount will be based in your current salary. Actually, the court might base your payments on your highest salary over the past 18 years! If you lose your job and ends up flipping burgers for a living, too bad for you; the payments do not change. If you cannot pay, you go to jail.
Tony, tony, tony, what are we going to do with you? You would get custody of a child only if the woman does not want it. The only exception might be the Arab countries where women do not have any rights.
[QUOTE=Kozerog;2330221]It is definitely a possibility. The worst of it is that the USA consulate in the foreign country may help out with the process.
Consulate staff usually do their jobs in a perfunctory manner, but they always have the option of getting enthusiastic about and working overtime on cases that catch their fancy. Imagine some fat ugly feminist stationed overseas in a country where the women are unusually pretty, so that the feminist has absolutely no hope of attracting any male attention whatsoever. Bored, sexually frustrated, seething with rage at American men tourists and expats (whom she thinks of as HER men) ignoring her and screwing local women instead. To fill her abundant spare time, she participates in local feminist consciousness raising events and whatnot, gets to know the local feminists (and there are always of few of these even in places like Ukraine), hears stories about a local woman who an American man impregnated and abandoned.[/QUOTE]
Foreign visas for child support. . .
Anecdotal. I had a Mexican worker with US citizenship a year ago who told me of his child support adventure. His Mexican wife ran off with a rich guy in Mexico and she got a divorce and child support for the daughter. The wife wouldn't let him see his daughter, so he returned to the USA and refused to pay the Mexican child support order. The wife has been trying to collect child support but cannot get a visa to chase him for child support in California. He told her, when you let me see my daughter, then I will pay you the child support, but she refuses. . . A large powerful force protects American men from foreign golddiggers. The US Border Patrol and ICE. If you get a foreign woman US citizenship or green card, then she can easily come to where you live and make your life hell in a US divorce court.
[QUOTE=Stevie69;2329963]Yes, the amount itself is not much for anyone from the "west", but you would at least have to make sure it is your kid. That means carrying on your own paternity test.
I am not a family law lawyer, so, I am just suggesting this as a possibility, but she might be able to sue you for child support in your country. Laws in the "west" have become exceedingly gynocentric, so, if she were to file a suit in your country, she might get significantly more child support, enough for her, the boyfriend and their kid to live in luxury.
There are some really horrible stories out there, cases in which the father unable to pay is put in jail, until he can pay, which he cannot do because he is in jail, so technically for the rest of his life. Just check the story of Dave Foley (from "Kids in the Hall" and "News Radio".
It is better is you always use and condom and a fake name, as I do.[/QUOTE]
Were we all so clueless when we were younger?
Yes; if she is having unprotected sex, she IS trying to get pregnant. You do not have to ejaculate to impregnate a female: sperm and seminal fluid come from different places. Seminal fluid helps, but it is not essential. . The times you "accidentally" end up having sex "au naturel" are the times of her period that she is most fertile.
[QUOTE=AntonySun1996;2330616]As per my previous posts I'm not seeing WGs now, I have turned an ex-WG to my girlfriend whom I support financially. We are living together. She told me she didn't want to get pregnant now either and always recommends me to use condoms or at least not to cum inside, but we still practice unprotected sex at times especially recently.[/QUOTE]
Re: were we all this clueless when young?
I was never clueless, but emotion used to override reason where women were concerned. I can still remember the facts of my crazy behavior, but not the emotions behind the craziness.
Once suggested marrying a girlfriend as we were walking past the civil marriage office. We had not had sex in months but were still living together because of tight rental situation in San Francisco in late 1990's. She was seeing another guy for sex, I was seeing another woman. My marriage proposal was a follow-up to a fight we had just had: "That'll teach her!" I was running my own business, wealthy with high income and she knew it. I was 38 at the time. Luckily, she decided to teach me a lesson by creating a scene in the marriage office, so that I stormed out.
Just 4 years ago, here in Ukraine, I was still thinking that I should be dating civilians not more than 20 years younger, versus having much younger sugar babies. For whatever reason, I got excited by one of these women in Dnipro (still Dnipropetrovsk then) who I had just met for coffee. Hadn't even kissed her much less had sex with her, had only spoken briefly with her, and already I was making plans about our future together. "I'm a madman in love!" I shouted in bad Russian as she laughed and waved goodbye from the taxi she had summoned to escape me. As soon as she was out of sight, I came to my senses: "What the hell was all that about?
I could go on and on. So many dodged bullets over the years. But I think I'm finally over all that now that I've committed to being a monger henceforth.
As for Antony, the reason she "recommends" condoms, rather than absolutely requiring them, is so she can blame him for the inevitable pregnancy: "I told you over and over to use condoms!"
