Old fat orange is totally megaloman and senile making USA mostly ridiculous in front of the world.
Printable View
Old fat orange is totally megaloman and senile making USA mostly ridiculous in front of the world.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3043305][URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/gunboat-diplomacy-accelerated-us-reportedly-interdicts-seizes-another-oil-tanker[/URL]
Long Live The Monroe Doctrine..[/QUOTE]Waiting in the on deck circle is CDMX.
[URL]https://www.npr.org/2025/11/15/nx-s1-5608991/mexicos-new-generation-takes-to-the-streets-accusing-leaders-of-protecting-cartels[/URL]
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3043304]I fault you a bit for trying to reason with this fool, your discussions look like you're arguing with some mentally ill homeless bum on the subway.[/QUOTE]LOL! Yeah, no doubt, that's where you get your so called debating skills from.
Speaking of arguing (or fighting) like bums on the subway.
Who better [NOPARSE] than the QAnon/MAGA/Repubs at a convention to portray such a grotesque and unruly sight. What a fiasco, as all the key MAGA faithless, lined up for a knuckle-dragging, knock-down and out [/NOPARSE]fight. [B]MAGA infighting erupts at Turning Point USA Conference,[/B] Dec 18,2025. [URL]https://www.politico.com/news/2025/12/18/maga-infighting-erupts-at-day-one-of-turning-point-usa-conference-00699665[/URL].
At the Turning Point USA Conference, civil war breaks out, as tensions explode as on the opening night, commentator Ben Shapiro launched a blistering attack from the stage, labeling fellow media personalities Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon, Candace Owens, and Megyn Kelly as [B]"frauds and grifters"[/B] and [B]"charlatans"[/B] [I]{...BTW, wait till Ben Shapiro, finds out that the corruption rots from the head, like stinking fish. I bet his own head is gonna explode! Chuckles!}[/I].
Needless to say, it was another shit-show with the feud escalating over the next subsequent days, as epithets, insults, slurs, slander and smear campaign attacks, took over the convention, meant supposedly to celebrate Charlie Kirk. [I]{...But, what an odd way to celebrate/honor Charlie Kirk? Or was it an homage?...}[/I].
Well, it couldn't have happened to a nicer group of MAGA people!
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3043127]Trump is hoping to have us focus on his fantasy that Biden's positive economic and national security results didn't and will not forever blow away his and every other Repub's horrific negative results. He does that as a constant distraction tactic for when, for instance, his latest grand and glorious announcement about drug-makers agreeing to lower their prices hadn't already been negotiated and accomplished for the vast majority of Americans who need those drugs in President Joe Biden's brilliant Inflation Reduction Act set to take effect more fully in 2026:
[B]Negotiated Prices Take Effect for Ten Drugs in 2026.
October 9, 2025[/B]
[URL]https://www.medicarerights.org/medicare-watch/2025/10/09/negotiated-prices-take-effect-for-ten-drugs-in-2026[/URL]
LOL. Oh look! Which is also after Trump jumped in with one of his first BIDEN BIDEN BIDEN distraction tactics by eliminating some of the drug price reductions President Joe Biden had already effected on "day one" of his 2nd disastrous presidential term:
[B]Trump Reverses Some Biden Drug Pricing Initiatives, Potentially Impacting Medicare Costs.[/B].[/QUOTE]Man you nailed it! I mean that pretty much sums up the MAGA Fuhrer, in a nutshell. Never earned a god damn thing in his lifetime.
But really, that's been his shtick, since birth. Just slap you name on anything that's not nailed down and call it yours. Take the latest "desecration" at Kennedy Center and the WH East Wing before that. [B]Trump Ignores Law and Sticks His Name on Kennedy Center,[/B] Dec 19th, 2025, [URL]https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-ignores-law-and-sticks-his-name-on-kennedy-center/[/URL].
The MAGA Fuhrer's narcissism heading in to the 2026 elections, I'm sure will serve him well. Especially as he continues to lie and tell Americans, the economy is great, and that the "affordability" issues and the higher prices at the "groceries (a word he created)" stores, they're experiencing, is all just a Dem hoax!
[QUOTE=Spidy;3043612]BTW, Why [NOPARSE]doesn't your so called article on "low cost of energy", consider or factor in the the time of build/constru[/NOPARSE]ction?
The last nuclear plants in the USA The Vogtle Unit 4 and Vogtle Unit 3, both took just over 10 years to build. The last one before those nuclear plants, [B]the Watts Bar Unit, took a whopping 43 years to build.[/B] That's [NOPARSE]almost a freakin' half a century of what? Wasted energy? Ineptitude? Cost overruns? Compliance? MAGA like stoppage/sab[/NOPARSE]otage?
On average solar farms in the USA Take 8 to 18 months to build. Wind farms, about 6-months to 3 years, on average depending on scale.[/QUOTE]Nuclear plants on average take 5-8 years to construct. That is a bargain when you consider how reliable, clean, and cheap the energy is and the small footprint. The big problem with wind is the gear box and turbines only last seven years on average. So yes they can be constructed quicker, but they have to be replaced every seven years. I love how you conveniently leave that out. 18 months to build and it only last seven years and it doesn't even provide constant energy and the footprint takes up hundreds of square miles, it just makes no sense. Well unless you have a political agenda to drive up energy prices to financially trap people to make them dependent on the state and you want to rule with a totalitarian regime that locks its people down. Then wind and solar make perfect sense LOL!
[QUOTE=Spidy;3043604]Chuckles and more chuckles, as once again you prove, that you are incapable of even understanding the simplicity of question being debated.
What [NOPARSE]a fuckin' joke you are, when provide a very brief blob of article, that briefly talks about land efficiency and "How much land area nuclear vs solar & wind, is required". There is no mention of industry using this as the lowest cost of energy? Just freakin' hilarious, ..."land area"? ..."land [/NOPARSE]area"?
Since when do energy projects that are consider all forms of energy generation, to determine the lowest cost of producing energy, use "land area" as the determining factor?
Get back to me, when you have [U]a real answer[/U] to the debate question proposed? [I][b]What is currently (2025) the lowest cost of energy? [/b][/I].[/QUOTE]Your a lefty and your supposed to care about the environment, but you clearly don't when it gets in the way of the Green New Scam the lunatic Democrats are trying to fuck over America with. You delusional little man, please listen. "Land Area" is extremely important to the local environment. As I stated before, go research what happened in New Jersey and how they were going to destroy our coasts with wind farms and destroy the habits for all the flora and fauna that live there. Go look up all the dead whales that washed up on our beaches when they started this shit. Go look up how much maintenence the farms would need and how much extra oil run off goes in the water from the boats maintaining the turbines. Its an absolute nightmare and it would have destroyed thousands of square miles of pristine shore line in the name of green energy when we don't even need it. Don't be angry you were so dumb to believe and back this scam, try to do the right thing and preserve what little natural environments we have left. New Jersey is a deep blue state and even New Jersey wanted nothing to do with thousands and thousands of acres of wind turbines off our beaches. Let the people decide what they want and don't force your political agenda on them because you bullied back in the day and you hate the world.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3043612]BTW, Why [NOPARSE]doesn't your so called article on "low cost of energy", consider or factor in the the time of build/constru[/NOPARSE]ction?
The last nuclear plants in the USA The Vogtle Unit 4 and Vogtle Unit 3, both took just over 10 years to build. The last one before those nuclear plants, [B]the Watts Bar Unit, took a whopping 43 years to build.[/B] That's [NOPARSE]almost a freakin' half a century of what? Wasted energy? Ineptitude? Cost overruns? Compliance? MAGA like stoppage/sab[/NOPARSE]otage?
On average solar farms in the USA Take 8 to 18 months to build. Wind farms, about 6-months to 3 years, on average depending on scale.[/QUOTE]7-11 years according to this article.
[URL]https://www.iberdrola.com/about-us/our-activity/offshore-wind-energy/offshore-wind-park-construction[/URL]
[QUOTE=Spidy;3043685]Man you nailed it! I mean that pretty much sums up the MAGA Fuhrer, in a nutshell. Never earned a god damn thing in his lifetime.
But really, that's been his shtick, since birth. Just slap you name on anything that's not nailed down and call it yours. Take the latest "desecration" at Kennedy Center and the WH East Wing before that. [B]Trump Ignores Law and Sticks His Name on Kennedy Center,[/B] Dec 19th, 2025, [URL]https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-ignores-law-and-sticks-his-name-on-kennedy-center/[/URL].
The MAGA Fuhrer's narcissism heading in to the 2026 elections, I'm sure will serve him well. Especially as he continues to lie and tell Americans, the economy is great, and that the "affordability" issues and the higher prices at the "groceries (a word he created)" stores, they're experiencing, is all just a Dem hoax![/QUOTE]'affordability' XD.
Put tarifs to make america great again, then price are raising, people stop buying the expensive tarifed stuffs, less stuffs moving inside the country because people arent buying it because they are buying the less expenssive stuff, the demand for less expenssive stuff is going up so bo the price too, some stuffs are moving inside because the price are higher so it worth it but most of it don't because of the tarifs, eveything is now more expensive be cause of the 'affordability'.
God damn the 'affordability' for this mess!
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3043127]Trump is hoping to have us focus on his fantasy that Biden's positive economic and national security results didn't and will not forever blow away his and every other Repub's horrific negative results. He does that as a constant distraction tactic for when, for instance, his latest grand and glorious announcement about drug-makers agreeing to lower their prices hadn't already been negotiated and accomplished for the vast majority of Americans who need those drugs in President Joe Biden's brilliant Inflation Reduction Act set to take effect more fully in 2026:
[B]Negotiated Prices Take Effect for Ten Drugs in 2026.
October 9, 2025[/B]
[URL]https://www.medicarerights.org/medicare-watch/2025/10/09/negotiated-prices-take-effect-for-ten-drugs-in-2026[/URL]
LOL. Oh look! Which is also after Trump jumped in with one of his first BIDEN BIDEN BIDEN distraction tactics by eliminating some of the drug price reductions President Joe Biden had already effected on "day one" of his 2nd disastrous presidential term:
[B]Trump Reverses Some Biden Drug Pricing Initiatives, Potentially Impacting Medicare Costs.[/B]
[URL]https://www.ajmc.com/view/trump-reverses-some-biden-drug-pricing-initiatives-potentially-impacting-medicare-costs[/URL]
Lolol. So Liar Trump gets to. Waddle over to the nearest podium and virtually without one word of pushback and clarification by the lazy typically pro Repub Mainstream Media announce some blithering BS about how he saved America from higher drug prices after he rescinded BIDEN BIDEN BIDEN's accomplishment to dramatically lower drug prices for most American customers for those drugs and then take credit for future drug price reductions already negotiated and put into BIDEN BIDEN BIDEN's Inflation Reduction. Act to take effect in about 3 weeks anyway! Lolol.
Oh, except this time the MSM will stand in stoney silence while total numbskull Trump tells them he reduced drug prices by "400%, 500% and even 600%.
Lolol. Can't beat that. Well, unless you reduce the prices by "700% of course.[/QUOTE]Not anymore he's been superceded by a trio of Scumbags.
#1 is Scumbag Pelosi by lightyears in 2008 she rigged the primaries against Scumbag Bubba and handed it to Scumbag Barry which gave us Our Lord and Savior in 2016.
#2 is RBG, in 2016 Scumbag Barry asked her politely like the cuck he is to retire and she told him "ain't no house slave telling me what to do" LMAO.
In 2020 she finally kicked the bucket and gave Our Lord and Savior another sweet ass Supreme Court seat to make up the Trump Court.
#3 the oligarchs rigged the election in 2020 and handed it to (#3 Scumbag Joe and Scumbag Harris).
Only to have Scumbag Pelosi and Scumbag Barry force him out of the race in the summer of 2024 only for him to quickly and astutely hand the baton to Birdbrain Harris.
And the rest is history folks thank you for your votes, please vote for AOC in 2028 God only knows what serendipity she will send our way LMFAO.
Allahu Akbar!!
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2025/12/23/chuck-todd-joe-biden-did-a-ton-of-damage-to-the-democratic-brand-with-his-one-term/[/URL]
Post script hey you feminist Cucks what we really need in 2026 is more female Democrats in high office ROTFLMMFAO.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3043612]BTW, Why [NOPARSE]doesn't your so called article on "low cost of energy", consider or factor in the the time of build/constru[/NOPARSE]ction?
The last nuclear plants in the USA The Vogtle Unit 4 and Vogtle Unit 3, both took just over 10 years to build. The last one before those nuclear plants, [B]the Watts Bar Unit, took a whopping 43 years to build.[/B] That's [NOPARSE]almost a freakin' half a century of what? Wasted energy? Ineptitude? Cost overruns? Compliance? MAGA like stoppage/sab[/NOPARSE]otage?
On average solar farms in the USA Take 8 to 18 months to build. Wind farms, about 6-months to 3 years, on average depending on scale.[/QUOTE]It takes 7-11 years to construct off shore wind farms. Not 3 three years.
[URL]https://www.iberdrola.com/about-us/our-activity/offshore-wind-energy/offshore-wind-park-construction[/URL]
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3043624]Old fat orange is totally megaloman and senile making USA mostly ridiculous in front of the world.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2025/12/23/louvre-tightens-security-installs-bars-on-infamous-window-of-crown-jewel-heist/[/URL]
Allahu Akbar.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3043760]Not anymore he's been superceded by a trio of Scumbags.
#1 is Scumbag Pelosi by lightyears in 2008 she rigged the primaries against Scumbag Bubba and handed it to Scumbag Barry which gave us Our Lord and Savior in 2016.
#2 is RBG, in 2016 Scumbag Barry asked her politely like the cuck he is to retire and she told him "ain't no house slave telling me what to do" LMAO.
In 2020 she finally kicked the bucket and gave Our Lord and Savior another sweet ass Supreme Court seat to make up the Trump Court.[/QUOTE]Todd totally misses which single demographic and on what single issue swung from their usual Dem vote to a Repub vote in 2024, in the only 3 swing states that mattered and only by less than 0.75 of a single percentage point, thereby being solely responsible for Trump winning the election. And, yes, it was a vote "against" something; it was the angry Muslim votes "against" anyone from the Biden Administration in PA, MI and WI for its support of Israel in the Israel-Gaza War, which they extrapolated to being support for Netanyahu, who they hated.
It is no more complicated than that. No other typically Dem-voting demographic shift from Dem to Repub flipped a single typically Blue state from Harris to Trump. None. Only that one demographic in three swing states, the only three swing states that mattered, and only on that one non economic / non inflation / non immigration / non crime / non tranny / non "woke" issue, decided the presidential election outcome and only by a swing of less than 0. 75 of a single percentage point did it.
Meanwhile, Repubs lost House seats to the Dems in the 2024 election, have continued to lose more of them ever since and the only Senate seats won by Repubs was in 2-3 states that were Ruby Red to begin with.
Consequently, as your link shows, at least Todd mentioned the far more important factor in his usual pro-Repub / anti-Dem screed:
[QUOTE]"Youve got progressives who dont like the direction of the party, who are going to end up voting enthusiastically in the midterms against Republicans, but it doesnt mean they like what the Democrats are doing.[/QUOTE]