Well sounds like you're trying to characterize it w / o reading it how typical
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3051090]Was he the MittWitt economic campaign advisor who told MittWitt to assure the American people that his historically brilliant Repub economic policies that brought us every Great Depression, Great Recession and Massive Jobs Destruction of the past 100 years would also lower the unemployment rate to 6% within 4 years? Then Obama / Biden went on to lower it below 5% in 6 months or something like that? LOL.
Oh, and please cite the posts and quotes where I "bash Muslims".
I have only pointed out that a tiny handful of angry Muslims who swung their usual vote for the Dem candidate to the Repub candidate in the only 3 swing states that mattered gave the presidency to Trump, that's all. A swing of less than about 114,900 votes from that one demographic out of hundreds of thousands of them in those 3 swing states did it. A swing of about 0. 75 of a single percentage point of them spread across those three states did it.
No blue states flipped from Harris to Trump. None. So whatever percentage of Blacks, Latinos, Asians, Men, whatever Trump gained and Harris lost momentarily on any particular isdue did not matter and had nothing to do with the players on the field or who won the presidency.[/QUOTE]Yes you constantly bash and use the "Dog whistle" here for your fellow racists / bigots that hate Caucasians (most Muslims are Caucasians).
I'm sure many many more very wise black males voted for Our Lord and Savior to help him handily win the Electoral College and the Popular vote.
BTW I have always extremely loathed Mitt (and have never voted for him).
And I'm sure Mitt hates Oren, which is an Economic Nationalist / Populist and Awesome Patriot.
4 photos
I have not seen the evidence of that
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3051129]Yes you constantly bash and use the "Dog whistle" here for your fellow racists / bigots that hate Caucasians (most Muslims are Caucasians).
I'm sure many many more very wise black males voted for Our Lord and Savior to help him handily win the Electoral College and the Popular vote.
BTW I have always extremely loathed Mitt (and have never voted for him).
And I'm sure Mitt hates Oren, which is an Economic Nationalist / Populist and Awesome Patriot.[/QUOTE]Was there an uncharacteristically large surge in black male votes for Trump in PA, MI and WI? Because those were the states whose Electoral College appointments gave the presidency to Trump in 2024. There was no surge of any typically Dem demographic voters that flipped a Blue state's EC appointments to Trump. Since that didn't happen, where are you getting that a move in Black, Latino or any other typically Dem demographic vote from Harris to Trump won him a single decisive EC appointment?
In the only 3 swing states that mattered, PA, MI and WI, there is plenty of evidence that the targeting of the Muslim Community in those 3 states and swinging just enough of those potential votes from Harris to Trump, less than a single percentage point swing among them, is the sole reason the USA now has to pay higher prices for groceries, there have been massive private-sector jobs layoffs, private-sector jobs creation has been practically non existent for over a year, Trillions and Trillions have been added to Trump's deficits with nothing to show for it and on and on.
[URL]https://www.politico.com/news/2023/12/02/swing-state-muslim-leaders-biden-00129758[/URL]
[URL]https://www.dailysabah.com/world/americas/us-muslims-drive-trumps-win-sparking-debate-among-pundits[/URL]
[URL]https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2024/11/08/muslim-voters-in-battle-ground-states-boosted-donald-trump-to-victory/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-earns-endorsement-highly-respected-muslim-leaders-battleground-state[/URL]
And this was a major deciding factor in their tiny handful of swing votes from Harris to Trump that "gave Trump the presidency"; Netanyahu simply delayed honoring the Biden-negotiated May 2024 ceasefire agreement until after the election:
[URL]https://www.trtworld.com/article/18254320[/URL]
An Always Welcome Bonus Video:
[URL]https://www.instagram.com/reel/DR4yoQ-EXd8/?igsh=bXEydzY1a3EwZ3Jn[/URL]
Post election analysis from NYT
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3051184]Was there an uncharacteristically large surge in black male votes for Trump in PA, MI and WI? Because those were the states whose Electoral College appointments gave the presidency to Trump in 2024. There was no surge of any typically Dem demographic voters that flipped a Blue state's EC appointments to Trump. Since that didn't happen, where are you getting that a move in Black, Latino or any other typically Dem demographic vote from Harris to Trump won him a single decisive EC appointment?
In the only 3 swing states that mattered, PA, MI and WI, there is plenty of evidence that the targeting of the Muslim Community in those 3 states and swinging just enough of those potential votes from Harris to Trump, less than a single percentage point swing among them, is the sole reason the USA now has to pay higher prices for groceries, there have been massive private-sector jobs layoffs, private-sector jobs creation has been practically non existent for over a year, Trillions and Trillions have been added to Trump's deficits with nothing to show for it and on and on.
[URL]https://www.politico.com/news/2023/12/02/swing-state-muslim-leaders-biden-00129758[/URL]
[URL]https://www.dailysabah.com/world/americas/us-muslims-drive-trumps-win-sparking-debate-among-pundits[/URL]
[URL]https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2024/11/08/muslim-voters-in-battle-ground-states-boosted-donald-trump-to-victory/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-earns-endorsement-highly-respected-muslim-leaders-battleground-state[/URL]
And this was a major deciding factor in their tiny handful of swing votes from Harris to Trump that "gave Trump the presidency"; Netanyahu simply delayed honoring the Biden-negotiated May 2024 ceasefire agreement until after the election:
[URL]https://www.trtworld.com/article/18254320[/URL]
An Always Welcome Bonus Video:
[URL]https://www.instagram.com/reel/DR4yoQ-EXd8/?igsh=bXEydzY1a3EwZ3Jn[/URL][/QUOTE]The erosion of the Democratic base is accelerating.
Black voters have been — and still are — the most reliable Democratic voters. But in his three presidential campaigns, Mr. Trump made serious inroads in heavily Black counties, across the Deep South and beyond.
Those incursions predated 2024: More counties with a majority of Black voters shifted toward the Republicans in each of the last three elections than the total number of counties nationwide that trended toward Democrats.
Democrats increased their share of the vote in all three elections in only two majority-Black counties in the entire country, Rockdale and Douglas, both outside Atlanta in Georgia, a hotly contested battleground state.
Percentage of Black population, by county.
Shifted left three times.
Shifted right three times.
80%.
70.
60.
Rockdale.
County.
50.
Counties.
In Georgia.
40.
30.
20.
10.
Note: Circle size indicates county population.
Measuring electoral performance by race using countywide results is imprecise; voters of any race could play a role in a partisan shift. But all signs point toward the same conclusion, including the fact that Mr. Trump's support continued to grow in each of the six most predominantly Black counties in the country.
In last year's election, Republicans gained ground in 193 of the country's 200 most predominantly Black counties — even as former Vice President Kamala Harris stood to become the first Black female president.
The slippage is even more pronounced and profound in Latino communities.
Percentage of Hispanic population, by county.
Shifted left three times.
Shifted right.
90%.
Counties.
In Texas.
80.
70.
60.
50.
No counties with a Hispanic.
Population of more than.
30 percent shifted to the left.
40.
30.
20.
10.
Note: Circle size indicates county population.
Of the 67 counties in America with a majority Hispanic population, 66 voted more Republican in 2024 than in 2012.
Even more arresting is that the average swing toward the G. O. P. In those 66 Hispanic-majority counties was 23 percentage points — a political earthquake with which both parties are still coming to terms.
Mr. Trump improved his results in each of his three presidential runs in about two-thirds of majority-Hispanic counties.
Democrats, by contrast, steadily improved their share of the vote in not a single county in America where Latinos account for a third or more of the population.
The DNC is clearly the party of Anti American Feminists, Trannies and all those from Asia that hate America from birth even if they were shit out here.
There was an aphorism going around after the election, seems everyone hates Trump except Blacks Whites and Hispanics (Jews Muslims and Hispanics are Caucasians).
2 photos
Oops. Your link guy missed it.
Maybe your link guy was distracted by Trump's racist cartoon.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3051359][URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFsmLTS360s[/URL][/QUOTE][B]Black Americans, stand up for immigrants. ICE is terrorizing our communities, too.
If there ever was a time for solidarity, the time is now. The end of due process for immigrants is the end of due process for everyone.[/B]
[URL]https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/voices/2025/11/15/ice-us-citizens-black-americans-chicago-south-side/87210498007/[/URL]
[QUOTE]When I read headlines about Immigration and Customs Enforcement and National Guard deployments in Chicago, Los Angeles, Washington, DC, and now possibly Charlotte, North Carolina, and New Orleans childhood trauma resurfaces. As a Black, first-generation citizen born in the United States, who grew up in an overpoliced immigrant community, I feel echoes of painful memories.
I lived in a mixed-immigration status household in East Flatbush, Brooklyn, a melting pot of Caribbean ethnicities including St. Lucian, Jamaican, Haitian, Dominican and Guyanese. I was always struck by how normal the militarization of our neighborhood seemed to some locals, even though it was anything but. When I visited Manhattan or somewhere more racially diverse, I noticed people there didnt face constant police checkpoints, frequent stops or fear of armed officers conditions proven to traumatize those repeatedly exposed to them.[/QUOTE]
Solidarity? I'm all for all Americans to stand united
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3051409]Maybe your link guy was distracted by Trump's racist cartoon.
[B]Black Americans, stand up for immigrants. ICE is terrorizing our communities, too.
If there ever was a time for solidarity, the time is now. The end of due process for immigrants is the end of due process for everyone.[/B]
[URL]https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/voices/2025/11/15/ice-us-citizens-black-americans-chicago-south-side/87210498007/[/URL][/QUOTE]Against Vile Libertarians like Chas Koch Thomas Massie and Rand Paul.
And the likes of posters like you, FUCK Asia in all of its filthy disgusting holes!!
[URL]https://www.wsj.com/opinion/foreign-countries-bear-the-burden-of-tariffs-86794b27[/URL]
Post Script: and fuck Canada the EU and Mexico as well!
3 photos
But, never fear, Trumpanomics has been great for China! As expected.
A Rasmussen Poll of Xi and the Chinese Communist Party would almost certainly show an overwhelming preference for Trump and Trumpanomics over Biden and Bidenomics.
[B]A year into Trump tariffs, Chinese factories and ports are buzzing with activity.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/12/trump-tariffs-cny-chinese-factories-and-ports-are-buzzing-with-activity.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]Factories and ports appear as busy as ever ahead of the Lunar New Year pre-holiday rush.
Major ports in China saw a surge in containers activity, pushing up freight prices.
For shipments to the U.S., large containers were running above levels during the same period in 2024 and 2025 for most part of January and into February.[/QUOTE][B]China's trade surplus hit record $1.2 trillion in 2025.[/B]
[URL]https://finance.yahoo.com/news/chinas-trade-surplus-hit-record-073006417.html[/URL]
[QUOTE]Last year's bruising trade war between Washington and Beijing -- which at one point saw reciprocal tariffs in the triple digits -- led to a 20 percent plunge year-on-year in China's exports to the United States, with imports falling 14.6 percent.
But other trade partners more than filled the gap, increasing Chinese exports overall by 5.5 percent in 2025, while imports stayed flat in dollar terms.[/QUOTE]MAGA Repubs and your facilitating relatively tiny handful of angry Muslims in the only 3 swing states that mattered and gave Trump the presidency in 2024, Xi and China thanks you very, very much for your vote.
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: LCOE of S+W+BAT vs Fossil Fuels and 'baseload' mythology
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3051054]Hot damn, an energy discussion! [/QUOTE]LOL! Dude get over yourself and don't be so freakin' conceited, energy debates and discussions have been going on here, for the last several months at least!
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3051054]For the bigger picture, ignoring weather events, by focusing just on LCOE, he ignores a lot of costs. For example, the cost of transmission build-out, new and upgraded substations, etc.[/QUOTE]Again, [NOPARSE]just freakin' hubris! As if a weather storms, downed powerlines, transmission outages and new grid transition costs don't also exist for fossil fuel power plants.
Also an LCOE is what is. Until the financial energy industry uses something else, quit y'all belly-aching! Ya don't see me belly-aching about an LCOE, that does not take into account the massive fossil fuels cradle to grave inefficiencies of 50% to 70%, when used to [/NOPARSE]generate electricity.
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3051054] He fails to consider that storage for wind and solar is expensive. And extremely expensive more than 6 hours out. ... BAHAHAHAHAHA![/QUOTE]So instead of flapping your gums and laughing [I](like an old maid windbag spinster),[/I] perhaps you should just try providing the evidence, with regards to your claims of fossil fuels (or nuclear), today having a lower LCOE than [I]solar/wind + battery storage.[/I] At best, the only fossil fuel, is gas-CCGT (the most efficient use of gas to generate electricity) and is only slightly lower or [I]on par with and LCOE for S+W+B.[/I] Yes, while solar and wind remain the lowest LCOE, even with storage many cases, worldwide.
[QUOTE=PVMagazineUSA]Lazard’s analysis of levelized cost of electricity across fuel types finds that new-build utility-scale solar, even without subsidy, [b]is less costly than new build natural gas, and competes with already-operating gas plant.[/b] ... On an unsubsidized $/MWh basis, renewable energy remains the most cost-competitive form of generation. ... both the lowest-cost and quickest-to-deploy generation resource.”[/QUOTE][B]Solar cost of electricity beats lowest-cost fossil fuel – even without tax credits,[/B], July 1st, 2025 [URL]https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2025/07/01/solar-cost-of-electricity-beats-lowest-cost-fossil-fuel-even-without-tax-credits/[/URL]
[U]The "baseload" grid of yesteryear, is not your electricity grid future of tomorrow:[/U]
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3051054] And doesn't appear to understand that you must have natural gas, coal, and/or nuclear plants for reliable baseload power, unless you live someplace like Quebec or New Zealand.[/QUOTE]I think AEMO CEO, Daniel Westerman said it best, when referring not only to the Australia's grid for the future, but what he thinks the grids of the world will transition to and become:[LIST][i]"Australia’s operational paradigm is no longer ‘baseload-and-peaking’, but increasingly it’s a paradigm of ‘renewables-and-firming". It’s a crucial point to understand."
"[b] 'Baseload' is not so much a technical virtue as a business model[/b] – the people who invest in coal generators, and nuclear in particular, count on those machines operating at or near full capacity most of the time." [/i][/LIST]I couldn't agree more with that profound statement, from the AEMO CEO, as he calls out fossil fuel "baseload", [B]NOT a "technical virtue",[/B] but rather the case of a [B]"business virtue",[/B] of the fossil fuel overlords.
And let's not get it twisted [I]...in a renewables future grid of tomorrow,[/I] as clean green renewable tech gets better and more robust, fossil fuels may still play role, just less and less of a role, as time marches on.
I think, many of the energy sources powering the renewables grid around the world of tomorrow, will be dynamically digitally [I]software/firmware engineered[/I] to operate in complement to provide continual power demand (that also simulates any traditional "baseload" as needed and are NOT necessarily required to generate electricity 24/7, on their own.