Fatality rates exaggerated
I thought it might be worth cross-posting something that was on the Philippine thread.
[QUOTE=RickRock;2473886]I think you're talking about case fatality rates.
The important number is infection fatality rates.
As researchers like us have learned more about the spread of the virus, we have discovered that the total number of infected people is far greater than the number of confirmed cases. For example in New York, it was more than 10 times the previously announced infection rate.
When deaths from COVID-19 are divided by the total number of cases not just reported cases you get a statistic called the infection fatality rate (IFR). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention currently has a best guess of 0. 26%% for the IFR.
[/QUOTE]On this thread ShooBree has made a similar point. The important statistic is not the CFR (which the media hypes up) but the IFR.
[URL]https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3410:[/URL]
[I]fatality ratio estimates now range from 0.02% to 0.86%, with a median of 0.26%,18 similar to that for seasonal flu.[/I]
[URL]https://www.who.int/bulletin/online_first/BLT.20.265892.pdf:[/URL]
[I]In people < 70 years, infection fatality rates ranged from 0.00% to 0.31% with crude and corrected medians of 0.05%.[/I]