Angeles City

[QUOTE=GoodEnough;2123841]I too was offended by the word and the contempt for women it denotes. Likely I just would have ignored his posts in the future without comment, but I think you guys are correct, and that those of us who dislike the use of derogatory terms should speak up.

I was curious about the common definition of the word "skank" so looked it up in the OED, which says: "derogatory; a promiscuous woman. ".

GE.[/QUOTE]By definition, doesn't that make all AC bargirls (and FL and such) a 'skank'?

For those upset by the term, can you pinpoint what is upsetting? If I call a girl an 'escort', or 'provider', or 'wh*re', or 'skank', is one of those terms worse than the others in your mind? Are the terms contemptuous towards women, or just promiscuous women? Are certain derogatory words in place for shaming purposes (shaming can be a legitimate cultural correction)?

Is the very nature of our hobby, bone-jumping non-monogamy, contemptuous? If you answer 'No', would women agree?

[QUOTE=Mogwai;2123861]I even think he's a 'reincarnated' troll that has been harassing us for a long time in the Angeles thread. I can't recall his name however and I can't retrieve his posts, but maybe they have been deleted.[/QUOTE]McCobb, or Cobb.

[QUOTE=WestCoast1;2123889]
McCobb, or Cobb.[/QUOTE]That's possible. But it wasn't the one I was looking for.

[QUOTE=WestCoast1;2123889]By definition, doesn't that make all AC bargirls (and FL and such) a 'skank'?

For those upset by the term, can you pinpoint what is upsetting? If I call a girl an 'escort', or 'provider', or 'wh*re', or 'skank', is one of those terms worse than the others in your mind? Are the terms contemptuous towards women, or just promiscuous women? Are certain derogatory words in place for shaming purposes (shaming can be a legitimate cultural correction)?

Is the very nature of our hobby, bone-jumping non-monogamy, contemptuous? If you answer 'No', would women agree?

McCobb, or Cobb.[/QUOTE]Skank (n.): "unattractive woman," 1965, perhaps from skag in this sense (1920's), which is of unknown origin. Verbal meaning "dance to reggae music" is from 1976, probably not the same word but also of unknown origin. Related: Skanking.

An unpleasant person, especially a woman who has sex with a lot of different people.

Therefore, "skank" accurately describes the women that Pedro fucked in Angeles City per his reports. Those who feel offended should keep in mind that the majority of the population in their Western homelands consider sex tourism offensive. In fact, some cannot even legally purchase sex in their hometowns. Plus, in the West men who fuck women 10 to 20 years younger are called "dirty old men" and "perverts" or something even worse. For example, in the USA, a 60-year-old aged cock penetrating a 20 to 30-year-old pussy is extremely revolting and unacceptable for most women.

Mongers who do not like their prostitutes referred to as "skanks" can discuss it in the "Safe Space" thread created for snowflake johns. "Skank" is not on the forum's list of censored words. The easily offended liberal sex tourists and sexpats can simply ignore posts from Pedro instead of trying to ban words as they allege Trump did.

[QUOTE=WestCoast1;2123889]Is the very nature of our hobby, bone-jumping non-monogamy, contemptuous? If you answer 'No', would women agree?

McCobb, or Cobb.[/QUOTE]The popular definition of skank is a woman who sleeps around. BFD! Everyone on this board sleeps around.

If it applies to them it applies to you. If you shit where you eat you'll smell your own shit while you eat. Is that a good thing?

It's a square word for loose women created by square uptight people. It's absurd to throw it around here.

And it's good to see the real mr E once in a while.

[QUOTE=Mogwai;2123861]I even think he's a 'reincarnated' troll that has been harassing us for a long time in the Angeles thread. I can't recall his name however and I can't retrieve his posts, but maybe they have been deleted.[/QUOTE]Totally agree. Cheers.

[QUOTE=WestCoast1;2123889]By definition, doesn't that make all AC bargirls (and FL and such) a 'skank'?

For those upset by the term, can you pinpoint what is upsetting? If I call a girl an 'escort', or 'provider', or 'wh*re', or 'skank', is one of those terms worse than the others in your mind? Are the terms contemptuous towards women, or just promiscuous women? Are certain derogatory words in place for shaming purposes (shaming can be a legitimate cultural correction)?

Is the very nature of our hobby, bone-jumping non-monogamy, contemptuous? If you answer 'No', would women agree?[/QUOTE]In danger of digressing from the main topic of this board I will like to suggest that promiscuity is a moral judgment arising from religion especially the Christian based religions. According to these religions sex outside of marriage is a bad thing and is called fornication. I do not subscribe to this; I believe that sex is a natural bodily function like eating, drinking or even breathing and the berating of individuals for a prodigious sex life is just the criticism of a healthy individual by someone who is perhaps less healthy and / or jealous.

[QUOTE=Turgid;2124013]In danger of digressing from the main topic of this board I will like to suggest that promiscuity is a moral judgment arising from religion especially the Christian based religions. According to these religions sex outside of marriage is a bad thing and is called fornication. I do not subscribe to this; I believe that sex is a natural bodily function like eating, drinking or even breathing and the berating of individuals for a prodigious sex life is just the criticism of a healthy individual by someone who is perhaps less healthy and / or jealous.[/QUOTE]A judgment of the action is totally independent of the action itself. You guys are acting like the action of sleeping around has no name or should not have a name. The definition is promiscuity. The same as eating too much and drinking too much have the definitions of glutton and alcoholic respectively (no matter how angelic the people performing these actions are to us).

I don't recall any post passing judgment except for the ones saying the op should not be calling promiscuous women skanks. Whether you choose to acknowledge it or not the women are by definition skanks, hores, hookers, sluts, skeezers. Likewise we punters are by definition johns, tricks, and all the other synonyms that are used to describe a man that pays a woman for sex. And I for one can't wait til the end of the month when I can trick off with some more AC skanks (or whatever other word you wish to use for a chick that you pay for sex)!

Ok skankers skank on.

Skank is a derogatory word and used as such. The only thing worse than a skank is a skanker fuxking skanks, imho. But then again skanker is just a word.

Skankers carry on.

[QUOTE=PedroMorales;2122890]
13. Clap: I got a mild case of chlamydia. [/QUOTE]LOL, reminded me of a WG in the real world. She told me she got "a little bit" pregnant after bare backing her boyfriend (ie. A customer she really liked who bought her stuff).

Great report, loved the bullet point format! We need more of this.

We said he should not call all of them skanks. Some of them surely are skanks as some of us are as well. The word skank (for me) has morphed into meaning low life. I do not deal w / low lifes nor do my friends. If some here think the worst of the people they hire for one job or another so be it. I think less of them for these hypocrisies and classless acts that they do. Big deal, do what you want, this is our nature to do so, to act against ourselves.

The long term players here know who's who (on ISG) and once in a while we protect the women we all rely on for our adventures. If you choose to pretend you like them (when in the field) and behind their backs degrade them you're not equal to those of us that respect the game and all it's players.

In the end meaning here when it's time to write a FR why should I share w / cold blooded hypocrites? True, they're in the minority but they're just so low I can't bring myself to share my experiences w / them.

I'll be in AC tomorrow. I'll try and do a bar report as to quality, numbers, and prices etc for the guys I respect here. I want to respect everyone but we're just so different it's not possible. It's nature's way that we are like this and I trust nature.

[QUOTE=Mogwai;2123878]I went bareback with her and she didn't object. Being the gentleman that I am I pulled out when I was about to cum and shoot my load on her belly. "No! Come inside!" she said. "Put it back in![/QUOTE]Reminiscent of something CM would write. In addition, this is within my experiences also. In the same way, the girl I posted today in PG #8926, a repeater for many years, doesn't just seem to want the cum deep inside, she has told me verbally and she also has a trick: everytime I cum in mish, she arches her back and clamps her ankles into my butt cheeks and squeezes her legs like a vice grip, forcing me as deep as possible inside without the possibility of pulling out. She DFK's non-stop and keeps the grip on her legs for a good 2 minutes after I cum (sometimes even after all the joy is gone and Johnson has gone limp and fallen completely out of her). She didn't used to do that until 3 years ago, when one time I pulled out and loaded up her face. She said nothing at the time. Then later after the shower and laying in bed she said something like: "Its ok you cum to my face if you want. But I want in my pussy. OK?" Um, sure. Should I tell you before when I want to cum on your face? She thought for a moment and said: "Yes. Any you like. Just saying I like to my pussy when you cum". And with that, she turned into a human-extremities vice grip: No drop to small to keep.

[QUOTE=MrEnternational;2124108]Whether you choose to acknowledge it or not the women are by definition skanks, hores, hookers, sluts, skeezers. [/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Dg8787;2124207]
Skank is a derogatory word and used as such.[/QUOTE]I'm with Dg here, as far as I understand the meaning and impact of the word 'skank' anyway. Google Translate translates skank to my language (Dutch) as 'slet', which means 'sl*t' (banned word).
I think 'slet' and 'sl*t' are definitely derogatory words.

I think 'hooker' is much less derogatory because it's commonly used as a substitute for prostitute. Therefore it has lost much of its impact.
'sl*t' is closer to 'skank' I think, but less derogatory. But again, I could be wrong because English is not my native language.

As for Mr E's post: I think there's a big difference between a promiscuous woman who sleeps around for free and for fun only and a 'promiscuous' woman who sleeps around for money because she and her family are depending on it. Only the first woman I might call a skank or a 'sl*t' sometimes, but not the second woman in most cases.

PS: 'sl*t' is a banned word on this forum, but 'skank' isn't. Strange.

[QUOTE=Mogwai;2124363]I'm with Dg here, as far as I understand the meaning and impact of the word 'skank' anyway. Google Translate translates skank to my language (Dutch) as 'slet', which means 'sl*t' (banned word).
I think 'slet' and 'sl*t' are definitely derogatory words.

I think 'hooker' is much less derogatory because it's commonly used as a substitute for prostitute. Therefore it has lost much of its impact.
'sl*t' is closer to 'skank' I think, but less derogatory. But again, I could be wrong because English is not my native language..[/QUOTE]Many of these women send sweet f all or very little back to their "families". They are not 19th century Dutch waifs up in the Big Smoke cobbling shoes and sucking dick for a living. They are uneducated dead enders who find themselves in a situation where over indulgence in drink drugs and dick is the norm. This is another reason why girls under 25 are bad news. They are the proverbial good time girls (on steroids and often much more).

Regarding the use of banned words, words depend on how they are used. Sometimes, it is best to call out people for what they are.

[QUOTE=Poopbunny;2124232]LOL, reminded me of a WG in the real world. She told me she got "a little bit" pregnant after bare backing her boyfriend (ie. A customer she really liked who bought her stuff). Great report, loved the bullet point format! We need more of this.[/QUOTE]Thank you very much. You have made an old skank lover very happy.

Here are some more.

1. Taxi from airport: arranged. It means I will skip Manila which is good. The biggest / worst skanks I met BTW was in LA Cafe. Dressed in sewer gear, got me to take her and another older one (old and ugly is better as more experienced), told me outside she was on the rag, left early, the other was a nice woman, for a skank (as many are).

2. Will sleep in, get up, treat myself to breakfast, shower, treat myself to as hair cut and shave, strol up Fiuelds and treat myself to coffee (the best part of the day, except for the beggars and sundry hawkers).

3. Clapcubators: Might stroll over to mall and see if there is any cheap pussy about but will most likely save my energy.

Dos and Don't.

4. No bar fines or bars. They are just not worth it. The problem is we get lazy and lazier.

5. Long term GF. I am not sure if this is worth it. It would be if I could get a few to perform circus tricks for me but it is not their thing. I might go for bringing a working girl back home to her province for a few days to see her rug rat. The logic here is quite simple. It would be a fun thing to do and she would love it and, depending how hardened she is, there could be a good sexual reward for me. Some of these princesses have lost all humanity towards us so one must beware and choose carefully.

6. Clapmachine. There is a major issue her. I like bareback and so do they, especially if you are a frequent flyer. The problem is women are asymptotic and one could again end up pissing blades.

7. A little bit of clap: There are some nasty doses about. I know. I got one many years ago.

8. Drink. This is an issue as we can end up drinking (far too much) both in the shorter and longer terms. If we go there to bonk, we should focus on the mission. Again, freelancers win there.

9. Payment: We need someone we can negotiate with. 1000 PHP long term, and a bit of food and a few treats thrown in (new panties if they sleep over etc) should be more than enough.

10. Pay to leave: This is important with our princesses. Without being vulgar, outside of pumping them, we have very little use for them. It is not like they are our wives or pet dog. We need to be able to send them away for spells but not to have them go bonking others (clap risk).

11. Meter watching. We have to watch the meter with them as it can get very expensive or beyond budget having a hired help on tap. We also have to be careful they or their pals do not get designed on our stuff. Perhaps they should pay us a joiner fee?

[QUOTE=WestCoast1;2124276]Reminiscent of something CM would write. In addition, this is within my experiences also. In the same way, the girl I posted today in PG #8926, a repeater for many years, doesn't just seem to want the cum deep inside, she has told me verbally and she also has a trick: everytime I cum in mish, she arches her back and clamps her ankles into my butt cheeks and squeezes her legs like a vice grip, forcing me as deep as possible inside without the possibility of pulling out. She DFK's non-stop and keeps the grip on her legs for a good 2 minutes after I cum (sometimes even after all the joy is gone and Johnson has gone limp and fallen completely out of her). She didn't used to do that until 3 years ago, when one time I pulled out and loaded up her face. She said nothing at the time. Then later after the shower and laying in bed she said something like: "Its ok you cum to my face if you want. But I want in my pussy. OK?" Um, sure. Should I tell you before when I want to cum on your face? She thought for a moment and said: "Yes. Any you like. Just saying I like to my pussy when you cum". And with that, she turned into a human-extremities vice grip: No drop to small to keep.[/QUOTE]Think medical advice is 30 minutes of raised pelvis.

Yeah. Go figure. Very hard to disengage when they do that. Their little short muscles are quite strong at gripping. Worse when they do a midnight ride while you are asleep.

Had one repeat who did the same as I wanted to come in the mouth or condom. She kept insisting pussy is okay.

Any man who loves women will never call them skanks, sl..ts, etc. And for that matter will not try to underpay them as well. Only boys lacking in cojones do that.

[QUOTE=Turgid;2124487]Any man who loves women will never call them skanks, sl..ts, etc. And for that matter will not try to underpay them as well. Only boys lacking in cojones do that.[/QUOTE]Real men pay whatever the princesses (in their eyes) ask for. What is your sample size to make such an observation? Every monger is a Romeo and every working girl is a Pretty Woman Juliet.

The big divide in life is between those who think the angles selling their mutton are "fallen Pretty Women" who love the film Pretty Woman and who need to be saved by some Hollywood want to be hot shot and those who take a more realistic view of life.

Here's one to masticate over. I know quite a few dominatrixes (or should that be dominatrices), almost all of whom do it for the money. Guess what. Such an insecure bunch of women I have never met and it is hilarious what they agonise over in their personal and professional lives.

Words like skanks have uses as they keep things real. Time for a few more bullet points.

1. Short term v long time: I used to be into long time but now I think it is just best to bonk and set them free (and to pay somewhere between the hsort and long time rates). This was one gets a good night's sleep and does not have to worry about getting robbed etc in the night. One also gets to check the sheets for blood and dirt stains.

2. Ideal age is 25/26. Younger lack experience and can have attitude. Older are fine if they are hardened to the game (but have hearts of gold).

3. Short time hotels: best used for serious bonking (threesomes and more).

4. Tradesman's entrance. Less Pinays are into that than Thais. Not a deal breaker as I have gone off it.

5. Special skills: tits massages and the like. Although Thailand again wins, a significant % of Pinays bring much to the table here. This again favours the freelancing street walker over the bar "girl".

6. Peso bills. It is important to break 500 PHP bills at every opportunity to have a ready supply of chump change at hand.

7. Room safe: Important though Trip advisor gives a report of a punter saying $600 went missing on him from one.

8. In Angeles, it is important to get the right life / bonk balance. This is because there is mainly only one reason to be there and that is to shoot one's semen into lovely princesses and to thank them profusely afterwards.

9. woman haters come in many forms. Those we may be concerned with here were smitten by a princess who broke their hearts. Mongers need insurances against such things. As in any business transaction, clear lines in the sand or bed sheets are needed.