FKK Sharks - Darmstadt

[QUOTE=TankTank123;2333708]Oh, I missed the chance of making arrangements to meet you! (You did not mention Sharks in your travel plans).

If this was yesterday you are talking about, the better-looking girls only started streaming in from 4 pm onwards. If you left before that, you missed most of the better-looking ones. There were about 70 girls by the evening. I did 5 girls (all very pretty in my eyes) over the course of the day and night This is a record for me in Sharks on a Monday, where normally 3 is the max, and sometimes only 1.

By the way, FKK World was glorious on Sunday. A large number of customers turned up there to enjoy the sunny afternoon in the garden. Very delicious doner kebab, and succulent barbequed Turkey and very tender barbequed lamb marinated to perfection with herbs. In place of the usual Sunday prosecco, they served a kind of prosecco-based Sangria with strawberries. About 60 girls were present, which is more than in a normal Sunday, but quality of optics cannot match that of Sharks on Monday.[/QUOTE]This Sunday and Monday were a very important holiday in Europe Pentecost, difficult to take any conclusion concerning LU and number of mongers, we have to see what will happen in the coming week-end.

I am a morning guy, will never stay after 8 PM in any club and this is really even late for me. Personally I have more interesting things to do on a Sunday Pentecost than to session Romanian prostitutes, for example continuing to prepare my coming trip with my Toy to Siberia.

I have to agree with Escape Artis here. And I have seen this type of reporting in other clubs too. People comparing lineups in the early afternoon to other clubs. Every time I read someone claiming a club has 10, 20 or 30 girls only, it is an indication that he is either biased against the club, or didn't want to stick around to give it a fair review.

Off the top of my head, I cannot remember a single FKK I have been to that had less than 30 girls. Although Andiamo, DV, Aca Gold (I left early, so it doesn't count) and maybe SS (perhaps also Mon. / Tues.) just barely scraped 30. And Magnum, but Mondays / Tuesdays there doesn't count.

On reflection. The top optic of my trip was an ultra slim girl standing facing away from me at the bar. I could see a thigh gap of several inches, and her pussy outlined against the light. Unfortunately her hair and face put me off. But I feel I ought to mention that the biggest wow of my trip was that couple of minutes LOL.

Escape Artist

Please reread my report: I made it clear that Finca had been crowded early. Sharks was still empty at 15.00. And I made it clear that Dietzenbach was busy when I arrived (25 minutes after leaving Sharks). So my comparison makes sense. I was surprised that these two clubs were busy during the time I had been in an empty Sharks.

Just shows I guess that Sharks is an evening club. I bet at night the situation is reversed, with Sharks busier than the other two

Please read my report properly. I made no mention of going to a room as Dietzenbach. Please do not write I went to a room when I did not

Also by the way there is no rule which says, as you say, it is important to give exact timings of club visits. I gave enough information by saying three hours early in the day. Members are not normally expected to give entry and exit times when they comment on a club

As for misleading. Firstly, a person needs to read my report properly and not read what they imagine. And even then who would be daft enough to be led by my reports?. Please read my report again and you will see I even added a codicil to my report saying it was merely opinion of a particular time and place. I am horrified that anyone should take my comments as some kind of Truth from high to be led by

As for you asking what my ratings say about Sharks vs Finca, I have no idea. I have no wish to make any sweeping conclusions. Not interested. Just saying what I saw. I note you chose to refer only to one aspect of my ratings.

My suggestions are

1. Read my report properly

2. Don't take what other members, including me, as being anything other than some random guy's ramblings, which you might or might not wish to accept to some degree. If you wish to say that for you Sharks is the best club because of x and y, I would accept and be interested, and would not misread your post and then try to invalidate it.

I repeat, it is weird that one club can be pretty much empty whilst other clubs can be packed out at the same time of day.

I note that your most recent club reports are nearly 18 months ago

[QUOTE=Optimist;2334350]Escape Artist. Please reread my report. I made it clear that Finca had been crowded early. Sharks was still empty at 15.00. And I made it clear that Dietzenbach was busy when I arrived, 25 minutes after leaving Sharks. So my comparison makes sense. I was surprised that these two clubs were busy during the time I had been in an empty Sharks. Just shows Sharks is an evening club. I bet at night the situation is reversed, with Sharks busier than the other two

As for misleading. Who would be daft enough to be led by my reports?. I added a council to my report saying it was merely opinion of a particular time and place.

As for you asking what my ratings say about Sharks vs Finca, I have no idea. I have no wish to make any sweeping conclusions. Not interested. Just saying what I saw[/QUOTE]Like Oase, Sharks lineup on Mondays can be very reliant on the weather. And peak hour are between 16.00 and 23.00. It is definitely not a night club, but you pretty much went there on the slowest hours of the whole week. If weather is great, then it can be packing from 12.00 on most days too. But Mon / Tues. Are still the slowest.

* Yes, Dalma is back in Sharks, she's one of at least 5 (natural) busty girls in Sharks (at shawnkemp5354).

* So surprising to read that someone visits 3 clubs on the same day (Sharks / Finca / Dietzenbach) anyhow, but surely more surprising are the semi-conclusions:

-"chic and charm" is what he is looking for: Very strange to look for that in Dietzenbach, it is a AO-club so basically you can forget about that. The only truthful selling point is the sheer fact that the girls working there fuck bareback for "peanuts", good luck finding chic and charm there. Just bollocks! The main attraction of RTC is simply the AO-stuff. Never been to Dietzenbach myself (and I never will for that matter) but I can't imagine it to be any better and classier than the AO-clubs in NRW which is kind of the same procedure.

- empty Sharks, well. Things loosened up for sure later on Monday with at least 70/80 girls if not more (I only stayed until 8 PM), (short) waiting time for rooms so girls were kinda busy. At least 150 visitors when I left and more arriving. Take into account that Monday was a public holiday so more full than on ordinary days for sure.

- your optics-scores: can't judge Dietzenbach but I can't imagine that there might be a lot of good looking girls working there. AO-clubs basicly "attract" another "kind of girl" than ordinary clubs. Finca I know quite well: way less girls, way less pretty ones, apart from maybe 1 or 2 stunners it's a club filled with relatively ordinary Romanian girls but miles away from the beauty level from Sharks!

Difficult to compare any club but it doesn't make any sense to have such a small margin from 6,5 to 5,5 and even the same result for the "top-3" with 8,5 for both Sharks and Finca. Anyone which regularly visits both clubs knows that your estimation is not even close to the actual reality! If you sit the whole day in clubs like Finca / Parksauna / Babylon / LivingRoom / AcapulcoGold etc you are basically being surrounded by 2, maybe 3 stunners maximum and the rest are GND-types and no real head turning girls. If you make 1, just one walk throughout Sharks, you will have seen more stunning girls than in those 5 mentioned clubs together during a whole day, quite simple. I think is it kind of important that some sort of realism is still available in reports. It has been quite obvious for a while that colleague Optimist is a big fan of Finca and some other places and that is perfectly fine, but some more realism would be appropriate I think, otherwise it becomes completely ridiculous in a way!

Pistons and everybody. Yes. I went at the slowest time of the week. I knew that. I go to clubs at quiet times, middling times, busy times. In fact normally I prefer quieter times.

No need for anybody else to pile in to tell me the same thing

SpermBirds.

Your report about the number of guys and girls later in the day is really excellent information which balances up my information very nicely. I am pleased to hear as the girls I knew who were there but normally take Monday free, will not have been disappointed

As for Dietzenbach. Read my report. I wrote that I went to Dietzenbach to meet a colleague - not looking for chic and charm. So you saying I am talking bollocks to go there for chic and charm is ridiculous. By the way, as you will not know as you have never been there, I did in previous times meet a girl there with chic and charm, who I fucked with condom and who became a favourite girl through several clubs. So, don't try to put me down by saying it is bollocks. At least I go exploring in unlikely places

I don't care if you find my ratings or my reports lacking in realism. As far as I am concerned very few posts in the FKK thread have any realism. I am just astonished that my post which was meant to be a light post has upset so many Sharks' regulars. I even have said that if I were local I would go to Sharks out of choice.

You say I am a big fan of Finca. You say. Nothing of the sort. It just happens to be a club which works for me at the moment. You judge the Finca lineup when you weren't even there this week as far as I can tell by your post. As I wrote elsewhere the LU has had a significant upswing at the moment, like it did in summer 2016 (I think). Normally my Finca average score would be much lower. No doubt it will be followed by a downswing. It seems to be unacceptable to suggest that the Finca line up might even temporarily in some ways even be within touching distance of Sharks'. Way fewer girls yes, but not way less girls. Why are Sharks supporters so defensive..I am more than happy to hear that other people have different estimations, but not to be told that my opinions are biased, unrealistic, and bollocks. There should be respect for different viewpoints

What is so surprising about occasionally visiting three clubs in one day. Is that a sin?. Over a period of 13 hours that allows more time in each club than many club visitors sometimes do

Replying to Pistons. How can reporting the number of girls I see be counted as being biased against the club?

Business over the past couple of years has brought me to Germany a few times a year. Looks like I will be back in a week for a nice Thursday. Saturday night stay. This will be my first time in summer weather, so hoping to spend some time out back.

For the handful of times I am in Germany, I have only visited Sharks. I know the proper rates and when a girl is trying to take advantage. I am staying in Darmstadt, I will have a rental and can drive. Is it worth visiting any of the other clubs? The LU at Sharks has worked for me and I have found some very nice ladies. It looks like there are other clubs around Frankfurt. Is it worth skipping Sharks one night to check out one of the other clubs? If you think so, I would be interested to know the club and what advantage it may have over Sharks.

Thanks!

[QUOTE=SpermBirds;2334383]* So surprising to read that someone visits 3 clubs on the same day (Sharks / Finca / Dietzenbach) anyhow, but surely more surprising are the semi-conclusions:

-"chic and charm" is what he is looking for: Very strange to look for that in Dietzenbach, it is a AO-club so basically you can forget about that. The only truthful selling point is the sheer fact that the girls working there fuck bareback for "peanuts", good luck finding chic and charm there. Just bollocks! The main attraction of RTC is simply the AO-stuff. Never been to Dietzenbach myself (and I never will for that matter) but I can't imagine it to be any better and classier than the AO-clubs in NRW which is kind of the same procedure.

- empty Sharks, well. Things loosened up for sure later on Monday with at least 70/80 girls if not more (I only stayed until 8 PM), (short) waiting time for rooms so girls were kinda busy. At least 150 visitors when I left and more arriving. Take into account that Monday was a public holiday so more full than on ordinary days for sure.[/QUOTE]I fully agree with you that RTC are not for my chic, elegance and charm, but only we know why, but unfortunately for me, I would like so much like you to find beauties at Sharks, but when I had 4 attractive looks at Finca around Vatertag, I didn't have 4 rooms at Sharks since last 22 June, I don't know who are your beauties, but I don't see any Amanda, or Deniz or Aicha or Magdalena ex Mainhattan, at Sharks, when I would be really happy to find such looks to enjoy at Sharks because I prefer Sharks for the club, chalets in the garden. When I visit Oase, I meet some German ex Sharks regulars, and we say the same: lack of beauties at Sharks now, prettier girls at Oase. Quantity don't make quality for me, I will always prefer only 1 top girl and to go only with her, rather than 200 GND I don't desire.

[QUOTE=SpermBirds;2334383]* Yes, Dalma is back in Sharks, she's one of at least 5 (natural) busty girls in Sharks (at shawnkemp5354).

* So surprising to read that someone visits 3 clubs on the same day (Sharks / Finca / Dietzenbach) anyhow, but surely more surprising are the semi-conclusions:

-"chic and charm" is what he is looking for: Very strange to look for that in Dietzenbach, it is a AO-club so basically you can forget about that. The only truthful selling point is the sheer fact that the girls working there fuck bareback for "peanuts", good luck finding chic and charm there. Just bollocks! The main attraction of RTC is simply the AO-stuff. Never been to Dietzenbach myself (and I never will for that matter) but I can't imagine it to be any better and classier than the AO-clubs in NRW which is kind of the same procedure.

- empty Sharks, well. Things loosened up for sure later on Monday with at least 70/80 girls if not more (I only stayed until 8 PM), (short) waiting time for rooms so girls were kinda busy. At least 150 visitors when I left and more arriving. Take into account that Monday was a public holiday so more full than on ordinary days for sure.

- your optics-scores: can't judge Dietzenbach but I can't imagine that there might be a lot of good looking girls working there. AO-clubs basicly "attract" another "kind of girl" than ordinary clubs. Finca I know quite well: way less girls, way less pretty ones, apart from maybe 1 or 2 stunners it's a club filled with relatively ordinary Romanian girls but miles away from the beauty level from Sharks![/QUOTE]Fully agree with your comments on Finca and Dietz, Finca can never reach Shark LU and Dietz just attract ugly girls for me even they will pay me I will not session them.

I hear from more than one discerning source that on the day I was there, many enjoyable rooms were had by them. I am sure if I had had the time and skills and stamina, I would also have had some of their good fortune. I only mention this as some members think I am biased against Sharks, and this gives me a chance to write a new positive element.

I was pointing out the problem with your post that you began with "wanting to reassess your choices" at Sharks after being accused of favoring Finca at the expense of compromising optics. If the intent was to fairly reassess one's choices, one would not pick the absolutely worst time to go as a basis of research. The conclusion, "I was happy to know that I was not compromising on optics by not making Sharks my home," seemed to be one made my comparing apples to oranges, a fact that is worthy of pointing out to readers who did not fully understand the context of the report. My aim was to point out that one cannot "know" that they are not missing out on optics by using the absolute worst line up time to visit. Readers should be aware of this fact.

You are correct that I have not posted many reports. That fact takes nothing away from the above observations.

[QUOTE=Optimist;2334350]Escape Artist

Please reread my report: I made it clear that Finca had been crowded early. Sharks was still empty at 15.00. And I made it clear that Dietzenbach was busy when I arrived (25 minutes after leaving Sharks). So my comparison makes sense. I was surprised that these two clubs were busy during the time I had been in an empty Sharks. [/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Optimist;2334494]I hear from more than one discerning source that on the day I was there, many enjoyable rooms were had by them. I am sure if I had had the time and skills and stamina, I would also have had some of their good fortune. I only mention this as some members think I am biased against Sharks, and this gives me a chance to write a new positive element.[/QUOTE]Feel free to have your subjective tastes, as say girls: we are all different, when I enjoy, I write I like, and when I'm unfortunately disappointed, I also write.

[QUOTE=Optimist;2334435]What is so surprising about occasionally visiting three clubs in one day. Is that a sin?. Over a period of 13 hours that allows more time in each club than many club visitors sometimes do

Replying to Pistons. How can reporting the number of girls I see be counted as being biased against the club?[/QUOTE]1. Nothing wrong with visiting 3 clubs in one day. I've done it myself too, although probably won't do it again. But I guess with Dietz entry rate, it isn't that bad. I believe PL has done that several times too even.

2. Because of the way it is framed. And not just you choose to frame such numbers here on the forum. It is as if personal observations would generalize objective numbers, given how so few readers have first person knowledge.

3. Spermbirds: Many days Sharks doesn't have as many lookers as all those other clubs combined from walking down around the lounge. I have not been to Parksauna, but if Acagold got all the Aca girls, that comment would be more off than anything Optimist wrote.

4. I'd agree on the Finca number of lookers: probably just 2-3. At least it was on my only visit so far, but I wouldn't place money on it if Optimist claims it has improved. Then again I recall I found 2 girls at Finca who Optimist had talked highly of, who weren't to my liking at all as well. But that goes with all members here on ISG.