[QUOTE=Wendella]didn't the angkor empire implode due to mishandling agriculture? maybe if some ngo's had been around then, things woulda turned out differently[/quote]
Whatever . . . Look, I don't know whether to continue the conversation, but if we do I think a separate thread would be called for (if enough people are interested). If not, I don't see much need to challenge Phil Istin's summary, and had actually written a longer more analytical response to what I thought was a good post by Channy - but lost it as I'm just typing on my phone. I'm happy to discuss it with you, I'm not sure how much I disagree with you (ie, a bit or a lot), but at what point are people going to say make way for p4p info??
Agriculture - afaiaa, in part. Also in part to overextension of resources in building programs - not that there's very clear records that far back and it has to be done by analysis and tested inference (eg Maurice Glaize's work). But NGOs can't usually do much about droughts and floods.
[quote]
looked like some pretty wide brush strokes in that post to me....
[/quote] but some rather good ones IMHO
[quote]didn't you just get done saying the cambodians dont' like to blame? that post seems to show opposite-- as did what i heard of Dr. B.
[/quote] Do maybe check him out - I posted the link - he's Swiss anyway. What's wrong in finding uplifting archetypes? Or do you prefer just to carp? What's the shared objective, if there is one?
[quote]
i bet if i did a quick search i'd find there actually are books written on these subjects by cambodians. and whether or not, what's wrong with foreigners writing about it?
[/quote] well search away. And it's not about an author's nationality so much as the degree of scientific rigor.
[quote]Judging by the things i've heard about KR, and by translations of signs i read at S-21 and elsewhere, i actually dont' think we're talking about sth very complex but actually just the opposite. If anything, one's struck by the frightening simplicity of it all, and how obvious and crude it all is.[/QUOTE]
well yes, especially if you just want go by translations of a few signs. Life and death can always be simplistic. And the PP regime was literally simplistic in concept. Whatever. The more you dig, the more you'll find.
