It tends to be in the eyes of the beholder
[QUOTE=Harold444;1414809]But please stop saying there are 8s or 9s to be found.[/QUOTE]A numeric rating of a SW is meaningless without context. What is a 1 and what is a 10? Is the 10 comparable to the winner of the 2012 Miss Universe title? Or is a 10 the best looking girl you're likely to find in a Bangkok MP? This is an issue in measurement theory, a branch of applied mathematics. To have a useful equal interval scale (such as a 1 to 10 rating scale of physical appearance) it is minimally necessary to define the end points of the scale, and preferably the midpoint as well: a 1 looks like this; a 5 looks like this; a 10 looks like this. In the absence of these anchors all you can conclude is that an 8 is more attractive than a 4. In the absence of context my 8 may be too unattractive to meet your minimal standard for a woman worth fucking.
Rating the beauty of a woman is compounded by cultural differences and personal preferences. A bubble butt is a very desirable feature on a woman in some cultures, and some woman in these culture will have butt augmentations. Personally I like a woman with a smaller and firm ass. But when you read the previous sentence are you certain you know what I mean by a smaller ass? A woman another man describes as having a gorgeous bubble butt I might think has a grossly fat ass. A woman I think has a nice sized firm ass the next man may think has a skinny ass not worth fucking.
I've rarely seen a woman in one of the beer bars that I would rate higher than a 6. But a man who procured his ladies exclusively from beer bars might look at a group of ladies I think are all bunch of 4s and rate some of them as a 4 others as a 6 and some as an 8. Perhaps he's more experienced at judging women who fall within a certain range of beauty and is able to make fine discrimination. Maybe 8s are to be found in a Bangkok beer bar, but because I spend very little time in beer bars I don't have enough opportunities to run into the occasional 8.
I find it most useful when a report describes the woman and how hot the guy found her: "she was pretty hot, kind of short, an okay face, good sized tits and nice big ass." Better yet is when a report says,"She actually looks better than her picture on the website." An 8 tells me next to nothing. What does it mean? That she looks like one of the women who didn't make it beyond the regional competitions for the Miss Colombia title? I have a buddy who occasionally sees a lady in her mid-twenties in Medellin. I couple of years ago she was a regional finalist for Miss Colombia. I'd describe her as a drop dead gorgeous young lady with fantastic boobs and an ass to die for. But perhaps the fact that she didn't have a nice big bubble butt kept her from advancing to the finals.
What we need is the Hoeprano Hotness Rating Scale
[quote=tony hoeprano; 1415549]bringing up some good points here. i don't think the 1-10 system can comprehensively judge a girl's beauty, it's just too narrow a range. you can say a girl who is pretty hot, but maybe a little low class or whatever and judge her an 7 or 8 at face value and that might be a fair enough grade. but match her up against auto show promo girls (just using that as an example, not absolute) and she would be outclassed by a mile. even the less hot promo girl would mop the floor of a typical 7-8 girl on the streets. and where do you class the $15 girls in cambodia and the philippines? they might be an 8 or 9 to a clown who sits all day in his dirty stinky underwear, but if you match those girls up against a hot rb or top tier freelance girl, it would be like secretariat racing a $35, 000 claimer on the first ticket of the daily double at santa anita lol.
if one has to use a numerical value on girls, emulate the beyer speed rating that does a really good job showcasing how fast a horse is on a given track. if anyone knows horse racing and the good ol daily racing form, one look at that beyer speed rating and you generally have a good idea how fast and at what stakes he / she runs at. same system should be applied to girls and is much wider a range than the standard 1-10[/quote]continuing to use measurement theory as a framework for an unnecessarily detailed analysis, what is need is a multi-dimensional scaling system. these require a bit of matrix algebra, but are not too difficult to do now that we have modern computers to perform the countless hours of simple arithmetic calculations required to manipulate large matrices in mulit-dimensional space. each attribute, face, ass, pussy, legs, stomach, tits, skin tone, would receive a rating and these would be combined to calculate an overall physical appearance rating. of course we'd want guys to see the individual components of this score so the ass lovers could hone in on these ladies, same for the tit lovers, etc. then there's the matter of performance. we'd have to evaluate her bj skills and probably apply a weighting coefficient to reflect bare versus covered, cim, cof. ideally we'd want to measure, in centimeters, how deep she swallowed cock, and collect and measure the amount of spit that drooled out of her mouth while doing this. then of course there is the fucking, both pussy and ass, independent ratings on each of the common positions; and we'd want to take the bareback dudes into consideration and again factor in covered versus bare. sluttiness is another attribute as well as the auditory quality of her squeals. and then of course there is context, which probably is largely a function of how much you had to pay. did you pick her up off the street and she only charged 500. did she come from a sukhumvit soapy or was she an expensive sideliner from ratchada. the problem is the model is pretty complicated. and i wouldn't get into whether she does ffm with lesbian action, mmf with dp, gang bangs and [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord118][CodeWord118][/url] (quantity and accuracy of her aim.) that would make it really complicated. the rating system could be created. i'd start by developing a preliminary rating form and circulate it on isg for feedback. no doubt there are things i'm missing that will be immediately obvious to the more depraved members of this forum. it might take a while to complete it on every girl a guy fucks. we'd need hundreds of guys fucking hundreds of girls and even then we wouldn't have enough data. these multivariate analyses require huge data sets to have any validity.
on the other hand, we could spend all the time we waste going through this exercise just fucking the ladies.
i've bookmarked an article on the beyer speed figure to read this weekend. i don't play the ponies so i've never heard of it. but i find this stuff interesting. helps slow down the inevitable advance of the mental decrepitude.
1 photos
Skogis 1 to 10 women/performance rating system
Since womens looks and beauty are in the eyes of the beholders and everyone have their own opinion regarding this, it is hard, if not impossible, to do a 1 to 10 women rating system in general. What is possible is to have our own personal rating system and my system works like this (I hereby declare this to be my subjective ratingsystem and this is how it works for me so no need to argue or disagree).
I devide my ratings upon location meaning if I go to Biergarden (BG) I have rather low expectation of the girls in general located on sceene in BG. If I visit Demo, one of the most exclusive hi so nightclubs in BKK and with the best looking females I ever seen in Thailand. In Other venues in BKK where I mostly do my mongering expectations will run from sth between BG and this top noche venue(and maby a tad towards Demo on the upside). My purpose with visiting the diff venues will also come into play(P4P or picking a girl into my regular fleet).
BG I specificaly use for daytime release sessions (ST and 3somes) where my main point is to just get my pipeline cleaned and serviced without any demands of GFE / PSE play whatsoever. With girls from here even I cover up. For 3somes I ofcourse need girls to participate in my pornmovie playing in my head to fulfill my darkside fantasies so a few small demands are to be had. This irritating (and also amuzing) Harold444 I notice use my 8 to 9 ratings of the girls in BG as an example for downgrading the quality of the ladies present and I have many times agreed 8 to 9's according to my system is not seen everyday in BG but they can be had. Depends also on pure luck I guess. What system Harold444 operates under (except falling in love with this exeptional Rainbow GOGO girl) I don't know and have no interest in knowing bcs that is up to him as looks and body ratings are individual. An 8 to 9 girl in my system I would probably rate down to 6-7 at Demo. So if I met the same girl I thought was a stunner according to my BG standards (comparing to the rest of the crowd, standing out from the crowd present, according to my slightly lower expectation from the place and my use of her / them) she would still be doable but nothing more.
Frequenting medium to medium plus places as Climax, Levels, Q-Bar, Infinity (earlier Insomnia) , Shock69, Mixx, Spasso and more(for LT play) my expectations runs higher. In such places I expect some good girl quality, combi of PSE/GFE and here the girl crowd mostly will find itself on a quite good level and a 8 to 9 girl here would be a 7 to 8 at Demo and then they are more than good enough to session up with.
In Demo(where my rating system is developed from when it comes to looks) you have for Thailand the most stunning beauties imaginable and moviestars, models, rich mixed babes and here they go all the way up to 10 (the real thai 10). A girl rating 5 here would be doable but then probably be a bit chubby. If seen in BG she would have atleast been rated as a 7 to 8 and in Climax a fair 6 to 7. Ofcourse in Demo girls can only be met through normal mechanisms as most girls here are well heeled.
I also have a permance ratingsystem but it works surprisingly simular to the girls rating system. In my younger mongeringyears (mostly in USA, Colombia, Venezuela, Brazil) I mostly went for the 9 to 10 girls(developed back then from FHM and simular magazines and later reinvented in Thailand from Demo) back then and often in hi so places. My mongering back then viewed compensating girls for sex was for loosers LOL. Even so it was here I first experienced starfishing so in an odd way a 9 to 10 girl would in some cases run as low as 5 on the performance scale. But the 6, 7, 8 and lowside 9 girls will perform in general around 8 to 9. But lately I see the benefits by paying girls to leave as I don't want to be stringed to any attatchments except from my fleet of regular girls. I leave out one for the crowd through one pic so it is for you guys to rate her? Where do you think we met (Bangkok ofcourse)? Her data is 165cm. 47kg. 29yrs, teached to A+ level (took a while) , lets call her Som, great performer and lives close to Don Muang airport.
Response to Skogis 1 to 10 women / performance rating system
[quote=skogis;1415803]since womens looks and beauty are in the eyes of the beholders and everyone have their own opinion regarding this, it is hard, if not impossible, to do a 1 to 10 women rating system in general.[/quote]this is one of the points i was making.
[quote=skogis; 1415803]i divide my ratings upon location meaning if i go to biergarden (bg) i have rather low expectation of the girls in general located on scene in bg. if i visit demo, one of the most exclusive hi so nightclubs in bkk and with the best looking females i ever seen in thailand.
frequenting medium to medium plus places as climax, levels, q-bar, infinity (earlier insomnia) , shock69, mixx, spasso and more (for lt play) my expectations runs higher. in such places i expect some good girl quality, combi of pse / gfe and here the girl crowd mostly will find itself on a quite good level and a 8 to 9 girl here would be a 7 to 8 at demo and then they are more than good enough to session up with.[/quote]another point i was making, an 8 rating for biergarden is not the same as an 8 at one of the g-clubs.
[quote=skogis;1415803]i also have a performance rating system but it works surprisingly similar to the girls rating system.[/quote]i think this is interesting. i would love to learn more about it. a citation or explanation would be appreciated.
[quote=skogis;1415803]i leave out one for the crowd through one pic so it is for you guys to rate her? where do you think we met (bangkok ofcourse)? her data is 165cm. 47kg. 29yrs, teached to a+ level (took a while) , lets call her som, great performer and lives close to don muang airport.[/quote]i'd like to see her naked. it's hard to judge her age. she looks like she might be well north of 30. i could be wrong. judging by the way the dress drapes around her midsection, she may have a bit of a tummy. similarly i'd like to know if her breasts are nice and perky or sort of saggy. on your biergarden scale i'd give her a 10. on your demo scale i'd give her an 8 if her tummy is flat and tight and her breasts are nice and perky. i have no idea where you met her. because she has a classy look about her i'll guess it was not a classy place.