Semi Pro PRC Stunners Again - Longs Bar / Harvester
Hell it is good to be back. I've only been travelling for a month but it feels like an eternity.
However, there was good news awaiting.
I wrote last year of a small group of A+ PRC stunners (Very classy) who were vaguely semi-pro and leaning towards enthusiastic amatuer status. (With the emphasis on enthusiasm! )
Well, upon my return from warm, dry, miserable and inhospitable climes, where nobody has a sense of humour, I called for a livener at Longs on the way back from the airport.
To my indescribable delight I spotted one of the PALS (PRC. 'A'. List. Stunners). Wonderful news.
I had a word with Miss Z, who seemed as pleased to see me as I was to see her. It transpires that she and her fellow enthusiasts have taken to freqenting Longs and the Harvester (Crown Plaza) in an attempt to dissasociate themselves from the WG hoards.
Miss 'Z' was wearing a super short little red number which revaled seamed stockings when she exhaled. Talk about distracting, my Guiness came close to spontanious effervescence overflowing its glass.
The lady in red did her usual extravagent dance routine (Showing off) for a while and spread her conversation around 3 or 4 keen observers finally settling on a visiting mercheant seaman (Brit) to be her beau for the night.
Having had a jolly good kip and recovered from my travels I headed for the Harvester the following night to find that it ws Karioki night which did not inspire me with enthusiasm.
However, every cloud has a sliver lining, and bugger me if Miss Z and her mate didn't turn up 15 minutes later and head for the stage wearing the flirtiest little mini skirts I have seen in a long time.
We were treated to 3 vocal renditions of very reasonable quality before the pair split up and worked the room like diplomatic veterans. Shaking hands, smiling, pocketing business cards and exchnging mobile numbers. It was a delight to behold!
But everything has its limits and voyeurism wears thin very quickly, I find.
So it was a couple of Red Bulls for the lady, 0. 25 Imperial Galloons of the black stuff for me, and away hame (as the jocks say) for the dirty deed.
Absolutely tremendous. And strongly recommended. But please tread carefully and remember that these girls are Semi pro at best and all have respectable day jobs. A bit of subtlty and charm will do you no harm.
[size=-2][b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]I certainly hope that the author or somebody else will post a link to this report in the Reports of Distinction thread. Please [url=http://www.internationalsexguide.info/forum/announcement-reportsofdistinction.php?]Click Here[/url] for more information.[/blue][/size]
When is a pro not a pro? (continued)
[QUOTE=Grateful Spread] ....I have come across WGs that prefer not to be considered as prostitutes.
...This week, I went with a WG from Seaview. She insisted that she worked as a hairdresser in a salon, which I have no reason to disbelieve ...would I have labelled her a moonlighting hairdresser or semi-pro?[/QUOTE]Grateful Spread,
You wrote exactly what I was thinking when I made my brief comment about WG's telling "white lies" about not being WGs.
I've been with many girls who tell me they're not really WGs, as they have a full-time job but occasionally play for some P4P cash. One is the yum Goldie, another was a cute Russian girl from Dubai Grand Hotel. Both actually worked as hairdressers (I know to be true), which doesn't pay much in Dubai.
Did I think of them differently to full-tme WGs? I have to admit it: Yes.
Illogical thinking on my part, because even full-time WGs in Dubai usually have other professions or trades behind them. Many CIS WGs are university graduates, and professional lawyers, architects, teachers, etc. Most are only in Dubai for a year or three (on and off), to get some relatively big money together for themselves and family.
I've shared some crazy times with WGs, but after they become regulars and start to confide their lives to me (family, profession, etc), I just cannot bring myself to do the same things with them. Psychologically, if I think of a working girl as a working girl, I usually take our sessions to the limit and beyond (if you know what I mean). If I think of her as regular girl, I tend to hold back a bit.
Maybe that's why I avoid taking regulars nowadays. Plus, believe it or not, being a family man, I give my emotional investments to my family, and share my sport-fucking with WGs.
When is a pro not a pro? MY Point of View
[quote=Funfor Females]More on Semi Pro PRC ... Have fun but be kind and sensitive. [/quote]My initial reaction was why are you qualifying "be kind and sensitive" to semi-pros (only)? I'd say any human being responds positively to those actions.
But I found the other comments interesting.
[quote=Grateful Spread]Not uniquely because of your FR but also because I have come across WGs that prefer not to be considered as prostitutes.[/quote]The "no day-job's" know what they are doing, but everyone I've met never REALLY considered herself a [u]career[/u] prostitute - just, as GS said, as a TEMPORARY "means to an end". As Piper said, all used to have a legit job back home until factory closure, layoff, economic collapse, divorce [i]encouraged[/i] them to look elsewhere...
[quote=Grateful Spread]This week, I went with a WG from Seaview. She insisted that she worked as a hairdresser in a salon, which I have no reason to disbelieve. ... To all intents and purposes, a respectable girl in a perfectly respectable job. My perception of her however, is that of a fully fledged WG. If I had had a similar experience with her in the Harvesters or Longs, would I have had the same perception or would I have labelled her a moonlighting hairdresser or semi-pro?[/quote]Prostitute: A person who engages in sexual intercourse for money. So what difference does the [u]frequency[/u] bring to the assessment? Pro or semi-pro - is there something that I'm missing that makes one [i]better[/i] (or less stigmatized) than the other? Being slightly facetious, but the Pro does NOT have to leave EARLY in order to get ready for the legit day-job (I have pulled some moonlighters, and unless it was a Thursday night, they DID have to leave early...)
[quote=Grateful Spread]Out of all the WGs I have been with, I would count very few who are died-in-the-wool pros, i.e. detached from any human emotion, just businesswomen delivering a service for as much as she can, as often as she can. Many of them do it as a means to an end – an escape from impoverishment – and quite a few do it to supplement their meagre wages in the civilian job place. As such, shouldn't we tread carefully with all WG’s as they are just as valid as the next human being trying to get by?[/quote]Likewise, I don't think I've met any hardcore pros here. As stated, they're here to support a family back home, save up some cash for a career change on the return home. MY experience is most of the ones I've met (Dubai based, no experience with Abu Dhabi) are full time wg's - only day job might be an appearance at an afternoon's TGIT, or I do know some that are taking some (English) language classes.
Most important, I TOTALLY agree with your last line. Like I said in the first response to F4F: I don't differentiate between a WG and a human being, regardless of her [i]frequency[/i] state.
[quote=F4F]The stunner I described in the post is remarkably camera shy, for obvious reasons, like she has a good job and is really only an enthusiastic Pro/Am.[/quote][quote=Grateful Spread]I am wondering whether the more neutral backdrop of these pubs and the allusion that the girls project that they are not prostitutes somehow distorts our own perception of them.[/quote]In some ways, a [i]moonlighter[/i] has more at risk if found out. Certainly given the idiocy that abounds here, a lot of harassment at work could be expected from some customer/co-worker that happens to stumble across her moonlighting career, either by personal observation or seeing a careless photo. I'd venture to say that she is counting on the "neutral backdrop" of said pubs to provide plausible denial-ability in case she runs into "somebody".
[quote=Piper1]I've shared some crazy times with WGs, but after they become regulars and start to confide their lives to me (family, profession, etc), I just cannot bring myself to do the same things with them. Psychologically, if I think of a working girl as a working girl, I usually take our sessions to the limit and beyond (if you know what I mean). If I think of her as regular girl, I tend to hold back a bit. [/quote]No, I don't know what you mean. When you don't know her, she's just a piece of meat until, after time, maybe she evolves to become human? Tell me, how many times do you have to pull her before she becomes a person? To each his own, but for me, rather a poor commentary on yourself.
Myself, I have my own delusions in the P4P world, but they're along the lines of that classic film, [i]Risky Business[/i]. You know, when Tom Cruise is doing his marketing to his friends, "You can take her out to dinner, $50, this and that, $25 here and there; total, $100, and MAYBE you get lucky. This way, take the same amount of money for a sure thing." I've never looked down on them, considered them "less", nor done anything just because "what the hell, she's just a wg". To each his own.
===========
On a lighter note:
[quote=Badboy9613]Feel asleep. I wake up at like 11am to this AWFUL noise. What was it? The girl was Snoring LOUD! [/quote]Brought back [i]fond[/i] (well some) memories... Pulled one girl where I could not sleep AT ALL she snored so loud. Moved her to the guest bedroom - I could STILL hear her. Incredible.
