Grand Millennium: Four or Five Stars?
[QUOTE]It also depends what you consider 5 stars. The GM is described as 5 stars on WOTIF. It ain't, really. The JW though, I would think is 5 stars.[/QUOTE]The last time I stayed at the Grand Millennium I was able to book a package deal through Agoda, which included a very nice room with a killer view on the club floor, which entitled me to access to the club lounge and free internet. The folks in the club lounge were just terrific. Every morning at breakfast they greeted me warmly and fussed over my every desire. The chef made my eggs exactly to order. During the middle of the day they were only to happy to fill my ice bucket, which saved me the hassle of calling room service. (A couple of times one of the girls even slipped me a can of Diet Coke to go, even though all drinks are supposed to be consumed in the lounge.) The evening reception was a civilized way to tune up with a cocktail or two prior to heading out on the town, and to meet some people who were far more knowledgeable about the city than I. And when it came time to check out I was able to handle the formalities in the lounge while two bellmen whisked my luggage down to the car.
Does all of that rate five stars? Perhaps not. The room, while nice, was on the small side. I would have preferred a little more space, extra storage and refrigerator. The towel supply was rather modest, and for some reason there was no place to hang the wet towels if you wanted to re-use them. I suppose I could have called room service for a fresh set, but that's a bother.
That said, I think true five star hotels in Bangkok are going to be FAR more expensive that the Grand Millennium. I paid USD $169 per night all-in last December, about 5,000 baht. Booking a more lavish hotel would have cost me another $100 per day, so I didn't see the value. Finally, I think that Grand Millennium's location, so very close to Soi Cowboy, has to factor into the decision of anybody reading this forum. That's got to be worth at least half a star.
Bunky