American Politics

[QUOTE=ChrisP;2547318]Those are two completely different and separate points. Obviously your brain has difficulty differentiating between things, which is an indicator of extreme low IQ. I have never mentioned the voting machine theory. However, the black riots of last year were clearly a thing, despite the best efforts of the democrats and the fake news media to cover them up. Indeed, no less a person than Kamala Harris. The former low level San Francisco assistant district attorney who sucked and fucked the married San Francisco mayor 30 years her senior, Willie Brown, into giving her her big political break. Encouraged these riots, which caused billions of dollars of damage and lost revenue. It was therefore clearly in the minds of the Justices when they took the cowardly and laughable option in refusing to hear a major case brought by 20 of the states of the Union.

It is clearly not in your mind. Very little is.[/QUOTE]Hey Chris!

As always, your posts provide great value (of sorts), but this one stands out in my opinion. As you know, there are a lot of crazy people who think the government has business in a woman's uterus. And with some of those religious nut jobs serving on the supreme court, I started to wonder how this is going to end. But your post opened my eyes. No need to worry, these supreme court justices are just a bunch of snowflakes! Maybe we can also send some angry woman folk looting in downtown DC, for good measure? That'll scare the shit out of them. They won't dare touching Roe v Wade.

Thank you, again, for putting my mind at ease. Your posts on this board are surely one of a kind.

Yours truly.

Bblob69.

[QUOTE=Canada;2547216]You are kidding. Right this is a disgrace.[/QUOTE]This is the type of empty post Canada makes when one of many defeats his stupid utterings.

[QUOTE=ChrisP;2547332]Of course they cannot answer, so they use diversion and non-sequiturs.

This so-called "infrastructure" bill is a classic democrat / fakenews con. They call it "infrastructure" because to most people that means roads, bridges, etc. But as you have correctly pointed out, only a tiny fraction of it goes to actual infrastructure. The vast majority goes to left-wing bullshit such as green energy climate change nonsense; affirmative action welfare handouts for democrat shithole cities, etc.

This has been the democrat / media playbook for a long time. They tried to push AOC's bullshit so-called "Green New Deal" (shutting down the economy and bankrupting the country, and concentrating wealth and power in the hands of Washington, under the excuse of the fake climate change scam) but to their credit the American people rejected it. So now they push the same anti-freedom crap but call it "infrastructure", and of course the fake media goes along with it.

This is also why they have ramped up the censorship on social media, and are trying to get Fox pulled off the air. They can't debate openly; they can't allow people to openly challenge their fake socialist bullshit scams and cons. If they are honest, they get BTFO'd. Hell, even with the censorship and fake news they still lose elections, hence the need for mail-in voter fraud.[/QUOTE]Could all this anger be harvested somehow as an energy source?

[QUOTE=JohnClayton;2547390]Could all this anger be harvested somehow as an energy source?[/QUOTE]Let's do a crowdsource to buy him a bib or a bucket to retain all the foam spewing out his mouth.

You need to read your own crap you're spewing. You've answered your question.

Those other countries may or may not have and/or use mail-in voting, because they don't have backwards repressive and archaic Jim Crow type voting suppression laws.

Those other countries don't employ repressive voter suppression laws and gerrymandering voting districts, where people line up for 10+ hours to vote.

They provide voting stations that are close, nearby and at available convenient hours for all their citizens.

Many even provide the day-off work or a reduced working day to go and vote.

They actually believe, their [b]citizens voting in a more inclusive democracy is a better democracy. [/b]

[QUOTE=ChrisP;2547317]Try to read, buddy. Those countries you listed provide postal voting for citizens living *ABROAD* who have no way of getting to a poll, or in special individual cases for eligible voters which must be arranged well in advance (ie sick housebound people).

What they do not do is spam tens of millions of ballots out by regular mail to whoever, wherever, and accept them back in whatever fashion (ballot harvesting by political operatives; so-called "dropboxes" which can be filled by anyone) with no proof whatsoever that the person who ticked the boxes is the person it was sent out to. Which is how you get the count stopped at midnight in democrat cities in states where Trump is way ahead, and then suddenly hundreds of thousands of "ballots" show up at 4 am, 96% of them for Biden.

It's bullshit. For a secure election, the vast majority of votes must be cast in person in secure polling stations after showing ID. The votes must then be counted on site immediately after the close of voting, with observers from both political parties permitted to watch everything. It is not rocket science. Unfortunately none of that happened in the laughable fraud of a 2020 election.

Oh, and now the democrats and fake media are having a meltdown about Georgia securing future elections from the same kind of fraud. It's hard to tell among the oceans of bullshit they spew but it seems their argument is that black people are too stupid to get a photo ID and too lazy to wait in line to vote. Sounds pretty racist to me.[/QUOTE]

If has been alleged that millions of fraudulent votes were cast using mail-in ballots. Why haven't any meaningful number ever been found? Every ballot has the name of a registered voter tied directly to it. With millions of investigation dollars why has no group of fake ballots ever been found?

[QUOTE=ScatManDoo;2547440]If has been alleged that millions of fraudulent votes were cast using mail-in ballots. Why haven't any meaningful number ever been found? Every ballot has the name of a registered voter tied directly to it. With millions of investigation dollars why has no group of fake ballots ever been found?[/QUOTE]We were given a sideshow as Trump and a crew of shister lawyers bilked the ReTrumplicans for the funds to pay for the Hail Mary passes. But it's actually too generous to call these laughing stocks Hail Marys. The Supreme Court that Trump thought he bought of course offered no relief as his slimeball business tactics were annihiated by the courts. The last stand was plain hilarious, where a whimpering and whining Trump called Pence a "pussy" while demanding that he refuse to count some electoral votes submitted from the states. Pence though, loyal as he was knew the jig was up as the Constitution gave him no such authority. It all comes back to this photo that was circulating around at the time, that was as appropo as it gets. Sweet.

[QUOTE=ScatManDoo;2547440]If has been alleged that millions of fraudulent votes were cast using mail-in ballots. Why haven't any meaningful number ever been found? Every ballot has the name of a registered voter tied directly to it. With millions of investigation dollars why has no group of fake ballots ever been found?[/QUOTE]Don't you know? Because Damn Dems have rigged everything, why else? Like really EVERYTHING. Newspapers, TV stations, the Internet, state election agencies, governors, lawyers, judges, even the SCOTUS Trump stuffed to his liking. I mean, poor GOP, why even keep fighting since the Dems are so malevolent and omnipotent? Time to give up.

[QUOTE=Bblob69;2547359]Come on Canada, what kind of answer is this? That's not how it goes. There are lots of people reading this thread, and they want to be entertained. To make sure we are on the same page, here is the playbook, step by step.

The game starts with a Trumper posting a statement that makes people believe he is borderline demented. The equivalent of something like '2+2 = 5'. So your start was actually pretty good. Then someone who is capable of independent thought and reasoning says something equivalent to 'no no no, 2+2 is not equal to 5'. And this is where the disconnect is Canada: at this point the Trumper is supposed to fly off the handle, and supposed to post a response that makes no particular sense but abundantly uses terms like 'radical left', 'fake media', 'socialism', 'low IQ', 'Hillary', etc (extra marks for a good conspiracy theory or two). And then we go from there.

Hope this helps, you really dropped the ball there. If you need some good practical examples to tune your game: I really enjoy playing 'Trumpie' with your friend ChrisP. He seems to have a few anxiety issues, but he has no filter, and he surely is on fire this morning.[/QUOTE]Really LOL. Great playbook!

[QUOTE=ScatManDoo;2547440]If has been alleged that millions of fraudulent votes were cast using mail-in ballots. Why haven't any meaningful number ever been found? Every ballot has the name of a registered voter tied directly to it. With millions of investigation dollars why has no group of fake ballots ever been found?[/QUOTE]Unconstitutional democrat shenanigans regarding signature verification - [URL]https://lidblog.com/georgias-hand-recounts-incomplete/[/URL] - "changed the statutory requirement that the signature must match the signature on the voter registration card to simply matching the signature on the absentee ballot application. " Then once the ballot is separated from the envelope, it is gone. Steven Crowder has done some great work on tracking down some of the fake ballots that can still be traced: he sent guys out to several so-called voter addresses that don't exist.

I ask again: if mail-in voting is perfectly secure, and the idea that you can spam tens of millions of ballots out to whoever, wherever, and accept them back whenever, then why does no other democracy permit it, except in extremely rare and controlled circumstances (voters living abroad; voters who cannot physically leave their homes)?

And furthermore, the fact that the elections were altered to mass mail-in voting *WITHOUT STATE LEGISLATURE CONSENT* renders them unconstitutional. As the Supreme Court would have had to affirm, which is why they took the cowardly exit and refused to hear the case.

[QUOTE=Spidy;2547404]where people line up for 10+ hours to vote. [/QUOTE]Nobody in a single election in America has ever lined up for more than 10 hours to vote, you buffoon. Stop spewing bullshit.

[QUOTE=JohnClayton;2547390]Could all this anger be harvested somehow as an energy source?[/QUOTE]Still waiting on your clarification about the Millennium Report, buddy. You know, the one you said was written by "a guy in Leningrad" (a city which hasn't existed for 30 years but never mind), while Xpartan claims it is in fact published by David Horowitz of the Freedom Center, both of which are as American as John Wayne eating mom's apple pie. So the question is: do you still stand by your Leningrad statement? Yes or no will suffice.

[QUOTE=PVMonger;2547380]Here's a link to a country-by-country voting analysis. It shows that most countries hold voting on a weekend day or voting day is a holiday. Yes it is Wikipedia so there might be errors but the net result is that the US is in the minority re: what day the vote is held.

Your ID comment shows how out-of-touch you are. Racist, too.

The lawsuits didn't get thrown out because they lacked proof.[/QUOTE]You didn't include a link, doofus. The link in the earlier post strengthened my case as it showed all other democracies have extremely strict rules on mail-in ballots: most don't permit them at all or only for citizens living outside the country; none simply spam them out by the million as happened in the US election last year. Why do you think that might be?

The "racism" comes from people who claim blacks are incapable of obtaining an ID or unwilling to show up to vote. I am not claiming that. You are, you racist.

The main lawsuits didn't get thrown out at all, ignoramus. For them to be thrown out they would have to have been accepted in the first place, but the court refused to look at them. Most notably the suit brought by no less than 20 states of the Union, on the unconstitutionality of altering the method of election (to mass mail-in voting) without the consent of the state legislatures, but rather by executive decree or judicial fiat.

I repeat: even if you believe every single mail-in ballot was legally cast and there was zero fraud (LOL), that is entirely irrelevant. The Constitution states clearly that the method of election must be decided by the legislative branch, not the executive or judicial. The legislatures were bypassed to make the changes, rendering the election unconstitutional and invalid. It is an open and shut case, which is why the Supreme Court had to (ludicrously) refuse to hear it. You can spin and squawk all you want but that fact remains true. The so-called "election" of former vice-president Biden was unconstitutional and invalid.

[QUOTE=Xpartan;2547501]Don't you know? Because Damn Dems have rigged everything, why else? Like really EVERYTHING. Newspapers, TV stations, the Internet, state election agencies, governors, lawyers, judges, even the SCOTUS Trump stuffed to his liking. I mean, poor GOP, why even keep fighting since the Dems are so malevolent and omnipotent? Time to give up.

Really LOL. Great playbook![/QUOTE]What model tin foil hat are you wearing?

Trump lost his ass in states with Republican controlled legislatures.

Crazy you must believe it was a bipartisan election steal Hahaha.

I pointed out that there's been no one reporting that a voter had their vote changed.

I pointed out that there's been no one reporting that they did not vote, yet had a ballot with their name voting on a fake ballot.

What is your response? That signature verification was loosened.

There still would be many people who did not vote for Biden getting their official vote count as a vote foe Biden (if there was widespread fraud).

If signature confirmation was the key to theft. ,. Why still no reports of people officially voting for Biden according to the register while they claim they did not?

If that happened, wouldn't we have millions of forged signatures? Yet gop voter fraud investigators could not find any!

Nobody who's signature was challenged has subsequently come out to state their vote was altered or faked!

Voter fraud = fake news.

[QUOTE=ChrisP;2547562]You didn't include a link, doofus. The link in the earlier post strengthened my case as it showed all other democracies have extremely strict rules on mail-in ballots: most don't permit them at all or only for citizens living outside the country; none simply spam them out by the million as happened in the US election last year. Why do you think that might be?[/QUOTE]It was in the news.

Called a pandemic. That resulted in changes.

Not a vast bipartisan conspiracy to steal an election.

[QUOTE=ChrisP;2547557]Still waiting on your clarification about the Millennium Report, buddy. You know, the one you said was written by "a guy in Leningrad" (a city which hasn't existed for 30 years but never mind), while Xpartan claims it is in fact published by David Horowitz of the Freedom Center, both of which are as American as John Wayne eating mom's apple pie. So the question is: do you still stand by your Leningrad statement? Yes or no will suffice.[/QUOTE]Sorry for the delay -- I had to do something far more important like eat a popscicle or take a shit. I will get back to you!