Pattaya Reports

[QUOTE=Socker;2198228]I'm a hater of fake tits too but I find the fakes in Thailand are far superior than any other country I've partaken. They hang natural, they're soft and mushy and if the girl has nice pale skin they look superb. The only shortcoming is there might be a small scar on the bottoms or they feel a little lumpy but this has been minor in the dancers I've hired.

The one in the red is from SC and the nude is from Pattaya, both were very pretty. The overall experiences were subpar but their tits were nice. I find the Thai / Asian fakes to be the most natural and sexiest looking.[/QUOTE]Personally, breast don't matter to me at all. And there is nothing worse than mommy tits. I'll take a great ass and legs over tits any day of the week. Don't get me wrong, they can be a nice bonus, but chances are I'm not going to pay much attention to them anyway. Now the bits between the legs; that's a different matter altogether. I've read a few studies about breast me vs ass men and the personality profiles are indeed very different. I tend to get along with my fellow ass men far better than I do breast men.

[QUOTE=Goatscrot;2198584]Personally, breast don't matter to me at all. And there is nothing worse than mommy tits. I'll take a great ass and legs over tits any day of the week. Don't get me wrong, they can be a nice bonus, but chances are I'm not going to pay much attention to them anyway. Now the bits between the legs; that's a different matter altogether. I've read a few studies about breast me vs ass men and the personality profiles are indeed very different. I tend to get along with my fellow ass men far better than I do breast men.[/QUOTE]I am a full body man. I like playing with every part of the girl's body, including the tits, during foreplay. My main problem with implants is that the girl does not usually like them being frigged.

It's always the face that attracts me first. I like pretty faces that are natural with not too much makeup. Then it's the body overall and it's proportionality. I like nice breasts, no sillies, flat tummy, no fat and nice thin legs all working together complimenting one another for a natural, slim, healthy girl feminine look. I like slender asses too, but I am not into large butts at all. I know some guys like the large ass. To each his own.

But when the clothes come off what I really love is the vagina, then shapely breasts and nipples from the very small to medium size, and lastly healthy, fresh looking skin. Ultimately there is something about the vagina, its hard to put into words what exactly turns me on or to describe how I distinguish a beautiful tempting vagina from a not so beautiful or plain one. Ha Ha. But when I see a beautiful pussy, I am in desire mode and I have to go down on it. BTW, I have never seen a a beautiful vagina on an ugly or plain girl, although I have had great fitting vaginas on plain girls, but sadly once in a while I have come across a smelly vagina on an otherwise attractive girl with pretty face and sexy body. It's too bad when that happens. It ruins everything.

[QUOTE=NattyBumpo;2198789]It's always the face that attracts me first. ... I like nice breasts, no sillies, flat tummy, no fat and nice thin legs all working together complimenting one another for a natural, slim, healthy girl feminine look. I like slender asses too, ...[/QUOTE]Could it be that being into faces implied you were more likely to be into tits as well? In that case there would roughly be two types of guys: upper-body guys and lower-body guys. The latter, to whom myself and Goatscrot below belong, would be into legs + asses.

On the street I can't say for sure whether I'd like to bed a girl or not before she's passed me and I've turned to look back.

As a lower-body guy online dating media don't work for me at all. Online platforms put faces and tits at a premium. They don't even allow the showing of legs and asses most of the time even if girls were willing to show them.

I've met men who are not at all into asses. They tend to be men from certain parts of the world like the middle-east and Asia. Such men would consider acceptable girls with what I regard as disastrous lower bodies, girls who might as well be cripple from the waist down. I wouldn't be comfortable in the street with such a girl. In fact I'd rather she were next to me in a wheel-chair so that her tapering ass is hidden from public attention. Those men are serious about being attracted to such girls though I'd challenge them to sponsor those girls to become pole dancers or lap dancers. Do they know such girls would get laughed out of the stage? Of course the other side of the medal is that provided they have good lower bodies I would hop into bed with women whose faces could be offputting to many men, like women maybe with androgenous faces, and of course with women with virtually no tits to speak of. I guess too men who are into lower bodies are not likely to be into kissing, girl-friend sex or cuddling, but I may be wrong and only speaking for myself.

[QUOTE=XXL;2198798]Could it be that being into faces implies you are more likely to be into tits as well? In that case there would roughly be two types of guys: upper-body guys and lower-body guys. The latter, to whom myself and Goatscrot below belong, would be into legs + asses.

As a lower-body guy online dating media don't work for me at all. Online platforms put faces and tits at a premium. They don't even allow the showing of legs and asses most of the time even if girls were willing to show them.[/QUOTE]Yeah, upper body - that's me until we are lying together naked in bed. Then I am a pussy man through and through, although she still has to have a pretty face and breasts I want to come home to as we shag. I put a premium on pretty faces. That's why I don't visit Tulip or SW anymore.

Some guys prefer anal fucking and CIM over vaginal sex. Not me brother.

[QUOTE=XXL;2198810]The anal vs vaginal is a different dichotomy. Nothing to do with upper vs lower body. The anus is at the same height above sea-level as the pussy.[/QUOTE]Your analysis is getting too technical for me. Vaginas vs asses: the former I find erotic and beautiful. The latter I find utilitarian. So for sex I prefer the vagina. If just feels better to me. Simple. I am not much into rim jobs either - receiving or giving.

Fully clothed I can't evaluate a girl's vagina. I can't even be real sure of quality in a nudie bar. It's not until we are lying in bed together that I know for sure what I've got and what I am going to do with it. So for me, it is a 2 stage process. 1st stage in the bar, club, massage parlor or even out on the street I look at her face first and then her body proportionality to see if I am attracted. I presume you, on the other hand, would score more points for a girl's butt and legs than I do. Hence we would find different girls more or less attractive although, since we both like Asian girls, there would be some degree of agreement (perhaps not large) in our individual assessment of a girl's looks too. For example I see punters with different tastes and preferences in girls in the Go Go's all the time. Some guys are really, really happy with girls I wouldn't shag for free and I am pretty sure they wouldn't be too interested in my kind of girls. It comes down to whatever turns you on is what you will get in BKK.

[QUOTE=NattyBumpo;2198815]Your analysis is getting too technical for me. Vaginas vs asses: the former I find erotic and beautiful. The latter I find utilitarian. So for sex I prefer the vagina. If just feels better to me. Simple. I am not much into rim jobs either - receiving or giving. .[/QUOTE]When a man says he is into girls asses I don't think he means he is into anal, or my perception of English is failing me here.

This is not to say there might not be a connection between being attracted to women's lower bodies and being into, say, performing rim jobs on women but the anal vs vaginal sex controversy was, it seems to me, not relevant here.

[QUOTE=XXL;2198822]When a man says he is into girls asses I don't think he means he is into anal, or my perception of English is failing me here. This is not to say there might not be a connection between being attracted to women's lower bodies and being into, say, rim jobs but the anal vs vaginal sex controversy was not relevant here.[/QUOTE]OK. I see your point. There might be a connection for some and there might not be for others.

[QUOTE=XXL;2198822]When a man says he is into girls asses I don't think he means he is into anal, or my perception of English is failing me here.

This is not to say there might not be a connection between being attracted to women's lower bodies and being into, say, performing rim jobs on women but the anal vs vaginal sex controversy was, it seems to me, not relevant here.[/QUOTE]Agree 100%. I love a nice round but not big ass as part of the looks package, but zero desire to fuck it.

XXL you would love the format of Brazilian escort ads. They lead with an ass picture, like all the rest is secondary. LOL. They have a different aesthetic and genes down there though. Some of these girls have huge solid not fat ass and tiny waist. It looks almost alien to me.

See photoacompahantes (not sure if com or net) to see the ass menu. Quite extensive!

[QUOTE=MrEnternational;2196921]What! Exchange rates have NOTHING to do with the price of pussy in Thailand, a non-taxed DOMESTIC good / service. If that was true then it would also affect the price of durian, taxi rides, and rent. My rent has remained the exact same 4500 baht for the past 8 years. Why is that? The price of pussy has only gone up for people that like to get chicks from gogo bars. I am still giving freelancers 1000 baht LT, the same as I was the first day I set foot in Pattaya in 2007.[/QUOTE]If his money is invested in the UK and he has to transfer it in to Thailand then he has to pay an exchange rate on it. Thus things cost more for him.

If he is earning money while in Thailand then you are correct.

For me it is the face that attracts me first. More precisely the eyes and smile. If I can see a brightness, a sign of laughter in her eyes and then a true smile on her face when we make eye contact it is a good start for me. I will forgive a couple of kilos overweight, small boobs or some other characteristic that does not make her a 10.

We all have different expectations, standards and taste but for me attitude over looks anyday.

Give me a 6-8 who is fun and gives me a time over a 10 that is up herself and doesn't perform.

Boobs or asses? All part of the package LOL.

[QUOTE=RobJones;2198877]For me it is the face that attracts me first. More precisely the eyes and smile. If I can see a brightness, a sign of laughter in her eyes and then a true smile on her face when we make eye contact it is a good start for me. I will forgive a couple of kilos overweight, small boobs or some other characteristic that does not make her a 10. We all have different expectations, standards, and taste but for me, attitude over looks any day. Boobs or asses? All part of the package LOL.[/QUOTE]I disagree! The body is the only thing I need. We use the butta-face term correct? My ex-wife had a snaggle teeth, ugly mug, and I think she scared our infant son a couple times! Her body, on the other hand, was very fucking nice. Every time I wanted to dump her she would put on a skin-tight skirt and just walk around jiggling in front of me. I'm very forgiving a face for a nice long GFE shag with a great hourglass body. Tits and bubble ass rule!

[QUOTE=NakedGunz;2198883]I disagree! The body is the only thing I need. We use the butta-face term correct? My ex-wife had a snaggle teeth, ugly mug, and I think she scared our infant son a couple times! Her body, on the other hand, was very fucking nice. Every time I wanted to dump her she would put on a skin-tight skirt and just walk around jiggling in front of me. I'm very forgiving a face for a nice long GFE shag with a great hourglass body. Tits and bubble ass rule![/QUOTE]I like to fuck with lights on LOL. As I said each to his own. If we all liked the same type of girl there would be a shortage.

[QUOTE=RobJones;2198897]I like to fuck with lights on LOL. As I said each to his own. If we all liked the same type of girl there would be a shortage.[/QUOTE]Can't we as a forum of men, be pragmatic and honest and just admit " I like to fuck ugly chicks ". This "all women are beautiful" crap belongs among women. Yeah, there are different flavours of hooker, but the hot one's are still hot and the ugly still ugly.

[QUOTE=Blanquiceleste;2198032]RB you took the words out of my mouth. Last year I wrote a report about availability of pussy against price points along with a commentary on their value for money (from my perspective). I find the girls from beer bars the most suitable. This is also partly because a large majority of girls in Gogos have implants and tattoos and other habits that turn me off. And a sizeable number have pretty undesirable attitudes. Last year I had gone out with BB and UV to a few Gogo bars over 2 days, but did not barfine a single chick. Yes, I was generous with drinks and I groped the girls I was buying drinks for, but did not bother to take them out. Instead, each night I found a new girl from many of the beer bars that dot the town.[/QUOTE]Interesting, I usually found beer bars to have nothing but middle aged women who are not attractive.