Montreal

[QUOTE=ChubzyMaximus;2210640]My understanding of Charlotte from MM is that she finds reviews degrading. Well, LOL......................
Maybe Wyatt can go see Charlotte and get her to change her mind?[/QUOTE]Interesting. That's probably it.

I thought perhaps that because she's a squirter she never wanted that publicized. I could see some of these local guys showing up with an arsenal of toys and gadgets trying to turn Charlotte's body into a water park. What girl needs that kind of pressure? Perhaps some guys are turned-off by it.

This is where YMMV certainly comes into play. Some guys are offered anal, some are not. Some guys are DFKed intensely other get a bit of LFK. Some guys are squirted on, some are not.

You definitely see YMMV with some of the new girls. Some of the new girls never establish consistent service. Some of the girls respond to the feedback and turn it up a notch. The bombshell Heaven didn't have the reputation for solid performance awhile back pre-Euphoria.

Thanks for the help.

A simpler question, is it OK to show up at an incall session dressed clean but casually? Like shorts and running shoes.

[QUOTE=StrawMan83;2210962]Thanks for the help.

A simpler question, is it OK to show up at an incall session dressed clean but casually? Like shorts and running shoes.[/QUOTE]Yes, definitely. That is the standard John attire in the summer and your clothes come off very quickly.

I second the recommendation of April Rose of Mike's Mansion and Sonia and Hannah of the Unicorns particularly if you have a fetish you want to explore.

Someone in the thread was under the impression that Sonia is a Girl Next Door facially, but she shows a lot of her face on Twitter and I think she is very pretty. Of course I enjoy fetishes, so that likely makes her more attractive to me.

[QUOTE=Xtc2018M;2210700]
Silly question: Which is the best agency for new-in-biz girls? I tend to go with girls who are starting fresh with no reviews and I generally have more luck in terms of getting what I like. Any suggestion?[/QUOTE]Tough call. Truly new girls don't have pics. In any other market, this would be a red flag (plus I have very specific tastes LOL). My perusal of Vogue, XO &Euphoria web sites shows an equal proportion of new, no photo girls. If a girl has professional photos, changes are large she's not 'new'.

I'd say you'the have a pretty good chance of getting somebody pretty cute with any of the agencies.

The other thing, if you have time, is to befriend the bookers at the agencies and let you preferences be known. They will attempt to satisfy I bet.

[QUOTE=Xtc2018M;2210700]Silly question: Which is the best agency for new-in-biz girls? I tend to go with girls who are starting fresh with no reviews and I generally have more luck in terms of getting what I like. Any suggestion?[/QUOTE]If you like true newbies, you really need to have a conversation with the booker. Some of the "new" girls at the big agencies get recruited from smaller, lesser known agencies and just change their names. Surprisingly, a few girls come out of Montreal's massage parlor scene.

[QUOTE=WyattEarp;2211211]If you like true newbies, you really need to have a conversation with the booker. Some of the "new" girls at the big agencies get recruited from smaller, lesser known agencies and just change their names. Surprisingly, a few girls come out of Montreal's massage parlor scene.[/QUOTE]One good thing that has occurred in the Montreal scene in the last five years is an increase in the marketing concept of Branding. There is a greater conformity regarding facial looks, body style, age of provider, and GFE services at certain Montreal agencies, particularly at XO, Euphoria and Vogue. That has good and bad points. If he wants the "prototype" Montreal college coed GFE experience. He can probably feel pretty safe booking anyone from them, although my preference is still toward booking a highly reviewed lady. Most are still in their 20's, so they ain't old and washed up, even if they have 50 reviews.

Many other Montreal agencies have several ladies that are just as good or better than those big three agencies that seem to emphasize Branding. My favorite in Montreal was with Wildtime, but she isn't on the roster currently. And Mikes Mansion has some of the hottest ladies in town and also does Branding to an extent, but has a slightly greater variance between ladies in my opinion than the other three. You kind of have to treat the Unicorns as a statistical outlier, since not everyone is into fetish. If you are, they are the best.

At one time, that wasn't the case. I got a threesome once with the Montreal Satin Dreamz agency, and one lady Carmen was in the top 10 percent of providers I have ever seen, and the other lady was an abnormal acting beast. I had the beast leave halfway through the session to enjoy Carmen. I had originally booked Carmen and another highly rated lady, but the agency insisted on a last minute substitution. That is the kind of bullshit that probably scares the new guy asking questions, and makes some of us much more prone to only seeing highly reviewed ladies. And it is a good point about Branding.

I suppose the bad points are that it may be more likely to result in price increases as competition, or the perception of competition, declines as a few big players dominate the market. And it makes us less likely to try new things that we may like. The milfs, heavier girls, and Goths often go to more eclectic agencies or to agencies that have a lot more of them, and it is easy to forget about trying them if all the attention is focused on three agencies who don't tend to work with them. And of course the CBJ only ladies find it frustrating to work in a market, and with an agency, where BBBJ is expected.

But for the most part, I think the marketing concept of Branding is good. I often mention the story of two consecutive evening in Buenos Aires, where the same agency sent me a GFE girl who looked like Phoebe Cates while she acted in Fast Times at Ridgemont High. The next night (afternoon, actually), they said only one lady was available. She was the grossest, skankiest lady I have ever been with (I think she was non-GFE, but I insisted on that, anyway) and she actually stole the toilet paper from the room. I am not kidding.

In Barcelona, you can read the reviews of what I call the big commercial line-up brothels (in comparison to the small appointment-only brothels that I prefer), and find one guy who honestly said he had the best sexual experience at one of them one night, and the worst sexual experience at the same place the next night. The smaller places do more Branding, and you don't get that. The ladies at many smaller places are of similar age, looks, and do BBBJ as standard. One of the reasons that a lot of guys going to the big commercial line-up brothels in Barcelona seem to look for the new girls is that new ladies are less likely to try to upsell GFE service to tourists. This upselling totally ruins the review system, if the preference is for new ladies with no reviews. Once again, most customers on the local Barcelona review board are expressing a preference for two active groups, Vecinitasbcn and teensbcn, who are doing the exact type of marketing Branding that I described with respect to the Montreal agencies I mentioned. When all the ladies are similar and have excellent reviews, there is confidence in choosing any of them.

When the marketing concept of Branding works it is very beneficial to customers who are looking for a certain prototype session. The key is for there to be enough competition and a lack of upselling. Right now it seems to be working extraordinarily well in Montreal.

Just got back from a few days in Montreal. Got the bait and switch feeling with XO all week. Booked for the week, everyday last minute cancel then get a list of who's available.

XO canceled 5 appointments in 4 days and only offered incall for all the more popular ladies (anyone over $220). Shelly, Shelly, Amanda, Katie, Elena and Dakota All got canceled last minute. Saw Safia (after Elena canceled) & Meghan. Both were subpar. Safia. Looks 6, personality-5, performance-5 Just wanted to do the bare minimum and go, has invasiline plastic braces in, couldn't do BBBJ much, and also kept coughing the entire hour (I hope I don't get sick from her). Wanted to upsell 3 some with her friends. Stay away. Meghan- didn't see all the beauty everyone was raving about, she is thicker than I pictured. I rate her face GND or a 7, performance was -6.5 personality was OK - 7 . I was the first of the day, got the code to go in at 12:15, by 12:50 she's asking me to finish up. I wasn't feeling it with her so I just finished up and left. If your the first of the day and she drags. Its on you. I had another booking with her the next day, but I canceled it. Would not repeat with her. Just my perspective not trying to start a argument with anyone.

Vogue, Euphoria & Velveltlove were all easy and great to book with. Euphoria seems to have the best looking girls. Most of the girls I saw were reviewed here already and if its basically the same I'll leave it out. I'll just add anything different.

Eiley. Euphoria - young inexperienced & hot as hell. Face - 8. 5 with her hair down 9. Performance - 7, BBBJ CIM ($40) was good. Has clit and nipple rings. This girl could be a model.

Eley. Vogue - My fav of the trip, repeated with her twice. A little older (27?) but great personality- 9 , and performance-9 looks -7 BBBJ CIM (50).

Paige. Velevt love- Cute, tried to please. Looks -7.5, personality - 7, performance- 7.

Sweet Kylie. Velvet love. Goth chick look with the dark hair and pale skin. Skinnier than pics, has a annoying giggle, but tries to please. DT BBBJ porn style, so much eye contact I had to look away. LOL She had bad breath the day she saw me and it was 5 or 6 pm after a day of shopping for her. For those who do DFK, good luck here.

Erika. Really sweet girl, has a little acne on the face, really tries to please. Likes to get off rubbing her clit during the session. Looks - 7.5, Performance 7.5 personality - 8.5 - she has the Micheal Jackson skin issue down there, its a bit discolored. Might be a turnoff for some.

I'm not sure if I should of disclosed such personal issues / details of the providers. Not sure if its breaking any unsaid rules. PM me if I am. I will edit. But, I'm just including info that I would like to know if I were booking one of them.

[QUOTE=JellyBelly;2211387]Just got back from a few days in Montreal. Got the bait and switch feeling with XO all week. Booked for the week, everyday last minute cancel then get a list of who's available.

XO canceled 5 appointments in 4 days and only offered incall for all the more popular ladies (anyone over $220). Shelly, Shelly, Amanda, Katie, Elena and Dakota All got canceled last minute. Saw Safia (after Elena canceled) & Meghan. Both were subpar. Safia. Looks 6, personality-5, performance-5 Just wanted to do the bare minimum and go, has invasiline plastic braces in, couldn't do BBBJ much, and also kept coughing the entire hour (I hope I don't get sick from her). Wanted to upsell 3 some with her friends. Stay away. Meghan- didn't see all the beauty everyone was raving about, she is thicker than I pictured. I rate her face GND or a 7, performance was -6.5 personality was OK - 7 . I was the first of the day, got the code to go in at 12:15, by 12:50 she's asking me to finish up..[/QUOTE]Thanks for reviews mate.

I too tried to see Shelly and only incalls were offered. Let me ask you, what was the duration of action you were requesting? I know if you request a minimum 2 Hour booking you increase your likelihood. Logistically speaking, it is a lot easier for a provider to stay in an incall an and see clients. Logistically it's easier on the agency as well as transport in and from outcall can be delayed due to notorious Montreal traffic. The agency may be able to fit in another client in all that time it takes transporting the provider back and forth.

Heard Amanda comes out for an outcall if it's 2 hours min. Perhaps death man can shed light on this? Someone has mentioned on the other board that Jamie will come out for 3 Hour bookings if she's not on schedule. Well at least for some. Problem is some of us can't afford that. Also, what if you don't click with the provider? In that scenario, shit even 1 Hour is torture. I had Scarlett for a two hour outcall. The time flew by easy with her. Same with Hanna.

I had mentioned in a earlier post somewhere that safia is a francophone. What was your assessment of her level of English. Her reviews are quite variable and others have mentioned she's quite beautiful. Do you think language was an issue or not really?

Jelly Belly, great reviews. You are entitled to your different perspective. Things here at ISG are more open. You could get some flack from a local wandering into the conversation, but they have no clout here nor do they have the free rein to shout you down. I have joked about how Montreal must have 9's walking everywhere while in my major city I could walk around all day and never see a girl who is a 9 looker.

I'm disappointed that XO gave you the run around. I think that has come up in discussions including the clock-watching in various places, but it is certainly not allowed to go too far on the green board. Mongerer88 is a student, or more accurately professor, of the MTL scene. He might have something to add.

I do want to question one comment. "Euphoria seems to have the best looking girls. " While it's obviously subjective, how did you come to that conclusion?

I was thinking. You know that thing you do when you talk to yourself without moving your mouth. Anyway, I wondered what the Bell Curve says about the 1-10 scale. This is in regards to, as you would guess, the subjective rating system that most men understand and practice.

The Bell Curve says that only 4% of a population is a 9 or higher. An additional 7% are an 8. 12% score a 7. So roughly a quarter of women are 7 or higher.

Based on my experience, the Bell Curve would be about right for the general population. Given that the top agencies are probably a superior representation of the young female population, it's likely their line-ups are made up of 7's, 8's and a few 9's. My personal opinion would be over 90% of the girls are 7's and 8's. Perhaps you could unscientifically double the 4% above and say 1 out of 12 girls at the top agencies are a 9. Perhaps 1 in 10 when a top agency has had a good run of recruiting and retention. I'm contrasting this with the deluge of 9's that are thrown around on the local board. Does anyone have a different opinion?

[QUOTE=WyattEarp;2211549]Jelly Belly, great reviews. You are entitled to your different perspective. Things here at ISG are more open. You could get some flack from a local wandering into the conversation, but they have no clout here nor do they have the free rein to shout you down. I have joked about how Montreal must have 9's walking everywhere while in my major city I could walk around all day and never see a girl who is a 9 looker.

I'm disappointed that XO gave you the run around. I think that has come up in discussions including the clock-watching in various places, but it is certainly not allowed to go too far on the green board. Mongerer88 is a student, or more accurately professor, of the MTL scene. He might have something to add.

I do want to question one comment. "Euphoria seems to have the best looking girls. " While it's obviously subjective, how did you come to that conclusion?[/QUOTE]Thanks for the feedback, just wanted to contribute. I got a lot of info and laughs from this board.

My friends saw a bunch of girls from Euphoria (I stood outside the door right before they arrive to check them out) Bailey stood out- beautiful face, hear her service and attitude were both great. Both of my friends also thought Euphoria was above the rest (of course personal opinions and depending on who they saw).

Forgot to mention I saw Leyla from vogue who looks exactly like Marrisa Tome when she was 21. I actually googles a pic of a younger Marrisa Tome put it up side my side with her face. Looks exactly like her. Wanted to take a pic, but she won't let me ([URL]https://www.google.com/search?q=marisa[/URL]+tomei&rlz=1 CAACAU_enUS786 US786&tbm=isch&tbo=you&source=univ&sa=X&ved=2 ahUKEwjbvbq2 l-jcAhVGm-AKHV-jB90 QiR56 BAgHEBo&biw=1591&bih=925#imgrc=zpkprNtq9 HXJKM:).

She won the prettiest face of my trip award. Her body is a 6, she's a little thick, small a cups, skin bumpy from shaving. Service was standard. Fun personality. Seems really street smart.

I spent way too much time on this post but lots to argue about here LOL. Mostly in the numbers tho not in the general methodology.

First I'the argue that the mean of the population of all women, all ages, is less than 5.

Second, in my experience, when dealing with personal preference (art, food, music, wine, feminine beauty) it's not normally distributed (bell curve) but skewed with a long right tail.

Third you don't state the standard deviation (sigma). If the mean of all women is 5 and SD is 1, then your number are way off.

In that case, the chance of finding a 6 or higher is only 16%, 7 or higher 2% and an 8 or higher is 0. 13% or pretty close to 1 in a thousand. The chances of a 9. 0 is 2 in 10 thousand! (Meaning there are 52 9's in all of Montreal). I can't find a calculator that won't round the odds of a 9. 5 off to zero.

The math is little more realistic if you assign a 7 to the average SW. In that case, the odds of a 9 are about 2%.

Then I did it backwards (bayseian). If heaven is. 9. 5 and I judge that only about 5% of the other girls on the agency sites are about that rating (I actually took 10 minutes to do a survey of the main 4 agencies web sites). It makes the average escort an 8 more or less with 67% between 7 and 9.

Thus ends today's statistics lesson.

[QUOTE=WyattEarp;2211571]

The Bell Curve says that only 4% of a population is a 9 or higher. An additional 7% are an 8. 12% score a 7. So roughly a quarter of women are 7 or higher.

Based on my experience, the Bell Curve would be about right for the general population. Given that the top agencies are probably a superior representation of the young female population, it's likely their line-ups are made up of 7's, 8's and a few 9's. My personal opinion would be over 90% of the girls are 7's and 8's. Perhaps you could unscientifically double the 4% above and say 1 out of 12 girls at the top agencies are a 9. Perhaps 1 in 10 when a top agency has had a good run of recruiting and retention. I'm contrasting this with the deluge of 9's that are thrown around on the local board. Does anyone have a different opinion?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=HarvestBoi;2211649]I spent way too much time on this post but lots to argue about here LOL. Mostly in the numbers tho not in the general methodology.

Thus ends today's statistics lesson.[/QUOTE]A couple of weeks without pussy or a bottle of wine or two and even your 6 becomes an instant ten, so there goes all the statistics out the window.

[QUOTE=WyattEarp;2211571]I was thinking. You know that thing you do when you talk to yourself without moving your mouth. Anyway, I wondered what the Bell Curve says about the 1-10 scale.....

...The Bell Curve says that only 4% of a population is a 9 or higher. An additional 7% are an 8. 12% score a 7. So roughly a quarter of women are 7 or higher.
[/QUOTE]Well there is probably a lot of bias. You are more likely to write a review about a girl you enjoyed more than usual (likely on the local board) or a girl you did not (not likely on the local board as you would smited by the local white knights).

For example, guy 1 sees a girl that was incredible in terms of looks and service, a true 9 for him. He is going to write a review on her. Guy 2 sees the same girl and has an okay experience l, good, not amazing, a 7. He does not feel inclined to write a review, because it didn't really stand out. Guy 3 has a horrible experience and writes a negative review. His post is deleted and he is banned and exiled. Thus only 1 review remains, even though there was 3 opinions.

Greetings,

I'm planning a trip to Montreal and can't wait. I will be looking into the European and quebecois talent for sure. But also am curious as to the exotic talent. I love ebony, Latina & Asian (as well as European) - all for different reasons. I heard Trina (formerly at XO) was great. But she is no longer on the website unfortunately. I wonder if she moved to another agency? Has anyone seen Asia from XXXtase? Any other ebony suggestions would be greatly appreciated!