FKK Sharks - Darmstadt

[QUOTE=Hyperion2007;2793159]Much less customers than my last visit 3 weeks ago, probably linked to this be the last weekend of the month. But almost the same number of girls, between 80 and 90. So for the few men in attendance, it was very nice. 7 rooms this trip:

Beyonce:.....

Brenda (x2): ....

Kathryn: ....

Liv: .....

Melissa (x2):...

Less new girls that my last three trips, so I was more focused on my regulars. To be noted there is a massive improvement in the restaurant for the service at 5 pm. The food is better and more importantly with much more diversity.[/QUOTE]Great report, I can say we have same taste for girls, Liv I didn't want to try as she is not my type, Kendra. Her friend- is exactly my type.

Mara is a friend of Kathryn and a better provider, you should try.

Supermodel mean in fashion taller than 1. 77 , so Melissa is not tall enough, but I m pretty sure she would make little riot among poor Globe casting, even she lost a bit freshness for face. So cute, lovely, full fresh natural with no tattoo Sena seen on 18/19 February would be a queen of GFE for who is able, at Globe. Better looks at Sharks than Globe, but I need more than only Roxette song: The look. But my girl should return. I will wait for her rare quality for me, charming lovely full natural real supermodel she could really be in fashion.

[QUOTE=SobeLizard;2793036]Why do you like talking about your Pecker so much?[/QUOTE]FKK land of small size and pussies, even for most tall of 2 sexes. What I see weekly.

[QUOTE=HammerTime96;2793176]Eva (RO) who stands at the beginning of the bar. Besides, I really like Eva's optics; pretty face with gorgeous eyes, beautiful natural breasts, sexy waist, great long legs and a nice ass, unfortunately she decided a few years ago to get a bunch of stupid tattoos. I told her back then, "don't do it!" but you know: women, they have a mind of their own! LOL![/QUOTE]Now she has a damn big and ugly tattoo between belly and hips: a big dog head. "LOL". Eva is pretty much one of the dumbest girls at Sharks. She asked me once if I would be so nice to bring a bar of chocolate for her at my next visit. When I did her the favor and presented her a big bar of milk chocolate, she was annoyed, looked at me with a sour expression in her face and said: "I prefer chocolate with nuts!" 😠 Why didn't she say that before? I think she seems to like to lick her customers' nuts too. 😅.

[QUOTE=BarryManila;2793422]Now she has a damn big and ugly tattoo between belly and hips: a big dog head. "LOL". [/QUOTE]Yeah, I have no idea what these girls are thinking when they get all those tattoos. They are probably not thinking at all, LOL!

It's almost impossible to find a woman [U]without[/U] tattoos in Sharks.

One of the worst was that Romanian gypsy chick with those pistols tattooed on her hips (last time I saw her was before the Plandemic) and Alice (RO) also looks quite ridiculous with one fully tattooed arm, and the opposite leg is also fully tattooed. (plus various other tattoos of course) Or Julie (MOL) or Renate (RO) with one of those 'eagles' tattooed underneath their breasts, or Abby (RO) with some strange diamond shape between her titties.

WHY the fuck do women do this to themselves? When I was young, truck drivers and football hooligans had tattoos, not sexy women!

Some guys here will say "yeah, but you still fuck them so you must like it," but they forget that there is unfortunately not very much choice if you like the hourglass voluptuous pornstar shape of girls. The silhouette is one thing, but those huge ugly drawings on their skin are another thing, and are unfortunately part of the deal.

[QUOTE=BarryManila;2793422]Now she has a damn big and ugly tattoo between belly and hips: a big dog head. "LOL". Eva is pretty much one of the dumbest girls at Sharks. She asked me once if I would be so nice to bring a bar of chocolate for her at my next visit. When I did her the favor and presented her a big bar of milk chocolate, she was annoyed, looked at me with a sour expression in her face and said: "I prefer chocolate with nuts!" Why didn't she say that before? I think she seems to like to lick her customers' nuts too.[/QUOTE]I don't know who she is, but funny experience when these girls won't reach Nobel award.

[QUOTE=HammerTime96;2793519]Yeah, I have no idea what these girls are thinking when they get all those tattoos. They are probably not thinking at all, LOL!

It's almost impossible to find a woman [U]without[/U] tattoos in Sharks.

One of the worst was that Romanian gypsy chick with those pistols tattooed on her hips (last time I saw her was before the Plandemic) and Alice (RO) also looks quite ridiculous with one fully tattooed arm, and the opposite leg is also fully tattooed. (plus various other tattoos of course) Or Julie (MOL) or Renate (RO) with one of those 'eagles' tattooed underneath their breasts, or Abby (RO) with some strange diamond shape between her titties.

WHY the fuck do women do this to themselves? When I was young, truck drivers and football hooligans had tattoos, not sexy women!

Some guys here will say "yeah, but you still fuck them so you must like it," but they forget that there is unfortunately not very much choice if you like the hourglass voluptuous pornstar shape of girls. The silhouette is one thing, but those huge ugly drawings on their skin are another thing, and are unfortunately part of the deal.[/QUOTE]Kity, both Katalea, Alina, Sabrina, Kalila, Roxy, supermodel frenchie, Sena, Oulia. At, Alisha. Hu and I m sure also many others I don't know are without tattoo nor silicon, and many others with no silicon and only small tattoes like Melissa, Jasmin and many others. Much more difficult to find at Globe where girls are more expensive to pay silicon and tattoes.

[QUOTE=Hyperion2007;2793159]Much less customers than my last visit 3 weeks ago, probably linked to this be the last weekend of the month. But almost the same number of girls, between 80 and 90. So for the few men in attendance, it was very nice. 7 rooms this

Kathryn: romanian, between 22 and 25 years old, 1 m65/70, slim, be-cup breasts, long brown hair. In the club for 4 years, with the name Anastasia before the lockdown. It's been a long time that I think to go with her but she have a reputation of bad rooms. I would say that for the blowjob and the sex she is on the low average of Sharks. She tried to shorten the room, less than 20 minutes after the start she said that we were close to the end. I gained 5 more minutes but it's a clear indicator that she is to ...[/QUOTE]Wonderful report. We haven't seen such kind of reports for long time. Before pandemic, there used to be some regular visitors, such as YamaYama, BadinSweet, Uncleox, Tanktank, Bitumen, Jnpr30, etc, provided many reports of distinction. We wish we could see more and more such good reports soon.

About Catherine (used to named Anastasia pre-pandemic), I think she is good but sometimes moody. She is still very young, 21/22 yo. I went to room with her a few weeks ago. She was very friendly to me. Service wise was very standard but I rated above average at least. No upsell anus. 300 for2 hous. We stayed in room for about 1 hour55 min.

Brenda is longtime old friend. Not any fresh feelings as Roxi. Of course she is nice to me.

[QUOTE=HammerTime96;2793176][B]So, the Golden Rule here is: DO NOT EXCHANGE NUMBERS and avoid this potential mess completely![/B][/QUOTE]Fortunately for me I've never had any such problems. And if I did, then I would just block a tute! I've exchanged numbers with so many girls and it was indeed a great way to stay in touch and get some pictures too hahaha! So I for one won't be adopting your golden rule. I think the worst situation I had was a Filipina girl who kept calling me in the States from Manila like at 3 am in the morning my time and waking me up and shit! I asked her to please stop it and to take into account the time zone difference when calling. Of course a lot of good that did. I may as well had been talking to a brick wall. I finally decided to block her ass and that was that! But not before I got me some pics. Ha!

[QUOTE=HappyTour;2793590]Wonderful report. We haven't seen such kind of reports for long time. Before pandemic, there used to be some regular visitors, such as YamaYama, BadinSweet, Uncleox, Tanktank, Bitumen, Jnpr30, etc, provided many reports of distinction. We wish we could see more and more such good reports soon.

About Catherine (used to named Anastasia pre-pandemic), I think she is good but sometimes moody. She is still very young, 21/22 yo. I went to room with her a few weeks ago. She was very friendly to me. Service wise was very standard but I rated above average at least. No upsell anus. 300 for2 hous. We stayed in room for about 1 hour55 min.

Brenda is longtime old friend. Not any fresh feelings as Roxi. Of course she is nice to me.[/QUOTE]Miss anal is older than 22, look at her face, when she was already at Sharks before covid and not 18 . When silicon killed superstar Roxana on 2014 business, but new plastic seemed to help her business. I wonder if she didn't work at Oase before Sharks, like Myriam ex Estefania who also put silicon.

[QUOTE=TheCane;2793631]Fortunately for me I've never had any such problems. And if I did, then I would just block a tute! I've exchanged numbers with so many girls and it was indeed a great way to stay in touch and get some pictures too hahaha! So I for one won't be adopting your golden rule. I think the worst situation I had was a Filipina girl who kept calling me in the States from Manila like at 3 am in the morning my time and waking me up and shit! I asked her to please stop it and to take into account the time zone difference when calling. Of course a lot of good that did. I may as well had been talking to a brick wall. I finally decided to block her ass and that was that! But not before I got me some pics. Ha![/QUOTE]Even I love to push on autobahns, but of course I get contact with my good girls I don't name and they don't ask me money but prefer I keep on going to give them business. As the best guy, even I miss her charming quality, but I adviced her to extend her time off for private reasons, even looking forward tasting her beauty soon.

[QUOTE=HammerTime96;2790041]Sure, but don't forget: this is just to break-even.

I dunno what the last time was that you were in Sharks, but the place is relatively EMPTY compared to 2019. There hardly [I]is[/I] an opportunity cost, because there simply [I]are[/I] relatively few customers. Refusing a 50430 customer means gambling that a better 100430 customer will arrive within the next 30-40 minutes, so I doubt that this is a successful strategy when you see many girls (even the good looking ones) sitting around idly for [U]hours on end.[/U] Seriously: what was the last time you were in Sharks?
[/QUOTE]RE: WGs only needing to 1-2 rooms per day over 36 work days to break even: I also emphasised that many of those rooms might only be 15-20 minutes, because within the first five minutes, the WG can probably assess if a customer might be a potential whale for her. According to a sales / marketing guru, 4 percent of customers can account for up to 64 percent of sales. So a WG might tailor her service and pretend to "fall in love" if she detects the monger is a vulnerable target (type to engage in self-delusion and spend irresponsibly to keep the illusion going). Supporting your SIMP theory, such mongers might fall into some or all of the following categories: (1) socially awkward wanting the "trophy GF" they were never able to get in real life, (2) lonely and depressed, (3) midlife-crisis. The latter two categories are probably more pronounced in Germany (or any rich, ageing OECD country). I know a Sharks WG who works 2-3 days a week, but often has day long appointments other days of the week. She has shown photos to me of her in pricey vacation locales and fancy hotels and penthouses.

[URL]https://www.forbes.com/sites/davelavinsky/2014/01/20/pareto-principle-how-to-use-it-to-dramatically-grow-your-business/[/URL]

[QUOTE=HammerTime96;2790041]
Sure, they can talk to their colleagues and smoke cigarettes, but this also 'scares' away potential customers because many men don't feel like invading into a group of Romanian girls who are deeply involved in a conversation, having prying ears from other WGs listening in on the conversation, the price negotiation and perhaps the 'unusual' service requests from the customer. Besides that, perhaps in the large group of 5- girls, there are 2 girls you've been to a room with before, so by selecting a different girl you might 'offend' the other 2. Many guys prefer a much more subtle approach, so appearing 'single and available' and offering some seclusion and privacy is IMO a key aspect of a successful WG, and it's the hot ones that sit / stand around [U]by themselves[/U] that are usually much more successful in catching customers. But as I said before, Sharks is relatively EMPTY when compared to 2019 (even during weekends), so of course eventually all girls become bored and start to group together so they can chat to make the time pass more quickly, making things worse for themselves. I always visit during the weekends, and I have [U]never[/U] seen any waiting times for rooms in 2022 or now in 2023, that's how empty it is.
[/QUOTE]Valid point. I have heard a few mongers say they do not like approaching when WGs are sitting in a group.

[QUOTE=HammerTime96;2790041]

Two points; 1) I never said that they are [U]losing[/U] money, but I [U]do[/U] speculate that they have taken a serious financial blow and some are barely scraping by. 2) in your previous reply you made some interesting points which can be summed up with 'Pride will come before the fall' when discussing how people refuse to acknowledge reality. I wonder how many girls are perhaps making some financial sacrifices in order to 'subsidise' their 100430 Utopia.

[/QUOTE]I suspect the top 10-20 percent of WGs are probably making either the same or more with 100460 scheme. Majority may make 50-80 percent what they used to. But my point is maybe some WGs are okay with "working" less. I have met escorts who have told me that they prefer only seeing 3-4 clients a day, and spacing out the appointments throughout the day. This allows them to perform mentally and physically they say (as opposed to being disengaged and a mentally checked out starfish who just closes her eyes while she gets fucked). Admittedly, these are usually the WGs who have built up a customer base and have many loyal regulars. Monger boards often complain that these WGs are hard to secure appointments with.

Now will this continue to be true in the coming months, as the economy worsens? I would probably revise down my estimates. But yes, I notice what you notice. In all my visits in 2022 and 2023, I only remember experiencing a room wait once (in December 2022). Less rooms overall for sure, but it is hard to quantify how many less rooms are being made. As for male attendance, it has been inconsistent. I think there needs to be 3-6 consecutive months of low attendance before management or WGs start to panic. I predict the return of Monday-Tuesday vouchers.

Time will tell how the Sharks WGs react moving forward. It is hard to imagine existing Sharks WGs dropping their rates. I could see some Sharks WGs migrating to other clubs like FKK ROM or NRW and accepting lower rates (allows them to save some face). I could also envision existing Sharks WGs retiring (which would reduce supply). Best case scenario would be that a fresh supply of WGs come from Romania who have never been spoiled by 100460, and are thus more open to accepting 50430.

Anecdotally, I am hearing that many RLD establishments are seeing significantly less traffic. This makes sense, because their clientele is probably more affected by inflation than FKK customers. Maybe these RLD WGs will migrate to Sharks.

Unless there is WWIII, the price for the top 20% will only go up. There's just too many men with enough money to keep them busy. For the rest, I don't care too much and I wouldn't go to a room even at 30430.

[QUOTE=McAdonis;2793885]RE: WGs only needing to 1-2 rooms per day over 36 work days to break even: I also emphasised that many of those rooms might only be 15-20 minutes, because within the first five minutes, the WG can probably assess if a customer might be a potential whale for her. According to a sales / marketing guru, 4 percent of customers can account for up to 64 percent of sales. So a WG might tailor her service and pretend to "fall in love" if she detects the monger is a vulnerable target (type to engage in self-delusion and spend irresponsibly to keep the illusion going). Supporting your SIMP theory, such mongers might fall into some or all of the following categories: (1) socially awkward wanting the "trophy GF" they were never able to get in real life, (2) lonely and depressed, (3) midlife-crisis. The latter two categories are probably more pronounced in Germany (or any rich, ageing OECD country). I know a Sharks WG who works 2-3 days a week, but often has day long appointments other days of the week. She has shown photos to me of her in pricey vacation locales and fancy hotels and penthouses..[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=SerpentX;2793909]Unless there is WWIII, the price for the top 20% will only go up. There's just too many men with enough money to keep them busy. For the rest, I don't care too much and I wouldn't go to a room even at 30430.[/QUOTE]Even I was proposed a discount compare to discovery by one few weeks ago, even most are not full busy even on Friday or Saturday, even Brenda, Roxy, Katalea, Melissa of course, Kity, Liv, are sometimes waiting for business, but for 90% girls, rate won t go down 100/30 , some not even fkissing for this rate like Kity. Simona asking 150/30 = Globe rate, for kissing when I would not give her 50 for her look when only her naturals worth, and she prefers to stay waiting for business for hours sitting at the bar, when a much more impressive look lowered her rate from December from 150 down 100/30 . 100/30 don t even always mean with fluent french kissing. Only good point is few looks at Sharks are prettier than Globe casting for 150/200/60 vs 300/60 . In NRW, can still find few pretties for 50/30 for high level.

Is standard pricing still possible at this club?