-
Unk, you really need, and I hate to say this as I have been trying to not use it without an explanation, RTFFF. Boxx has many, many times given info about finding girls, you just must be too full of your relationship to read the F F first before saying he has no info . And as far a E goes, yes he has been a pain in the A, a laughable member of the PITA committee.
This is not a flame, as all I just said is fact and opinion.
Guess I will need to donate $2 to the benifit and not drink one beer at Brenda's so I can be a special person as you, although I'm sure I cannot reach your level. PWhipped
Damn, am I lost? Trashman, I thought you were friends with Box,LL and AtlMgr, or am I too stupid to see that all this is in fun, do not look here often, but was asked to see about "E". Now I see this flaming, or is it is Jest? All of you guys are very-very valued members here and I enjoy all of you, I hope this is all in Jest. Yes, your friend, PW
Hey, I just RTFFF again, yea, you f---- perverts, keep it up, now I get it, damn, it's terrible to get old and senile, I think I shall just drift into the never never land, no not Mickael's, the world beyond, the one with unlimited Asian virgins and LBFMs, and I do not think this is a derogotory term, but a compliment to a nice blk girl that provides a very good session. Am I wroing again? PW
Skinless, when I die, will you please take up a collection to send me to you part of the world, I cannot think of anything better than to be among those lovley Asian ladies, guess I am too old to go now, wish I had stayed when I was there in the late 60's. Can you send one here so she can take my ashes back there after she f---- me to death, what a way to go, please let me go now. PW
-
Atlanta Monger, BoxCC, Jackson (alphabetical order as to not [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] anybody off),
The E wants to go after under 18 yo's and in my opinion is in breach of the posting guidelines and rules set by Jackson during/after the Skinless/******** discussions on the Thailand board.
-
whipped,
whatever made you think that ll, box, and am were my friends? they are all fags and can kiss my big fish belly white ass with my pants down in the middle of rush hour traffic with a boil on my butt oozing puss!
of course we're friends! they are great guys as long as i can slap 'em around and keep 'em whipped into shape.
i would be honored to party with them anytime, anyplace.
christ box, now i'm gonna hafta put on my asbestos underwear! whew, that was a good one.
and last but not least, am, you can bite me!
see how well i have taught you guys? i am totally impressed by the speed with which you all dispatched these love notes to me!
in all seriousness, jackson, i 2nd or 3rd or whatever the motion that this fellow be at the very least severely chastised by you if not banned outright for seeking to promote **** discussions and sexual activity. his points that legal age of consent does vary from place to place not withstanding, this seems to be one issue that all members seem to be truly united on. i know that i can be a real asshole at times and seriously opinionated, but even i draw the line on this matter. although i hesitate to speak for otto given our past, i am confident that he and i would probably be very united on this issue.
-
Until somebody posts something [i]verbatim[/i] that this guy posted which is off-the-reservation offensive, count me as one vote AGAINST the nattering nabobs of negativism who demand yet another scalp.
-Uncle Otto
-
Otto, you can't tell me that you aren't having fun with us Nattering Nabobs! lol.
Yes, I have lodged another complaint. But, I did it in the proper section instead of out on other boards.
I do post about finding girls and other such information, but sometimes I would rather come here and do a battle of wits. But, even that is becoming boring because I hate engaging in a battle of wits with unarmed men! lol. (Just kidding)
I do enjoy sparing with you guys, but I had to make a serious comment about 'The E'. He has started flame wars before in a couple different sections of the board and I just didn't want to see that shit start up again. If you hadn't noticed, I am a peace loving man, and just want everyone to get along! ;-)
-
BTW, PW, thank you for the defense, but we are just one big happy family now. We can say fuck you to each other and know that we still love one another! lol.
But, we all still reserve the right to come here to the complaints section to rag on each other.
-
otto,
i think the main problem folks seem to have with this fellow as do i is the seeming promotion of sex with **** girls, despite jackson's very clear rule of noone under 18.
i seem to remember other issues, but admittedly cannot recall the details at this point, so i will stick to the offense at hand.
now, if jackson wants to change the rules, then i have zero problem with this guys posts re. **** girls.
-
Sheesh, you guys need to get LAID!!!!!
-
Otto,
You asked that somebody post something [i]verbatim[/i] that this guy posted which is off-the-reservation offensive. Atlanta monger has posted the following in the original section in which it was written. All itallicized words in the quote below are from "The E"
[quote]You have clearly stated your opinion on this matter, yet The E still insists upon discussing sex with girls under the age of 18 -- reference his comments in several posts below:[i]
"If I am attracted to the female, she's the LAC, and she let's me fuck her, I most likely will"
"why turn down perfectly good pussy if it's legal?"
"It's all a matter of opinion. You say 18 and I say LAC, whatever that may be."
"pussy is 'pussy"[/i][/quote]If these sentiments do not bother you, well, I won't say what I think because you would consider it an attack. If these comments do not sway you, I encourage you to read them in the context they were originally written to discover they were not lifted out of context.
Jackson has already weighed in on the very first post before Mr E even wrote most of the above words. He is clearly in violation of forum rules and has disregarded the warning El Jefe has given him.[quote][blue]The existing Forum rules shall remain in effect. There shall be no discussion of any person or persons under the age of 18 on this website.[/blue][/quote]
I realize you have issues with many of those who are weighing in on this matter, but please put them aside, base your opinion on the facts, as opposed to taking the side of the percieved underdog.
Peace,
LoveLOS
PS Chupalmongus - you are right. It's sad when this board is one of the most entertaining on the site... LOL
PSS PW I too agree that LBFM is a term of endearment. We need to get you to SEA also, as the term originated there and basically refers to those LBFMs of the asian persuasian. And yes, I like AM, Trash, Box, and even you, but is is fun to grill your ass occasionally.
-
Trashman: If you read the Skinless/********* discussion, you will see where Atlanta Monger stands on this issue.If you stand with him and support breaking Thailand's Child Prostitution Laws "fine", but please don't encourage others to as they will get caught. And Thai jails are not nice, especially for kiddy fuckers.
As regards LBFM, this was Zel_da's/SA's invention and helped get him banned at one stage. B stands for brown and not black. It pissed Jackson off and it is a derogatory term. It means these women (rice paddy hookers) are good for only one thing. Those of us who discuss poetry, fine wines and other grand things with them know otherwise.
-
Here is the link to the discussion thread you mention, skinless -- and you won't find a single post in there by me:
[url]www.wsgforum.com/vforum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1780[/url]
Take your lies and shove 'em.
-
I am on record on this board as condemning those who promote seeking out girls under the age of 18 for sex.
That said, what I have seen posted by The E, including the very brief quote given a few posts below by LoveLOS, doesn't qualify as promoting under-aged sex.
-Uncle Otto
P.S. And why not go ahead and attack me, LoveLOS? You've never hesitated in the past. Is it because I'm more apt to return fire than The E (whom I must again compliment on his not taking the bait from people trying to provoke him).
-
No Uncle, your support of E led me to question where you stood, so I thank you for clarifying your stance in a more unequivocal way. While I interpret E's comments differently, still, for the second time in a week we are on the same side of the fence in general principle. Good.
You know I also have a stubby little short fuse and will return fire when provoked, that shit is all well documented on this board. Nonetheless, I have no need, wish or desire to get into it with you for no good reason--and that tiny little PS barb isn't worth a fight.
As a side note, I am enjoying your reports in the NoVA board (on topic and entertaining), I hope we can continue to peacefully co-exist.
Peace,
LoveLOS
PS--
Skinless,
I consider both you and Atlanta Monger good guys, and I honestly cannot find any post where AM is on the wrong side of the Thailands Child Prostiutuion Laws, and I damn sure know Trashman is not in support of that shit either. Thanks for your re-consideration of this matter. -LL
-
skinless,
i profess great ignorance as to the subject and tone of am's post to which you refer so i can't comment except to say that i am on record in past posts for being pretty much not interested in seeing discussions with **** being portrayed as anything but negative, so i don't think i am in support of breaking thailand's laws or their basic intent. i also very swiftly will jump in someone's shit if i see them posting that crap on the boards i regularly post upon. clear?
-
For those of you unaware, I discovered on the Letters to the Editor forum a post from Skinless requesting that Jackson terminate his membership.
Now I don't know his whole history, but he must have posted something of value sometime in over 500 posts, didn't he? If so, I hate to see someone like him go for the wrong reasons.
